Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Propensity score matching analysis comparing the efficacy of Ruxolitinib to historical controls in second-line or beyond treatment for chronic GvHD after steroid failure

Subjects

Abstract

Established first-line therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) comprises corticosteroids with/without calcineurin inhibitors, but about half of cGvHD patients are refractory to corticosteroid therapy. The present study retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes in 426 patients and undertook a propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis between ruxolitinib (RUX) treated group and a historical group of cGvHD patients treated with best available treatment (BAT). PSM process adjusted unbalanced risk factors between the 2 groups, including GvHD severity, HCT-CI score, and treatment line, extracting 88 patients (44 in BAT/RUX groups each) for final analysis. In PSM subgroup, RUX group showed 74.7% 12 months’ FFS rate vs 19.1% for BAT group (p < 0.001), whereas 12 months’ OS rates were 89.2% and 77.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis for FFS confirmed RUX superiority over BAT together with HCT-CI score 0–2 vs ≥3. For OS, RUX was superior to BAT, while age ≥60 years and severe grade cGvHD adversely impacted OS. In PSM subgroup, at months 0, 3, and 6, 4.5%, 12.2% and 22.2% more patients in RUX group could discontinue prednisone compared to BAT group, respectively. In conclusion, the current study showed that for FFS, RUX was superior to BAT as second-line therapy or beyond in cGvHD patients after therapy failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Outcomes in the overall patient group.
Fig. 2: Outcomes in the propensity score matched groups.
Fig. 3: Comparison of daily dose corticosteroids between the 2 groups.
Fig. 4: Proportion of the patients on daily prednisone dose ≤0.1 mg/kg/day and those discontinued it at month 0, 3 and 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon request from the authors at their discretion.

References

  1. Cooke KR, Luznik L, Sarantopoulos S, Hakim FT, Jagasia M, Fowler DH, et al. The biology of chronic graft-versus-host disease: a task force report from the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23:211–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9:215–33. https://doi.org/10.1053/bbmt.2003.50026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cho BS, Lee SE, Song HH, Lee JH, Yahng SA, Eom KS, et al. Graft-versus-tumor effect according to type of graft-versus-host disease defined by National Institutes of Health consensus criteria and associated outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:1136–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saillard C, Crocchiolo R, Furst S, El-Cheikh J, Castagna L, Signori A, et al. National Institutes of Health classification for chronic graft-versus-host disease predicts outcome of allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplant after fludarabine-busulfan-antithymocyte globulin conditioning regimen. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:1106–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2013.820285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeiser R, Polverelli N, Ram R, Hashmi SK, Chakraverty R, Middeke JM, et al. Ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:228–38. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2033122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieder ML, McDonald GB, Kida A, Hingorani S, Armenian SH, Cooke KR, et al. National Cancer Institute-National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute/pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium First International Consensus Conference on late effects after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: long-term organ damage and dysfunction. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:1573–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolff D, Fatobene G, Rocha V, Kroger N, Flowers ME. Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease: treatment options and patient management. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021;56:2079–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01389-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Penack O, Marchetti M, Ruutu T, Aljurf M, Bacigalupo A, Bonifazi F, et al. Prophylaxis and management of graft versus host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e157–e167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30256-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu H, Shi J, Luo Y, Tan Y, Zhang M, Lai X, et al. Evaluation of ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory chronic graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2034750. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeiser R, Lee SJ, Three US. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for chronic GVHD. Blood. 2022;139:1642–5. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021014448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Novitzky-Basso I, Linn SM, White J, Elemary M, Xenocostas A, Hamad N, et al. Propensity score matching analysis comparing ruxolitinib vs historical controls in 2 nd line or beyond treatment for chronic Gvhd after therapy failure. Blood. 2021;138:1805. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-151683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jagasia MH, Greinix HT, Arora M, Williams KM, Wolff D, Cowen EW, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2014 Diagnosis and Staging Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:389–401.e381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005;106:2912–9. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Inamoto Y, Storer BE, Lee SJ, Carpenter PA, Sandmaier BM, Flowers ME, et al. Failure-free survival after second-line systemic treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2013;121:2340–6. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-11-465583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Inamoto Y, Flowers ME, Sandmaier BM, Aki SZ, Carpenter PA, Lee SJ, et al. Failure-free survival after initial systemic treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2014;124:1363–71. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-03-563544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon SR, Sizemore CA, Ridgeway M, Zhang X, Smith J, Brown S, et al. Corticosteroid-free primary treatment of chronic extensive graft-versus-host disease incorporating rituximab. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:1576–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Streiler C, Shaikh F, Davis C, Abhyankar S, Brownback KR. Ruxolitinib is an effective steroid sparing agent in bronchiolitis obliterans due to chronic graft-versus-host-disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55:1194–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0662-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khoury HJ, Langston AA, Kota VK, Wilkinson JA, Pusic I, Jillella A, et al. Ruxolitinib: a steroid sparing agent in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53:826–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-017-0081-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Redondo S, Esquirol A, Novelli S, Caballero AC, Garrido A, Onate G, et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory/dependent chronic graft-versus-host disease: real-world data and challenges. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28:43:e41–43.e45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

INB, SML, JW, ME, AX, UD, KK, NH, ST, SC, AL, RK, JM, DDHK contributed patient and treatment data for analysis. SML, DDHK collected data and undertook statistical analysis. INB, SML, DDHK reviewed the data and prepared the manuscript. INB, SML, JW, ME, AX, UD, KK, NH, ST, SC, AL, RK, JM, DDHK reviewed the analysis results and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Dong Hwan Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novitzky-Basso, I., Linn, S.M., White, J. et al. Propensity score matching analysis comparing the efficacy of Ruxolitinib to historical controls in second-line or beyond treatment for chronic GvHD after steroid failure. Bone Marrow Transplant 58, 1024–1032 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-023-02020-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-023-02020-5

Search

Quick links