Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Real-world utilisation of ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM): a report from the Australian and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry (MRDR)

Abstract

Supported by clinical trial proven survival benefit, clinical guidelines recommend upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for eligible MM patients. However, reported real-world utilisation is lower than expected (40–60%). We reviewed ASCT utilisation, demographics and outcomes for MM patients (≤70 years, ≥12-month follow-up) enroled onto the Australian/New Zealand MRDR from June 2012 to May 2020. In 982 patients (<65 years: 684, 65–70 years: 298), ASCT utilisation was 76% overall (<65 years: 83%, 65–70 years: 61%, front-line therapy: 67%). Non-ASCT recipients were older (median age: 65 years vs 60 years, p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (cardiac disease: 16.9% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001; diabetes: 19.1% vs 7.0%, p < 0.001; renal dysfunction: median eGFR(ml/min): 68 vs 80, p < 0.001), inferior performance status (ECOG ≥ 2: 26% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and higher-risk MM (ISS-3: 37% vs 26%, p = 0.009, R-ISS-3 18.6% vs 11.8%, p = 0.051) than ASCT recipients. ASCT survival benefit (median progression-free survival (PFS): 45.3 months vs 35.2 months, p < 0.001; overall survival (OS): NR vs 64.0 months, p < 0.001) was maintained irrespective of age (<65 years: median PFS: 45.3 months vs 37.7 months, p = 0.04, OS: NR vs 68.2 months, p = 0.002; 65–70 years: median PFS: 46.7 months vs 29.2 months, p < 0.001, OS: 76.9 months vs 55.6 months, p = 0.005). This large, real-world cohort reaffirms ASCT survival benefit, including in ‘older’ patients necessitating well-designed studies evaluating ASCT in ‘older’ MM to inform evidence-based patient selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Progression-free survival.
Fig. 3: Overall survival.

References

  1. Kyle RA, Steensma DP. History of multiple myeloma. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011;183:3–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Pandey S, et al. Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia. 2014;28:1122–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Naymagon L, Abdul-Hay M. Novel agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a review about the future. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreau P, Richardson PG, Cavo M, Orlowski RZ, San Miguel JF, Palumbo A, et al. Proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood. 2012;120:947–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Varga C, Laubach JP, Anderson KC, Richardson PG. Investigational agents in immunotherapy: a new horizon for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2018;181:433–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hipp S, Tai YT, Blanset D, Deegen P, Wahl J, Thomas O, et al. A novel BCMA/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager for the treatment of multiple myeloma induces selective lysis in vitro and in vivo. Leukemia. 2017;31:1743–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zou J, Chen D, Zong Y, Ye S, Tang J, Meng H, et al. Immunotherapy based on bispecific T-cell engager with hIgG1 Fc sequence as a new therapeutic strategy in multiple myeloma. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:512–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. D'Agostino M, Boccadoro M, Smith EL. Novel Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017;12:344–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson KC. New insights into therapeutic targets in myeloma. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:184–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N. Engl J Med. 1996;335:91–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N. Engl J Med. 2003;348:1875–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gay F, Oliva S, Petrucci MT, Conticello C, Catalano L, Corradini P, et al. Chemotherapy plus lenalidomide versus autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide maintenance, in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1617–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cavo M, Gay F, Beksac M, Pantani L, Petrucci MT, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e456–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N. Engl J Med. 2017;376:1311–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Quach H, Joshua D, Ho J, Szer J, Spencer A, Harrison SJ, et al. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who are eligible for stem cell transplantation: position statement of the Myeloma Foundation of Australia Medical and Scientific Advisory Group. Intern Med J. 2015;45:94–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreau P, San Miguel J, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Zamagni E, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:iv52–iv61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, Costello C, Dhodapkar MV, Kumar S, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma: ASCO and CCO joint clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1228–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong Doo N, Coory M, White V, Harrison SJ, Prince HM, Millar JL, et al. Low uptake of upfront autologous transplantation for myeloma in a jurisdiction with universal health care coverage: a population-based patterns of care study in Australia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014;14:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nivison-Smith I, Bardy P, Dodds AJ, Ma DDF, Aarons D, Tran S, et al. A review of hematopoietic cell transplantation in Australia and New Zealand, 2005 to 2013. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:284–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris TC, Velangi M, Jackson G, Marks DI, Ranaghan L. Northern Ireland Regional Haematology G, et al. Less than half of patients aged 65 years or under with myeloma proceed to transplantation: results of a two region population-based survey. Br J Haematol. 2005;128:510–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bergin K, Moore E, McQuilten Z, Wood E, Augustson B, Blacklock H, et al. Design and development of the Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) myeloma and related diseases registry. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Palumbo A, Cavallo F, Gay F, Di Raimondo F, Ben Yehuda D, Petrucci MT, et al. Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N. Engl J Med. 2014;371:895–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Merz M, Neben K, Raab MS, Sauer S, Egerer G, Hundemer M, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:189–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marini C, Maia T, Bergantim R, Pires J, Aguiar E, Guimarães JE, et al. Real-life data on safety and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2019;98:369–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen YC, Zuckerman T, Yeshurun M, Perez G, Magen H, Henig I, et al. Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective national multi-site cohort study. Ann Hematol. 2017;96:271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Garderet L, Beohou E, Caillot D, Stoppa AM, Touzeau C, Chretien ML, et al. Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma patients: a prospective multicenter study. Haematologica. 2016;101:1390–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Winn AN, Shah GL, Cohen JT, Lin P-J, Parsons SK. The real world effectiveness of hematopoietic transplant among elderly individuals with multiple myeloma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shah GL, Winn AN, Lin PJ, Klein A, Sprague KA, Smith HP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for elderly patients with multiple myeloma using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare database. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21:1823–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moreau P, Attal M. All transplantation-eligible patients with myeloma should receive ASCT in first response. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:250–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nivison-Smith I, Simpson JM, Dodds AJ, Ma DD, Szer J, Bradstock KF. A population-based analysis of the effect of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013;54:1671–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenberg AS, Brunson A, Jonas BA, Keegan THM, Wun T. Association between autologous stem cell transplant and survival among californians with multiple myeloma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:78–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Costa LJ, Huang JX, Hari PN. Disparities in utilization of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for treatment of multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21:701–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hayden PJ, Eikema D-J, Koster L, Goldschmidt H, Blaise D, Potter M, et al. Trends in autologous transplantation for myeloma in EBMT centres between 1993 and 2017. Blood 2019;134:4575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Hayman SR, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Dingli D, et al. Safety outcomes for autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93:56–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sanchez L, Sylvester M, Parrondo R, Mariotti V, Eloy JA, Chang VT. In-hospital mortality and post-transplantation complications in elderly multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a population-based study. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2017;23:1203–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spencer A, Prince HM, Roberts AW, Prosser IW, Bradstock KF, Coyle L, et al. Consolidation therapy with low-dose thalidomide and prednisolone prolongs the survival of multiple myeloma patients undergoing a single autologous stem-cell transplantation procedure. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1788–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005;106:2912–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Farina L, Bruno B, Patriarca F, Spina F, Sorasio R, Morelli M, et al. The hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) predicts clinical outcomes in lymphoma and myeloma patients after reduced-intensity or non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2009;23:1131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos M-V, Larocca A, Facon T, Kumar SK, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 2015;125:2068–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaya H, Peressini B, Jawed I, Martincic D, Elaimy AL, Lamoreaux WT, et al. Impact of age, race and decade of treatment on overall survival in a critical population analysis of 40,000 multiple myeloma patients. Int J Hematol. 2012;95:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rajkumar SV. Value and cost of myeloma therapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38:662–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rawstron AC, Child JA, de Tute RM, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, et al. Minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry in multiple myeloma: impact on outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2540–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Paiva B, Vidriales MB, Cerveró J, Mateo G, Pérez JJ, Montalbán MA, et al. Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2008;112:4017–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Child JA, Thakurta A, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:28–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Barlogie B, Alexanian R, Dicke K, Zagars G, Spitzer G, Jagannath S, et al. High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for resistant multiple myeloma. Blood. 1987;70:869–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Barlogie B, Hall R, Zander A, Dicke K, Alexanian R. High-dose melphalan with autologous bone marrow transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood. 1986;67:1298–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Muchtar E, Dingli D, Kumar S, Buadi FK, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR, et al. Autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma patients 70 years or older. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2016;51:1449–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharma M, Zhang MJ, Zhong X, Abidi MH, Akpek G, Bacher U, et al. Older patients with myeloma derive similar benefit from autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2014;20:1796–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients, hospitals, clinicians, and research staff at participating institutions for their support of the MRDR. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors; however, the ANZ MRDR has received funding from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi and Takeda.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Spencer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Members of the Australian and New Zealand Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry are listed in Supplementary Information.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergin, K., Wellard, C., Augustson, B. et al. Real-world utilisation of ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM): a report from the Australian and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry (MRDR). Bone Marrow Transplant 56, 2533–2543 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01308-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-021-01308-8

Search

Quick links