Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Photophysiological response of Symbiodiniaceae single cells to temperature stress

Abstract

Photosynthetic dinoflagellates in the family Symbiodiniaceae engage in symbiosis with scleractinian corals. As coral ‘bleaching’ is partly governed by the thermal sensitivity of different Symbiodiniaceae lineages, numerous studies have investigated their temperature sensitivity. However, the systematic identification of single-cells with increased temperature resistance among these dinoflagellates has remained inaccessible, mostly due to a lack of technologies operating at the microscale. Here, we employed a unique combination of microfluidics, miniaturized temperature control, and chlorophyll fluorometry to characterize the single-cell heterogeneity among five representative species within the Symbiodiniaceae family under temperature stress. We monitored single-cell maximum quantum yields (Fv/Fm) of photosystem (PS) II under increasing temperature stress (22‒39 °C, + 1 °C every 15 min), and detected a significant Fv/Fm reduction at lineage-specific temperatures ranging from 28 °C to 34 °C alongside a 40- to 180- fold increase in intraspecific heterogeneity under elevated temperatures (>31 °C). We discovered that the initial Fv/Fm of a cell could predict the same cell’s ability to perform PSII photochemistry under moderate temperature stress (<32 °C), suggesting its use as a proxy for measuring the thermal sensitivity among Symbiodiniaceae. In combination, our study highlights the heterogeneous thermal sensitivity among photosynthetic Symbiodiniaceae and adds critical resolution to our understanding of temperature-induced coral bleaching.

Ocean warming can disrupt the symbiosis between corals and photosynthetic dinoflagellates from the family Symbiodiniaceae, a process referred to as bleaching [1]. Corals can recover from bleaching by repopulating more stress-tolerant symbiont cells [2] and/or by recruiting new cells from the environment [3, 4]. The bleaching susceptibility of corals is thus partly linked to the thermal sensitivity of Symbiodiniaceae and many studies have experimentally tested lineage-specific thermal tolerances of coral symbionts [5,6,7,8]. However, the considerable heterogeneity between Symbiodiniaceae single cells remains underexplored [9], despite strong indications that the phenotypic richness among symbiont lineages is useful for mitigating bleaching effects [4, 10,11,12,13].

Here we studied the effect of temperature stress on Symbiodiniaceae single cells via microfluidics, microscale temperature control and pulse amplitude-modulated chlorophyll fluorometry (PAM) imaging. Specifically, we asked: (i) how heterogeneous are single-cells of Symbiodiniaceae under temperature stress and, (ii) does the initial photophysiology of a cell predict its thermal tolerance?

To address these questions, we selected five representative species from three Symbiodiniaceae lineages: Effrenium sp. (‘S1’, clade E, non-symbiotic), Symbiodinium sp. (‘S2’, ‘S3’ and ‘S4’, clade A, all symbiotic), and Fugacium sp. (‘S5’, clade F, symbiotic). The identity of all cell cultures was determined by phylogenetic analysis (Table S1 and Fig. S1) and their growth was inspected via absorbance measurements (Fig. S2). Following this characterization, single cells were loaded into individual microwells within a microfluidic device that was attached to a miniaturized temperature regulation system [14] and a PAM microscope (Fig. 1a‒c). Together, this setup enabled us to measure single-cell maximum quantum yields of PSII, i.e., Fv/Fm = (FmF0)/Fm under user-defined temperatures. As certain representative species (i.e., Effrenium sp. ‘S1’, Fugacium sp. ‘S5’) exhibited significantly reduced Fv/Fm during stationary phase (Fig. S3), all experiments were conducted using exponentially growing cells.

Fig. 1: An integrated microfluidic approach to study the photophysiological responses of Symbiodiniaceae single cells under temperature stress.
figure 1

a The fully assembled temperature regulation system with the microfluidic chip attached using immersion oil, ready to be observed via a variable chlorophyll fluorescence imaging microscope (PAM). The temperature regulation system includes a heat-stage and a cooling channel (flushed with deionized water) and, in combination with PAM, enables single-cell measurements of Fv/Fm under user-defined temperatures. b Top image, microwells with a diameter of 20 µm filled with individual cells of Symbiodiniaceae. Within the entire microfluidic device most microwells were empty (~54%) while the remaining microwells were filled either with single-cells (31%) or multiple cells (15%). Bottom image, the microfluidic device mounted onto the heat-stage. c False-color image of Fv/Fm of Symbiodiniaceae single-cells immobilized within microwells of the microfluidic chip. d Heatmap depicting the reduction of average Fv/Fm under stepwise increasing temperatures. Black stars denote the temperature at which Fv/Fm values differed significantly, for the first time, when compared to Fv/Fm values at 22°C (one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests, p < 0.05). e Average Fv/Fm of five Symbiodiniaceae species exposed to stepwise increasing temperatures. In this profile, temperatures were increased by +1 °C every 15 min from 22 to 39 °C, followed by rapid cooling to 22°C for 2.5 h. Data was obtained from three individual experiments for each species (except for Symbiodinium sp. ‘S4’ where only two experiments were performed). The total number of single cells for each species were n = 784 for Effrenium sp. ‘S1’, n = 356 for Symbiodinium sp. ‘S2’, n = 313 for Symbiodinium sp. ‘S3’, n = 465 for Symbiodinium sp. ‘S4’, and n = 528 for Fugacium sp. ‘S5’. f Percentage of photosystem (PS) II inactive cells as a function of the thermal dose. Data points were fitted to dose–response curves to determine the half-maximal effective distress dose (D50%), i.e., the dose at which 50% cells did not maintain PSII activity. For this calculation, cells with Fv/Fm values lower than 0.05 were considered PSII inactive. D50% for each species is indicated in the figure using a horizontal black dashed line. See main text and supplementary materials for details on thermal dose calculation.

To understand the photophysiological heterogeneity among Symbiodiniaceae under temperature stress, we repeatedly measured single-cell Fv/Fm under stepwise increasing temperatures (22‒39 °C, + 1°C every 15 min). This temperature range does not represent an environmentally realistic scenario but was chosen according to known growth conditions for coral symbionts [15] and in order to probe their thermal tolerance in a rapid assay (akin to [8], but using single cells). At cultivation temperature (22 °C), all five species demonstrated average Fv/Fm ranging between 0.38‒0.53; however, under increasing temperatures, these values gradually declined in a lineage-specific manner (Fig. 1d, e). A significant (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) decline in average Fv/Fm started to occur at 28 °C (‘S2’, ‘S3’, and ‘S4’), 31 °C (‘S5’), and 34°C (‘S1’) compared to their respective Fv/Fm obtained at 22 °C (Table S2).

As stepwise increasing temperature exposes cells to aggregate stress, we calculated the cumulative thermal dose [14] (D) with a unit of °Ch via:

$$D = \int_{t_0}^{t_x} (T\left( t \right) - T_0)dt$$

where t0 represents the starting time in hours of the temperature profile, tx represents the investigated time point in hours, T(t) and T0 (°C) represent the temperature at tx and t0, respectively. By plotting the percentage of cells with inactive PSII as a function of D and fitting a dose-response curve (Fig. 1f), we determined the half-maximal effective distress dose (D50%) and the corresponding temperature where D50% occurred. This revealed D50% values of 140 °Ch for Effrenium sp. ‘S1’ (occurring at 37 °C), 126 °Ch, 121 °Ch, and 116 °Ch for Symbiodinium sp. ‘S2’, ‘S3’, and ‘S4’ (at 36 °C, 35 °C, and 35 °C, respectively), and 103 °Ch for Fugacium sp. ‘S5’ (at 33 °C). Single cells of Symbiodiniaceae thus respond differently to cumulative short-term temperature stress and certain species (e.g., Effrenium sp.) appear more temperature resilient than others (e.g., Fugacium sp.). These findings are broadly consistent with earlier studies on coral symbionts, where Fv/Fm typically decreased above 31 °C [16,17,18].

To describe the phenotypic heterogeneity among Symbiodiniaceae single cells under temperature stress, we calculated a measure of photophysiological heterogeneity, H by [19]:

$$H = \frac{{std(F_v/F_m)}}{{\widetilde {F_v/F_m}}}$$

where \(\widetilde {F_v/F_m}\) represents the average Fv/Fm at a specific temperature and \(std\left( {F_v/F_m} \right)\) represents the corresponding standard deviation. All species demonstrated increasing H values under elevated temperatures, but significantly higher H after exceeding the temperature where D50% occurred (Fig. 2a, b). Maximal H values were 2.46 (‘S1’), 16.3 (‘S2’), 8.3 (‘S3’), 12.4 (‘S4’), and 12.8 (‘S5’) (Table S3 for all H values). Applying a thermal dose above D50% thus increases the photophysiological heterogeneity among single cells. Notably, mid-exponentially growing cells exhibited lower H values compared to cells grown at stationary phase (Table S3), which suggests that the single cell heterogeneity also increases with culture age or, alternatively, due to other factors that change with time (e.g., microenvironments). In other microorganisms, single cell heterogeneity occurs due to stochastic gene expression or molecular-level ‘noise’ which increases the probability of specific phenotypes to persist in challenging environments [20]. Similar mechanisms could be in play for coral symbionts and our platform, in combination with single-cell selection [9] and sequencing methods, is uniquely suited to explore the molecular underpinnings of this heterogeneity and to accelerate targeted phenotyping efforts.

Fig. 2: The photophysiological heterogeneity of Symbiodiniaceae single cells under elevated temperatures.
figure 2

a Single cell Fv/Fm values from all investigated Symbiodiniaceae species under stepwise increasing temperatures. Fv/Fm values at a given temperature were obtained by averaging three Fv/Fm measurements performed at each temperature step for each cell (see supplementary materials and methods for details). Solid lines along scatterplots represent the fitting results to a normal distribution. b The phenotypic heterogeneity, H, of individual cells from five Symbiodiniaceae species under stepwise increasing temperatures. See main text and supplementary materials for details on the calculation of H. Inset: enlarged curves displaying H at 22‒31 °C. c Examples of correlations between Fv/Fm before and after temperature exposure for single cells of Effrenium sp. ‘S1’. Here the X-axis represents the Fv/Fm value from each individual cell before temperature exposure (at 22 °C) and the Y-axis represents the Fv/Fm value from the same cell under stepwise increasing temperatures. Note that only data on four temperature conditions (23, 28, 33, and 38 °C) are displayed to increase overall readability of the figure. Linear regression fittings and corresponding R2 values are shown in the legend. d Heatmap of R2 values for single cells of five Symbiodiniaceae species at each temperature. R2 values were obtained from linear regressions of scatterplots between single cell Fv/Fm values at elevated temperatures and Fv/Fm values of the same cell at 22 °C (see c for example correlations). Black stars denote the temperature at which the linearity starts to collapse (i.e., R2 < 0.5).

We explored whether the innate photophysiology of a cell could reflect its ability to resist future temperature stress by plotting the initial Fv/Fm (at 22 °C) of a cell against its Fv/Fm at increasing temperatures and linear regression fitting (Fig. 2c and Fig. S4‒S8). This revealed a linear correlation (R2 > 0.5) at temperatures below 31 °C for all species and a collapse of this linearity (R2 < 0.5) for three out of five species above 31°C (Fig. 2d). This suggests that the initial photophysiology of a cell at 22 °C is useful in predicting its PSII activity at temperatures up to 31 °C. Our inability to predict PSII activity above 31 °C is likely related to the simultaneous increase in phenotypic heterogeneity beyond this temperature. Despite these observed trends we cannot rule out that Symbiodiniaceae cells with low initial Fv/Fm could still exhibit high thermal tolerance. For example, photoacclimation can result in lower Fv/Fm while cells maintain thermal tolerance [17]. Conceivably, non-ideal cultivation temperatures could also have led to the reduction of initial Fv/Fm values among our cultures and so could have microenvironmental gradients within cultivation vessels (e.g., small differences in irradiance or gas transfers due to stratified growth of cells). Despite these potential shortcomings, earlier work corroborated that the application of acute heat stress to corals could resolve fine differences in host thermal tolerance [8]. We therefore speculate that our minimally-invasive method holds potential to provide bottom-up information on the thermal sensitivity of corals but also emphasize that further experimental verification is needed.

In summary, our study (i) uncovered increasing levels of single cell heterogeneity under elevated temperatures and (ii) reliably predicted photophysiological responses of single cells to temperatures below 31 °C. Finally, besides temperature, our approach can also be used to reproduce other environmental features experienced by symbionts in hospite (e.g., pH and nutrients) and thus help elucidate the interplay between temperature stress, chemical microenvironment and acidification on coral symbionts.

References

  1. Pandolfi JM, Connolly SR, Marshall DJ, Cohen AL. Projecting coral reef futures under global warming and ocean acidification. Science. 2011;333:418–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baird AH, Marshall PA. Mortality, growth and reproduction in scleractinian corals following bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002;237:133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis CL, Coffroth MA. The acquisition of exogenous algal symbionts by an octocoral after bleaching. Science. 2004;304:1490–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuda SB, Chakravarti LJ, Cunning R, Huffmyer AS, Nelson CE, Gates RD, et al. Temperature mediated acquisition of rare heterologous symbionts promotes survival of coral larvae under ocean warming. Glob Chang Biol. 2022;28:2006–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thornhill DJ, Howells EJ, Wham DC, Steury TD, Santos SR. Population genetics of reef coral endosymbionts (Symbiodinium, Dinophyceae). Mol Ecol 2017;26:2640–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diaz-Almeyda EM, Prada C, Ohdera AH, Moran H, Civitello DJ, Iglesias-Prieto R, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in thermotolerance and photoacclimation in Symbiodinium dinoflagellates. Proc R Soc B. 2017;284:20171767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Howells EJ, Beltran VH, Larsen NW, Bay LK, Willis BL, van Oppen MJH. Coral thermal tolerance shaped by local adaptation of photosymbionts. Nat Clim Change. 2012;2:116–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Voolstra CR, Buitrago-Lopez C, Perna G, Cardenas A, Hume BCC, Radecker N, et al. Standardized short-term acute heat stress assays resolve historical differences in coral thermotolerance across microhabitat reef sites. Glob Change Biol. 2020;26:4328–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Behrendt L, Salek MM, Trampe EL, Fernandez VI, Lee KS, Kuhl M, et al. Phenochip: a single-cell phenomic platform for high-throughput photophysiological analyses of microalgae. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabb2754.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Torda G, Donelson JM, Aranda M, Barshis DJ, Bay L, Berumen ML, et al. Rapid adaptive responses to climate change in corals. Nat Clim Change. 2017;7:627–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buerger P, Alvarez-Roa C, Coppin CW, Pearce SL, Chakravarti LJ, Oakeshott JG, et al. Heat-evolved microalgal symbionts increase coral bleaching tolerance. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba2498.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kavousi J, Denis V, Sharp V, Reimer JD, Nakamura T, Parkinson JE. Unique combinations of coral host and algal symbiont genotypes reflect intraspecific variation in heat stress responses among colonies of the reef-building coral, Montipora digitata. Mar Biol. 2020;167:23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parkinson JE, Baums IB. The extended phenotypes of marine symbioses: ecological and evolutionary consequences of intraspecific genetic diversity in coral–algal associations. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Andersson M, Johansson S, Bergman H, Xiao L, Behrendt L, Tenje M. A microscopy-compatible temperature regulation system for single-cell phenotype analysis— demonstrated by thermoresponse mapping of microalgae. Lab Chip. 2021;21:1694–705.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hume B, D’Angelo C, Burt J, Baker AC, Riegl B, Wiedenmann J. Corals from the Persian/Arabian Gulf as models for thermotolerant reef-builders: prevalence of clade C3 Symbiodinium, host fluorescence and ex situ temperature tolerance. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;72:313–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karim W, Nakaema S, Hidaka M. Temperature effects on the growth rates and photosynthetic activities of Symbiodinium cells. J Mar Sci Eng. 2015;3:368–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Takahashi S, Yoshioka-Nishimura M, Nanba D, Badger MR. Thermal acclimation of the symbiotic alga Symbiodinium spp. alleviates photobleaching under heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:477–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robison JD, Warner ME. Differential impacts of photoacclimation and thermal stress on the photobiology of four different phylotypes of Symbiodinium (Pyrrhophyta). J Phycol. 2006;42:568–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Calabrese F, Voloshynoyska I, Musat F, Thullner M, Schlomann M, Richnow HH, et al. Quantitation and comparison of phenotypic heterogeneity among single cells of monoclonal microbial populations. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martins BMC, Locke JOW. Microbial individuality: How single-cell heterogeneity enables population level strategies. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;24:104–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MT and SJ acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 757444), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (grant number WAF 2016.0112), and Uppsala University. Microfabrication was performed by the SciLifeLab funded pilot facility Customized Microfluidics using the MyFab-Uppsala cleanroom. LB was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (2019-04401); LB and FB by grants from the Science for Life Laboratory. Open access funding was provided by Uppsala University.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Uppsala University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LB and LX designed the study. LX performed experiments and analyzed the data, with support from SJ and MT who fabricated the heat-stage, SR performed DNA extraction and amplification, FB and MS performed phylogenetic analysis. The manuscript was written by LX and LB with contributions from all coauthors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Behrendt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, L., Johansson, S., Rughöft, S. et al. Photophysiological response of Symbiodiniaceae single cells to temperature stress. ISME J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01243-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01243-6

Search

Quick links