The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in severe limitation and closure of dental practices in many countries. Outside of the acute (peak) phases of the disease, dentistry has begun to be practised again. However, there is emerging evidence that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted via airborne routes, carrying implications for dental procedures that produce aerosol. At the time of writing, additional precautions are required when a procedure considered to generate aerosol is undertaken.
This paper aims to present evidence-based treatments that remove or reduce the generation of aerosols during the management of carious lesions. It maps aerosol generating procedures (AGPs), where possible, to alternative non-AGPs or low AGPs. This risk reduction approach overcomes the less favourable outcomes associated with temporary solutions or extraction-only approaches. Even if this risk reduction approach for aerosol generation becomes unnecessary in the future, these procedures are not only suitable but desirable for use as part of general dental care post-COVID-19.
Uncertainty and the emerging evidence that SARS-CoV-2 may be transmitted via airborne routes has implications for practising dental procedures that generate aerosols.
There are evidence-based treatments including use of high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants, atraumatic restorative treatment, silver diamine fluoride, the Hall Technique and resin infiltration, which remove or reduce aerosol generation during the management of carious lesions.
This risk reduction approach for aerosol generation may guide practitioners to overcome the less favourable outcomes associated with temporary solutions or extraction-only approaches in caries management.
The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has precipitated the COVID-19 pandemic. The World Health Organisation (WHO)1 has recommended a society-wide quarantine approach (during acute or peak phases of the disease), social distancing and handwashing followed by contact tracing. Alongside this, most countries have suspended elective and non-urgent dental care,2,3 closing many practices with only emergency treatment provision.4,5,6 This acute phase of the pandemic is subsiding, although further acute phases are being seen in different countries. There is increasing dental need across populations and dental practices are suffering financially, so practices are opening and commencing care. However, the WHO has taken a cautious and risk assessment approach and recommended that situations where aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are carried out should be reduced to a minimum, with additional precautions in place.
It is still controversial but there is growing concern over possible airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.4,5,6,7 Although there has been much written about possible spread of COVID-19 through aerosols generated in the dental surgery, reviews of the evidence show there is little directly relating to respiratory viruses, despite over 70 years of research into bio-aerosols in dental settings.8,9,10,11 Studies of microbial content of aerosols and splatter generated during dental procedures have mostly involved aerobic bacteria.9,10,11,12,13,14,15 Viral studies are sparse, focusing on blood-borne HIV and hepatitis B.8,16 This limits confidence in the assumptions around transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during dental treatment. Although there seems to be little supporting evidence for mass transmission of respiratory pathogens through provision of dental care in the past, evidence is still emerging around transmission of this novel virus, where there is no innate immunity in the global population.
In general, management of dental caries has traditionally involved using instruments that have potential to generate bio-aerosols containing saliva, blood and tooth debris; the high-speed air rotor,17,18,19,20,21 slow-speed handpiece22,23,24 and use of the air-water syringe to complete steps for most dental materials.16,17,25,26
Until uncertainty around the level of risk associated with SARS-CoV-2 transmission between dental staff and patients is resolved or an acceptable level of risk is agreed, and because many aspects of dental treatment generate aerosols, a precautionary position is to keep aerosol generation as low as possible.
This paper presents evidence-based management for dental caries that removes or reduces the generation of aerosols and aids personalised care planning based around AGP reduction.
Caries management strategies with reduced aerosol generation
Although they are changing frequently, in response to evidence, we have set this paper against a background of local, national and international standards and recommendations. These include use of patient flow and environment cleaning processes, and standard and enhanced PPE use, as well as other measures put in place to practice safely practice while COVID-19 is still a health threat. Dental professionals are familiar with infection control strategies, but after an outbreak of a highly infective, potentially airborne-transmitted virus, extra protective measures have to be adopted. In this time of emerging evidence resulting in constant change, these measures should continue to be in line with national and local regulations, with vigilance to changes and by reference to Public Health England.
The paper will consider the alignment of traditional AGPs for caries management with 'non-AGPs' and 'low AGPs' (see Tables 1 and 2). Non-AGPs are those that generally do not include steps that generate aerosols, such as the use of rotary instruments and air-water syringes where air and water are used together in a spray, or procedures that can be modified to be carried out in a way that does not generate aerosols and compromise the quality of the procedure. Low AGPs are those that also contain steps that might generate a lower amount of aerosol, such as the air-water syringe where the air and water are used independently of one another. Non-AGPs still have potential for salivary contamination and low AGPs may need the air-water syringe in some instances. However, there is less aerosol produced if the water is used to wash without combining it with air to give a spray.16,26 Use of rubber dam with sealing around tooth holes and high-volume evacuation help minimise risk. Because of the possibility of viral load in the blood of COVID-19-positive patients, it is preferable to avoid pulpal exposures. The non-invasive and minimally invasive procedures, such as selectively removing carious tissues during atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and the Hall Technique (HT), are discussed below and make pulp exposures less likely. However, if a pulp exposure did look likely during caries removal, an indirect pulp cap should be considered.
The procedures discussed here are based around minimal intervention dentistry approaches, aiming to maintain the dentition throughout the course of life by handling the disease, dental caries, in a biological manner; treating the cause and not just its symptoms (the carious lesions).27
The non-AGPs and low AGPs for managing carious lesions can be grouped into:
Control the disease - prevention, early detection and managing the carious lesion (whether confined to enamel or cavitated) through controlling the biofilm, by making the lesion cleansable with non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) or by removing the plaque and using chemicals to stop its progress and promote remineralisation (commonly silver diamine fluoride [SDF]; topical fluoride)
Cover and seal the biofilm and carious lesion - involves no caries removal and creates a seal to deprive the carious biofilm of nutrients, oxygen etc, causing the carious lesion to arrest, such as fissure sealing and resin infiltration for non-cavitated lesions and the HT
Carious tissue removal - only decomposed, infected dentine and unsupported demineralised enamel should be removed selectively using hand instruments (eg ART and/or chemo-mechanical caries removal [CMCR]).
The online supplementary information file details further sources and some video tutorials of these techniques.
Methods to control carious lesions
Primary preventive approaches (also known as non-invasive strategies for the management of caries) can reduce the risk of progressive dental tissue loss and avoid the need for treatments using rotary instruments. The main preventive approaches have to be through the community and home, with behavioural components such as sugar restriction, plaque removal and oral health education. Clinicians hold a pivotal role in supporting oral health behaviours.
For remineralisation, fluoride-based agents are accepted as the primary medicament. Although there is less supporting evidence, other remineralisation agents such as self-assembling peptide P11-428 might be considered.
Preventive sealants cover plaque-retentive areas, occlusal fissures and pits, which are most vulnerable to caries.29,30 However, resin-based sealants involve a washing step to remove the acid etch thoroughly, generating some aerosol. Nevertheless, this risk can be avoided by using low-viscosity or high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (LVGICS/HVGIC) and excess material can be removed with hand instruments. A Cochrane review found no difference in the preventive effect of resin, LVGIC or HVGIC sealants.30
The purpose of treating dental caries is primarily to stop its progression within the tooth as well as restoring the lost dental hard tissues when needed. Early detection of carious lesions will reduce the need for aerosol-producing restorative care required for advanced lesions. In addition, patients with active dental caries need to have their disease risks addressed as part of the long-term disease management.31,32
Non-restorative cavity control for dentinal lesions
What it is and when to use it
NRCC is a method of using 'cleaning' to prevent biofilm maturation and carious lesions progression. It can be used for dentinal carious lesions in the primary and permanent dentition, root carious lesions and cavitated coronal smooth surface lesions.
How it works and clinical effectiveness
By making the carious surface accessible and having plaque frequently and thoroughly removed, the carious process will arrest.
In primary teeth, the effectiveness of NRCC in medium and large cavities together with ART restorations in small cavities has been tested in comparison to amalgam and ART restorations.33 Tooth survival after 3.5 years was 89% and not significantly different from either amalgam (91%) or ART restorations (90%), and in a randomised control trial of occluso-proximal cavitated lesions, survival (of pulp and tooth) was 92% at 2.5 years compared to 98% for teeth treated with the HT.34 NRCC has a less robust evidence base than the other treatment options discussed in this paper, with most of the reports of success being related to particular situations and carried out by dentists who support this technique. The choice to use NRCC is less dependent on the shape or type of lesion than it is on the attitude of the patient towards prevention and the skill of the dentist in behaviour change.35
NRCC consists of three concurrent stages:
Working with the patient to make plaque control more successful (improving oral hygiene procedure/habits). The patient has to be ready to change behaviours that led to development of the disease in the first place. Success depends on the clinician's ability to change the patient's (or in the case of a child, the parent's) behaviour towards taking responsibility. So, 'prevention' becomes very much more than simply providing instruction of what to do (knowledge) and how to do it (skills), but has to involve an aspect of refocusing the patient to feeling empowered to make a difference to their own oral health (attitude). Daily removal or disruption of the biofilm by brushing with a fluoridated toothpaste will slow down the carious process and can even halt it
Creating a cavity shape where the carious biofilm/dentine is accessible to a toothbrush (lesion exposure). In some cases, overhanging enamel has to be removed. To avoid use of rotary instruments, hand instruments can be used to gain access to the lesion (see ART)
Treatment with 38% SDF and/or a 5% NaF varnish therapy to reduce carious activity and promote remineralisation.33 These additional measures can support success of the NRCC approach if the carious lesion is active or there is increased risk that carious lesion activity will recur.
In the primary dentition, the goal is to avoid the lesion causing pain and/or infection until the tooth exfoliates. For the permanent dentition, with grossly broken down teeth, root carious lesions or coronal smooth surface lesions, the main goal is to avoid the lesions leading to pain and/or infection while also avoiding or delaying the need for restoration.
SDF for dentine lesions
What it is and when to use it
SDF is a clear, colourless liquid that arrests active cavitated carious lesions and remineralises demineralised enamel and dentine.36 Some products have a blue tint, but these are not available in the UK. Although licensed to treat dentine sensitivity in the UK and some other countries, it is more usually used 'off-label' to arrest carious lesions. It turns active carious lesions black; therefore, consent to treatment must be obtained and it must be handled with care as it will temporarily stain skin, mucosa and most surfaces on contact.
SDF is an effective way of treating active lesions for primary and permanent teeth (coronal dentine and root).37,38 It can be used opportunistically while the patient is in the dental chair by applying to other high-risk surfaces. SDF is effective in arresting early childhood caries39 and exposed root surfaces.40 It is more successful when used in cleansable lesions and accessible areas of the mouth.41 When caries is more severe or affects multiple teeth, repeated applications of SDF controls the disease (for example, applied after two weeks and six weeks, then six months as required).42
How it works and clinical effectiveness
SDF penetrates infected dentine,43 making the lesion twice as hard as healthy dentine.44 It produces a dense superficial layer and fills in micro-cavities with solid metallic silver.45 It also acts directly on the plaque biofilm,46,47 inhibiting bacterial growth.48,49 Removing carious tissue before SDF application is not necessary as it does not improve caries arrest.50
SDF has been shown to have some effect in preventing carious lesions in primary teeth, with one review showing that, by applying it at least once per year, 61% of new caries lesions might be prevented.51 SDF is clinically effective as well as cost-effective, and has the advantage of combined use with all other caries management techniques.51,52
Carious tissue is not removed at all. To minimise droplet and aerosol production, the surface is dried with cotton instead of compressed air, then SDF is applied using a micro brush. Arresting lesions using SDF can provide a solid foundation for restorations53,54 and can be combined with ART in primary or permanent teeth or the HT. There are currently no clinical trials of efficacy, so combinations may be thought of as a 'belt and braces' approach to synergise the benefits of both treatments.
Methods for sealing the carious lesion
Fissure sealing over non-cavitated carious lesion
What it is and when to use it
Sealant materials can control non-cavitated lesions on occlusal surfaces where there is no significant breach in the surface integrity of the tooth, even if the lesion can be seen clinically (through shadowing), or radiographically, to extend into dentine.55,56,57,58,59,60 These are also known as micro-invasive treatments.
How it works and clinical effectiveness
As well as being highly effective for prevention of dental caries,30 placing a well-sealed fissure sealant over a carious lesion will arrest it and stop it from progressing.57,58,59,60
While shallow or moderately deep lesions are likely to be successfully managed, there is not enough evidence to make recommendations for deeper lesions for long-term management. Although they may provide a good seal, they will not add much to the strength of the tooth. Their application is limited to teeth where there is less weakening of the tooth structure (that is, less extensive lesions) and the tooth structure can support them. In cases where the lesion is extensive, the sealant may not be able to withstand breakdown of the lesion surface if the forces are high.
Although they have a lower retention rate than resin sealants, the therapeutic effect of GIC on the tooth seems to balance the bulk material loss. There is good evidence to support a high caries-preventive effect from high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants.30 However, there is little directly comparable evidence, as yet, on their relative performances sealing dentinal carious lesions.
Resin fissure sealant application involves use of the air-water syringe, creating an aerosol. Clinicians could consider using GIC or HVGIC ART sealants instead, as these do not require rinsing or desiccation for placement, to prevent further progression of lesions. More long-term treatment may be required later, but there may be sufficient success from the sealant to allow it to be managed by re-sealing rather than replacing with a restoration.
What it is and when to use it
Resin infiltration (RI) is a technique that arrests non-cavitated carious lesions.61,62 It can treat non-cavitated lesions on smooth and approximal surfaces in both dentitions effectively. Lesions have to be limited to enamel and the outer third of dentine.61,62,63,64,65 It can also camouflage the whitish appearance of hypomineralised enamel on smooth surfaces.62,64 Similar to sealants, this is also known as a micro-invasive treatment.
How it works and clinical effectiveness
A very low-viscosity resin infiltrate is introduced into the micro-porosities of carious lesions to fill them through capillary action and arrest their progress.65 Systematic reviews show RI to be an effective micro-invasive treatment at timespans up to 36 months.61,65
Low AGP use
The diffusion of the RI results from surface and sub-surface dehydration conditions created by hydrochloric acid followed by ethanol. The air-water syringe has to be used to rinse and dry which may produce aerosols. Rubber dam, sealing material and high-volume evacuators should be used.5,66
What it is and when to use it
The HT is a method for treating asymptomatic carious primary molar teeth where the lesion has extended into dentine (cavitated or non-cavitated). The correct size of preformed metal crown is chosen and then pushed over the tooth to seal the carious lesion.67
The HT has been used in some secondary care settings for temporary management of partially erupted permanent molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation. However, there are currently no clinical trials to support this use. If practitioners are considering using the HT as a temporary non-AGP measure for permanent molar teeth, there are a few points, besides the lack of supporting evidence, that they should consider. Firstly, the crowns should only be placed on teeth that are not yet in occlusion. Secondly, the HT in this cas , unlike primary teeth HT use, provides only a temporary solution until more definitive restorative treatment and this will necessitate an AGP to remove the crown. Finally, permanent tooth preformed crowns are less easy to fit than those for primary teeth and almost always need to be trimmed with scissors, crimped and polished.
How it works and clinical effectiveness
It provides full coronal coverage and the risk of future carious lesion development on another surface of the tooth is avoided.67
The HT is technically simple to carry out and is well accepted by children, their parents and dentists.68,69 It has a strong evidence base showing high long-term success rates in randomised control trials (>90%) compared to conventional restorations (50-80%) and comparable to conventional crowns.68,69,70 The high rate of success, its durability and cost-effectiveness have meant use of the HT has increased, with a recent survey including 709 paediatric dentists from six continents showed that 92% had heard about it and 51% were using it.71
The HT is AGP-free as there is no removal of carious tissue and no tooth preparation. No local anaesthesia is required. The luting cement is GIC. As with all clinical procedures, careful case selection with accurate lesion and pulp status diagnoses (clinically and radiographically) are essential for success. Parents have to be happy with the appearance before placement, although children generally like the crown's appearance.
Methods for carious dentine lesion management
Atraumatic restorative treatment
What it is and when to use it
ART involves using hand instruments to access carious lesions through enamel and to remove a selected amount of demineralised dental tissues. This is also known as a minimally invasive treatment.
How it works and clinical effectiveness
ART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73 Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However, ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions.
ART involves no rotary, aerosol-producing instruments during opening of the cavity and selective removal of the carious tissue. ART's success is determined not only by the shape and the sharpness of the hand instruments, but also the technique used as well as the knowledge of the affected dental tissues and experience of the dental practitioner.
In some deeper lesions in permanent teeth, stepwise carious tissue removal may have been the treatment of choice but involves a second high-speed air rotor step to remove the restoration. Therefore, following selective carious tissue removal, a restoration designed to last in the long term should be placed. The restoration seal should be checked and maintained as necessary on a regular basis.
Chemo-mechanical methods for carious tissue removal
Currently, there are sodium hypochlorite-based and enzyme-based CMCR agents in the market. A recent systematic review found CMCR time-consuming, but effective, for caries removal.74 The manufacturer's recommendations are that the caries removal agents are washed out, but could well be removed with spoon instruments and cleaned with wet cotton pellets.
Limitations of non-AGP and low AGP in management of carious lesions
The majority of carious lesions in children and young adults can be treated with non-AGP measures because they are usually the first lesion on a tooth. One of the difficulties with applying non-AGPs in adults is that most lesions occur in relation to a failing restoration (previously known as secondary caries) and it does not seem possible to remove restorative materials without using rotary instruments and creating aerosols. However, repairing existing restorations rather than replacing them should be considered where possible.
Treatments that remove or reduce the generation of aerosols during the management of carious lesions can allow a successful risk reduction approach and are still effective.
World Health Organisation. COVID-19 strategy update. 2020. Available at https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/covid-strategy-update-14april2020.pdf (accessed July 2020).
American Dental Association. COVID-19 Frequently Asked Questions. 2020. Available online at https://success.ada.org/en/practice-management/patients/coronavirus-frequently-asked-questions (accessed July 2020).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dental Settings: Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Dental Settings During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. 2020. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/dental-settings.html (accessed July 2020).
Ge Z, Yang L, Xia J, Fu X, Zhang Y. Possible aerosol transmission of COVID-19 and special precautions in dentistry. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2020; 21: 361-368.
Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dent Res 2020; 99: 481-487.
Fennelly K P. Particle sizes of infectious aerosols: implications for infection control. Lancet Respir Med 2020; DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30323-4.
Lewis D. Mounting evidence suggests coronavirus is airborne-but health advice has not caught up. Nature 2020; 583: 510-513.
Araujo M W B, Andreana S. Risk and prevention of transmission of infectious diseases in dentistry. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 376-382.
Rautemaa R, Nordberg A, Wuolijoki-Saaristo K, Meurman J H. Bacterial aerosols in dental practice - a potential hospital infection problem? J Hosp Infect 2006; 64: 76-81.
Zemouri C, Awad S F, Volgenant C M, Crielaard W, Laheij AM, de Soet JJ. Modeling of the Transmission of Coronaviruses, Measles Virus, Influenza Virus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Legionella pneumophila in Dental Clinics. J Dent Res 2020; 99: 1192-1198.
Zemouri C, De Soet H, Crielaard W, Laheij A. A scoping review on bio-Aerosols in healthcare & the dental environment. PLoS One 2017; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178007.
Harrel S K. Airborne spread of diseasethe implications for dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32: 901-906.
Szymańska J, Sitkowska J. Bacterial Hazards in a Dental Office: An update review. Afr J Microbiol Res 2012; 6: 1642-1650.
Manarte-Monteiro P, Carvalho A, Pina C, Oliveira H, Manso M C. Air quality assessment during dental practice: Aerosols bacterial counts in an universitary clinic. Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac 2013; 54: 2-7.
Labaf H, Owlia P, Taherian A, Haghgoo R. Quantitative analysis of changes in bacterial aerosols during endodontic, periodontic and prosthodontic treatments. Afr J Microbiol Res 2011; 5: 4946-4948.
Miller R L. Characteristics of blood-containing aerosols generated by common powered dental instruments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1995; 56: 670-676.
Grundy J R. Enamel aerosols created during use of the air turbine handpiece. J Dent Res 1967; 46: 409-416.
Al-Amad S H, Awad M A, Edher F M, Shahramian K, Omran T A. The effect of rubber dam on atmospheric bacterial aerosols during restorative dentistry. J Infect Public Health 2017; 10: 195-200.
Earnest R, Loesche W. Measuring harmful levels of bacteria in dental aerosols. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122: 55-57.
Purohit B, Priya H, Acharya S, Bhat M, Ballal M. Efficacy of pre-procedural rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination during dental procedures. J Infect Prev 2009; 10: 190-192.
Yamada H, Ishihama K, Yasuda K, Hasumi-Nakayama Y, Shimoji S, Furusawa K. Aerial dispersal of blood-contaminated aerosols during dental procedures. Quintessence Int 2011; 42: 399-405.
Dawson M, Soro V, Dymock D et al. Microbiological assessment of aerosol generated during debond of fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2016; 150: 831-838.
Day C J, Sandy J R, Ireland A J. Aerosols and splatter in dentistrya neglected menace? Dent Update 2006; 33: 601-606.
Toroğlu M S, Haytaç M C, Köksal F. Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 299-306.
Polednik B. Aerosol and bioaerosol particles in a dental office. Environ Res 2014; 134: 405-409.
Micik R E, Miller R L, Mazzarella M A, Ryge G. Studies on dental aerobiology: I. bacterial aerosols generated during dental procedures. J Dent Res 1969; 48: 49-56.
Frencken J E, Peters M C, Manton D J, Leal S C, Valeria V, Eden E. Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) for managing dental caries - a review. Int Dent J 2012; 62: 223-243.
Alkilzy M, Tarabaih A, Santamaria R M, Splieth C H. Self-assembling peptide P11-4 and fluoride for regenerating enamel. J Dent Res 2018; 97: 148-154.
de Amorim R G, Frencken J E, Raggio D P, Chen X, Hu X, Leal S C. Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 2703-2725.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, Worthington H V. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub5.
Gannam C V, Chin K L, Gandhi R P. Caries risk assessment. Gen Dent 2018; 66: 12-17.
Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Dahlén G et al. Caries risk assessment. A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 81-91.
Mijan M, de Amorim R G, Leal S C et al. The 3.5-year survival rates of primary molars treated according to three treatment protocols: A controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1061-1069.
Santamaria R M, Innes N P, Machiulskiene V, Schmoeckel J, Alkilzy M, Splieth C H. Alternative caries management options for primary molars: 2.5-year outcomes of a randomised clinical trial. Caries Res 2017; 51: 605-614.
van Strijp G, van Loveren C. No removal and inactivation of carious tissue: non-restorative cavity control. In Schwendicke F, Frencken J, Innes N (eds) Caries Excavation: Evolution of Treating Cavitated Carious Lesions. pp 124-136. Basel: Karger Publishers, 2018.
Mei M L, Nudelman F, Marzec B et al. Formation of fluorohydroxyapatite with silver diamine fluoride. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 1122-1128.
Yee R, Holmgren C, Mulder J, Lama D, Walker D, Helderman W V P. Efficacy of silver diamine fluoride for arresting caries treatment. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 644-647.
Llodra J C, Rodriguez A, Ferrer B, Menardia V, Ramos T, Morato M. Efficacy of silver diamine fluoride for caries reduction in primary teeth and first permanent molars of schoolchildren: 36-month clinical trial. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 721-724.
Gao S S, Zhao I S, Hiraishi N et al. Clinical trials of silver diamine fluoride in arresting caries among children. JDR Clin Transl Res 2016; 1: 201-210.
Oliveira B H, Cunha-Cruz J, Rajendra A, Niederman R. Controlling caries in exposed root surfaces with silver diamine fluoride: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149: 671-679.
Fung M H T, Duangthip D, Wong M C M, Lo E C M, Chu C H. Randomized clinical trial of 12% and 38% silver diamine fluoride treatment. J Dent Res 2018; 97: 171-178.
Seifo N, Robertson M, MacLean J et al. The use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in dental practice. Br Dent J 2020; 228: 75-81.
Li Y, Liu Y, Psoter W J et al. Assessment of the silver penetration and distribution in carious lesions of deciduous teeth treated with silver diamine fluoride. Caries Res 2019; 53: 431-440.
Chu C H, Lo E C M. Microhardness of dentine in primary teeth after topical fluoride applications. J Dent 2008; 36: 387-391.
Seto J, Horst J A, Parkinson D Y, Frachella J C, DeRisi J L. Enhanced tooth structure via silver microwires following treatment with 38 percent silver diamine fluoride. Pediatr Dent 2020; 42: 226-231.
Mei M L, Li Q L, Chu C H, Lo E C M, Samaranayake L P. Antibacterial effects of silver diamine fluoride on multi-species cariogenic biofilm on caries. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2013; 12: 4.
Milgrom P, Horst J A, Ludwig S et al. Topical silver diamine fluoride for dental caries arrest in preschool children: A randomized controlled trial and microbiological analysis of caries associated microbes and resistance gene expression. J Dent 2018; 68: 72-78.
Knight G M, McIntyre J M, Craig G G, Mulyani, Zilm P S, Gully N J. Differences between normal and demineralized dentine pretreated with silver fluoride and potassium iodide after an in vitro challenge by Streptococcus mutans. Aust Dent J 2007; 52: 16-21.
Zhao I S, Gao S S, Hiraishi N et al. Mechanisms of silver diamine fluoride on arresting caries: a literature review. Int Dent J 2018; 68: 67-76.
Chu C H, Lo E C M, Lin H C. Effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish in arresting dentin caries in Chinese pre-school children. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 767-770.
Seifo N, Cassie H, Radford J R, Innes N P T. Silver diamine fluoride for managing carious lesions: An umbrella review. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 145.
Horst J A, Heima M. Prevention of dental caries by silver diamine fluoride. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2019; 40: 158-164.
Chu C H, Lee A H C, Zheng L, Mei M L, Chan G C F. Arresting rampant dental caries with silver diamine fluoride in a young teenager suffering from chronic oral graft versus host disease post-bone marrow transplantation: A case report. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: 3.
Young D A, Frostad-Thomas A, Gold J, Wong A. Secondary Sjögren syndrome: A case report using silver diamine fluoride and glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149: 731-741.
Wright J T, Tampi M P, Graham L et al. Sealants for preventing and arresting pitandfissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38: 282-308.
Wright J T, Crall J J, Fontana M et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pitandfissure sealants: A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147: 672-682.
Handelman S L, Washburn F, Wopperer P. Two-year report of sealant effect on bacteria in dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93: 967-970.
Handelman S L, Leverett D H, Solomon E S, Brenner C M. Use of adhesive sealants over occlusal carious lesions: Radiographic evaluation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1981; 9: 256-259.
Zhang W, Mulder J, Frencken J E. Is preventing micro-cavities in dentine from progressing with a sealant successful? Br Dent J 2019; 226: 590-594.
Handelman S L. Effect of sealant placement on occlusal caries progression. Clin Prev Dent 1982; 4: 11-16.
Liang Y, Deng Z, Dai X, Tian J, Zhao W. Micro-invasive interventions for managing non-cavitated proximal caries of different depths: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 2675-2684.
Höchli D, Hersberger-Zurfluh M, Papageorgiou S N, Eliades T. Interventions for orthodontically induced white spot lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2017; 39: 122-133.
Anand V, Arumugam S B, Manoharan V, Kumar S A, Methippara J J. Is resin infiltration a microinvasive approach to white lesions of calcified tooth structures?: a systemic review. Int J Clin Paediatr Dent 2019; 12: 53-58.
Borges A B, Caneppele T M F, Masterson D, Maia L C. Is resin infiltration an effective esthetic treatment for enamel development defects and white spot lesions? A systematic review. J Dent 2017; 56: 11-18.
Dorri M, Dunne S M, Walsh T, Schwendicke F. Micro-invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010431.pub2.
Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme. Management of Acute Dental Problems During COVID-19 Pandemic. 2020. Available online at https://www.sdcep.org.uk/published-guidance/acute-dental-problems-covid-19/ (assessed July 2020).
Innes N P T, Evans D J P, Bonifacio C C et al. The Hall Technique 10 years on: Questions and answers. Br Dent J 2017; 222: 478-483.
Innes N P, Evans D J P, Stirrups D R. The Hall Technique; A randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: Acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health 2007; 7: 18.
Santamaria R M, Innes N P T, Machiulskiene V, Evans D J P, Splieth C H. Caries management strategies for primary molars: 1yr randomized control trial results. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1062-1069.
Elamin F, Abdelazeem N, Salah I, Mirghani Y, Wong F. A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan. PLoS One 2019; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217740.
Hussein I, Al Halabi M, Kowash M et al. Use of the Hall technique by specialist paediatric dentists: a global perspective. Br Dent J 2020; 228: 33-38.
Tedesco T K, Calvo A F B, Lenzi T L et al. ART is an alternative for restoring occlusoproximal cavities in primary teeth - evidence from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; 27: 201-209.
Frencken J E, Liang S Z Q. Survival estimates of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) versus traditional restorative treatment: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Br Dent J 2020; in press.
Hamama H H H, Yiu C K Y, Burrow M F, King N M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on chemomechanical caries removal. Oper Dent 2015; DOI: 10.2341/14-021-LIT.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eden, E., Frencken, J., Gao, S. et al. Managing dental caries against the backdrop of COVID-19: approaches to reduce aerosol generation. Br Dent J 229, 411–416 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2153-y
This article is cited by
COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
BMC Oral Health (2022)
“I guess it looks worse to me, it doesn’t look like there’s been a problem solved but obviously there is”: a qualitative exploration of children’s and their parents’ views of silver diamine fluoride for the management of carious lesions in children
BMC Oral Health (2021)
CariesCare International adapted for the pandemic in children: Caries OUT multicentre single-group interventional study protocol
BMC Oral Health (2021)
A Pan-Canadian narrative review on the protocols for reopening dental services during the COVID-19 pandemic
BMC Oral Health (2020)