Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Co-design of an oral health promotion animated film with families in the South of England

Abstract

Introduction Oral health promotion interventions should be evidence-based and designed with community involvement. In England, Family Hubs are attended by families from a range of social backgrounds and provide an ideal setting for co-design of health interventions.

Aim To co-design and evaluate an animated film for promoting oral health in community settings.

Methods Families attended two co-design workshops at a Family Hub in Portsmouth, during which they discussed oral health priorities and commented on the animation design. A before-and-after survey questionnaire assessed its impact on oral health knowledge in another Family Hub in Portsmouth. Qualitative data were analysed using the Framework method, while the survey data were analysed descriptively.

Results Families prioritised evidence-based advice for inclusion in the film and contributed to the film storyline. This enabled relevant alterations to ensure the animation was engaging and age-appropriate. Although the survey response rate was low for inferential statistics, descriptive analysis indicated variation in the oral health knowledge of parents and carers.

Conclusion Families can offer valuable contributions to the design of health promotion interventions. A co-design method provides an approach for communicating health advice in a form that is relevant and applicable to target audiences.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Petersen P E. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century - the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 3-24.

  2. Watt R G. From victim blaming to upstream action: tackling the social determinants of oral health inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35: 1-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh S. Evidence in oral health promotion - implications for oral health planning. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: e15-e18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Public Health England. Delivering Better Oral Health: An Evidence-Based Toolkit for Prevention. 2014. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health-an-evidence-based-toolkit-for-prevention (accessed February 2019).

  5. Gao X, Lo E C, Kot S C, Chan K C. Motivational interviewing in improving oral health: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Periodontol 2014; 85: 426-437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Public Health England. National Dental Epidemiology Programme for England: oral health survey of fiveyearold children 2017. 2018. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/oral-health-survey-of-5-year-old-children-2017 (accessed February 2019).

  7. NHS Digital. NHS Outcomes Framework - England, May 2018: Quarterly publication. 2018. Available at https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/clinical-indicators/nhs-outcomes-framework/archive/nhs-outcomes-framework-indicators---may-2018-release/ (accessed February 2019).

  8. Mortimore A, Wilkinson R, John J H. Exploring the potential value of using data on dental extractions under general anaesthesia (DGA) to monitor the impact of dental decay in children. Br Dent J 2017; 222: 778-781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer V J, Weavell W, Callander R et al. The participatory zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement. Med Humanit 2019; 45: 247-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. BMJ Qual Saf 2006; 15: 307-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Children's Commissioner. Family Hubs: A discussion paper - Coordinated local support and intervention for children in need and their families. 2016. Available at https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Family-Hubs-A-Discussion-Paper-2016.pdf (accessed January 2020).

  12. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman A, Burgess R G (eds) Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge, 2002.

  13. Gale N K, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 117.

  14. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Portsmouth City Council. Toothville video. 2019. Available at http://www.portsmouth.gov.uk/toothville/ (accessed February 2019).

  16. Amin M S, Harrison R L. Understanding parents' oral health behaviours for their young children. Qual Health Res 2009; 19: 116-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vamos C A, Thompson E L, Avendano M et al. Oral health promotion interventions during pregnancy: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2015; 43: 385-396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez A, Beaton L, Freeman R. Strengthening social interactions and constructing new oral health and health knowledge: the co-design, implementation and evaluation of a pedagogical workshop programme with and for homeless young people. Dent J (Basel) 2019; DOI: 10.3390/dj7010011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nanjappa S, Freeman R. CHATTERBOX: developing and piloting an interactive communication toolkit for engaging families with dental services. J Nurs Care 2014; DOI: 10.4172/2167-1168.1000215.

  20. Lewney J, Holmes R D, Rankin J, Exley C. Health visitors' views on promoting oral health and supporting clients with dental health problems: a qualitative study. J Public Health 2018; 41: e103-e108. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Portsmouth City Council employees in scheduling workshops, recruiting participants, and distributing questionnaires. In addition, the authors wish to thank Portsmouth City Council animation designers for creating the animated film, as well as their funder, Public Health England.

Funding

This work was supported by Public Health England.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Wanyonyi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scott, D., Currie, C., Stones, T. et al. Co-design of an oral health promotion animated film with families in the South of England. Br Dent J 228, 164–170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1208-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1208-4

Further reading

Search

Quick links