Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

HLA mismatches that are identical for the antigen recognition domain are less immunogenic

Abstract

For hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) HLA 10/10 (HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1) matched donors are optimal, but are not available for all patients. The identification of permissive/non-immunogenic mismatches may improve the outcome of HLA mismatched transplants. We hypothesize that HLA alleles identical within the antigen recognition domain (ARD), but mismatched outside the peptide binding groove or α-helices are often permissive mismatches. We evaluated the functional impact of non-ARD mismatches by performing in vitro functional T cell assays. Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte precursor assays were performed for 23 HLA class I mismatches and 96% (22 out of 23) were negative. Mixed lymphocyte reaction assays were conducted on 10 HLA class II mismatches and all were negative. However, 4 out of 10 combinations were positive in the Elispot and all involved one direction: a DRB1*14:01/DRB3*02:01 responder against a DRB1*14:54/DRB3*02:02 stimulator. These positive responses were confirmed by Primed Lymphocyte Testing and the DRB1* mismatch seemed to be responsible for the response. In conclusion, HLA mismatches with amino-acid differences outside the ARD are not very immunogenic. However, in some cases weak T cell reactivity in vitro can be observed. The impact of these responses on clinical outcome of HCT remains to be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sj Lee, Klein J, Haagenson M, Baxter-Lowe LA, Confer DL, Eapen M, et al. High resolution donor–recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood. 2007;110:4576–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pidala J, Lee SJ, Ahn KW, Spellman S, Wang HL, Aljurf M, et al. Nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch increases mortality after myeloablative unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2014;124:2596–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hou L, Vierra-Green C, Lazaro A, Brady C, Haagenson M, Spellman S, Hurley CK, Limited HLA. sequence variation outside of antigen recognition domain exons of 360 10 of 10 matched unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplant donor–recipient pairs. HLA. 2017;89:39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao Y, Lazaro AM, Masaberg C, Haagenson M, Vierra-Green C, Spellman S, et al. Evaluating the potential impact of mismatches outside the antigen recognition site in unrelated hemapoietic stem cell transplantation: HLA-DRB1*1454 and DRB1*140101. Tissue Antigens. 2009;73:595–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson J, Malik A, Parham P, Bodmer JG, Marsh SGE. IMGT/HLA database–a sequence database for the human major histocompatibility complex. Tissue Antigens. 2000;55:280–7. www.ebi.ac.uk/imgt/hla

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang JH, Meijers R, Xiong Y, Liu JH, Sakihama T, Zhang R, et al. Crystal structure of the human CD4 N-terminal two-domain fragment complexed to a class II MHC molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10799–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gans CP, Tang TF, Slack R, Ng J, Hartzman RJ, Hurley CK. DRB1*14 diversity and DRB3 associations in four major population groups in the United States. Tissue Antigens. 2002;59:364–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Emmery P, Mach B, Reith W. The different level of expression of HLA-DRB1 and –DRB3 genes is controlled by conserved isotopic differences in promotor sequence. Hum Immunol. 1993;38:137–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang L, FPMJ VanBree, Van Rood, Claas JJ. FHJ. The effect of individual HLA-A and -B mismatches on the generation of cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors. Transplantation. 1990;50:1008–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strijbosch LWG, Buurman WA, Does RJMM, Zinken PH, Groenewegen G. Limiting dilution analysis. Experimental design and statistical analysis. J Immunol Methods.1987;97:133–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mickelson EM, Clift RA, Fefer A, Storb R, Thomas ED, Warren RP, et al. Studies of the response in mixed leukocyte culture of cells from patients with aplastic anemia to cells from HLA-identical siblings. Transplantation. 1981;32:90–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van Els CA, Bakker A, van Rood JJ, Goulmy E. Induction of minor histocompatibility antigen-specific T-helper but not T-cytotoxic response is dependent on the source of antigen-presenting cell. Hum Immunol. 1990;28:39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oudshoorn M, Doxiadis II, van den Berg-Loonen PM, Voorter CE, Verduyn W, Claas FH. Functional versus structural matching: can the CTLp test be replaced by HLA allele typing? Hum Immunol. 2002;63:176–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandez-Viña MA, Wang T, Lee SJ, et al. Identification of a permissible HLA mismatch in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2014;123:1270–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bettens F, Schanz U, Tiercy J-M. Lack of recognition of HLA class I mismatches outside α1/α2 domains by CD8+alloreactive T lymphocytes: the HLA-B44 paradigm. Tissue Antigens. 2013;81:414–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heeger PS. “T-cell allorecognition and transplant rejection: a summary and update. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:525–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Faner R, James E, Huston L, Pujol-Borrel R, Kwok WW, Juan M. Reassessing the role of HLA-DRB3 T cell responses: evidence for significant expression and complementary antigen presentation. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:91–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Balen P, van Luxemburg-Heijs SA, van de Meent M, van Bergen CA, Halkes CJ, Jedema I, Falkenburg JH. Mismatched HLA-DRB3 can induce a potent immune response after HLA 10/10 matched stem cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2017 https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pasi A, Crocchiolo R, Bontempelli M, Carcassi C, Carella G, Crespiatico L, et al. The conundrum of HLA DRB1*14:01/*14:54 and HLA-DRB3*02:01/02:02 mismatches in unrelated hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46:916–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The CIBMTR is supported by Office of Naval Research Grants N00014-14-1-0028 and N00014-15-1-0848. The views expressed in this article do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or any other agency of the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dave Roelen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roelen, D., de Vaal, Y., Vierra-Green, C. et al. HLA mismatches that are identical for the antigen recognition domain are less immunogenic. Bone Marrow Transplant 53, 729–740 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0108-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0108-6

Search

Quick links