Electroencephalographic delta/alpha frequency activity differentiates psychotic disorders: a study of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder

Article metrics

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) has been proposed as a neurophysiological biomarker to delineate psychotic disorders. It is known that increased delta and decreased alpha, which are apparent in psychosis, are indicative of inappropriate arousal state, which leads to reduced ability to attend to relevant information. On this premise, we investigated delta/alpha frequency activity, as this ratio of frequency activity may serve as an effective neurophysiological biomarker. The current study investigated differences in delta/alpha frequency activity, in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar I disorder with psychotic features and methamphetamine-induced psychosis. One hundred and nine participants, including individuals with SCZ (n = 28), bipolar I disorder with psychotic features (n = 28), methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder (MPD) (n = 24) and healthy controls (CON, n = 29). Diagnosis was ascertained with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition disorders and current medication was recorded. EEG was undertaken in three testing conditions: resting eyes open, resting eyes closed and during completion of a simple cognitive task (visual continuous performance task). EEG delta/alpha frequency activity was investigated across these conditions. First, delta/alpha frequency activity during resting eyes closed was higher in SCZ and MPD globally, when compared to CON, then lower for bipolar disorder (BPD) than MPD for right hemisphere. Second, delta/alpha frequency activity during resting eyes open was higher in SCZ, BPD and MPD for all electrodes, except left frontal, when compared to CON. Third, delta/alpha frequency activity during the cognitive task was higher in BPD and MPD for all electrodes, except left frontal, when compared to CON. Assessment of EEG delta/alpha frequency activity supports the delineation of underlying neurophysiological mechanisms present in psychotic disorders, which are likely related to dysfunctional thalamo-cortical connectivity. Delta/alpha frequency activity may provide a useful neurophysiological biomarker to delineate psychotic disorders.

Introduction

Psychotic symptoms are characteristic of schizophrenia (SCZ), methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder (MPD) and may also be seen in bipolar disorder (BPD). Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive method for recording electrical brain activity, providing a reliable measure of direct brain activity with higher temporal resolution than functional imaging1,2. EEG may therefore be a particularly useful approach in delineating neurophysiological mechanisms that underlie different psychotic disorders1,2,3,4. However, findings are not always consistent, and studies have largely focused on a single rather than multiple psychotic disorders5,6,7,8, and are often unable to address the effect of medications on frequency activity4,9,10.

Delta synchronisation, increased EEG delta activity, has been reported in SCZ and BPD, with an absence of EEG studies in MPD. Previous studies support greater delta synchrony during resting eyes closed (REC) for SCZ when compared with controls (CON)11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Few studies in SCZ have addressed relative delta activity during resting eyes open (REO) or during the completion of a cognitive task21,22. BPD has also been shown to have greater delta synchrony compared to CON during REC and REO4,23,24, although again not all data are consistent25. Delta synchronisation is strongly associated with CNS depression, as seen during slow-wave sleep, in coma and during anaesthesia, all conditions characterised by decreased levels of consciousness26,27,28,29. Global delta synchrony in CNS depression is suggested to result from assembly of subthreshold activity of GABAergic project neurons emanating from the thalamic reticular nucleus30,31. A second thalamic nucleus, the lateral geniculate nucleus, with simple attentional stimulation, for example, REO with cross-hair fixation, has been reported to reduce global delta synchrony32. The subthreshold activity of GABAergic thalami projection neurons may underlie the presentation of increased delta synchrony reported in SCZ and BPD.

Alpha desynchronisation, decreased alpha activity, has been reported in SCZ and BPD, but no studies are available in MPD. In SCZ alpha desynchronisation is reported in adolescent onset SCZ, first-episode SCZ and un-medicated and medicated SCZ13,14,17,18,20,23,33,34,35,36,37,38,39. In BPD, reduction of alpha activity during resting conditions is also supported4,23,40,41. Attenuation of alpha synchronisation has been strongly associated with CNS depression, as is seen with prolonged use of alcohol, anaesthesia and vegetative state, all conditions characterised by decreased levels of consciousness42,43,44. The presence of alpha synchronisation is indicative of healthy resting wakefulness with readiness to process salient information45. Two key networks underlie alpha desynchronisation. First, activation of the visual system, mediated by the reticular activating system46,47, as is seen from REC to REO where there is a mass desynchronisation of alpha. Second, desynchronisation of alpha activity is purported to reflect diverse changes in thalamo-cortical and cortical network communication45,48,49,50. The exaggerated desynchronisation of alpha activity in psychotic disorders has been suggested to represent inappropriate arousal and readiness to attend to information, whether internal or external45. We expect to see alpha desynchronisation in SCZ, BPD and MPD; however, this desynchronization may differ across three testing conditions: REC, REO and during the completion of a cognitive task.

On the premise of the current literature delta/alpha frequency activity may serve to delineate the psychotic disorders neurophysiologically. The aims of this study were to (1) extend current understanding of EEG frequency activity using delta/alpha ratio as a potential biomarker in psychosis by: (a) inclusion of participants with one of three psychotic disorders (SCZ, BPD I with history of psychosis, MPD); (b) record of delta/alpha frequency activity during three laboratory testing conditions—REO, REC and a simple cognitive task, a visual continuous performance task (CPT). Then (2) investigate differences in delta/alpha frequency activity in relation to prominent prescription medications. We hypothesised that psychotic disorders delta/alpha frequency activity would differ from demographic healthy controls and would serve to delineate the psychotic disorders, regardless of current medication regimes.

Subjects and methods

The investigation was a case-controlled study involving recruitment of clinically stable outpatients from the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Three psychotic disorder diagnoses were included namely SCZ, bipolar I disorder with a significant history of psychosis (BPD), and MPD. CON participants were recruited from similar socio-economic backgrounds as patient participants.

The study was approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, University of Cape Town (HREC Ref. No.: 192/2010). Western Cape Provincial and Hospital approval was also obtained. All research activities were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki51. All research participants provided voluntary informed consent.

Participants visited the laboratory twice. The first visit included provision of informed consent and an assessment clinical interview, using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID-I) using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)52 conditions. Control participants were excluded if there was a history of psychotic symptoms or family history of psychotic disorder. Participants with a psychotic disorder were excluded if they did not meet the diagnostic criteria for the study conditions: for example, participants with schizoaffective disorder were excluded. Participants were also excluded if they were younger than 19 years or older than 40 years, had general medical conditions that required prescription medications, had apparent learning disability, major brain trauma/surgery, any history of cardiovascular insult, individual or family history of epilepsy, medical implants or any metal within their person, for example, shrapnel. Female participants were excluded if they were pregnant or lactating. Patients with SCZ or BPD were excluded if any of their episodes were considered to be related to the use of a substance. MPD included psychotic symptoms with onset during methamphetamine intoxication or withdrawal and did not persist beyond 1 month since the last use of methamphetamine, or evidence of an underlying ‘primary’ psychotic disorder not related to the use of methamphetamine52. Evidence that the symptoms are better accounted for by a psychotic disorder that is not methamphetamine induced included the following: the symptoms precede the onset of the methamphetamine use; the symptoms persist for a substantial period of time (e.g. about a month52) after the cessation of acute withdrawal or severe intoxication, or are substantially in excess of what would be expected given the amount of methamphetamine used or the duration of use; or there is other evidence that suggests the existence of an independent non-MPD (e.g. a history of recurrent non-methamphetamine-related episodes). Patients with MPD were excluded if it was unclear if methamphetamine was causal to their symptoms or diagnosis, and if any of their psychotic episodes may have been related to another substance of abuse.

The second visit included a full morning of brain imaging. All EEGs were performed between 1100 and 1200 h, on a weekday. All clinical scales were performed on the same day and after the morning of brain imaging by trained clinical personnel.

Prior to obtaining EEG records, participants were familiarised to the different conditions: REO, REC, and a visual CPT. For REO, using E-prime53, a cross-hair, +, was presented on the screen and participants were asked to relax and look at the cross-hair. For REC ‘CLOSE EYES’ was presented on the screen in front of them. Records of 3 min EEG were obtained for each of the resting-state conditions. For the CPT the researcher explained the task requirements and participants completed a 30-s practice session, repeated if necessary until the participant was clear about task requirements.

The CPT included cueing of two S’s and the target a third consecutive S, that is, S-S-S or Cue-Cue-Target. Sixty trials of S-S-S were presented with 300 non-vowel inter-stimuli, no Xs or vowels were used. In addition, the presentation of 40 trick-Ss were embedded (these were single S’s). The total number of stimuli presented, including S-S-S, trick-Ss and inter-stimuli, was 540. The interval between presentation of stimuli was 100 ms, and presentation of stimuli was 500 ms, only a correct response to the target that was shorter than 500 ms resulted in shorter presentation of target S, the average duration of the task being 11 min. Behavioural data were extracted using E-prime53 and cross-checked with analogue inputs to EEG data file, Acknowledge 4.1 (Biopac Systems, Inc.). Behavioural data extracted included the number of correct responses, response time duration and errors of omission and commission.

EEG recording of REO, REC and CPT was undertaken using a simple EEG montage that included frontal (F3 and F4), central (C3 and C4) and parietal (P3 and P4) electrodes. Standard 10/20 caps (Electro-Cap International, Inc.) were used, of either medium or large size depending on head circumference of participant. Participants were grounded peripherally, linked earlobe reference was applied, and electrooculography (EOG) was recorded. The EEG system used was the Biopac MP150 system with 100 C EEG amplifiers and EOG amplifier (Biopac Systems, Inc.). Digital EEG data and analogue data, from E-prime, were collected via the MP150 system, with a sampling rate of 500 Hz, and were visualised real-time using AcqKnowledge 4.1 (Biopac Systems, Inc.).

For EEG data processing, data were first eye blink corrected and movement corrected (EOG), using automated ICA EOG correction in Acqknowledge 4.1 (Biopac Systems, Inc.), and then band pass filtered 0.1–30 Hz and Fourier transformed, using an in-house Matlab GUI, to accommodate differences in participant electrical brain activity conduction, that is, brain surface to recording electrode, relative (%) frequency bands power activity was extracted: delta (0.1–4.0 Hz), theta (4–7 Hz), alpha (7–14 Hz) and beta (15–30 Hz). For the purposes of the current study, we analyse delta/alpha frequency band activity only.

Clinical rating scales included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)54; Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia55; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression56; Young Mania Rating Scale57; Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale58; Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)59; and Simpson Angus Extrapyramidal Scale60. Chlorpromazine equivalents were calculated from current medication regimes61. Drug use history, nicotine, alcohol and methamphetamine were recorded using the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)62.

Statistical analysis

The data were largely non-parametric, as per Shapiro–Wilks distribution testing, and all EEG data parameters were skewed with significant group variance. There was an attempt to transform these data; however, no single transformation was held across delta/alpha frequency activity for the three testing conditions to address parametric bounds. There were three specific analysis approaches to determine group differences: (1) analysis across the four groups (CON, SCZ, BPD, MPD) (Table 1 and Fig. 1); (2) analysis across the three psychotic groups (SCZ, BPD, MPD) (Table 2); (3) medication analysis within the psychotic groups (Table 3). For the analysis of (1) and (2), first Kruskal–Wallis multivariate analysis of variances were performed, p < 0.05 (Fig. 1). Thereafter, correlational analyses, using Spearman’s rank order correlation, Rho >±0.6, p < 0.01, were applied across and within groups between variables that were reported in Tables 1 and 2 with their respective delta/alpha frequency activity data. To investigate the association of prescribed medications within the psychotic groups (3), Mann–Whitney U tests were applied and grouped by either on or off the respective medication being investigated. This included medications that were prescribed to at least 9 of the 80 participants with psychosis, refer to Table 2.

Table 1 Research participant groups ages, education, and behavioural performance
Fig. 1: Delta/alpha frequency activity during three testing conditions: resting eyes closed (REC), resting eyes open (REO) and continuous performance task (CPT) in four groups: control (CON, n = 29), schizophrenia (SCZ, n = 28), bipolar I disorder with history of psychosis (BPD, n = 28) and methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder (MPD, n = 24).
figure1

a Delta/alpha frequency activity during REC was lower for CON than SCZ and MPD globally, and lower for BPD than MPD for right hemisphere electrodes (F4, C4, P4). b Delta/alpha frequency activity during REO was lower in CON than SCZ, BPD and MPD for all electrodes except left frontal (F3). c Delta/alpha frequency activity during the CPT was lower in CON than BPD and MPD for all electrodes except left frontal (F3). Median, interquartile and range are reported; p < 0.05

Table 2 Psychotic groups duration of illness, medications, and clinical scale scores
Table 3 Delta/alpha frequency activity association with second-generation antipsychotics during the continuous performance task

Results

One hundred and nine research participants participated in the study: 28 individuals with diagnosis of SCZ, 28 with a diagnosis of BPD, 24 individuals with diagnosis of MPD and 29 healthy CON. Participants with SCZ and BPD were older than CON and MPD; all participants were between the ages of 19–40 years old. MPD participants reported lower educational achievement than CON and BPD. Several behavioural performance differences were found: CON performance surpassed SCZ and MPD for the number of correct responses, response time and errors of commission and omission; BPD performance surpassed SCZ for number of correct responses and response time; and SCZ participants made more errors of omission than participants with BPD or MPD (Table 1).

Duration of illness and medication recorded from the psychotic groups showed the following differences: MPD had a shorter duration of illness than BPD and SCZ; first-generation antipsychotics were more prescribed in MPD than BPD and SCZ (reflected in haloperidol prescription); second-generation antipsychotics were more prescribed in SCZ than MPD (reflected in clozapine prescription); and mood stabilisers were more prescribed in BPD than SCZ and MPD (reflected in lithium and sodium valproate prescription). Anticholinergic prescription (orphenadrine) differed across groups, with a tendency to be more prescribed in MPD compared to BPD (Table 2). Clinical scale scores differed across the patient participant groups: BPD participants had lower scores on the PANSS and its subscales compared to SCZ; the only aspect of the PANSS for which MPD participants did not report a lower score than participants with BPD was for the positive symptoms subscale; BPD participants were found to have greater psychosocial and occupational function (GAF) and were mentally less ill (CGI) than SCZ participants; and BPD participants reported fewer extrapyramidal symptoms than participants with SCZ or MPD (Table 2).

Delta/alpha frequency activity group differences

During REC differences were found for delta/alpha frequency activity across all electrodes: F3 (H3,109 = 10.36, p = 0.01); F4 (H3,109 = 13.38, p = 0.03); C3 (H3,109 = 9.43, p = 0.02); C4 (H3,109 = 12.81, p = 0.005); P3 (H3,109 = 11.29, p = 0.01); P4 (H3,109 = 14.04, p = 0.002). Where SCZ and MPD delta/alpha frequency activity was higher than CON (SCZ vs.CON: F3p = 0.009, F4p = 0.002, C3p = 0.03, C4p = 0.007, P3p = 0.02, P4p = 0.02; MPD vs.CON: F3p = 0.01, F4p = 0.003, C3p = 0.006, C4p = 0.002, P3p = 0.001, P4p = 0.0004). Then MPD delta/alpha frequency activity was higher compared to BPD for right hemisphere only (MPD vs.BPD: F4p = 0.03, C4p = 0.04, P4p = 0.02) (Fig. 1a).

During REO differences were found for delta/alpha frequency activity across all electrodes, except for F3: F4 (H3,107 = 9.83, p = 0.02); C3 (H3,107 = 9.54, p = 0.02); C4 (H3,107 = 10.48, p = 0.01); P3 (H3,107 = 10.21, p = 0.01); and P4 (H3,107 = 11.36, p = 0.009). Where SCZ, BPD and MPD delta/alpha frequency activity was higher than CON (SCZ vs. CON: F4p = 0.008, C3p = 0.02, C4p = 0.01, P3p = 0.01, P4p = 0.01; BPD vs. CON: F4p = 0.01, C3p = 0.008, C4p = 0.02, P3p = 0.01, P4p = 0.02; MPD vs. CON: F4p = 0.01, C3p = 0.01, C4p = 0.002, P3p = 0.005, P4p = 0.001) (Fig. 1b).

During the CPT difference were found for delta/alpha frequency activity across all electrodes, except for F3: F4 (H3,108 = 8.61, p = 0.03); C3 (H3,108 = 10.14, p = 0.01); C4 (H3,108 = 9.79, p = 0.02); P3 (H3,108 = 8.45, p = 0.03); P4 (H3,108 = 9.94, p = 0.01). BPD and MPD delta/alpha frequency activity was higher than CON (BPD vs. CON: F4p = 0.01, C3p = 0.005, C4p = 0.01, P3p = 0.02, P4p = 0.009; MPD vs. CON: F4p = 0.02, C3p = 0.02, C4p = 0.01, P3p = 0.007, P4p = 0.008) (Fig. 1c).

Delta/alpha frequency activity correlates

No significant correlations were found for delta/alpha frequency activity with variables listed in Table 1, or within the psychotic group for duration of illness, chlorpromazine equivalent or clinical scale scores in Table 2.

Delta/alpha frequency associations with medication

Relationships between delta/alpha frequency activity were evident during the CPT testing condition only. With second-generation antipsychotics delta/alpha frequency activity was lowered globally (Table 3). The only within-group, that is, a single psychotic disorder, relationship was found in SCZ for P3 where second-generation antipsychotics lowered delta/alpha frequency activity (SCZ; z = 2.27, p = 0.02; on = 2.39 (0.85–7.63) off = 4.89 (2.14–6.78). Then first-generation antipsychotics delta/alpha frequency activity was higher for left frontal electrode (F3; z = 1.98, p = 0.04; on = 5.33 (1.15–15.36) off = 3.88(1.60–8.70)). Then haloperidol, a first-generation antipsychotic, delta/alpha frequency activity, was higher for right central electrode (C4; z = −2.09, p = 0.03; on = 6.02 (1.22–9.49) off = 4.32 (1.03–14.87)).

Discussion

Our main finding was delta/alpha frequency activity, that is, higher delta and lower alpha synchronisation during three testing conditions is able to delineate psychotic disorders (Fig. 1). Although medication status was associated with differences in delta/alpha frequency activity during the cognitive task, this did not attenuate the delineation of the psychotic disorders.

First, delta/alpha frequency activity during REC was higher in SCZ and MPD globally, when compared to CON, then lower for BPD than MPD for right hemisphere. Previous studies report increased delta synchronisation during REC for SCZ when compared with CON11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 and alpha desynchronisation SCZ13,14,17,18,20,23,33,34,35,36,37,38,39 when compared with CON. In BPD increased delta synchronisation4,23,24 and decreased alpha synchronisation has previously been reported4,23,40,41, although not all data are consistent25. Then abstinent previously dependent methamphetamine users without psychosis have been shown to lack EEG complexity63, suggesting higher delta synchronisation during REC for MPD, while no differences in alpha activity were reported64,65. Then for MPD, our findings suggest that higher delta/alpha frequency activity is specific to psychosis, and not drug related. The hemispheric differences between BPD and MPD suggest an attenuated deficit over the right hemisphere in BPD, and support BPD as a potential hemispheric disorder66,67. During REC delta/alpha frequency activity delineates SCZ and MPD from CON.

Second, delta/alpha frequency activity during REO was higher in SCZ, BPD and MPD for all electrodes, except left frontal, when compared to CON. Compared to REC, limited studies have reported EEG frequency activity during REO in SCZ, those that have do report higher delta activity4,11,68,69, else a lack of difference13. In BPD, higher delta activity has been reported during REO4,23,24, but not consistently25. While alpha desynchronisation is reproducibly reported for SCZ13,14,17,18,20,23,33,34,35,36,37,38,39 and BPD4,23,40,41. As reported for REC, no previous research has investigated delta or alpha activity in MPD; however, as suggested for REO, higher delta/alpha activity may be specific to psychosis, and not drug related. Lack of difference in delta/alpha frequency activity for left frontal electrode needs further study. During REO delta/alpha frequency activity delineates SCZ, BPD and MPD from CON.

Third, delta/alpha frequency activity during the cognitive task was higher in BPD and MPD for all electrodes, except left frontal, when compared to CON, and associations were found with medication during the cognitive task. There is limited research on EEG frequency activity during cognitive activation in psychotic disorders. Delta synchronisation over frontal cortex has been associated with poor cognitive performance70, this was apparent for SCZ (Table 1); however, relative delta/alpha activity was not correlated with behavioural performance in the current study. A single study in BPD reported greater delta activity during cognitive activation in BPD71. Reduced alpha frequency activity has been associated with reduced cognitive resource availability72. Lack of difference in delta/alpha frequency activity for left frontal electrode compliments findings during REO; however, further study is required to understand this lack of difference. During CPT delta/alpha frequency activity delineates BPD and MPD from CON.

Although cross-sectional design does not allow conclusions about causality, second-generation antipsychotic medication which were prescribed equally across groups lowered delta/alpha frequency activity globally during the cognitive task only (Table 3). This carried over to SCZ, where left parietal cortex delta/alpha frequency was lower. Previous work in this area is inconsistent; second-generation antipsychotics have been reported to decrease73 or increase10,74,75,76,77 delta activity, to increase73,78 and decrease10,75 alpha activity. Then prescription of first-generation antipsychotics increased delta/alpha frequency activity for left frontal electrode, and then haloperidol, a first-generation antipsychotic, increased delta/alpha frequency activity for right central electrode. One study in SCZ found that haloperidol acutely decreased delta, and then after 28 days of treatment, a similar effect was seen in delta, then alpha increased34. A study in CON found that acute dosing of haloperidol increased delta activity77. We hypothesise that second-generation antipsychotics attenuate the disparity in delta/alpha frequency activity, especially during cognitive activation, that is, phasic vs. tonic cortical arousal. Further study is required to investigate potential causality and role of both first-generation and second-generation antipsychotics in delta/alpha frequency activity during cognitive activation.

The study has several limitations. First, MPD participants were younger and reported a shorter duration of illness (Tables 1 and 2). No relationships with age or duration of illness were found for delta/alpha frequency activity, suggesting age and duration of illness were not potential confounders. Studies in abstinent previously dependent methamphetamine users report reduced complexity of EEG activity, for example, increased delta with no change in alpha64,65. Then duration of psychotic illness has been associated with increased delta12 and to hold no association with delta17,18 or alpha activity12, and increased delta has also been shown to serve as a good predictor for developing psychosis79,80,81. With limited EEG research in MPD, further study is required to address the impact of age and duration of illness on delta/alpha frequency activity.

Second, drug use history was recorded using the ASSIST62, a tool used in primary health care. Correlation analyses were performed using the total scores for nicotine, methamphetamine and alcohol across the four groups and within each of the groups, and no relationships were found with delta/alpha frequency activity. In future studies, a more sensitive measure should be employed, such as the Kreek–McHugh–Schuluger–Kellogg scale, which better quantifies subjective substances of abuse, including duration of substance abstinence82. Several cautions should be noted with using EEG delta/alpha as a neurophysiological biomarker to delineate psychotic disorders. First, the current cohorts were comprised of stable outpatients, and the findings may not be generalisable to patients with active psychosis. Second, the sensitivity and specificity of findings here need to be validated in larger patient samples, including other psychotic83,84 and more common mental disorders36,85,86,87,88. Third, our study did not address the question of whether delta/alpha frequency activity represent an endophenotype that is also altered in first-degree family members4,23,25,89,90.

In conclusion, this is the first study to show the delineation of psychotic disorders using delta/alpha frequency activity (Fig. 1). These findings support the involvement of thalamo-cortical mechanisms in the psychotic disorders. If findings are replicated, delta/alpha frequency activity may provide a useful neurophysiological biomarker to delineate the psychotic disorders.

References

  1. 1.

    Galderisi, S., Mucci, A., Volpe, U. & Boutros, N. Evidence-based medicine and electrophysiology in schizophrenia. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 40, 62–77 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Boutros, N. N. et al. The status of spectral EEG abnormality as a diagnostic test for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 99, 225–237 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Kim, J. W. et al. Diagnostic utility of quantitative EEG in un-medicated schizophrenia. Neurosci. Lett. 589, 126–131 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Narayanan, B. et al. Resting state electroencephalogram oscillatory abnormalities in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar patients and their relatives from the bipolar and schizophrenia network on intermediate phenotypes study. Biol. Psychiatry 76, 456–465 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Alustiza, I., Radua, J., Pla, M., Martin, R. & Ortuno, F. Meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of timing and cognitive control in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: evidence of a primary time deficit. Schizophr. Res. 188, 21–32 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Schnack, H. G. & Kahn, R. S. Detecting neuroimaging biomarkers for psychiatric disorders: sample size matters. Front. Psychiatry 7, 50 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Heilbronner, U., Samara, M., Leucht, S., Falkai, P. & Schulze, T. G. The longitudinal course of schizophrenia across the lifespan: clinical, cognitive, and neurobiological aspects. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 24, 118–128 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Arnone, D. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging studies in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 195, 194–201 (2009).

  9. 9.

    Narayanan, B. et al. Multivariate genetic determinants of EEG oscillations in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder from the BSNIP study. Transl. Psychiatry 5, e588 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Galderisi, S., Mucci, A., Bucci, P., Mignone, M. L. & Maj, M. Multilead quantitative EEG profile of clozapine in resting and vigilance-controlled conditions. Psychiatry Res. 67, 113–122 (1996).

  11. 11.

    Karson, C. N., Coppola, R., Daniel, D. G. & Weinberger, D. R. Computerized EEG in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 14, 193–197 (1988).

  12. 12.

    Di Lorenzo, G. et al. Altered resting-state EEG source functional connectivity in schizophrenia: the effect of illness duration. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 234 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Locatelli, M., De Angeli, A., Leone, E., Grassi, B. & Scarone, S. Factor analysis and computerized EEG: preliminary data on schizophrenic patients. Int. J. Neurosci. 72, 265–270 (1993).

  14. 14.

    Miyauchi, T. et al. Computerized EEG in schizophrenic patients. Biol. Psychiatry 28, 488–494 (1990).

  15. 15.

    Winterer, G. et al. An association between reduced interhemispheric EEG coherence in the temporal lobe and genetic risk for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 49, 129–143 (2001).

  16. 16.

    Wuebben, Y. & Winterer, G. Hypofrontality—a risk-marker related to schizophrenia? Schizophr. Res. 48, 207–217 (2001).

  17. 17.

    Sponheim, S. R., Clementz, B. A., Iacono, W. G. & Beiser, M. Clinical and biological concomitants of resting state EEG power abnormalities in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 48, 1088–1097 (2000).

  18. 18.

    Sponheim, S. R., Clementz, B. A., Iacono, W. G. & Beiser, M. Resting EEG in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 31, 37–43 (1994).

  19. 19.

    Morihisa, J. M., Duffy, F. H. & Wyatt, R. J. Brain electrical activity mapping (BEAM) in schizophrenic patients. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 40, 719–728 (1983).

  20. 20.

    Borisov, S. V., Kaplan, A. I., Gorbachevskaia, N. L. & Kozlova, I. A. Segmental structure of the EEG alpha activity in adolescents with disorders of schizophrenic spectrum. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deiat. Im. I. P. Pavlov. 55, 329–335 (2005).

  21. 21.

    Basar, E. & Guntekin, B. Review of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma response oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders. Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62, 303–341 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Basar, E., Basar-Eroglu, C., Guntekin, B. & Yener, G. G. Brain’s alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and theta oscillations in neuropsychiatric diseases: proposal for biomarker strategies. Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62, 19–54 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Clementz, B. A., Sponheim, S. R., Iacono, W. G. & Beiser, M. Resting EEG in first-episode schizophrenia patients, bipolar psychosis patients, and their first-degree relatives. Psychophysiology 31, 486–494 (1994).

  24. 24.

    Chen, S. S. et al. Impaired frontal synchronization of spontaneous magnetoencephalographic activity in patients with bipolar disorder. Neurosci. Lett. 445, 174–178 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Venables, N. C., Bernat, E. M. & Sponheim, S. R. Genetic and disorder-specific aspects of resting state EEG abnormalities in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 35, 826–839 (2009).

  26. 26.

    Kay, D. C. Human sleep and EEG through a cycle of methadone dependence. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38, 35–43 (1975).

  27. 27.

    Englehardt, W., Carl, G., Dierks, T. & Maurer, K. Electroencephalographic mapping during isoflurane anesthesia for treatment of mental depression. J. Clin. Monit. 7, 23–29 (1991).

  28. 28.

    Chi, O. Z., Sommer, W. & Jasaitis, D. Power spectral analysis of EEG during sufentanil infusion in humans. Can. J. Anaesth. 38, 275–280 (1991).

  29. 29.

    Hashemi, M., Hutt, A. & Sleigh, J. How the cortico-thalamic feedback affects the EEG power spectrum over frontal and occipital regions during propofol-induced sedation. J. Comput. Neurosci. 39, 155–179 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Ulrich, D. Subthreshold delta-frequency resonance in thalamic reticular neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 40, 2600–2607 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Herrera, C. G. et al. Hypothalamic feedforward inhibition of thalamocortical network controls arousal and consciousness. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 290–298 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Weyand, T. G., Boudreaux, M. & Guido, W. Burst and tonic response modes in thalamic neurons during sleep and wakefulness. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1107–1118 (2001).

  33. 33.

    Iacono, W. G. Bilateral electrodermal habituation–dishabituation and resting EEG in remitted schizophrenics. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 170, 91–101 (1982).

  34. 34.

    Kemali, D. et al. Computerized EEG topography findings in schizophrenic patients before and after haloperidol treatment. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 13, 283–290 (1992).

  35. 35.

    Omori, M. et al. Quantitative EEG in never-treated schizophrenic patients. Biol. Psychiatry 38, 305–309 (1995).

  36. 36.

    Begic, D. et al. Quantitative electroencephalography in schizophrenia and depression. Psychiatr. Danub. 23, 355–362 (2011).

  37. 37.

    Small, J. G., Milstein, V., Sharpley, P. H., Klapper, M. & Small, I. F. Electroencephalographic findings in relation to diagnostic constructs in psychiatry. Biol. Psychiatry 19, 471–487 (1984).

  38. 38.

    Takeuchi, K. et al. Correlation of third ventricular enlargement and EEG slow wave activity in schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Res. 55, 1–11 (1994).

  39. 39.

    John, J. P., Khanna, S., Pradhan, N. & Mukundan, C. R. EEG alpha coherence and psychopathological dimensions of schizophrenia. Indian J. Psychiatry 44, 97–107 (2002).

  40. 40.

    Yener, G. G. & Basar, E. Brain oscillations as biomarkers in neuropsychiatric disorders: following an interactive panel discussion and synopsis. Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62, 343–363 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Kim, D. J. et al. Disturbed resting state EEG synchronization in bipolar disorder: a graph-theoretic analysis. Neuroimage Clin. 2, 414–423 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Hoffman, W. E., Charbel, F. T., Edelman, G., Albrecht, R. F. & Ausman, J. I. Nitrous oxide added to isoflurane increases brain artery blood flow and low frequency brain electrical activity. J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 7, 82–88 (1995).

  43. 43.

    Kaplan, R. F., Glueck, B. C., Hesselbrock, M. N. & Reed, H. B. Jr. Power and coherence analysis of the EEG in hospitalized alcoholics and nonalcoholic controls. J. Stud. Alcohol 46, 122–127 (1985).

  44. 44.

    Lehembre, R. et al. Resting-state EEG study of comatose patients: a connectivity and frequency analysis to find differences between vegetative and minimally conscious states. Funct. Neurol. 27, 41–47 (2012).

  45. 45.

    Klimesch, W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain. Res. Brain. Res. Rev. 29, 169–195 (1999).

  46. 46.

    Hardle, W., Gasser, T. & Bacher, P. EEG-responsiveness to eye opening and closing in mildly retarded children compared to a control group. Biol. Psychol. 18, 185–199 (1984).

  47. 47.

    Volavka, J., Matousek, M. & Roubicek, J. Mental arithmetic and eye opening. An EEG frequency analysis and GSR study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 22, 174–176 (1967).

  48. 48.

    Schurmann, M. & Basar, E. Functional aspects of alpha oscillations in the EEG. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 39, 151–158 (2001).

  49. 49.

    Fisch, N. J. Alpha channeling in mirror machines. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 225001 (2006).

  50. 50.

    Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., McEvoy, L. & Yu, D. High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cereb. Cortex. 7, 374–385 (1997).

  51. 51.

    World Medical Association. 64th WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (World Medical Association, Fortaleza, Brazil, 2013).

  52. 52.

    First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M. & Williams, J. B. in Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), Clinician Version, User’s Guide (American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, 1997).

  53. 53.

    Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-prime version 2.0]. (2012), http://www.pstnet.com.

  54. 54.

    Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A. & Opler, L. A. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 13, 261–276 (1987).

  55. 55.

    Addington, D., Addington, J., Maticka-Tyndale, E. & Joyce, J. Reliability and validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schizophr. Res. 6, 201–208 (1992).

  56. 56.

    Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 23, 56–62 (1960).

  57. 57.

    Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E. & Meyer, D. A. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br. J. Psychiatry 133, 429–435 (1978).

  58. 58.

    Busner, J. & Targum, S. D. The Clinical Global Impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry 4, 28–37 (2007).

  59. 59.

    Aas, I. H. Guidelines for rating global assessment of functioning (GAF). Ann. Gen. Psychiatry. 10, https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-10-2 (2011).

  60. 60.

    Simpson, G. M. & Angus, J. W. A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 212, 11–19 (1970).

  61. 61.

    Woods, S. W. Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J. Clin. Psychiatry 64, 663–667 (2003).

  62. 62.

    Gryczynski, J. et al. Validation and performance of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) among adolescent primary care patients. Addiction 110, 240–247 (2015).

  63. 63.

    Yun, K. et al. Decreased cortical complexity in methamphetamine abusers. Psychiatry Res. 201, 226–232 (2012).

  64. 64.

    Kalechstein, A. D. et al. Quantitative EEG abnormalities are associated with memory impairment in recently abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 21, 254–258 (2009).

  65. 65.

    Newton, T. F. et al. Quantitative EEG abnormalities in recently abstinent methamphetamine dependent individuals. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 410–415 (2003).

  66. 66.

    Ho, N. F. et al. Hemispheric lateralization abnormalities of the white matter microstructure in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 42, 160090 (2017).

  67. 67.

    Kwon, J. S., Youn, T. & Jung, H. Y. Right hemisphere abnormalities in major depression: quantitative electroencephalographic findings before and after treatment. J. Affect. Disord. 40, 169–173 (1996).

  68. 68.

    Kirino, E. Correlation between P300 and EEG rhythm in schizophrenia. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 35, 137–146 (2004).

  69. 69.

    Uvarova, L. G. & Alfimova, M. V. Peculiarities of EEG dynamics in cognitive activity demanding persistent attention in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychosis and their relatives. Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. Im. S. S. Korsakova. 105, 41–46 (2005).

  70. 70.

    Chen, Y. H. et al. Frontal slow-wave activity as a predictor of negative symptoms, cognition and functional capacity in schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiatry 208, 160–167 (2016).

  71. 71.

    Heninger, G. R. Lithium carbonate and brain function. I. Cerebral-evoked potentials, EEG, and symptom changes during lithium carbonate treatment. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 35, 228–233 (1978).

  72. 72.

    Valentino, D. A., Arruda, J. E. & Gold, S. M. Comparison of QEEG and response accuracy in good vs poorer performers during a vigilance task. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 15, 123–133 (1993).

  73. 73.

    Wetzel, H. et al. Seroquel (ICI 204 636), a putative 'atypical' antipsychotic, in schizophrenia with positive symptomatology: results of an open clinical trial and changes of neuroendocrinological and EEG parameters. Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 119, 231–238 (1995).

  74. 74.

    Joutsiniemi, S. L., Gross, A. & Appelberg, B. Marked clozapine-induced slowing of EEG background over frontal, central, and parietal scalp areas in schizophrenic patients. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 18, 9–13 (2001).

  75. 75.

    Knott, V., Labelle, A., Jones, B. & Mahoney, C. Quantitative EEG in schizophrenia and in response to acute and chronic clozapine treatment. Schizophr. Res. 50, 41–53 (2001).

  76. 76.

    Lee, D. Y. et al. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling of risperidone effects on electroencephalography in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 144, 272–278 (1999).

  77. 77.

    Yamada, K. et al. EEG GLOBAL FIELD POWER SPECTRum changes after a single dose of atypical antipsychotics in healthy volunteers. Brain. Topogr. 16, 281–285 (2004).

  78. 78.

    Small, J. G. et al. Computerized EEG profiles of haloperidol, chlorpromazine, clozapine and placebo in treatment resistant schizophrenia. Clin. Electroencephalogr. 18, 124–135 (1987).

  79. 79.

    van Tricht, M. J. et al. Can quantitative EEG measures predict clinical outcome in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis? A prospective multicenter study. Schizophr. Res. 153, 42–47 (2014).

  80. 80.

    Lavoie, S. et al. Frontal delta power associated with negative symptoms in ultra-high risk individuals who transitioned to psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 138, 206–211 (2012).

  81. 81.

    Zimmermann, R. et al. EEG spectral power and negative symptoms in at-risk individuals predict transition to psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 123, 208–216 (2010).

  82. 82.

    Kellogg, S. H. et al. The Kreek–McHugh–Schluger–Kellogg scale: a new, rapid method for quantifying substance abuse and its possible applications. Drug Alcohol Depend. 69, 137–150 (2003).

  83. 83.

    Mientus, S. et al. Cortical hypoactivation during resting EEG in schizophrenics but not in depressives and schizotypal subjects as revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Psychiatry Res. 116, 95–111 (2002).

  84. 84.

    Schellenberg, R., Knorr, W., Schindler, M., Kropf, S. & Beyer, H. EEG-power spectral components of schizoaffective disorders. Schizophr. Res. 3, 357–359 (1990).

  85. 85.

    Grin-Yatsenko, V. A., Baas, I., Ponomarev, V. A. & Kropotov, J. D. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG recordings at early stages of depressive disorders. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 281–289 (2010).

  86. 86.

    Sachs, G., Anderer, P., Dantendorfer, K. & Saletu, B. EEG mapping in patients with social phobia. Psychiatry Res. 131, 237–247 (2004).

  87. 87.

    Kano, K., Nakamura, M., Matsuoka, T., Iida, H. & Nakajima, T. The topographical features of EEGs in patients with affective disorders. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 83, 124–129 (1992).

  88. 88.

    Matousek, M. EEG patterns in various subgroups of endogenous depression. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 10, 239–243 (1991).

  89. 89.

    Trubnikov, V. I., Uvarova, L. G. & Orlova, V. A. Genetic analysis of the resting EEG parameters of schizophrenics and their relatives. Genetika 29, 1519–1525 (1993).

  90. 90.

    Simmonite, M., Bates, A. T., Groom, M., Hollis, C. & Liddle, P. F. Reduced event-related low frequency EEG activity in patients with early onset schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings. Psychiatry Res. 232, 51–57 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by National Research Foundation and University Research Committee. We acknowledge Lungiswa Mankayi, Ziyanda Gemashe, Goodman Sibeko, Neil Horn, Bonita Abrahams and David Karpul. We wish to thank the research participants for their time and willingness to participate in the current study.

Author information

Correspondence to Fleur M Howells.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howells, F.M., Temmingh, H.S., Hsieh, J.H. et al. Electroencephalographic delta/alpha frequency activity differentiates psychotic disorders: a study of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder. Transl Psychiatry 8, 75 (2018) doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0105-y

Download citation

Further reading