Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Randomized phase II trial of extracorporeal phototherapy and steroids vs. steroids alone for newly diagnosed acute GVHD

Abstract

Steroids remain the initial therapy for acute graft-vs.-host disease (AGVHD). Strategies to improve response and minimize steroid exposure are needed. We report results of a randomized, adaptive, Bayesian-designed, phase II trial of prednisone with or without extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as an initial therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AGVHD. The primary endpoint was success at day 56 defined as: alive, in remission, achieving AGVHD response without additional therapy, and on <1 mg/kg at day 28 and <0.5 mg/kg on day 56 of steroids. Eighty-one patients were randomized to the ECP arm (n = 51) or steroids alone (n = 30). Median age was 54 years (range: 17–75); 90% had grade II AGVHD and 10% had grades III and IV AGVHD, with skin (85%), upper (22%)/lower (22%) gastrointestinal, and liver (10%) involvement. The ECP arm had a higher probability of success (0.815) and exceeded the predefined threshold for determining the investigational arm promising. ECP was potentially more beneficial than steroids-alone in skin-only AGVHD (response rate: 72% vs. 57%, respectively) than for visceral-organ AGVHD (47% vs. 43%, respectively). The addition of ECP to steroids may result in higher GVHD response as initial therapy for AGVHD, especially for patients with skin-only involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Patient consort diagram.
Fig. 2: Non-relapse mortality by success or failure.
Fig. 3: Adverse events.
Fig. 4: Days 28 and 56 steroid doses by treatment arm.
Fig. 5: Long-term outcomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacMillan ML, DeFor TE, Holtan SG, Rashidi A, Blazar BR, Weisdorf DJ Validation of Minnesota acute graft-versus-host disease risk score. Haematologica. 2020:105:519–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Levine JE, Braun TM, Harris AC, Holler E, Taylor A, Miller H, et al. A prognostic score for acute graft-versus-host disease based on biomarkers: a multicentre study. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2:e21–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MacMillan ML, Robin M, Harris AC, DeFor TE, Martin PJ, Alousi A, et al. A refined risk score for acute graft-versus-host disease that predicts response to initial therapy, survival, and transplant-related mortality. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:761–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Antin JH, Chen AR, Couriel DR, Ho VT, Nash RA, Weisdorf D. Novel approaches to the therapy of steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004;10:655–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weisdorf D, Haake R, Blazar B, Miller W, McGlave P, Ramsay N, et al. Treatment of moderate/severe acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: an analysis of clinical risk features and outcome. Blood. 1990;75:1024–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolanos-Meade J, Logan BR, Alousi AM, Antin JH, Barowski K, Carter SL, et al. Phase 3 clinical trial of steroids/mycophenolate mofetil vs steroids/placebo as therapy for acute GVHD: BMT CTN 0802. Blood. 2014;124:3221–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Couriel DR, Saliba R, de Lima M, Giralt S, Andersson B, Khouri I, et al. A phase III study of infliximab and corticosteroids for the initial treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:1555–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alousi AM, Weisdorf DJ, Logan BR, Bolanos-Meade J, Carter S, Difronzo N, et al. Etanercept, mycophenolate, denileukin, or pentostatin plus corticosteroids for acute graft-versus-host disease: a randomized phase 2 trial from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Blood. 2009;114:511–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SJ, Zahrieh D, Agura E, MacMillan ML, Maziarz RT, McCarthy PL Jr., et al. Effect of up-front daclizumab when combined with steroids for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: results of a randomized trial. Blood. 2004;104:1559–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cragg L, Blazar BR, Defor T, Kolatker N, Miller W, Kersey J, et al. A randomized trial comparing prednisone with antithymocyte globulin/prednisone as an initial systemic therapy for moderately severe acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:441–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cahn JY, Bordigoni P, Tiberghien P, Milpied N, Brion A, Widjenes J, et al. Treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease with methylprednisolone and cyclosporine with or without an anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody. A multicenter phase III study. Transplantation. 1995;60:939–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oray M, Abu Samra K, Ebrahimiadib N, Meese H, Foster CS. Long-term side effects of glucocorticoids. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15:457–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Edelson R, Berger C, Gasparro F, Jegasothy B, Heald P, Wintroub B, et al. Treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Preliminary results. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:297–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maeda A, Schwarz A, Bullinger A, Morita A, Peritt D, Schwarz T. Experimental extracorporeal photopheresis inhibits the sensitization and effector phases of contact hypersensitivity via two mechanisms: generation of IL-10 and induction of regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:5956–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gatza E, Rogers CE, Clouthier SG, Lowler KP, Tawara I, Liu C, et al. Extracorporeal photopheresis reverses experimental graft-versus-host disease through regulatory T cells. Blood. 2008;112:1515–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Renzo M, Sbano P, De Aloe G, Pasqui AL, Rubegni P, Ghezzi A, et al. Extracorporeal photopheresis affects co-stimulatory molecule expression and interleukin-10 production by dendritic cells in graft-versus-host disease patients. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151:407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peritt D. Potential mechanisms of photopheresis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12:7–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamioni A, Parisi F, Isacchi G, Giorda E, Di Cesare S, Landolfo A, et al. The immunological effects of extracorporeal photopheresis unraveled: induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells in vitro and regulatory T cells in vivo. Transplantation. 2005;79:846–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Greinix HT, van Besien K, Elmaagacli AH, Hillen U, Grigg A, Knobler R, et al. Progressive improvement in cutaneous and extracutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease after a 24-week course of extracorporeal photopheresis-results of a crossover randomized study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:1775–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Flowers ME, Apperley JF, van Besien K, Elmaagacli A, Grigg A, Reddy V, et al. A multicenter prospective phase 2 randomized study of extracorporeal photopheresis for treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2008;112:2667–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakellari I, Gavriilaki E, Batsis I, Mallouri D, Panteliadou AK, Lazaridou A, et al. Favorable impact of extracorporeal photopheresis in acute and chronic graft versus host disease: prospective single-center study. J Clin Apher. 2018;33:654–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Perotti C, Del Fante C, Tinelli C, Viarengo G, Scudeller L, Zecca M, et al. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy in graft-versus-host disease: a longitudinal study on factors influencing the response and survival in pediatric patients. Transfus. 2010;50:1359–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greinix HT, Knobler RM, Worel N, Schneider B, Schneeberger A, Hoecker P, et al. The effect of intensified extracorporeal photochemotherapy on long-term survival in patients with severe acute graft-versus-host disease. Haematologica. 2006;91:405–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Messina C, Locatelli F, Lanino E, Uderzo C, Zacchello G, Cesaro S, et al. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for paediatric patients with graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2003;122:118–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Salvaneschi L, Perotti C, Zecca M, Bernuzzi S, Viarengo G, Giorgiani G, et al. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in childhood. Transfus. 2001;41:1299–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cid J, Carbasse G, Suarez-Lledo M, Moreno DF, Martinez C, Gutierrez-Garcia G, et al. Efficacy and safety of one-day offline extracorporeal photopheresis schedule processing one total blood volume for treating patients with graft-versus-host disease. Transfus. 2019;59:2636–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This physician-initiated trial was supported by a grant from Therakos, Inc., a Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals company. Additional support was provided through the Cancer Center Support Grant (NCI Grant P30 CA016672).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RSM contributed patient enrollment, paper writing, and interpretation of results; RB contributed to trial design, interpretation of results, and statistical analysis; GR contributed data collection and interpretation of results; BJO contributed data collection; URP, CMH, MQ, PA, IFK, BO, SOC, and EJS contributed patient enrollment and interpretation of results; KR contributed patient enrollment, laboratory analysis, and interpretation of results; DM and KK contributed laboratory analysis and interpretation of results; DRC contributed study design; REC contributed to study design, patient enrollment, and interpretation of results; and AMA contributed to study design, enrollment of patients on study, interpretation of results, and wrote the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin M. Alousi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AMA has served as a speaker for Therakos, Inc. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehta, R.S., Bassett, R., Rondon, G. et al. Randomized phase II trial of extracorporeal phototherapy and steroids vs. steroids alone for newly diagnosed acute GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 56, 1316–1324 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-01188-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-01188-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links