The factors that count in selecting future dentists: sensorimotor and soft skills


Introduction Dental schools across the world are increasingly adopting 'multiple mini interview' (MMI) approaches to evaluate prospective students. But what skills and abilities are being assessed within these short, structured 'interview' stations and do they map on to the requirements of dental practice? Understanding the fundamental processes being measured is important if these assessments are to serve the purpose of identifying the students with the greatest potential to succeed in dental practice.

Materials and methods To this end, we performed factor analysis on data from 239 participants on ten MMI stations used for undergraduate selection at a UK dental school.

Results The analysis revealed that this assessment approach captured two fundamental underlying traits. The first factor captured scores on six stations that could be labelled usefully as a 'soft skill' factor. The second captured scores on four stations that could be described usefully as a 'sensorimotor' factor.

Conclusion The present study demonstrates that the structure of at least one MMI used within the UK for dental school entry can be parsed into two distinct factors relating to soft skills and sensorimotor abilities. This finding has implications for the efficiency of the interview process, the refinement of MMI assessment in dental schools across the world and understanding of the critical skills that a successful dental practitioner must possess.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

    Polyzois I, Claffey N, McDonald A, Hussey D, Quinn F. Can evaluation of a dental procedure at the outset of learning predict later performance at the preclinical level? A pilot study. Eur J Dent Educ 2011; 15: 104-109.

  2. 2.

    Mushtaq F, Baraas R C, Al-Saud L M et al. Should prospective dental students be screened for colour vision deficits? Br Dent J 2016; 221: 227-228.

  3. 3.

    Mon-Williams M A, Mushtaq F, Wilkie R M, Khambay B, Keeling A, Manogue M. A three dimensional view of stereopsis in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015; 219: 479-480.

  4. 4.

    ADEA House of Delegates. ADEA competencies for the new general dentist (As approved by the 2008 ADEA House of Delegates). J Dent Educ 2011; 75: 932-935.

  5. 5.

    Cowpe J, Plasschaert A, Harzer W, Vinkka-Puhakka H, Walmsley A D. Profile and competences for the graduating European dentist update 2009. Eur J Dent Educ 2010; 14: 193-202.

  6. 6.

    General Dental Council. Preparing for practice: Dental team learning outcomes for registration. 2015. Available at (accessed February 2019).

  7. 7.

    Morris J G. The value and role of the interview in the student admissions process: a review. Med Teach 1999; 21: 473-481.

  8. 8.

    Razack S, Faremo S, Drolet F, Snell L, Wiseman J, Pickering J. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison. Med Educ 2009; 43: 993-1000.

  9. 9.

    Kreiter C D, Yin P, Solow C, Brennan R L. Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004; 9: 147-159.

  10. 10.

    Eva K W, Macala C. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine. Med Educ 2014; 48: 604-613.

  11. 11.

    Kay E, Bennett J, Allison P, Coombes L R. Evidence-informed dental student recruitment techniques. Br Dent J 2010; 208: 127-131.

  12. 12.

    Eva K W, Rosenfeld J, Reiter H I, Norman G R. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004; 38: 314-326.

  13. 13.

    Dowell J, Lynch B, Till H, Kumwenda B, Husbands A. The multiple mini-interview in the UK context: 3 years of experience at Dundee. Med Teach 2012; 34: 297-304.

  14. 14.

    Roberts C, Zoanetti N, Rothnie I. Validating a multiple mini-interview question bank assessing entry-level reasoning skills in candidates for graduate-entry medicine and dentistry programmes. Med Educ 2009; 43: 350-359.

  15. 15.

    Alaki S M, Yamany I A, Shinawi L A, Hassan M H, Tekian A. Can Multiple Mini-Interviews Predict Academic Performance of Dental Students? A Two-Year Follow-Up. J Dent Educ 2016; 80: 1376-1383.

  16. 16.

    Lemay JF, Lockyer J M, Collin V T, Brownell A K. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2007; 41: 573-579.

  17. 17.

    Pau A, Jeevaratnam K, Chen Y S, Fall A A, Khoo C, Nadarajah V D. The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review. Med Teach 2013; 35: 1027-1041.

  18. 18.

    Campagna-Vaillancourt M, Manoukian J, Razack S, Nguyen L H. Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 91-96.

  19. 19.

    Oyler D R, Smith K M, Elson E C, Bush H, Cook A M. Incorporating multiple mini-interviews in the postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency programme selection process. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2014; 71: 297-304.

  20. 20.

    Cleland J, Dowell J, McLachlan J, Nicholson S, Patterson F. Identifying best practice in the selection of medical students (literature review and interview survey). 2012. Available at https: // (accessed February 2019).

  21. 21.

    Eva K W, Reiter H I, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Wood T J, Norman G R. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. JAMA 2012; 308: 2233-2240.

  22. 22.

    Lee H J, Park S B, Park S C et al. Multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of academic achievements during the first 2 years of medical school. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9: 93.

  23. 23.

    McAndrew R, Ellis J. An evaluation of the multiple mini-interview as a selection tool for dental students. Br Dent J 2012; 212: 331-335.

  24. 24.

    McAndrew R, Ellis J. Applicants' perceptions on the multiple mini-interview process as a selection tool for dental and therapy and hygiene students. Br Dent J 2013; 215: 565-570.

  25. 25.

    Foley J I, Hijazi K. The admissions process in a graduate-entry dental school: can we predict academic performance? Br Dent J 2013; 214: E4.

  26. 26.

    McAndrew R, Ellis J, Valentine R A. Does a selection interview predict year 1 performance in dental school? Eur J Dent Educ 2017; 21: 108-112.

  27. 27.

    Ruscio J, Roche B. Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychol Assess 2012; 24: 282-292.

  28. 28.

    Barbour M E, Sandy J R. Multiple mini interviews for selection of dental students: influence of gender and starting station. J Dent Educ 2014; 78: 589-596.

  29. 29.

    Till H, Myford C, Dowell J. Improving student selection using multiple mini-interviews with multifaceted Rasch modeling. Acad Med 2013; 88: 216-223.

  30. 30.

    Dalaya M, Ishaquddin S, Ghadage M, Hatte G. An interesting review on soft skills and dental practice. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: ZE19-ZE21.

  31. 31.

    Gansky S A, Pritchard H, Kahl E et al. Reliability and validity of a manual dexterity test to predict preclinical grades. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 985-994.

  32. 32.

    Al-Saud L M, Mushtaq F, Allsop M J et al. Feedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator. Eur J Dent Educ 2017; 21: 240-247.

  33. 33.

    Mirghani I, Mushtaq F, Allsop M J et al. Capturing differences in dental training using a virtual reality simulator. Eur J Dent Educ 2018; 22: 67-71.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faisal Mushtaq.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirghani, I., Mushtaq, F., Balkhoyor, A. et al. The factors that count in selecting future dentists: sensorimotor and soft skills. Br Dent J 226, 417–421 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading