Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Research Article
  • Published:

Reassessing acquired neonatal intestinal diseases using unsupervised machine learning

Abstract

Background

Acquired neonatal intestinal diseases have an array of overlapping presentations and are often labeled under the dichotomous classification of necrotizing enterocolitis (which is poorly defined) or spontaneous intestinal perforation, hindering more precise diagnosis and research. The objective of this study was to take a fresh look at neonatal intestinal disease classification using unsupervised machine learning.

Methods

Patients admitted to the University of Florida Shands Neonatal Intensive Care Unit January 2013–September 2019 diagnosed with an intestinal injury, or had imaging findings of portal venous gas, pneumatosis, abdominal free air, or had an abdominal drain placed or exploratory laparotomy during admission were included. Congenital gastroschisis, omphalocele, intestinal atresia, malrotation were excluded. Data was collected via retrospective chart review with subsequent hierarchal, unsupervised clustering analysis.

Results

Five clusters of intestinal injury were identified: Cluster 1 deemed the “Low Mortality” cluster, Cluster 2 deemed the “Mature with Inflammation” cluster, Cluster 3 deemed the “Immature with High Mortality” cluster, Cluster 4 deemed the “Late Injury at Full Feeds” cluster, and Cluster 5 deemed the “Late Injury with High Rate of Intestinal Necrosis” cluster.

Conclusion

Unsupervised machine learning can be used to cluster acquired neonatal intestinal injuries. Future study with larger multicenter datasets is needed to further refine and classify types of intestinal diseases.

Impact

  • Unsupervised machine learning can be used to cluster types of acquired neonatal intestinal injury.

  • Five major clusters of acquired neonatal intestinal injury are described, each with unique features.

  • The clusters herein described deserve future, multicenter study to determine more specific early biomarkers and tailored therapeutic interventions to improve outcomes of often devastating neonatal acquired intestinal injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Heatmap and corresponding hierarchal dendrogram.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated and analyzed during this study is included as a supplement.

References

  1. Mizrahi, A., Barlow, O., Berdon, W., Blanc, W. A. & Silverman, W. A. Necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants. J. Pediatr. 66, 697–706 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lueschow, S. R., Boly, T. J., Jasper, E., Patel, R. M. & McElroy, S. J. A critical evaluation of current definitions of necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr. Res. 91, 590–597 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alda, E. Why so many published studies and so little progress in necrotizing enterocolitis? Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 118, 372–374 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel, R. M., Ferguson, J., McElroy, S. J., Khashu, M. & Caplan, M. S. Defining necrotizing enterocolitis: current difficulties and future opportunities. Pediatr. Res 88, 10–15 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Neu, J., Modi, N. & Caplan, M. Necrotizing enterocolitis comes in different forms: Historical perspectives and defining the disease. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 23, 370–373 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neu, J. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: The future. Neonatology 117, 240–244 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neu, J. Prevention of necrotizing Enterocolitis. Clin. Perinatol. 49, 195–206 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell, M. J. et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann. Surg. 187, 1–7 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Walsh, M. C. & Kliegman, R. M. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 33, 179–201 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagaraj, H. S., Sandhu, A. S., Cook, L. N., Buchino, J. J. & Groff, D. B. Gastrointestinal perforation following indomethacin therapy in very low birth weight infants. J. Pediatr. Surg. 16, 1003–1007 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aschner, J. L., Deluga, K. S., Metlay, L. A., Emmens, R. W. & Hendricks-Munoz, K. D. Spontaneous focal gastrointestinal perforation in very low birth weight infants. J. Pediatr. 113, 364–367 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De La Cruz, D., Lure, A. & Neu, J. Necrotizing Enterocolitis. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 122, 367–378 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moss, R. L. et al. Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation. N. Engl. J. Med 354, 2225–2234 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rees, C. M. et al. Peritoneal drainage or laparotomy for neonatal bowel perforation? A randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 248, 44–51 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blakely, M. L. et al. Initial laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage in extremely low birthweight infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 274, e370–e380 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 2022 Manual of Operations, Part 2, Release 26.1 (PDF) – Help Center. https://vtoxford.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/4405064008467-2022-Manual-of-Operations-Part-2-Release-26-1-PDF -.

  17. CDC, Ncezid & DHQP. CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definitions for Specific Types of Infections. (2022).

  18. Ji, J. et al. A data-driven algorithm integrating clinical and laboratory features for the diagnosis and prognosis of necrotizing enterocolitis. PLoS One 9, e89860 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Battersby, C., Longford, N., Costeloe, K. & Modi, N. Development of a gestational age-specific case definition for neonatal necrotizing Enterocolitis. JAMA Pediatr. 171, 256–263 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gephart, S. M. et al. Changing the paradigm of defining, detecting, and diagnosing NEC: Perspectives on Bell’s stages and biomarkers for NEC. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 27, 3–10 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Caplan, M. S. et al. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Using regulatory science and drug development to improve outcomes. J. Pediatr. 212, 208–215.e1 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noorbakhsh-Sabet, N., Zand, R., Zhang, Y. & Abedi, V. Artificial intelligence transforms the future of health care. Am. J. Med 132, 795–801 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamamoto, R. Application of artificial intelligence for medical research. Biomolecules 11, 90 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. De Francesco, D. et al. Data-driven longitudinal characterization of neonatal health and morbidity. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eadc9854 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Campbell, J. P. et al. Applications of artificial intelligence for retinopathy of prematurity screening. Pediatrics 147, e2020016618 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Matsushita, F. Y., Krebs, V. L. J. & de Carvalho, W. B. Identifying clinical phenotypes in extremely low birth weight infants—an unsupervised machine learning approach. Eur. J. Pediatr. 181, 1085–1097 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lure, A. C. et al. Using machine learning analysis to assist in differentiating between necrotizing enterocolitis and spontaneous intestinal perforation: A novel predictive analytic tool. J. Pediatr. Surg. 56, 1703–1710 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pammi, M., Aghaeepour, N. & Neu, J. Multiomics, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine in perinatology. Pediatr. Res. 2022 1–8 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02181-x.

  29. Lin, Y. C., Salleb-Aouissi, A. & Hooven, T. A. Interpretable prediction of necrotizing enterocolitis from machine learning analysis of premature infant stool microbiota. BMC Bioinforma. 23, 104 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, C. R. Definitions of necrotizing enterocolitis: What are we defining and is machine learning the answer? Pediatr. Res. 91, 488–489 (2021).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jarman, A. Hierarchical cluster analysis: Comparison of single linkage, complete linkage, average linkage and centroid linkage method. (2020).

  32. Espinosa, C. A. et al. Multiomic signals associated with maternal epidemiological factors contributing to preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries. Sci. Adv. 9, eade7692 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jehan, F. et al. Multiomics characterization of preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e2029655 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghaemi, M. S. et al. Multiomics modeling of the immunome, transcriptome, microbiome, proteome and metabolome adaptations during human pregnancy. Bioinformatics 35, 95–103 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kelleher, S. T., McMahon, C. J. & James, A. Necrotizing Enterocolitis in children with congenital heart disease: a literature review. Pediatr. Cardiol. 42, 1688–1699 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pammi, M. et al. Intestinal dysbiosis in preterm infants preceding necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiome 5, 31 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial assistance was received in support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.G., A.L., N.A., and J.N. contributed to conception and design of the study. D.G., A.L., S.M., T.G., and E.S. contributed significantly to the acquisition of data. A.C. and N.A. performed data analysis, used machine learning for hierarchal clustering, and performed statistical analysis. D.G., A.C., N.A., D.S., D.C., and J.N. were involved with drafting, revising, and final approval of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Gipson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr. Aghaeepour is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards of January AI, Parallel Bio, Celine Therapeutics, and WellSim Biomedical Technologies, is a paid consultant for MaraBio Systems, and is Cofounder and the Chief Scientist of Takeoff AI. Dr. Neu serves on the Scientific Advisory Boards of Astarte, Medela, and Arla Foods; serves on the Global Scientific Council for the Nestle Nutrition Institute; serves as a consultant for Glycome and Siolta Therapeutics; and has a research grant through Infant Bacterial Therapeutics. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to be reported.

Consent statement

Patient consent was not required to perform this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gipson, D.R., Chang, A.L., Lure, A.C. et al. Reassessing acquired neonatal intestinal diseases using unsupervised machine learning. Pediatr Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03074-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03074-x

Search

Quick links