CAD/CAM techniques for the conservative and efficient management of tooth wear

Abstract

The prevalence of tooth wear has increased significantly in recent decades. Whilst many treatment approaches are available, there is no consensus on the best materials or techniques. Advances in digital workflows have the potential to reduce the biological cost of treatment, improve treatment outcomes and reduce costs. This article describes modern CAD/CAM techniques which preserve tooth tissue and improve efficiency.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    White D A, Tsakos G, Pitts N B et al. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009: common oral health conditions and their impact on the population. Br Dent J 2012; 213: 567.

  2. 2.

    Nunn J, Morris J, Pine C, Pitts N B, Bradnock G, Steele J. Adult dental health survey: The condition of teeth in the UK in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 639.

  3. 3.

    Mesko M E, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci M S et al. Rehabilitation of severely worn teeth: A systematic review. J Dent 2016; 48: 9-15.

  4. 4.

    Loomans B, Opdam N, Attin T et al. Severe tooth wear: European consensus statement on management guidelines. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 111-119.

  5. 5.

    Darbar U R, Hemmings K W. Treatment of localized anterior tooth wear with composite restorations at an increased occlusal vertical dimension. Dent Update 1997; 24: 72-75.

  6. 6.

    Gulamali A B, Hemmings K W, Tredwin C J, Petrie A. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up). Br Dent J 2011; 211: E9.

  7. 7.

    Aljawad A, Rees J S. Retrospective study of the survival and patient satisfaction with composite Dahl restorations in the management of localised anterior tooth wear. The Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016; 24:222-229.

  8. 8.

    Bartlett D, Varma S. A retrospective audit of the outcome of composites used to restore worn teeth. Br Dent J 2017; 223: 33.

  9. 9.

    Milosevic A, Burnside G. The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8year study. J Dent 2016; 44: 13-19.

  10. 10.

    Hemmings K W, Darbar U R, Vaughan S. Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 287-293.

  11. 11.

    Edelhoff D, Sorensen J A. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 503-509.

  12. 12.

    D'Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F et al. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 615-624.

  13. 13.

    De Angelis F, D'arcangelo C, D'amario M, Zazzeroni S, Ciampoli C, Caputi S. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 328-336.

  14. 14.

    Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 289-296.

  15. 15.

    Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconcini S, Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: A 3-year study. Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 65-71.

  16. 16.

    Gow A M, Hemmings K W. The treatment of localised anterior tooth wear with indirect Artglass restorations at an increased occlusal vertical dimension. Results after two years. The Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002; 10: 101-105.

  17. 17.

    Chochlidakis K M, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen C J, Feng I J, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 184-190.

  18. 18.

    Patzelt S B, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub J R, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1687-1694.

  19. 19.

    Ryakhovskiy A N, Kostyukova V V. Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems. Stomatologiia 2016; 95: 65-70.

  20. 20.

    Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118: 36-42.

  21. 21.

    Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 313-320.

  22. 22.

    Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont 2016; 27: 35-41.

  23. 23.

    Horvath S D. Key parameters of hybrid materials for CAD/CAM-based restorative dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2016; 37: 638-643.

  24. 24.

    Quinn J B, Quinn G D. Material properties and fractography of an indirect dental resin composite. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 589-599.

  25. 25.

    Ferracane J L. Resin composite - state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.

  26. 26.

    Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson C L, Watts D C. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 862-872.

  27. 27.

    Coldea A, Swain M V, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymerinfiltratedceramicnetwork materials. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 419-426.

  28. 28.

    Schlichting L H, Maia H P, Baratieri L N, Magne P. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105: 217-226.

  29. 29.

    Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 125-133.

  30. 30.

    Johnson A C, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja S. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM composite and composite-ceramic occlusal veneers. J Prosthodont Res 2014; 58: 107-114.

  31. 31.

    Coldea A, Swain M V, Thiel N. In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation. J Mech Behavior Biomed Mater 2013; 26: 34-42.

  32. 32.

    Mörmann W H, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Sener B, Attin T, Mehl A. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness. J Mech Behavior Biomed Mater 2013; 20: 113-125.

  33. 33.

    Fasbinder D J, Neiva G F. Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: 56-66.

  34. 34.

    Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 587-593.

  35. 35.

    Lebon N, Tapie L, Vennat E, Mawussi B. Influence of CAD/CAM tool and material on tool wear and roughness of dental prostheses after milling. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 236-247.

  36. 36.

    Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 705-710.

  37. 37.

    Koller M, Arnetzl G V, Holly L, Arnetzl G. Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/CAM: customization case study. Int J Comput Dent 2012; 15: 159-164.

  38. 38.

    Thornton I, Ruse N D. Characterization of nanoceramic resin composite and lithium disilicate blocks. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 151.

  39. 39.

    Jesús G, Dib A, Espinosa I. Face bows in the development of Michigan occlusal splints. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia 2013; 25: 117-131.

  40. 40.

    Shodadai S, Türp J, Gerds T, Strub J. Is there a benefit of using an arbitrary facebow for the fabrication of a stabilization appliance? Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 517-522.

  41. 41.

    Choi D, Bowley J, Marx D, Lee S. Reliability of an ear-bow arbitrary face-bow transfer instrument. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 150-156.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Antov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antov, H., Jablonski, R., Keeling, A. et al. CAD/CAM techniques for the conservative and efficient management of tooth wear. Br Dent J 227, 791–796 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0889-z

Download citation

Further reading

Search