This retrospective observational study (NEUF) included adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-cell ALL) who had received blinatumomab for the treatment of minimal residual disease-positive (MRD+) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell ALL via an expanded access program (EAP). Patients were eligible if blinatumomab was initiated via the EAP between January 2014 and June 2017. Patients were followed from blinatumomab initiation until death, entry into a clinical trial, the end of follow-up, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2017), whichever occurred first. Of the 249 adult patients included, 109 were MRD+ (83 Philadelphia chromosome-negative [Ph−] and 26 Philadelphia chromosome-positive [Ph+]) and 140 had a diagnosis of R/R B-cell ALL (106 Ph− and 34 Ph+). In the MRD+ group, within the first cycle of blinatumomab treatment, 93% (n = 49/53) of Ph− and 64% (n = 7/11) of Ph+ patients with evaluable MRD achieved an MRD response (MRD <0.01%). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached over a median follow-up time of 18.5 months (Ph−, 18.8 [range: 5.1–34.8] months; Ph+, 16.5 [range: 1.8–31.6] months). In the R/R group, within two cycles of blinatumomab, 51% of Ph− and 41% of Ph+ patients achieved complete hematologic remission (CR/CRh/CRi), and 83% of Ph− and 67% of Ph+ MRD-evaluable patients in CR/CRh/CRi achieved an MRD response. Median (95% confidence interval) OS was 12.2 (7.3–24.2) months in the R/R Ph− subgroup and 16.3 (5.3–not estimated) months in the R/R Ph+ subgroup. This large, real-world data set of adults with B-cell ALL treated with blinatumomab confirms efficacy outcomes from published studies.
Approximately 30–50% of patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-cell ALL) in complete hematologic remission (CR/CRh/CRi) exhibit post-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) persistence, which indicates resistance to standard chemotherapy . The presence of MRD-positive (MRD+) disease is also associated with a high relapse rate and poor overall survival (OS) [1, 2], representing the most important risk factor for hematologic relapse in adult patients with B-cell ALL . Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have poor long-term survival and limited treatment options. MRD eradication is, therefore, the goal for patients with B-cell ALL; this highlights the importance of incorporating MRD assessment into routine clinical practice .
Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) molecule that directs CD3-expressing T cells to CD19-expressing B cells, resulting in tumor cell lysis [4, 5]. The efficacy of blinatumomab in patients with B-cell ALL has been demonstrated in various studies. In a Phase 2 trial in patients with MRD+ B-cell ALL, 78% of patients receiving blinatumomab achieved a complete MRD response, which was associated with longer relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS compared with MRD nonresponders [2, 6]. In two single-arm Phase 2 studies, blinatumomab induced hematologic remission in heavily pretreated patients with R/R Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph−) B-cell ALL [7, 8]. In a Phase 3 trial, treatment with blinatumomab resulted in longer median OS than standard chemotherapy . MRD results were also analyzed in this patient population and showed longer OS for MRD responders than for MRD nonresponders; the difference was greater in first salvage than in second or later salvage [10, 11]. In a Phase 2 trial in patients with R/R Ph+ B-cell ALL, 36% of patients achieved complete remission (CR), of whom 88% attained MRD negativity .
Evidence of real-world use of blinatumomab to date is based on data from a compassionate use program in France, an ad hoc survey in Italy, and a retrospective cohort study in the USA [13,14,15]. These data sets demonstrated responses comparable to those reported in clinical trials [2, 9].
Before country-specific approval, blinatumomab was made available to patients who met prespecified criteria via an expanded access program (EAP). The NEUF study was a retrospective observational study including both adult and pediatric patients receiving blinatumomab treatment via an EAP.
Materials and methods
To describe the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of adult patients with B-cell ALL who received blinatumomab in the EAP, and in pre-identified clinically relevant subgroups (i.e., MRD+ Ph−/Ph+ and R/R Ph−/Ph+ subgroups).
As described previously, patients treated with blinatumomab in the EAP between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017, in France, Italy, the Russian Federation, Spain, and the UK were eligible for inclusion ; the sites with the largest number of requests were invited to participate in the NEUF study. Patients were not eligible for inclusion in the study if informed consent was not provided (per local regulations) or if their medical records were not available. Adverse events were reported separately and according to local regulations, as detailed previously .
CR was defined as ≤5% blasts in the bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, and full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets >100 × 109/L and absolute neutrophil count >1 × 109/L) [9, 16, 17]. CR with partial recovery of peripheral blood counts (CRh) was defined as CR, but with partial recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets >50 × 109/L and absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 109/L). CR with incomplete recovery of peripheral blood counts (CRi) was defined as CR, but with incomplete recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets >100 × 109/L or absolute neutrophil count >1 × 109/L) among patients with R/R B-cell ALL at blinatumomab initiation.
MRD assessment was undertaken as per local clinical practice using a technique with a quantifiable sensitivity down to 10−4 assessed by flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction. Standardized protocols [18,19,20,21] were available for use in routine clinical practice in the participating countries, and technique choice was at the discretion of each investigator/site. MRD status was abstracted from each patient’s medical record, and available MRD data were analyzed irrespective of the technique used. Patients categorized as having a complete MRD response were those in CR/CRh/CRi with undetectable MRD within the first cycle or the first two cycles of blinatumomab treatment, depending on how many cycles were required. MRD response was defined as CR/CRh/CRi with low-level nonquantifiable MRD (<10−4/0.01%). Patients with persistent MRD were those without an MRD response or complete MRD response (quantifiable MRD, ≥10−4/0.01%). Patients with MRD relapse were those in CR/CRh/CRi and who had a prior complete MRD response or an MRD response that was subsequently lost (quantifiable MRD).
In the MRD+ group, disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated and described as the time from blinatumomab initiation to the date of relapse or death in remission, whichever occurred first.
In the R/R B-cell ALL group, relapse was defined as >5% blasts in the bone marrow or extramedullary relapse after documented CR/CRh/CRi. RFS was estimated for the R/R B-cell ALL group and defined as the time from achievement of CR/CRh/CRi (best response within the first two cycles) to the date of relapse or death in remission, whichever occurred first. In both groups, OS was defined as the time from initiation of blinatumomab treatment until death from any cause.
Enrolled patients were observed from blinatumomab initiation until death, entry into a clinical trial, the end of follow-up, or the end of the study (December 31, 2017), whichever occurred first.
The study was approved by the appropriate local institutional review boards/independent ethics committees and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines issued by the International Conference of Harmonisation.
Analyses were descriptive and no formal hypothesis was tested . Time-to-event analysis (e.g., for OS, DFS, and RFS) was undertaken using Kaplan–Meier (KM) methodology and using inverse KM estimates to calculate follow-up time. Mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was evaluated as mortality not due to disease relapse, treating relapse and death due to undocumented relapse as competing risks. Mortality estimates were calculated using cumulative incidence function analysis. To address immortal time bias (i.e., relapse is not possible prior to response), landmark analyses were undertaken, comparing OS between patients who responded to blinatumomab treatment within the first two cycles and those who did not. Any patient who did not report a response to blinatumomab treatment within two cycles (84 days) was classed as a nonresponder, even if they later had a response.
Overall, 249 patients were included, of whom 109 were MRD+ (83 Ph− and 26 Ph+) and 140 had a diagnosis of R/R B-cell ALL (106 Ph− and 34 Ph+) (Table 1). All patients in the Ph+ subgroup had the BCR-ABL1 translocation confirmed prior to blinatumomab initiation (Supplementary Table 1). Owing to missing diagnosis data, four additional patients were excluded from these analyses. In the MRD+ group, most of the patients (71%) had persistent MRD irrespective of the number of prior salvages and their Ph status. Patients who had no prior salvage therapy (CR1) represented 60% and 38% of the Ph− and Ph+ subgroups, respectively. The remaining patients (40% of Ph− and 62% of Ph+) had received at least one prior salvage therapy (CR2+). In the R/R subgroups, 42% of Ph− patients had no prior salvage (76% relapsed and 24% refractory) and 12% of Ph+ patients had no prior salvage (50% relapsed and 50% refractory).
Concurrent therapies during blinatumomab treatment
Within each group, patients received a median of two cycles of blinatumomab. In the MRD+ group, four patients (two Ph− and two Ph+) were treated with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). In the R/R B-cell ALL group, 13 patients (all Ph−) were treated with DLI. Concurrent use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was documented for 12 patients in the MRD+ Ph+ subgroup and 14 patients in the R/R Ph+ subgroup. Use of TKIs is reported in Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2, and comedications of interest are summarized in Supplementary Table 3.
Response to blinatumomab treatment
In patients with evaluable MRD (n = 64), 88% (n = 56) achieved an overall MRD response (either a complete MRD response or an MRD response) within the first cycle of blinatumomab. Among the 83 patients who were evaluated for MRD within two cycles of blinatumomab, 84% (n = 70) had an overall MRD response, representing 91% and 59% of patients in the Ph− and Ph+ subgroups, respectively (Fig. 1A). The overall MRD response did not differ by CR1 or CR2+ status in both the Ph− (88% and 91%, respectively) and the Ph+ subgroup (57% and 56%, respectively).
Within the first two cycles of blinatumomab, 54 patients (51%) in the R/R Ph− subgroup achieved CR/CRh/CRi, of whom 91% (49/54) achieved CR (Fig. 1B). Among these 54 patients, 42 had an evaluable MRD assessment within the first two cycles of blinatumomab and 83% (n = 35) achieved an overall MRD response (22 had a complete MRD response [52%]; 13 had an MRD response [31%]) (Fig. 1B).
Within the first two cycles of blinatumomab, 14 patients (41%) in the R/R Ph+ subgroup achieved CR/CRh/CRi and all patients achieved CR (Fig. 1B). Of these patients, 12 had an evaluable MRD assessment (Fig. 1B), and eight of these (67%) achieved either a complete MRD response (50%; n = 6) or an MRD response (17%; n = 2).
Patients with extramedullary involvement
In the R/R group, of the 20 Ph− patients with extramedullary involvement, 10 patients (50%) achieved complete hematologic remission with five of these achieving an MRD response. Among the five Ph+ patients with extramedullary involvement, three achieved complete hematologic remission, of whom two achieved an MRD response.
Patients with DLI
In the MRD+ group, two of the four patients treated with DLI had evaluable MRD and both (one Ph− and one Ph+) achieved an MRD response. In the Ph− subgroup, 69% (n = 9) of patients who received a DLI achieved CR/CRh/CRi following two cycles of blinatumomab, and five of the six evaluable patients (83%) achieved an overall MRD response.
OS and DFS in the MRD+ group
Median OS and median OS censored at the time of HSCT were not reached (Fig. 2A, B). Median follow-up was 18.5 months (Supplementary Table 4). Achieving an overall MRD response in the first two cycles of blinatumomab resulted in better KM estimates for OS at 24 months among MRD responders (71.5%) than among MRD nonresponders (57.1%; persistent MRD or MRD relapse) (Supplementary Fig. 2A). Similar results were found in a landmark analysis (Supplementary Table 5). Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) DFS was 27.6 (13.0–not estimated [NE]) months (Fig. 2C; Supplementary Table 6), and 33.0 (17.0–NE) months with additional censoring at the time of HSCT (Fig. 2D). DFS estimates at 24 months were better in MRD responders than in nonresponders (KM estimates: 61.2% of MRD responders vs 36.9% of MRD nonresponders; Supplementary Fig. 3).
In both Ph− and Ph+ subgroups, the KM estimates for OS and DFS at 24 months were consistent with those in the overall MRD+ group (Supplementary Fig. 2A; Supplementary Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 4; Supplementary Table 5). DFS was 25.7 months in the Ph− subgroup (median follow-up, 18.6 months) and was not reached in the Ph+ subgroup (median follow-up, 16.2 months) (Supplementary Table 6). In the Ph− subgroup, better outcomes were observed in the CR1 subgroup than in the CR2+ subgroup (median OS: NE versus 16.98 months [Fig. 2E]; median DFS: 32.98 versus 11.34 months). The KM estimates for OS and DFS at 24 months are shown in Supplementary Figs. 2A and 3.
OS and RFS in the R/R group
In the Ph− subgroup, median (95% CI) OS was 12.2 (7.3–24.2) months (Fig. 3A; Supplementary Table 4), and 9.5 (7.1–24.2) months when censoring for HSCT (Fig. 3B). Median (95% CI) RFS was 11.0 (8.2–15.4) months with and without additional censoring at the time of HSCT (Fig. 3C, D; Supplementary Table 6). The KM estimate (95% CI) for RFS at 24 months was 33.1% (19.0–47.8%) overall (Supplementary Table 6), 35.0% in MRD responders, and 28.6% in MRD nonresponders (Supplementary Fig. 4). KM estimates for OS at 24 months were better among responders (CR/CRh/CRi or MRD) versus nonresponders, in patients with a prior HSCT versus no prior HSCT, and in patients with bone marrow blasts <50% versus ≥50% at blinatumomab initiation (Supplementary Fig. 2B). In the Ph+ subgroup, median (95% CI) OS was 16.3 (5.3–NE) months (Fig. 3E), and 16.3 (5.3–16.3) months with additional censoring at the time of HSCT (Fig. 3F). KM estimates for OS at 24 months were 56.6% in responders and 46.4% in nonresponders (Supplementary Fig. 2C). Median RFS was 6.7 months in analyses with or without additional censoring at the time of HSCT (Fig. 3G, H; Supplementary Table 6). The KM estimate (95% CI) for RFS at 24 months was 21.2% (4.0–47.3%) (Supplementary Table 6).
OS and RFS in R/R patients with DLI
In the Ph− subgroup of patients who received a DLI, four out of 13 died from any cause. At 12 months and 18 months, OS (95% CI) was 76.2% (42.7–91.7%) and 66.6% (33.1–86.1%), respectively. Of the nine patients with CR/CRh/CRi, one patient died from any cause and three patients relapsed. At 12 months and 18 months, RFS (95% CI) was 51.9% (16.4–78.8%).
Outcomes following blinatumomab treatment
In the MRD+ group, 74 patients (68%) receiving blinatumomab proceeded to HSCT (Supplementary Table 7). Of these, 66% (n = 49) achieved an MRD response before transplant. In patients with an MRD response following blinatumomab who did not have any cytotoxic therapy (n = 43) between blinatumomab and transplant (Supplementary Table 7), the median (95% CI) time from achieving an MRD response to HSCT was 2.3 (1.6–9.1) months.
In the R/R group, of the Ph− patients who were in CR/CRh/CRi, 43 (41%) proceeded to HSCT (Supplementary Table 7), among whom 33 (77%) achieved CR/CRh/CRi before transplant. Of these 33 patients, 29 achieved CR/CRh/CRi and proceeded to HSCT without additional cytotoxic therapy. In this subgroup, median (95% CI) time from achieving CR/CRh/CRi to HSCT was 4.6 (2.2–NE) months.
Among the Ph+ patients in the R/R group who were in CR/CRh/CRi, 11 (32%) proceeded to HSCT following blinatumomab treatment (Supplementary Table 7). Of these, six (55%) achieved CR/CRh/CRi after blinatumomab initiation and all were treated with additional cytotoxic therapy before HSCT. Median time to HSCT was not reached.
Nonrelapse mortality after HSCT
In the MRD+ group, mortality following HSCT was evaluable in 56 patients. Nonrelapse mortality (95% CI) at 12 months was 10.1% (4.3–23.8%; Table 2). In the Ph− and Ph+ subgroups, 12-month mortality (95% CI) was 9.0% (3.3–24.4%) and 18.1% (3.7–90.0%), respectively.
In the R/R group, mortality following HSCT was evaluable in 29 Ph− patients, and nonrelapse mortality (95% CI) at 12 months was 19.3% (9.3–40.4%). In the Ph+ subgroup, mortality following HSCT was evaluable in six patients, and nonrelapse mortality (95% CI) following HSCT at 12 months was 15.4% (2.9–84.6%) (Table 2).
The NEUF study describes the largest documented European cohort of patients treated with blinatumomab in real-world clinical practice reported to date. The real-world effectiveness of blinatumomab in adults with MRD+ or R/R ALL was comparable to that reported in other clinical and real-world studies [2, 3, 6, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
In the MRD+ group, over half of patients were in CR1 and 84% of patients with an evaluable MRD achieved an overall MRD response within the first two cycles of blinatumomab therapy. Moreover, the MRD+ group included more than two-thirds of patients with persistent MRD prior to initiating blinatumomab therapy. The overall results in the MRD+ group align with previously reported efficacy data from clinical and real-world studies. In the Phase 2 clinical trial, 78% of patients achieved a complete MRD response . In the FRENCH-CYTO study, 89% of the MRD+ patients achieved a complete MRD response following blinatumomab . Crucially, the NEUF study shows that survival outcomes were improved in patients who did versus did not have an MRD response, and in patients in the CR1 versus CR2+ subgroup, in line with earlier findings from the Phase 2 trial . Nonrelapse mortality at 12 months was 10% in the MRD+ group.
In the R/R Ph− subgroup, over half of patients achieved CR/CRh/CRi and over one-third proceeded to HSCT, in line with the results of the Phase 3 trial in which nearly half of patients had also received blinatumomab in their first salvage [9, 10]. The transplant realization rate was considerably higher in patients in the NEUF study than in the Phase 3 clinical trial. The relatively short median interval from achieving CR/CRh/CRi to HSCT of 4.6 months among patients who did not receive other cytotoxic therapy indicates that blinatumomab is being used as a bridge to transplantation. Importantly, patients who had an HSCT before blinatumomab initiation as well as patients who achieved CR/CRh/CRi and/or an MRD response following blinatumomab treatment had an improved survival result compared with patients who did not. Moreover, given the good results when censoring for HSCT, blinatumomab could be considered to be a valuable option also for older patients unfit for transplantation. Despite some differences in patient characteristics and outcomes, the data of the NEUF study align overall with the literature [13,14,15].
In the R/R Ph+ subgroup, over 40% of patients achieved CR/CRh/CRi within two cycles of blinatumomab initiation and over two-thirds of these patients with available MRD data achieved an MRD response. Most patients in the R/R Ph+ subgroup had at least one prior salvage therapy. Over one-third of patients achieved CR/CRh/CRi and proceeded to allogeneic HSCT without further therapy. This was similar to results reported in a Phase 2 trial of patients with R/R Ph+ , in which 36% of patients achieved CR/CRh/CRi within two cycles of blinatumomab initiation and 88% of these patients achieved an MRD response . As expected, the Ph+ subgroup had slightly worse outcomes than the Ph− subgroup. Patients with Ph+ B-cell ALL are considered to be high risk owing to their cytogenetic profile and the limited MRD response to treatment [22, 23]. With regard to the improvement of the MRD response induced by blinatumomab in patients with Ph+ B-cell ALL, its efficacy in patients who were newly diagnosed with Ph+ B-cell ALL was reported in the D-ALBA study , in which 60% of patients achieved a molecular response following treatment with dasatinib and two cycles of blinatumomab. Molecular response rates further increased with additional cycles of blinatumomab. As proposed by Puzzolo et al, the host immune system may contribute to this effect of blinatumomab in this setting . This may explain the encouraging results obtained in patients treated with DLI.
In a proportion of patients with extramedullary involvement included in the NEUF study, blinatumomab elicited a response regardless of Ph status, and this response was consistent with the cytomorphological response of each Ph− or Ph+ subgroup; this is one of the first reports on the effect of blinatumomab in this subset of patients. Overall, these results highlight the real-world effectiveness of blinatumomab in different subgroups of patients with B-cell ALL.
The limitations of this study merit consideration and have been detailed previously . Individuals enrolled in an EAP may not be representative of the wider population of patients with B-cell ALL receiving blinatumomab treatment. An additional limitation of the study was a potential patient selection bias given that only sites with the largest proportion of expanded access requests across the selected countries were invited to participate in the NEUF study. Of those, 51 sites participated. Finally, a small proportion of patients in the MRD+ group demonstrated bone marrow blasts >5%; this may indicate that clinicians enrolled patients with an advanced disease or that the patient’s disease had progressed by the time they received blinatumomab.
In conclusion, these results from the largest European real-word cohort of adults with B-cell ALL are consistent with data from clinical and real-world studies, confirming the effectiveness of blinatumomab in both the MRD+ and R/R settings.
Data that support the results of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Qualified researchers may request data from Amgen studies. Details are available at the following: http://www.amgen.com/datasharing.
Zhao J, Song Y, Liu D. Recent advances on blinatumomab for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2019;8:28.
Gökbuget N, Dombret H, Bonifacio M, Reichle A, Graux C, Faul C, et al. Blinatumomab for minimal residual disease in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2018;131:1522–31.
Gökbuget N, Dombret H, Giebel S, Bruggemann M, Doubek M, Foa R, et al. Minimal residual disease level predicts outcome in adults with Ph-negative B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology. 2019;24:337–48.
Blinatumomab summary of product characteristics. 2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/blincyto-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2022.
Bargou R, Leo E, Zugmaier G, Klinger M, Goebeler M, Knop S, et al. Tumor regression in cancer patients by very low doses of a T cell-engaging antibody. Science. 2008;321:974–7.
Gökbuget N, Zugmaier G, Dombret H, Stein A, Bonifacio M, Graux C, et al. Curative outcomes following blinatumomab in adults with minimal residual disease B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61:2665–73.
Topp MS, Gökbuget N, Stein AS, Zugmaier G, O’Brien S, Bargou RC, et al. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:57–66.
Topp MS, Gökbuget N, Zugmaier G, Klappers P, Stelljes M, Neumann S, et al. Phase II trial of the anti-CD19 bispecific T cell-engager blinatumomab shows hematologic and molecular remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:4134–40.
Kantarjian H, Stein A, Gökbuget N, Fielding AK, Schuh AC, Ribera JM, et al. Blinatumomab versus chemotherapy for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:836–47.
Dombret H, Topp MS, Schuh AC, Wei AH, Durrant S, Bacon CL, et al. Blinatumomab versus chemotherapy in first salvage or in later salvage for B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60:2214–22.
Topp MS, Stein AS, Gökbuget N, Horst HA, Boissel N, Martinelli G, et al. Blinatumomab as first salvage versus second or later salvage in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of a pooled analysis. Cancer Med. 2021;10:2601–10.
Martinelli G, Boissel N, Chevallier P, Ottmann O, Gökbuget N, Topp MS, et al. Complete hematologic and molecular response in adult patients with relapsed/refractory philadelphia chromosome-positive B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia following treatment with blinatumomab: results from a phase II, single-arm, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1795–802.
Cabannes-Hamy A, Brissot E, Leguay T, Huguet F, Chevallier P, Hunault M, et al. High tumor burden before blinatumomab has a negative impact on the outcome of adult patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A real-world study by the GRAALL. Haematologica. 2022;107:2072–80.
Badar T, Szabo A, Advani A, Wadleigh M, Arslan S, Khan MA, et al. Real-world outcomes of adult B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with blinatumomab. Blood Adv. 2020;4:2308–16.
Bonifacio M, Papayannidis C, Lussana F, Fracchiolla N, Annunziata M, Sica S, et al. Real-world multicenter experience in tumor debulking prior to blinatumomab administration in adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Front Oncol. 2021;11:804714.
Locatelli F, Maschan A, Boissel N, Strocchio L, Alam N, Pezzani I, et al. Pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with blinatumomab in a real-world setting: results from the NEUF study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022;69:e29562.
Gökbuget N, Kelsh M, Chia V, Advani A, Bassan R, Dombret H, et al. Blinatumomab vs historical standard therapy of adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6:e473.
Bruggemann M, Schrauder A, Raff T, Pfeifer H, Dworzak M, Ottmann OG, et al. Standardized MRD quantification in European ALL trials: proceedings of the Second International Symposium on MRD assessment in Kiel, Germany, 18–20 September 2008. Leukemia. 2010;24:521–35.
Gabert J, Beillard E, van der Velden VH, Bi W, Grimwade D, Pallisgaard N, et al. Standardization and quality control studies of ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia – a Europe Against Cancer program. Leukemia. 2003;17:2318–57.
Theunissen P, Mejstrikova E, Sedek L, van der Sluijs-Gelling AJ, Gaipa G, Bartels M, et al. Standardized flow cytometry for highly sensitive MRD measurements in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2017;129:347–57.
Pigneux A, Montesinos P, Cong Z, Zhang X, Pownell AK, Wieffer H, et al. Testing for minimal residual disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Europe: a clinician survey. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1100.
Moorman AV, Harrison CJ, Buck GA, Richards SM, Secker-Walker LM, Martineau M, et al. Karyotype is an independent prognostic factor in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): analysis of cytogenetic data from patients treated on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial. Blood. 2007;109:3189–97.
Foa R, Bassan R, Vitale A, Elia L, Piciocchi A, Puzzolo MC, et al. Dasatinib-blinatumomab for Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1613–23.
Puzzolo MC, Radice G, Peragine N, de Propris MS, Mariglia P, Vignetti M, et al. Host immune system modulation in Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with dasatinib and blinatumomab. Blood. 2021;138:2290–3.
Medical writing support was provided by Sinéad Flannery, PhD, of PharmaGenesis London, London, UK. Medical writing and editorial support were provided by Carine Thual of Amgen (Europe) GmbH. Support for analyses and interpretation of data was provided by Mark Lillie of Amgen (UK) Ltd.
Funding was provided by Amgen (Europe) GmbH.
Nicolas Boissel received honoraria from Amgen, Ariad, Jazz, Pfizer, Servier, and Shire. Sabina Chiaretti received honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen Inc., Incyte, Pfizer, and Shire. Cristina Papayannidis received honoraria from Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire, and Teva Pharmaceuticals for travel, sponsored lectures, and advisory board meetings. Josep-Maria Ribera received research funds and honoraria from, and served on advisory boards for, Amgen, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, and Shire. Renato Bassan received honoraria for advisory boards from Amgen Inc., Incyte, Pfizer, and Shire. Andrey N. Sokolov received support from Amgen, Astellas, Novartis, and Pfizer for travel and sponsored lectures. Naufil Alam and Georg Kreuzbauer were employees of Amgen at the time of this work and still hold stocks of Amgen Inc. Alessandra Brescianini and Isabella Pezzani are employees and stockholders of Amgen. Gerhard Zugmaier is employed by Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, owns stock in Amgen Inc., and holds patents relating to blinatumomab. Robin Foà received honoraria for speaker bureau and advisory boards for Amgen Inc., Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. Alessandro Rambaldi received support from Amgen, Celgene, Novartis, and Pfizer for travel, sponsored lectures, and advisory board meetings.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Boissel, N., Chiaretti, S., Papayannidis, C. et al. Real-world use of blinatumomab in adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in clinical practice: results from the NEUF study. Blood Cancer J. 13, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00766-7