Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Usefulness of podcasts to provide public education on prostate cancer genetics



Podcasts, or episodic digital audio recordings, represent a novel way to reach large audiences for public education. Genetic evaluation has important implications for prostate cancer (PCa) care but is underutilized. We created a series of five podcasts about PCa genetics and tested their usefulness in raising awareness and providing education to lay audiences.


We recruited 157 men and women from the general public and 100 patients with PCa from across the U.S., who listened to a podcast and completed an online survey. The primary outcome was the perceived usefulness of the podcast (score ≥5 on a published 7-point Likert scale). Secondary outcomes were relevance to informational needs, satisfaction and ease of use, as well as genetic knowledge and attitudes toward genetic testing after listening to the podcasts.


The podcasts were associated with high mean scores for perceived usefulness (5.6/7), relevance to informational needs (5.6/7), satisfaction (5.8/7), and ease of use (5.9/7). After listening to the podcasts, 80–100% correctly answered most key knowledge questions about PCa genetics, and 85% had a positive attitude toward genetic testing. On multivariable analysis, the perceived usefulness of the podcasts was higher among Black/Hispanic adults (p = 0.05) and those with a family history of PCa (p = 0.01).


A podcast series on PCa genetics was perceived as useful and associated with high rates of knowledge for patients with PCa and the general public. Podcasts represent a promising new educational tool to raise awareness about PCa genetic evaluation, particularly for high-risk groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Data availability

Data will be available only for health/medical/biomedical research purposes. Interested investigators will be required to submit a formal letter of intent outlining research aims, rationale, and approach. Furthermore, documentation of local IRB approval, including a description of type of review, should be submitted with the data request. A Data Use Agreement must be signed by the Institutions involved before any data are released.


  1. Pew Research Center Journalism & Media. Podcast Listenership. Accessed July, 2019.

  2. Abdous M, Facer BR, Yen CJ. Academic effectiveness of podcasting: a comparative study of integrated versus supplemental use of podcasting in second language classes. Computers Educ. 2012;58:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loeb S, Massey P, Leader AE, Thakker S, Falge E, Taneja S, et al. Gaps in public awareness about BRCA and genetic testing in prostate cancer: social media landscape analysis. JMIR Cancer. 2021;7:e27063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Loeb S, Giri VN. Clinical implications of germline testing in newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Loeb S, Li R, Sanchez Nolasco T, Byrne N, Cheng HH, Becker D, et al. Barriers and facilitators of germline genetic evaluation for prostate cancer. Prostate 2021;81:754–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med. 2004;36:588–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wynia MK, Osborn CY. Health literacy and communication quality in health care organizations. J health Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 2):102–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vordenberg SE, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Characteristics of older adults predict concern about stopping medications. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020;60:773–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meiser B, Cowan R, Costello A, Giles GG, Lindeman GJ, Gaff CL. Prostate cancer screening in men with a family history of prostate cancer: the role of partners in influencing men’s screening uptake. Urology. 2007;70:738–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weise N, Shaya J, Javier-Desloges J, Cheng HH, Madlensky L, McKay RR. Disparities in germline testing among racial minorities with prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022;25:403–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nwosu AC, Monnery D, Reid VL, Chapman L. Use of podcast technology to facilitate education, communication and dissemination in palliative care: the development of the AmiPal podcast. BMJ Supportive Palliat Care. 2017;7:212–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards AL, Shaw PA, Halton CC, Bailey SC, Wolf MS, Andrews EN, et al. “It just makes me feel a little less alone”: a qualitative exploration of the podcast Menopause: Unmuted on women’s perceptions of menopause. Menopause. 2021;28:1374–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubin JM, Greer AB, Patel P, Carrion DM, Paesano N, Kettache RH, et al. Global survey of the roles and attitudes toward social media platforms amongst urology trainees. Urology 2021;147:64–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ovalle F. American Diabetes Association 2019 Conference Podcast With the Editor-in-Chief: What Are the Outcomes from ADA This Year and What Are the Future Developments in Diabetes? Diabetes Ther. 2019;10:1177–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowen ME, Fuller W, Kansagara D. From the editors desk: introducing the JGIM bottom line summary and podcast. J Gen Internal Med. 2019;34:1671–72

Download references


This study is supported by the Department of Defense (W81XWH2010310).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conception and design (SL, VNG), Data acquisition (SL, TSN, NB), Data analysis and interpretation (all), Drafting the manuscript (SL), Critical revision of manuscript (all), Statistical analysis (KS), Supervision (SL, VNG).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stacy Loeb.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

SL declares equity in Gilead, unrelated to the current study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loeb, S., Sanchez Nolasco, T., Siu, K. et al. Usefulness of podcasts to provide public education on prostate cancer genetics. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links