Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Predictors of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria in the rectal vault of men undergoing prostate biopsy

A Correction to this article was published on 31 January 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Importance

Fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant rectal vault flora is associated with infectious complications in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS-PNB).

Objective

To determine the patient factors that predict FQ-resistant rectal cultures in men who are undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy.

Methods

An IRB approved retrospective review of 6183 consecutive men who had undergone a rectal swab culture in preparation for TRUS-PNB between January 2013 and December 2014 was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the clinical and demographic factors associated with FQ-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the rectal vault.

Results

Of the 6179 rectal swabs analyzed, 4842 (78%) were FQ-sensitive, and 1337 (22%) were FQ-resistant. On univariable analysis, increasing age, prior TRUS-PNB, higher number of biopsy cores obtained, diabetes mellitus, antimicrobial use within the past 6 months and non-Caucasian race were predictors of FQ-resistance (all p < 0.05). Men with FQ-resistant cultures were more likely to have benign pathology on TRUS-PNB (p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, increasing patient age (OR = 1.01/year [1.00–1.02]), use of antimicrobials in the last 6 months (OR = 2.85[2.18–3.72]), African American (OR = 1.99 [1.66–2.37]), Asian (OR = 3.39 [2.63–4.37]), and Hispanic (OR = 2.10 [1.72–2.55]) races were independently associated with FQ-resistant rectal cultures. The overall infectious rate was 1.1% (56/5214) and the sepsis rate was 0.46% (24/5214). The infection rate in the FQ-resistant group was 3.9% (43/1107) compared to FQ-sensitive group 0.3% (13/4107), p < 0.001.

Conclusion

In this cohort, increasing age, recent antimicrobial-use, and non-Caucasian race were independent predictors of FQ-resistance in the rectal vault. As FQ-resistance is associated with infectious complications from transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy, understanding risk factors may assist infection control efforts.

Key points

  • Question: What are the factors that predict fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant rectal cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy?

  • Findings: Increasing age, recent antimicrobial-use, African American, Asian, and Hispanic race were independent predictors of FQ resistance in the rectal vault.

  • Meaning: Older man, antimicrobial usage within 6 months, African American, Asian and Hispanic race were  associated with men with FQ-resistance rectal flora and may benefit from alternative prophylaxis and monitoring strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 31 January 2019

    The original version of this article contained an error in the name of author Alfredo Mena Lora. This has now been corrected.

References

  1. Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C, Klotz LH, et al. Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;189(1 Suppl):S12–17. discussionS17-18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bearden DT, Danziger LH. Mechanism of action of and resistance to quinolones. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21(10 Pt 2):224s–232s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Warren JW, Abrutyn E, Hebel JR, Johnson JR, Schaeffer AJ, Stamm WE. Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:745–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson L, Sabel A, Burman WJ, Everhart RM, Rome M, MacKenzie TD, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in outpatient urinary Escherichia coli isolates. Am J Med. 2008;121:876–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peirano G, Pitout JD. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli sequence type 131 isolates causing bloodstream infections in a canadian region with a centralized laboratory system: rapid emergence of the H30-Rx sublineage. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:2699–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee R, Johnston B, Lohse C, Porter SB, Clabots C, Johnson JR. Escherichia coli sequence type 131 is a dominant, antimicrobial-resistant clonal group associated with healthcare and elderly hosts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:361–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brigmon MM, Bookstaver PB, Kohn J, Albrecht H, Al-Hasan MN. Impact of fluoroquinolone resistance in Gram-negative bloodstream infections on healthcare utilization. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:843–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebbing L, Metlay JP, Bilker WB, Edelstein PH, Fishman NO. Association between fluoroquinolone resistance and mortality in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: the role of inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:923–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM. Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol. 2011;186:1830–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S, Meng MV, Raman JD, Spears V, et al. An update of the American Urological Association white paper on the prevention and treatment of the more common complications related to prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2017;198:329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Papagiannopoulos D, Abern M, Wilson N, O’Block N, Raff L, Coogan C, et al. Predictors of infectious complications after targeted prophylaxis for prostate needle biopsy. J Urol. 2017;199:155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ng CF, Chan SY. Re: The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy--are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis? Feliciano J, Teper E, Ferrandino M, Macchia RJ, Blank W, Grunberger I, et al. J Urol. 2008;179:952–955. J Urol.2008;180:1570–1.author reply 1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts MJ, Williamson DA, Hadway P, Doi SA, Gardiner RA, Paterson DL. Baseline prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and subsequent infection following prostate biopsy using empirical or altered prophylaxis: a bias-adjusted meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43:301–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Papagiannopoulos D, Abern M, Wilson N, O’Block N, Raff L, Coogan C, et al. Predictors of infectious complications after targeted prophylaxis for prostate needle biopsy. J Urol. 2018;199:155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan-Linnell SK, Becnel Boyd L, Steffen D, Zechiedrich L. Mechanisms accounting for fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:235–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karlowsky JA, Hoban DJ, Decorby MR, Laing NM, Zhanel GG. Fluoroquinolone-resistant urinary isolates of Escherichia coli from outpatients are frequently multidrug resistant: results from the North American Urinary Tract Infection Collaborative Alliance-Quinolone Resistance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2251–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Redgrave LS, Sutton SB, Webber MA, Piddock LJV. Fluoroquinolone resistance: mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:438–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Starre WE, van Nieuwkoop C, Paltansing S, van’t Wout JW, Groeneveld GH, Becker MJ, et al. Risk factors for fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in adults with community-onset febrile urinary tract infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:650–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rattanaumpawan P, Tolomeo P, Bilker WB, Fishman NO, Lautenbach E. Risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in Enterococcus urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139:955–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rehman MS, Rashid N, Ashfaq M, Saif A, Ahmad N, Han JI. Global risk of pharmaceutical contamination from highly populated developing countries. Chemosphere. 2015;138:1045–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kookana RS, Williams M, Boxall AB, Larsson DG, Gaw S, Choi K, et al. Potential ecological footprints of active pharmaceutical ingredients: an examination of risk factors in low-, middle- and high-income countries. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369 pii: 20130586. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Boeckel TP, Gandra S, Ashok A, Caudron Q, Grenfell BT, Levin SA. et al. Global antibiotic consumption 2000 to 2010: an analysis of national pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect Dis.2014;14:742–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoeffel EM, Rastogi S, Kim MO, Hasan S, Economics US, Administration et al. The Asian Population: 2010. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau, 2012.

  24. Rohren EM, Etchebehere EC, Araujo JC, Hobbs BP, Swanston NM, Everding M, et al. Determination of skeletal tumor burden on 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1507–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel U, Dasgupta P, Amoroso P, Challacombe B, Pilcher J, Kirby R. Infection after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: increased relative risks after recent international travel or antibiotic use. BJU Int. 2012;109:1781–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rattanaumpawan P, Tolomeo P, Bilker WB, Fishman NO, Lautenbach E. Risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in Gram-negative bacilli causing healthcare-acquired urinary tract infections. J Hosp Infect. 2010;76:324–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lautenbach E, Fishman NO, Bilker WB, et al. Risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in nosocomial escherichia coli and klebsiella pneumoniae infections. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2469–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bozeman CB, Carver BS, Eastham JA, Venable DD. Treatment of chronic prostatitis lowers serum prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 2002;167:1723–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Speakman MJ, Cheng X. Management of the complications of BPH/BOO. Indian J Urol. 2014;30:208–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saraswati S, Sitaraman R. Aging and the human gut microbiota—from correlation to causality. Front. Microbiol. 2015;5.

  31. Magrone T, Jirillo E. The interaction between gut microbiota and age-related changes in immune function and inflammation. Immun Ageing. 2013;10:31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vyas L, Acher P, Kinsella J, Challacombe B, Chang RT, Sturch P, et al. Indications, results and safety profile of transperineal sector biopsies (TPSB) of the prostate: a single centre experience of 634 cases. BJU Int. 2014;114:32–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Phin Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, W., Papagiannopoulos, D., Latchamsetty, K.C. et al. Predictors of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria in the rectal vault of men undergoing prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 22, 268–275 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0092-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0092-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links