Lake Baikal is the deepest (~1.6 km) and most voluminous freshwater reservoir on Earth. Compared to plankton, its benthos remains poorly explored. Here, we ask whether latitude and/or depth determine benthic microbial community structure and how Baikal communities compare to those of other freshwater, brackish and marine sediments. To answer, we collected sediment upper layers (0–1 cm) across a ~600 km North-South transect covering the three basins of the lake and from littoral to bathybenthic depths (0.5–1450 m). Analysis of 16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicon sequences revealed communities with high richness and evenness where rare operational taxonomic units (OTUs) collectively dominated. Archaea represented up to 25% or prokaryotic sequences. Baikal sediments harbored typically marine eukaryotic and prokaryotic OTUs recently identified in some lakes (diplonemids, Bolidophyceae, Mamiellales, SAR202, marine-like Synechococcus, Pelagibacterales) but also SAR324, Syndiniales and Radiolaria. We hypothesize that, beyond the salinity barrier, adaptation to oligotrophy explains the presence of these otherwise typically marine lineages. Baikal core benthic communities were relatively stable across sites and seemed not determined by depth or latitude. Comparative analyses with other freshwater, brackish and marine prokaryotic sediment communities confirmed the distinctness of Baikal benthos, which include elements of similarity to marine and hydrothermally influenced systems.
Lake Baikal in Southern Siberia is the oldest (~30 Myr), deepest (~1650 m maximum and 750 m and average depth), and largest (by volume, ~23000 km3) freshwater lake on Earth. This unique ecosystem is akin, in several respects, to sea environments . Its surface freezes in winter, which triggers coastal downwelling and deep-water ventilation. Consequently, its water body remains cold (~4 °C), oxygen-rich and ultra-oligotrophic . Deep, cold and associated with a rifting zone, Lake Baikal host methane hydrates . Geographically, the Academician Ridge and the Selenga river delta delimitate three basins: Northern, Central, and Southern . Lake Baikal hosts many endemic metazoan species . Molecular analyses of prokaryotic (e.g., [4,5,6]) and microbial eukaryotic (e.g., [7,8,9]) diversity have been mostly carried out in plankton. Comparatively, benthic microbial communities remain poorly known, with few studies of archaea and bacteria in bottom, often seepage-influenced, sediments  and of sediment-associated eukaryotes . Here, we asked how benthic communities vary spatially along latitudinal and vertical gradients in Lake Baikal and how they compare to those of other freshwater, brackish and marine ecosystems. To answer, we carried out a comparative study of Baikal benthic prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbial communities across a ~600 km latitudinal North-South gradient traversing the three lake basins and from surface (littoral sediment) to the greatest depths (>1400 m) using a culture-independent approach (Fig. 1A; Supplementary Text). We purified DNA from the upper sediment layer (ca. 0–1 cm) and massively sequenced amplicons of 16S (V4-V5 region) and 18S (V4 region) rRNA genes. High-quality reads clustered in 33943 prokaryotic and 3351 eukaryotic SWARM-derived operational taxonomic units (OTUs), which did not reach saturation in accumulation curves (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Text). Computed from rarefied sequence matrices, eukaryotic and, especially, prokaryotic communities exhibited high richness, diversity and evenness scores (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Therefore, Baikal sediments seem to harbor complex communities with no clear dominant species.
Archaea reached up to 25% relative abundance and, on average, 20% of the OTUs (Supplementary Fig. 2). They encompassed diverse phyla, consistent with recent studies of seepage areas , with DPANN (Woesearchaeota and Pacearchaeota, now included in Nanoarchaeota) and TACK (Nitrososphaeria-Thaumarchaeota and, in some samples Bathyarchaeota) being the most abundant, followed by Euryarchaeota (Thermoprofundales/Marine Benthic Group-D and locally Methanofastidiosales/WS2A) (Fig. 1A; Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4; Supplementary Table 3). Free-living Thermoprofundales and Thaumarchaeota might be potential hosts for the parasitic/symbiotic DPANN . Bacteria comprised a wide variety of phyla likely involved in complex N, S and C cycling. PVC members (Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes) and Acidobacteriota were the most relatively abundant, followed by FCB (notably Bacteroidota, Latescibacteria, Gemmatimonadota), Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi and Nitrospinota (Fig. 1A; Supplementary Fig. 5). Proteobacteria (ca. 15%) were little abundant compared to lake or marine surficial sediments, but akin subseafloor sediments . Some biomass-degrading lineages, e.g., Phycisphaerae , Ignavibacteria  or Latescibacteria , suggest the contribution of thermophilic or seepage-associated microbes to Baikal benthic communities, possibly along faulting zones. Benthic protists were dominated by Stramenopiles and Alveolata (Fig. 1A). Alveolates comprised mostly ciliates, dinoflagellates and Syndiniales (Supplementary Table 4). Stramenopiles included heterotrophic lineages (labyrinthulids, amphifilidae, oomycetes, MAST) and ochrophyte algae (chrysophytes, diatoms), which sediment from the water column . Compared to prokaryotes, benthic protists were rare in seeping zones (BK22S), as obtaining amplicons was difficult. The abundance (percentage of reads) and diversity (percentage of OTUs) patterns of rare versus abundant OTUs across phyla were rather similar for eukaryotes and rare prokaryotic OTUs, whereas the diversity of abundant prokaryotic OTUs was remarkably constant across sites (Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7), suggesting a relatively stable core of dominant OTUs.
To see whether the depth and/or the latitude determined benthic microbial community structure, we performed an NMDS analysis based on dissimilarity matrices of OTU frequencies. However, we observed no obvious pattern discriminating samples according to basin or depth (Fig. 1B). Although two samples of intermediate depth (100–800 m) appeared to segregate along axis 1, surface (<100 m) and deep (>800 m) samples appeared mixed. This pattern was almost superimposable to that observed for prokaryotic OTUs, whereas eukaryotic OTUs seemed to segregate better surface from deep samples (Supplementary Fig. 8). PERMANOVA analyses confirmed no significant discrimination of prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities at the OTU level by latitude and only marginal significance for depth (prokaryotes, R2 = 0.23, p = 0.01; eukaryotes, R2 = 0.19, p = 0.07) (Supplementary Table 5). Since this marginal effect of depth might be due to the large collective dominance of rare OTUs (~40% prokaryotic and ~85% eukaryotic OTUs; Fig. 1C, upper-right inset), we also carried out NMDS and PERMANOVA analyses on i) dissimilarity matrices at high-rank taxon, rather than OTU, level, ii) Jaccard distance matrix, iii) Unifrac distance matrix and iv) Null model Raup-Crick index. Again, prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities did not segregate by depth (Supplementary Figs. 9–12). Phyla and depth categories did not significantly correlate for eukaryotes and only marginally for prokaryotes (Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). This situation contrasts with that of stratified plankton communities  and might be due to similar sediment environmental conditions, notably temperature, across lake depths. We detected a core of 44 prokaryotic OTUs shared by all the sediment samples that represented between ~15% and ~40% of prokaryotic abundance (Fig. 1C). Their phylogenetic affiliation fitted the overall prokaryotic phyla distribution, suggesting that, accompanying widely diverse rare OTUs, there is a stable core of benthic prokaryotic communities across basins and depths in Lake Baikal.
At odds with the idea that marine-freshwater transitions rare , we identified 332 OTUs belonging to typical marine taxa across the lake (Fig. 2A; Supplementary Table 7). Several of them belonged to groups already observed in freshwater systems, such as MAST clades, relatively abundant in Baikal, but also rarer diplonemids, Radiolaria (for which we identified several OTUs; Supplementary Fig. 13), Mamiellales, Bolidophyceae and, among bacteria, marine-like Synechococcus, SAR202 Chloroflexi and Pelagibacterales. Some of them were recently observed in Lake Baikal [8, 9, 18]. Others have never been reported in freshwater ecosystems, such as diverse Syndiniales and SAR324 Deltaproteobacteria, metabolically flexible sulfur metabolizers often associated with submarine hydrothermal plumes . To eliminate potential cross-contamination with marine samples during collection, handling or sequencing, we mined for other typical abundant marine taxa in our datasets. We detected neither thraustochytrids nor Prochlorococcus and Alteromonas (Fig. 2A), reinforcing the conclusion that Baikal ‘marine’ OTUs are indeed autochthonous. Our study confirms and extends the presence of several typically marine prokaryotes and eukaryotes at low abundances in Lake Baikal, reinforcing the idea that transition frequency between marine and freshwater habitats is underestimated . This opens questions about the specific molecular adaptations to the very low salinity of Lake Baikal (0.0 PSU) and suggests that oligotrophy and deep waters might be more important drivers than salinity for these lineages.
How do benthic Baikal communities compare to those of other aquatic ecosystems? Does the presence of Baikal marine taxa indicate intermediate ecological features between freshwater and marine environments? To answer, we retrieved 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence data from other freshwater, brackish and marine sediment samples (Supplementary Text; Supplementary Tables 8 and 9). An NMDS plot based on the high-rank taxa dissimilarity matrix showed that Lake Baikal sediment samples clustered away from other samples, albeit closer to freshwater systems (Fig. 2B). PERMANOVA analyses revealed a significant effect of the size and salinity category (R2 = 0.45; p = 10−4) (Supplementary Table 5), partly driven by Acidobacteriota, PVC, Nitrospirota and Chloroflexi (Fig. 2B, C). Therefore, the comparison of communities associated to upper-layer sediment in Lake Baikal and other benthic ecosystems across different depth and salinity ranges set it apart from other freshwater and marine systems.
UNDP-GEF. The ecological atlas of the Baikal basin. United Nations Office for Project Sercives (UNOPS). 2015. p 145. http://baikal.iwlearn.org/en.
Moore MV, Hampton SE, Izmest’eva LR, Silow EA, Peshkova EV, Pavlov BK. Climate change and the world’s “Sacred Sea”—Lake Baikal, Siberia. Bioscience. 2009;59:405–17.
Granin NG, Aslamov IA, Kozlov VV, Makarov MM, Kirillin G, McGinnis DF, et al. Methane hydrate emergence from Lake Baikal: direct observations, modelling, and hydrate footprints in seasonal ice cover. Sci Rep. 2019;9:19361.
Glöckner FO, Zaichikov E, Belkova N, Denissova L, Pernthaler J, Pernthaler A, et al. Comparative 16S rRNA analysis of lake bacterioplankton reveals globally distributed phylogenetic clusters including an abundant group of actinobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:5053–65.
Kurilkina MI, Zakharova YR, Galachyants YP, Petrova DP, Bukin YS, Domysheva VM et al. Bacterial community composition in the water column of the deepest freshwater Lake Baikal as determined by next-generation sequencing. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw094.
Zakharenko AS, Galachyants YP, Morozov IV, Shubenkova OV, Morozov AA, Ivanov VG, et al. Bacterial communities in areas of oil and methane seeps in pelagic of Lake Baikal. Micro Ecol. 2019;78:269–85.
Yi Z, Berney C, Hartikainen H, Mahamdallie S, Gardner M, Boenigk J, et al. High-throughput sequencing of microbial eukaryotes in Lake Baikal reveals ecologically differentiated communities and novel evolutionary radiations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93:10.
David GM, Moreira D, Reboul G, Annenkova NV, Galindo LJ, Bertolino P, et al. Environmental drivers of plankton protist communities along latitudinal and vertical gradients in the oldest and deepest freshwater lake. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:1436–51.
Annenkova NV, Giner CR, Logares R. Tracing the origin of planktonic protists in an ancient lake. Microorganisms. 2020;8:543.
Lomakina AV, Mamaeva EV, Galachyants YP, Petrova DP, Pogodaeva TV, Shubenkova OV, et al. Diversity of archaea in bottom sediments of the discharge areas with oil- and gas-bearing fluids in Lake Baikal. Geomicrobiol J. 2018;35:50–63.
Castelle CJ, Brown CT, Anantharaman K, Probst AJ, Huang RH, Banfield JF. Biosynthetic capacity, metabolic variety and unusual biology in the CPR and DPANN radiations. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:629–45.
Biddle JF, Fitz-Gibbon S, Schuster SC, Brenchley JE, House CH. Metagenomic signatures of the Peru Margin subseafloor biosphere show a genetically distinct environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:10583–1058.
Spring S, Bunk B, Sproer C, Rohde M, Klenk HP. Genome biology of a novel lineage of planctomycetes widespread in anoxic aquatic environments. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:2438–55.
Podosokorskaya OA, Kadnikov VV, Gavrilov SN, Mardanov AV, Merkel AY, Karnachuk OV, et al. Characterization of Melioribacter roseus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel facultatively anaerobic thermophilic cellulolytic bacterium from the class Ignavibacteria, and a proposal of a novel bacterial phylum Ignavibacteriae. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:1759–71.
Dombrowski N, Seitz KW, Teske AP, Baker BJ. Genomic insights into potential interdependencies in microbial hydrocarbon and nutrient cycling in hydrothermal sediments. Microbiome 2017;5:106.
Roberts SL, Swann GEA, McGowan S, Panizzo VN, Vologina EG, Sturm M, et al. Diatom evidence of 20th century ecosystem change in Lake Baikal, Siberia. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0208765.
Mukherjee I, Hodoki Y, Okazaki Y, Fujinaga S, Ohbayashi K, Nakano SI. Widespread dominance of kinetoplastids and unexpected presence of diplonemids in deep freshwater lakes. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2375.
Zemskaya TI, Cabello-Yeves PJ, Pavlova ON, Rodriguez-Valera F. Microorganisms of Lake Baikal—the deepest and most ancient lake on Earth. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:6079–90.
Sheik CS, Jain S, Dick GJ. Metabolic flexibility of enigmatic SAR324 revealed through metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:304–17.
Paver SF, Muratore D, Newton RJ, Coleman ML. Reevaluating the salty divide: phylogenetic specificity of transitions between marine and freshwater systems. mSystems. 2018; 3:e00232–18.
We thank Luis J. Galindo and Anabel Lopez-Archilla for help and discussions during our 2017 limnological cruise, and Philippe Deschamps for technical bioinformatic support. We thank the crew of the R/V G. Titov for their professionalism and efficiency onboard and the director of the Limnological Institute at Irkusk for logistical assistance. This research was funded by the European Research Council Grants ProtistWorld (322669, PL-G) and PlastEvol (787904, DM) as well as the Russian State grant 0345-2016-0009 (NVA).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reboul, G., Moreira, D., Annenkova, N.V. et al. Marine signature taxa and core microbial community stability along latitudinal and vertical gradients in sediments of the deepest freshwater lake. ISME J 15, 3412–3417 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01011-y
This article is cited by
Metagenome-derived virus-microbe ratios across ecosystems
The ISME Journal (2023)