Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Clinical Research
  • Published:

Lifestyle and sociodemographic factors associated with treatment choice of clinically localized prostate cancer in an equal access healthcare system

Abstract

Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors may play a role in determining whether patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PC) are managed with active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), or radiation therapy (RT); however, these relationships have not been well examined. In a cross-sectional study conducted within an equal access healthcare system, multivariable adjusted regression analysis revealed that living with a spouse or partner was associated with a 65% lower chance of being managed by RT (Pā€‰=ā€‰0.001) and 57% lower risk of being managed by AS (Pā€‰=ā€‰0.042) compared with RP. No other sociodemographic or lifestyle factors were independently associated with treatment modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available, within VA rules and policy requirements, upon request.

References

  1. Yap ML, Oā€™Connell DL, Goldsbury DE, Weber MF, Smith DP, Barton MB. Patterns of care for men with prostate cancer: the 45 and Up Study. Med J Aust. 2021;214:271ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Chierigo F, Wenzel M, Wurnschimmel C, Simone Flammia R, Horlemann B, Tian Z, et al. Survival after radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2022;207:375ā€“84.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Antonelli A, Palumbo C, Noale M, Artibani W, Bassi P, Bertoni F, et al. Overview of potential determinants of radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in management of clinically localized prostate cancer: results from an Italian, prospective, observational study (the Pros-IT CNR study). Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72:595ā€“604.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Denberg TD, Beaty BL, Kim FJ, Steiner JF. Marriage and ethnicity predict treatment in localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:1819ā€“25.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Schymura MJ, Kahn AR, German RR, Hsieh MC, Cress RD, Finch JL, et al. Factors associated with initial treatment and survival for clinically localized prostate cancer: results from the CDC-NPCR Patterns of Care Study (PoC1). BMC Cancer. 2010;10:152.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Yan Y, Carvalhal GF, Catalona WJ, Young JD. Primary treatment choices for men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma detected by screening. Cancer. 2000;88:1122ā€“30.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Sayyid RK, Klotz L, Benton JZ, Lodh A, Lambert JH, Woodruff P, et al. Influence of sociodemographic factors on definitive intervention among low-risk active surveillance patients. Urology. 2021;155:117ā€“23.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651ā€“61.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Oā€™Rourke ME. Narrowing the options: the process of deciding on prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Invest. 1999;17:349ā€“59.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Chen ZH, Yang KB, Zhang YZ, Wu CF, Wen DW, Lv JW, et al. Assessment of modifiable factors for the association of marital status with cancer-specific survival. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2111813.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EMA: Conceptualization, writingā€“original draft and writingā€“review and editing. LG: Formal analysis, writingā€“review, and editing. TO: Formal analysis, writingā€“review, and editing. AMDH: Methodology, data collection, writingā€“review, and editing. EW: Methodology, data collection, writingā€“review, and editing. CJG: Writingā€“review, and editing. DJL: Writingā€“review, and editing. TJD: Methodology, writingā€“review, and editing. SJF: Conceptualization, methodology, data collection, supervision, writingā€“review, and editing. ZSZ: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writingā€“original draft, and writingā€“review and editing. IC: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writingā€“original draft, and writingā€“review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric M. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest related to this work. ZSZ was on the external advisory board for the Scripps Proton Therapy Center and has consulted for EMD Serono. ZSZā€™s spouse does legal work for Johnson and Johnson and Allergan through her law firm. All other authors have no disclosures.

Additional information

Publisherā€™s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, E.M., Gu, L., Oyekunle, T. et al. Lifestyle and sociodemographic factors associated with treatment choice of clinically localized prostate cancer in an equal access healthcare system. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 25, 593ā€“595 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00551-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00551-4

Search

Quick links