Tumor-derived HMGB1 induces CD62Ldim neutrophil polarization and promotes lung metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer

Wang, Zhen; Yang, Chenghui; Li, Lili; Jin, Xiaoyan; Zhang, Zhigang; Zheng, Haiyan; Pan, Jun; Shi, Liyun; Jiang, Zhou; Su, Ke; Li, Baizhou; Shao, Xuan; Qiu, Fuming; Yan, Jun; Huang, Jian

doi:10.1038/s41389-020-00267-x

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 17 September 2020

Tumor-derived HMGB1 induces CD62L^dim neutrophil polarization and promotes lung metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer

Zhen Wang^1,2,3^na1,
Chenghui Yang^1,2,3^na1,
Lili Li^1,2,4,
Xiaoyan Jin^1,5,
Zhigang Zhang^1,6,
Haiyan Zheng³,
Jun Pan^1,2,3,
Liyun Shi⁷,
Zhou Jiang^1,2,3,
Ke Su^1,2,3,
Baizhou Li⁸,
Xuan Shao³,
Fuming Qiu⁴,
Jun Yan⁹ &
…
Jian Huang ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-5007^1,2,3

Oncogenesis volume 9, Article number: 82 (2020) Cite this article

4612 Accesses
41 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly aggressive, difficult to treat and commonly develops visceral metastasis, including lung metastasis. We observed that High mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) was highly expressed in human TNBC and positively correlated with cancer metastasis. The hypoxic tumor environment is known to regulate HMGB1 secretion, but an understanding of the underlying mechanism by which tumor-derived HMGB1 regulates interstitial components and promotes breast cancer lung metastasis has remained elusive. The results of the present study showed that the number of CD62L^dim neutrophils, which have a strong ability to produce neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), increased significantly in both peripheral blood and lung tissues in a mouse TNBC model and were regulated by tumor-derived HMGB1 through the TLR2 pathway. Furthermore, serum HMGB1 levels were positively correlated with CD62L^dim neutrophils in 86 breast cancer patients. We demonstrated that CD62L^dim neutrophils accelerated lung metastasis and that interventions targeting the “HMGB1-CD62L^dim neutrophil-NETs” axis could inhibit lung metastasis. Our results suggest that the combination of HMGB1 and CD62L^dim neutrophils is a potential marker for breast cancer lung metastasis and is novel target for future prevention and therapy.

Lung mesenchymal stromal cells influenced by Th2 cytokines mobilize neutrophils and facilitate metastasis by producing complement C3

Article Open access 27 October 2021

DNA of neutrophil extracellular traps promotes cancer metastasis via CCDC25

Article 11 June 2020

CXCL5 promotes gastric cancer metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition and activating neutrophils

Article Open access 06 July 2020

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Its morbidity ranks first among women, and its mortality rate ranks third¹. The primary cause of death in breast cancer patients is distant organ metastasis. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the worst prognosis of breast cancers and preferentially metastasizes to the lung². However, there is currently no definite marker to predict tumor metastasis.

HMGB1 is a highly conserved nuclear protein that was discovered in the calf thymus and consists of two DNA-binding HMG box domains (N-terminal A and Central B) and an acidic C-terminal tail³. Although there is increasing evidence of the impact of HMGB1 on tumor progression and metastasis, many contradictory findings have been reported. HMGB1 acts as a DNA chaperone in the nucleus and performs DNA repair and telomere stabilization in most cells. Furthermore, HMGB1 has been reported to bind to tumor suppressor genes (such as Rb) to regulate tumorigenesis and to promote genome stability and inhibit tumors by enhancing autophagy and maintaining telomere stability^4,5,6. Interestingly, as a major damage-associated molecular pattern protein (DAMP), HMGB1 is actively released after stimulation or passively released by damaged or dying cells^7,8. Previous studies have confirmed that HMGB1 induces the release of proinflammatory cytokines by activating proinflammatory signaling pathways⁹. At the same time, HMGB1 inhibits the antigen presentation function of dendritic cells and tumor-killing in CD8⁺ T cells, which also promotes the recruitment of M2 macrophages^10,11,12. Most studies have focused on changes in HMGB1 levels in the tumor microenvironment, but its role after leaving the primary site remains unknown³.

Hypoxia is a hallmark of the solid tumor microenvironment, as rapid tumor growth causes a lack of oxygen and the formation of a hypoxic environment in the tumor center. Although the presence of hypoxia in tumors is independent of tumor size, grade, stage, or histological type, hypoxia regulates many pathological processes to promote tumor malignancy and is significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in cancer patients¹³. Studies have shown that hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1α) promotes the release of HMGB1 from cells¹⁴, which then form complexes with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to promote tumor cell proliferation¹⁵.

Neutrophils are the major leukocytes in the human immune system, and their role in tumors has been underestimated due to their short lifespan and clear antibacterial ability. However, in recent years, studies have confirmed that neutrophils have prolonged lives in the presence of tumors¹⁶. Neutrophils play a number of roles in functional remodeling (secreting MMPs, VEGF, IL-6, and other factors) to promote tumor progression¹⁷. Furthermore, neutrophils play a central role in pre-metastatic niche formation and can even reactivate dormant tumor cells to promote tumor recurrence and metastasis^18,19. The heterogeneity of neutrophils has been well shown, with identified cell types such as the tumor-killing N1 neutrophils, tumor-promoting N2 neutrophils, low-density neutrophils (LDNs) and high-density neutrophils (HDNs)^20,21. In addition, some studies have shown that tumor cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia promote neutrophil differentiation into the CD62L^dim phenotype, which exerts immunosuppressive functions²². However, the influence of these processes on the changes and effects on tumor metastases have not yet been reported.

In the present study, we confirmed that hypoxic primary tumors cause tumor cells to secrete HMGB1 and further promote neutrophil polarization to the CD62L^dim phenotype via the TLR2 signaling pathway, thereby promoting the formation of tumor metastases. Furthermore, inhibition of the HMGB1 or TLR2 signaling pathway was shown to slow tumor metastasis.

Results

High expression levels of HMGB1 in TNBC are associated with tumor metastasis

The correlation between HMGB1 and the prognosis of different tumors was observed to be diverse (Fig. S1A), and the role of HMGB1 in breast cancer remains controversial³. According to the GEO database, among all of the patients initially diagnosed with breast cancer, patients with high HMGB1 expression are more likely to have breast cancer metastasis, especially in basal-like breast cancer (Figs. 1a and S1B). Basal-like breast cancer with increased HMGB1 expression exhibits pulmonary metastasis earlier, occurring at an average of 23 months. Further analysis of TCGA and METABRIC databases also revealed that basal-like breast cancer patients show higher levels of HMGB1 expression in primary tumors than non-basal-like breast cancer patients (Figs. 1b and S1C). Furthermore, we selected 80 pathology sections of primary breast cancer and divided them into 5 groups based on the HMGB1 expression intensity in tumor cells (Fig. 1c) and established scoring criteria (Fig. S1D). Consistent with the database results, TNBC expressed increased levels of HMGB1 (Figs. 1d and S1E), and the expression levels of HMGB1 were not correlated with tumor stage or lymph node metastasis (Fig. S1F, G). In addition, we compared breast cancer patients with lung metastasis and without tumor metastasis who underwent radical mastectomy in a span of 10 years. HMGB1 expression in the primary tumors of patients with breast cancer lung metastasis was higher than that observed in patients without tumor metastasis (Fig. 1e). In addition, we tested the serum of 86 patients and observed that the serum HMGB1 level was significantly increased in TNBC patients (Fig. 1f). These results suggest that HMGB1 is closely associated with tumor metastasis in breast cancer, especially in TNBC.

**Fig. 1: The high expression level of HMGB1 in triple-negative breast cancer patients is associated with tumor metastasis.**

Tumor cell-derived HMGB1 is responsible for lung metastasis of breast cancer

To elucidate the role of HMGB1 in breast cancer, we used a 4T1 orthotopic mouse model of TNBC. As a conserved nucleoprotein, HMGB1 is typically expressed in mammalian cells and is widely distributed in various organs (Fig. 2a). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that HMGB1, as a secreted protein, performs functions other than maintaining DNA stability²³. Therefore, HMGB1 secretion levels in various organs were assessed, and the primary tumors exhibited the highest HMGB1 levels (Fig. 2b). HMGB1 expression in primary tumors increased with tumor progression (Fig. S2A, B), and the concentration of HMGB1 in serum also increased over time (Fig. 2c). The composition of primary tumors is complex, and a variety of cells are involved in the secretion of HMGB1³. Both immune cells and tumor cells in primary tumors expressed high levels of HMGB1 (Fig. S2C). However, the primary source of HMGB1 in tumor tissue culture supernatant (TTCS) was tumor cells rather than immune cells (Fig. S2D, E). EMT6 is a tumor cell line with low lung metastatic ability²⁴. Compared to 4T1 cells, EMT6 cells showed reduced HMGB1 expression (Fig. 2d, e). Therefore, we constructed the cell lines 4T1-shHMGB1 and EMT6-HMGB1, which have silenced or overexpressed HMGB1, respectively. The transfection dose did not affect the proliferation of these cell in vitro (Fig. S2F). Mice were orthotopically inoculated with the constructed tumor cells. After 2 weeks, no significant difference was observed between tumor and spleen size (Fig. S2G, H). However, with tumor progression, high HMGB1 expression was observed to promote tumor growth in both the 4T1 and EMT6 tumors (Fig. 2f), and lung metastasis was obvious in the 4T1-Control and EMT6-HMGB1 groups but not the 4T1-shHMGB1 and EMT6-Control groups at 4 weeks (Fig. 2g). The survival time of the 4T1-shHMGB1 group was significantly longer than that of the 4T1-Control group, while the life span of the EMT6-HMGB1 group was shortened (Fig. 2h). To exclude the effect of tumor burden on tumor metastasis, we conducted a study at the early tumor-bearing stage in mice with insignificant tumor differences. The mice in the 4T1-Control and EMT6-HMGB1 groups had high HMGB1 expression in primary tumors and serum (Fig. S2I, L). In the lung tissue of mice, pre-metastatic- associated gene expression was significantly decreased in the 4T1-shHMGB1 and EMT6-Control groups (Fig. S2M), indicating that HMGB1 contributes to pre-metastatic niche formation. To further understand the correlation between the formation of the pre-metastatic niche and tumor metastasis, we established different short-term observation mouse tumor models (Fig. 2i). In the mice that received the non-metastatic breast cancer EMT6-Control-EMT6 group, the imaging results showed that EMT6-luciferase tumor cells (i.v.) returned to the primary tumor site but not lung. Moreover, HMGB1 overexpression in EMT6 cells (in situ) can cause more EMT6-luciferase tumor cells (i.v.) to remain in lung tissue. Compared to the 4T1-Control-EMT6 group, more EMT6-luciferase cells (i.v.) accumulated in the lung than was observed in the 4T1-shHMGB1-EMT6 group. Taken together, these data suggest that HMGB1 secreted by the primary tumor plays an important role in lung pre-metastatic niche formation.

**Fig. 2: HMGB1 derived from tumor cells is responsible for lung metastasis of breast cancer.**

Hypoxia regulates the release of HMGB1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm

As an important DAMP, HMGB1 enters the cytoplasm from the nucleus when cells are subjected to abnormal stimulation²⁵. Oxygen is one of the primary reasons for HMGB1 localization changes, and the local characteristics of tumors include low oxygen and low pH conditions¹⁵. In the hypoxic tumor center, HMGB1 was located in the cytoplasm of tumor cells, whereas in the normoxic tumor edge it was present in the nucleus of tumor cells (Figs. S3A and 3a). HMGB1 entered the cytoplasm of 4T1 cells from the nucleus under hypoxia for 72 h (Fig. 3b). The effect of hypoxia on HMGB1 was not reflected in the changes in transcription or protein levels (Fig. S3B, C) but rather in the translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Fig. 3c). The concentration of HMGB1 in the tumor cell culture supernatant (TCCS) increased gradually with the prolongation of hypoxia (Fig. 3d). Moreover, hypoxia did not cause the death of tumor cells, either 4T1 or EMT6, indicating that HMGB1 is the product of cell secretion rather than cell lysis (Fig. S3D). Compared to the 4T1-shHMGB1 group, the 4T1-Control group showed increased HMGB1 expression under hypoxic conditions, which could be reversed by treatment with antioxidants such as α-lipoic acid and N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) (Fig. 3e). In addition, HMGB1 overexpression could also increase the secretion by EMT6 under hypoxia. Here we show that the release of HMGB1 is controlled by hypoxia.

**Fig. 3: Hypoxia regulates the release of HMGB1 from the nucleus into the cytoplasm.**

Hypoxia-induced release of HMGB1 from primary tumors polarizes neutrophils into CD62L^dim neutrophils

Neutrophils of tumor-bearing mice with different tumor cells were examined. Neutrophils in the 4T1-shHMGB1 groups had significantly reduced bone marrow mobilization, peripheral blood distribution, and lung tissue infiltration than those from the 4T1-Control group, and HMGB1 overexpression promoted these conditions in the EMT6 groups (Figs. 4a and S4A, B). These results were consistent with the previously observed ability of HMGB1 to mobilize neutrophils²⁶. Importantly, the number of CD62L^dim neutrophils was significantly increased in the 4T1-Conrtrol and EMT6-HMGB1 groups compared with that in the 4T1-shHMGB1 and EMT6-Control groups (Figs. 4b and S4C). This result suggests that CD62L^dim neutrophils have an important function in pre-metastatic niche formation and that HMGB1 is crucial for the activation of neutrophils. Furthermore, we observed that recombinant HMGB1 (rHMGB1) can directly induce neutrophil polarization toward the CD62L^dim phenotype (Fig. 4c). The tumor tissue cultured supernatant (TTCS) from the 4T1-Control and EMT6-HMGB1 groups had the strongest ability to induce CD62L^dim neutrophils, while TTCS from the 4T1-shHMGB1 and EMT6-Control groups had comparatively weaker effects (Fig. 4d). In vitro cultured of tumor tissue for 24 h did not lead to tumor cell death (Fig. S4D). Moreover, only the hypoxic TCCS of the 4T1-Control and EMT6-HMGB1 groups effectively induced CD62L^dim neutrophils (Fig. 4e). This effect was inhibited by neutralizing HMGB1 (with glycyrrhizic acid) or inhibiting the release of HMGB1 from the cytoplasm (with ethyl pyruvate) (Fig. 4f). These results suggest that HMGB1 from tumor cells has an important impact on CD62L^dim neutrophils.

**Fig. 4: Hypoxia-released HMGB1 from primary tumor induce neutrophils to CD62L^dim.**

HMGB1 polarizes neutrophils to CD62L^dim neutrophils in breast cancer patients

In the tumor sections of TNBC patients, in the tumor center, HMGB1 was located in the cytoplasm, while in the tumor margin, HMGB1 was located in the nucleus. However, HMGB1 was not detected in peritumoral gland duct cells (Fig. 5a). We assessed the peripheral blood (PB) neutrophil proportion and the paired serum HMGB1 level of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and observed that TNBC patient PB had a higher proportion of CD62L^dim neutrophils than that from Non-TNBC patients (Figs. 5b and S4E). In addition, serum HMGB1 expression levels were positively correlated with the proportion of PB CD62L^dim neutrophils (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, rHMGB1 induced human CD62L^dim neutrophils in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5d). We treated the neutrophils from healthy donors with different patient sera and observed that the TNBC serum of patients had a stronger ability to induce CD62L^dim neutrophil polarization (Fig. 5e). These results further support the hypothesis of a “tumor-secreted HMGB1-CD62L^dim neutrophil” axis in human breast cancer patients.

**Fig. 5: HMGB1 induces neutrophils to CD62L^dim neutrophils in breast cancer patients.**

CD62L^dim neutrophils are induced by HMGB1 via TLR2 to form NETs

The morphology and development of neutrophils are greatly influenced by the activities of Toll-like receptors (TLRs)²⁷. HMGB1 receptors primarily include TLR2, TLR4, and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE)^25,28,29. Elevated TLR2 and TLR4 levels were observed in lung neutrophils from tumor-bearing mice (Figs. 6a and S5A). In addition, CD62L^dim neutrophils expressed higher levels of TLR2 and MyD88 than CD62L^hi neutrophils (Figs. 6b and S5B), but there was no significant difference in TLR4 levels (Fig. S5C). However, FLA-ST (TLR5 agonist) and FSL-1 (TLR2/6 agonist) induced CD62L^dim neutrophils (Fig. 6c), while D-ribose (RAGE agonist) did not affect the expression of CD62L on neutrophils (Fig. S5D). Bacterial flagellin is the only ligand recognized by TLR5³⁰. TLR2 works as a part of TLR1/2 and TLR2/6 complexes³¹, whereas CD62L^dim neutrophils are induced by activation of the TLR2/6 complex. Although the downstream target of TLR2 and TLR4 is MyD88, their effects were not completely consistent. Only o-Vanillin (TLR2 inhibitor) effectively inhibited the induction of CD62L^dim neutrophils by rHMGB1 (Fig. 6d). To further assess the role of TLR2 and TLR4 in CD62L^dim neutrophils, TLR2^−/− and TLR4^−/− transgenic mice were used (Fig. 6e), and the results showed that rHMGB1 did not induce TLR2^−/− neutrophils into CD62L^dim neutrophils (Fig. 6f). NETs formation is an important property of neutrophils, and a growing amount of evidence indicates a role for NETs not only in infections but also in noninfectious inflammatory diseases, including cancer³². CD62L^dim neutrophils exhibited a stronger ability to form NETs than CD62L^hi neutrophils (Fig. 6g). In addition, the FSL-1 and rHMGB1 also induced NETs formation in neutrophils (Fig. S5E), while TLR2^−/− neutrophils could not form effective NETs when induced by rHMGB1 (Fig. S5F). The results suggest that the effect of HMGB1 on CD62L^dim neutrophils may be mediated by TLR2.

**Fig. 6: CD62L^dim neutrophils are induced via TLR2 by HMGB1 to form NETs.**

Lung metastasis in breast cancer is mediated by the “HMGB1-TLR2-CD62L^dim neutrophil-NETs” axis

To assess the ability of CD62L^dim neutrophils to promote tumor metastasis, we also established different long-term observation groups (Fig. S6A). The in situ injection of 4T1 cells significantly increased the growth of EMT6-luciferase cells (i.v.) in the lung (Fig. 7a). Continuous injection of rHMGB1 or CD62L^dim neutrophils also increased the formation of metastasis of EMT6-luciferase (i.v.) in the lung. In addition, we also pretreated mice with rHMGB1 and then inoculated them with 4T1 cells in situ, observing that rHMGB1 also promoted the lung metastasis of tumor cells in advance (Fig. S6B). Furthermore, different interventions were administered to the tumor metastasis model (Fig. 7b), including inhibiting HMGB1 secretion from the cytoplasm, inhibiting the function of the HMG box of HMGB1, inhibiting the activation of TLR2, or clearance of the formed NETs. After 2 weeks of treatment, lung metastasis of the tumor was reduced to different degrees (Fig. 7c, d). Moreover, we tested the PB and lung CD62L^dim neutrophils from the different groups of mice and observed that inhibiting HMGB1 by glycyrrhizic acid or ethyl pyruvate and blocking TLR2 activation by O-Vanillin reduced the proportion of CD62L^dim neutrophils, while DNase I had no effect on the frequency of CD62L^dim neutrophils (Fig. 7e). In vitro immunofluorescence results confirmed that DNase I effectively reduced the formation of NETs (Fig. S6C). Furthermore, we conducted the rescue experiment for the 4T1-shHMGB1 group (Fig. S6D, E). Metastasis was observed at 4 weeks (Fig. 7f, g) and CD62L^dim neutrophils were detected under different interventions (Fig. 7h). These results again indicated that HMGB1 may promote lung metastasis of breast cancer through TLR2-CD62L^dim neutrophils.

**Fig. 7: “HMGB1-TLR2-CD62L^dim neutrophils-NETs” axis is responsible for lung metastasis of breast cancer.**

Discussion

L-Selectin (CD62L) is a type I transmembrane cell adhesion molecule that is expressed on most leukocytes, and numerous studies have shown that L-selectin downstream signaling can affect the movement of neutrophils, such as rolling, adhesion and migration^33,34. Subsequently, CD62L was shown to not only affect the behavior of neutrophils but also regulate their activation³⁵. CD62L^dim neutrophils are thought to be an independent subset due to their unique transcriptional properties in response to acute inflammation³⁶, while another study illustrated their poor antimicrobial activity³⁷. However, scholars in different fields have reported that CD62L^dim neutrophils present as an immunosuppressive subset that promotes disease progression, especially in chronic lymphocytic leukemia^22,38,39. In contrast, the literature suggests that CD62L^dim neutrophils are associated with improved survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)⁴⁰. These results suggest that the role of this subset is not uniform in different backgrounds. The role of CD62L^dim neutrophils in breast cancer, especially metastatic breast cancer, has not been reported. We propose, for the first time, that CD62L^dim neutrophils are significantly increased during the early stage of tumor progression and are regulated by HMGB1 secreted from the primary tumor. Persistent transfusion of CD62L^dim neutrophils promotes metastasis and even lung metastasis of low-metastatic-potential EMT6 tumor cells.

A previous study reported that HMGB1 recruits neutrophils to promote melanoma progression²⁸. We observed that HMGB1 produced by hypoxic tumors induced neutrophils to lose CD62L. Tumor tissues formed by HMGB1 knockdown tumor cells exhibited a reduced proportion of CD62L^dim neutrophils and reduced lung metastasis of tumors, effectively extending the survival period of the mice. We further demonstrated that HMGB1 overexpression partially increased the metastasis capacity of EMT6, and more importantly, significantly increased the number of CD62L^dim neutrophils in the EMT6-HMGB1 group. To further support our findings, data from database and our primary human tumor specimens showed that TNBC patients express higher levels of HMGB1 than non-TNBC patients. Moreover, breast cancer patients with lung metastasis were shown to express higher levels of HMGB1 than 10-year metastasis-free patients. In addition, patient serum HMGB1 had a significant positive correlation with the proportion of PB CD62L^dim neutrophils. Therefore, the induction of CD62L^dim neutrophil production by high levels of HMGB1 may accelerate lung metastasis of TNBC.

HMGB1 promotes CD62L^dim neutrophils to release NETs through the TLR2 signaling pathway. Previous studies have suggested that NETs possess antitumor effects⁴¹. However, recent studies have suggested that NETs promote cancer metastasis^42,43. We demonstrate that CD62L^dim neutrophils have robust NETs formation ability and that clearing NETs by DNase I reduces tumor lung metastasis. Taken together, these findings suggest that CD62L^dim neutrophils accelerate lung metastasis by enhancing NET formation.

The prevention and treatment of cancer metastasis is the ultimate goal of cancer research. It is not wise to remove all neutrophils in vivo due to the important immunosurveillance role of the immune system and the serious consequences of neutropenia. In vivo interventions targeting CD62L^dim neutrophils and their related pathways reduce tumor lung metastasis. In this study, we showed that CD62L^dim neutrophils are a neutrophil subset with clear markers and are a promising intervention target.

In summary, in the present study, we demonstrated that HMGB1 secreted by hypoxic tumor cells induces CD62L^dim neutrophils, thereby promoting lung metastasis via enhanced NETs formation. These findings suggest that CD62L^dim neutrophils and HMGB1 are potential targets to prevent breast cancer lung metastasis. We believe that the expression level of tumor tissue or serum HMGB1 combined with the PB CD62L^dim neutrophil percentage may be a prospective strategy to predict the possibility of tumor metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Human samples

Peripheral blood (PB) and tissue paraffin sections were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine. Clinico-pathological characteristics of patients included in this study were shown in Supplementary Tables 1–3. Blood samples were collected by licensed practical nurses at 6:00 a.m. before any treated intervention. Blood cells from Sodium Heparin Blood Collection Tube (BD vacuum™) were lysed for 15 min (BD Biosciences, #349202) and washed for subsequent flow cytometry analysis. Serum from Rapid Serum Tube (BD Vacutainer®) was obtained after 3000 rpm, 5 min centrifugation, and stored for ELISA test. All patients signed the informed consent, which was approved by the ethics review committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

Data obtain and analysis from database

Survival data of breast cancer and pan-tumor were obtained from Kaplan–Meier plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/). The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer patient cohort data were downloaded from the TCGA website (https://cancergenome.nih.gov), and the METABRIC cohort data was downloaded from the cBioPortal website (https://www.cbioportal.org). 714 cases from TCGA and 1903 cases from METABRIC were enrolled. Data classification and analysis was operated by R software (V4.0.1).

Cell lines

4T1 cell lines were purchased from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology of the Chinese Academy of Science (SIBS, Shanghai, China). EMT6 cell lines were purchased from FuDan IBS Cell Center (FDCC, Shanghai, China). Both cell lines were authenticated by STR profiling. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS (Gibco), 2 mmol/L glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1:100 penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). All of them were incubated in a humidified incubator at 37 °C supplied with 5% CO₂.

To culture in hypoxic condition, tumor cells were plated and put in hypoxic incubator (1% oxygen) after cells attached. Two antioxidants including α-lipoic acid (1 mM, Solarbio, #IL0180) and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (1 mM, Solarbio, #C8460) were added (Fig. 3e).

HMGB1 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and overexpression stable cell lines

4T1 cells were infected with shHMGB1 lentivirus or non-silencing control for 48 h. Stable clones were selected using puromycin (5 μg/mL). The HMGB1 shRNA oligonucleotide sequences were as follows: HMGB1 shRNA1: 5′-CCGGGAAGATGATGATGATGAATAATCTCGAGATTATTCATCATCATCATCTTCTTTTTG-3′. HMGB1 shRNA2: 5′-CCGGTTGGTGCACAGCACAAATTAGCTCGAGCTAATTTGTGCTGTGCACCAATTTTTG-3′. HMGB1 shRNA3: 5′-CCGGATGCAGCTTATAGAAGATAACTCGAGTTATCTTCGTATAAGCTGCATTTTTTG-3′. Non-silencing shRNA (control shRNA) were used as mock-transfected controls. Then HMGB1 expression was verified by real-time-PCR and western blot.

4T1-shHMGB1 and EMT6 cells were infected with lentivirus which overexpressed HMGB1 (NCBI reference sequence ID, NM_001313894.1) or its control for 48 h. Stable clones were selected using Blasticidin S (5 μg/mL).

Mice

Wild-type BALB/c female mice were purchased from Slaccas (Shanghai, China). TLR2^−/− C57BL/10 female mice were kindly gifted from Dr. Deborah A. Quinn (Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School). TLR4^−/− C57BL/6, Wild-type C57BL/6, and C57BL/10 female mice were purchased from Gempharmatech (Nanjing, China).

Genotyping of knockout mice were operated as protocol provided from Dr. Deborah A. Quinn and Gempharmatech. Briefly, mouse toes were ground with liquid nitrogen, and DNA was obtained using Animal Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech, #B518221), and further amplified by PrimerSTAR Max DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa, #R045A). Amplified DNA was then detected by Agarose Gel Electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel (Sigma-Aldrich, #A9539). For TLR2^−/− mice genotyping, primers were used as follows: (Common) 5′-CTTCCTGAATTTGTCCAGTACA-3′; (Mutant, 334 bp) 5’-GGGCCAGCTCATTCCTCCCAC-3’; (Wild Type, 499 bp) 5′-ACGAGCAAGATCAACAGGAGA-3′. For TLR4^−/− mice genotyping, primers were used as follows: TLR4 mutant (140 bp): (Forward) 5′-GCAAGTTTCTATATGCATTCTC-3′, (Reverse) 5’-CCTCCATTTCCAATAGGTAG-3’; TLR4 wild type (390 bp): (Forward) 5’-ATATGCATGATCAACACCACAG-3’, (Reverse) 5′-TTTCCATTGCTGCCCTATAG-3′. Six- to eight-week old age-matched mice were randomly assigned to different groups. BALB/c mice were anesthetized with 0.8% pentobarbital intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection and 100 μl cell suspension (4T1 or EMT6, 1 × 10⁶ cells /mL) were implanted in the right fourth mammary fat pad. All animal procedures are approved by Ethic Review Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

Specimen acquisition and processing

All mice specimens were processed at 9:00 a.m. to prevent the effects of circadian rhythm. Bone marrow (BM) cells from the hind limbs of mice were extracted and filtered. PB was taken from the eyeball and placed in the heparin tube, then lysed for 15 min. The primary tumor and lung tissue were cut into small pieces and digested in medium containing 1 mg/mL collagenase IV (Sigma-Aldrich, #V900893) in 37 °C shaking incubator for 2 h. Cell suspension was then filtered through 40 μm Nylon mesh (BD FALCON, #352340) for subsequent testing or culture in vitro.

Neutrophils magnetic isolation

The separation of mouse neutrophils was performed according to the Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) protocol provided (Mouse Neutrophil Isolation Kit, Miltenyi, #130-097-658). In short, single cells were obtained from PB, BM or lung tissue. 50 μl Neutrophil Biotin-Antibody Cocktail was added as primary antibodies per 200 μl cell suspension (5 × 10⁷ total cells in MACS buffer) and incubate for 15 min in 4 °C. After washing twice, 100 µl Anti-Biotin MicroBeads was added per 400 μl cell suspension. LS column and MidiMACS separator (Miltenyi) were applied for subsequent magnetic sorting.

The separation of human neutrophils was performed according to the procedure provided (EasySep™ Direct Human Neutrophil Isolation Kit, STEMCELL, #19666). Briefly, isolation cocktail (50 μl/mL) and RapidSpheres™ beads (50 μl/mL) was added into whole blood and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Then added isolation buffer up to 10 mL, and placed the tube into the EasySep™ Magnets for 5 min. The enriched cell suspension was collected in a new tube and incubate with RapidSpheres ™ beads for 5 min. A second separation with EASYSEP™ Magnets for 5 min was operated and the enriched cell suspension was collected for subsequent in vitro induction.

Primary tissue culture and supernatant collection

Primary tumor tissue was cut into small piece using sterile ophthalmic scissors. Then samples were put in a 6-well plate with FBS-free RPMI-1640 medium. Culture supernatant was harvested after 24 h and centrifuged at 300 × g, for 5 min. The tumor tissue culture supernatant was used for neutrophils induction in vitro. Tumor samples were further digested in medium containing 1 mg/mL collagenase IV and single cell suspension was obtained for apoptosis detection (AnnexinV-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit, BD Biosciences, #556547).

Primary tumor and metastatic tumor burden calculation

Tumor burden was calculated as long diameter times short diameter for a single tumor, and burden of multiple lung metastases was added together.

Tissue hypoxia detection

To detect primary tumor hypoxia, Hypoxyprobe™ Kit was applied (Hypoxyprobe Inc, #HP1). Hypoxyprobe™-1 (pimonidazole HCl) solution (60 mg/kg) was injected (i.p.) into 2 weeks 4T1-bearing mice and primary tumors were resected 1 h later. The tumor tissues were then fixed and embedded. Tissue sections were obtained and stained with mAb1, then with Alexa 594-conjugated secondary reagent.

Cell surface marker staining and flow cytometry

The isolated single cells from primary tumor, lung, PB or BM were washed with cell staining buffer for twice and then resuspend with 100 μl of cell staining buffer (Biolegend, #420201). Then fluorochrome-conjugated anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for CD45 (Clone 30-F11), CD11b (Clone M1/70), Ly-6G (Clone 1A8), CD62L (Clone MEL-14), TLR2 (Clone T2.5), TLR4 (Clone SA15-21), EpCAM (Clone G8.8), and anti-human mAbs specific for CD45 (Clone HI30), CD11b (Clone ICRF44), CD66b (Clone G10F5), CD62L (Clone DREG-56) were added according to the different experimental requirements. Samples were incubated in dark for 20 min in 4 °C, and washed with cell staining buffer for twice. The mAbs mentioned above were purchased from Biolegend. For flow cytometry analysis, samples were resuspended in 300 μl of cell staining buffer. Data was acquired with a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (V10.0 for Windows). For fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), single cell suspension was sorted with a FACSAria III cell sorter (BD Biosciences). The cell sorting strategy was as follows: 1. CD45-APC/Cy7, CD11b-PE/Cy7, Ly6G-APC, CD62L-PE; 2. EpCAM-PE, CD45-APC/Cy7.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time-PCR

Mouse tissues were ground in ceramic mortar containing liquid nitrogen, and total RNA of tissue samples was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, #15596-018). Cell samples were added directly to TRlzol according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration of purified RNA was tested by NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher). 1 μg total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (TaKaRa, #RR036A), amplified by TB Green Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, #RR420A) and detected by the 7500 Fast Real-Time system (Applied Biosystems). Data were processed using 7500 (V2.3) software (Applied Biosystems). Results were normalized based on housekeeping gene β-actin and then expressed as fold upregulation comparing with control.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction

The nucleoprotein and plasma protein were separated using Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Protein Extraction Kit (Beyotime, #P0027) as the manufacturer’s instructions described. Briefly, for cultured cell, the cells were digested with trypsin and washed with PBS, and then 200 μl Reagent A with 1 mM PMSF were added. High speed vortexing for 5 s and ice bath for 15 min were needed. then 10 μl Reagent B was added and the liquid was vortexed for 5 s in high speed with 1 min ice bath. After vortexing for 5 s and centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 5 min, the supernatant was collected as cytoplasmic protein. The precipitation was further deal with Nuclear protein extraction reagent with PMSF. After vortexing and ice bath in turn for 30 min, liquid was centrifugated at 16,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. the supernatant was collected as nuclear protein.

For tissue extraction, fresh tissues were obtained and put on ice immediately. Then the tissue was weighed and cut into piece. 60 mg tissue with 200 μl Reagent A, 10 μl Reagent B and 1 mM PMSF were mixed and glass tissue homogenizer was applied for further grinding. Homogenate was put on the ice for 15 min and centrifuged 1500 × g, 5 min, 4 °C. The supernatant was collected as tissue cytoplasmic protein for further concentration detection and HMGB1 content detection.

Western blot

Total proteins were harvested from sorted neutrophils or cultured tumor cells or fresh frozen tissues and lysed by pre-cooled lysis buffer with a cocktail of protease and phosphatase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher, #78445). Protein concentrations were measured by a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Thermo Fisher, #23227). The proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad). After blocked by the 5% (w/v) fat-free milk (BD Biosciences, #232100) at room temperature for 1 h, we incubated the membrane with the corresponding primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C followed by the appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. Immunoreactive bands were identified using enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher Pierce, #32109). primary antibody including anti-HMGB1 (1:250, Abcam, #ab79823), anti-β-actin (1:2000, HuaBio, #EM21002), anti-GAPDH (1:2000, HuaBio, #ET1601-4), anti-β-tubulin (1:2000, HuaBio, #EM1602-4), anti-TLR2 (1:1000, Abcam, #ab209217), anti-MyD88 (1:1000, Proteintech, #23230-1-AP), anti-histone H3 (1:2000, HuaBio, #ET1701-64) was applied. Secondary antibodies, including anti-mouse (1:5000, HuaBio, #G1006-1) and anti-rabbit (1:5000, HuaBio, #HA1001) were applied.

Immunocytofluorescence (ICF)

Tumor cells were plated on sterile round glasses in 12 wells and incubated in nomoxia or hypoxia incubator for indicated times (24, 48, and 72 h). For another, sorted neutrophils subsets were seeded on Poly-D-lysine (0.1 mg/mL, Beyotime, #C0312) coated sterile round glasses at 12 wells in complete RPMI-1640 medium for 1–3 h (depending on the adhesion degree via optical microscope). For destroy NETs, DNAseI (Roche, #11284932001, 1000 Unit/mL) were added (Fig. S6C). Then the glass was fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min at room temperature. Cell permeabilization was obtained after 20 min incubation with PBS containing 0.2% TritonX-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, #X100) and blocking by 3% BSA (MP Biomedicals, #0218054990) for 60 min. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies in 4 °C overnight and fluorescent secondary antibody was added then on the cells in 4 °C for 2 h. After washing, DAPI (Invitrogen, #D1306) was added and covered with glass. Samples were analyzed with LSM 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Primary antibodies including HMGB1 (1:250, Abcam, #ab79823), neutrophil elatase (1:200, Abcam, #ab68672), Alpha Tubulin- Alexa Fluor® 488 (1:1000, Abcam, #ab7291) and Sytox Orange Nucleic Acid Stain (Thermo Fisher, #S11368) were applied.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunohistofluorescence (IHF)

Mouse tissues for H&E staining or immunohistochemistry was obtained and covered with 4% PFA for at least 24 h, then embedding by paraffin. Immunohistochemistry was performed using standard protocol (Absin, #abs9211). Briefly, 4–5 μm paraffin sections were deparaffinized through alcohol gradients and rehydrated to water. Antigenic retrieval was performed using Tris-EDTA (pH = 9) buffer in thermostatic bath at 98°for 30 minutes. Antibodies specific to HMGB1 (1:350, Abcam, #ab79823) were used in this study.

The human and mouse tumor tissue sections were reviewed and scored by individual researchers (Z. Wang and C.H. Yang). Slides were scanned using Pannoramic MIDI (3DHISTECH Ltd) and images were captured through Pannoramic Viewer software (3DHISTECH Ltd).

Immunohistochemical staining scoring was semi-quantitatively evaluated by staining location, intensity, and the percentage of positive cells. If HMGB1 stained only in cell nucleus, the score was regarded as 1. The plasma staining intensity was graded as 0 (negative), 2 (weak staining), 3 (moderate staining) or 4 (strong staining). The percentage positivity was graded as 1 (<30%), 2 (30–60%), 3 (>60%). The two grades were added together to yield the immunoreactive score (IRS). Cases with discrepancies in IRS were discussed with other pathologists until consensus was reached. Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining was carried out by two researchers (Z. Wang and C.H. Yang) blinded to the clinicopathological characteristics.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)

HMGB1 concentration was tested in sandwich ELISA. Sample including murine serum, cell culture supernatants were tested by mouse HMGB1 ELISA kit (ArigoBio, #ARG81310) and human serum were tested by human HMGB1 ELISA kit (ArigoBio, #ARG81185). Procedure are operated as the manual protocol provided.

In vitro neutrophil intervention assay

Neutrophils were isolated from naive BALB/c mice BM and human PB. Cells were suspended in complete RPMI-1640 medium and seeded in plate bottom 96 wells (1 × 10⁵ cells/well). The following reagents/additives were used for in vitro neutrophils intervention. (1) concentrated tissue and cell culture supernatant obtained by ultrafiltration tube centrifugation at 3000 × g for 15 min in Fig. 4d, e (Millipore, #UFC900396) (2) TLR agonist including Pam3CSK4 (10 ng/mL, TLR2/TLR1 agonist, InvivoGen, #tlrl-pms), FSL-1(10 ng/mL, TLR2/6 agonist, InvivoGen, #tlrl-fsl), Poly(I:C) (LMW) (100 ng/ml, TLR3 agonist, InvivoGen, #tlrl-picw), MPLA-SM (1 μg/mL, TLR4 agonist, InvivoGen, #tlrl-mpla), FLA-ST (1 μg/mL, TLR5 agonist, InvivoGen, #tlrl-stfla), R848 (1 μg/mL, TLR7/8 agonist, InvivoGen, #tlrl-r848), TLR9 Agonist Kit containing ODN 1585, ODN 1826, ODN 2395 (1 μg/mL, TLR9 agonist, InvivoGen, #tlrl-kit9m) in Fig. 6c; (3) D-Ribose (mixture of isomers, RAGE agonist, MCE, #HY-W018772) in Fig. S5D; (4) O-Vanillin (100 μM, TLR1/2 & TLR2/6 inhibitor, Sigma-Aldrich, #120804) in Fig. 6d; (5) TAK242 (10 µM, TLR4 inhibitor, MCE, #HY-11109) in Fig. 6d; (6) TTP488 (4 nM, RAGE inhibitor, Selleck, #S6415) in Fig. 6d; (7) recombinant murine HMGB1 protein (Biolegend, #764004) in Fig. 4c and recombinant human HMGB1 protein (Biolegend, #557804) in Fig. 5d; (8) HMGB1 inhibitor, including glycyrrhizic acid (200 μM, Sigma-Aldrich, #PHR1516) and ethyl pyruvate (1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, #E47808) were added (Fig. 4f). (9) 20% human serum including healthy donor, TNBC and non-TNBC in Fig. 5e; Neutrophils were harvested 4 h later for flow cytometry analysis or RT-PCR.

In vivo recombinant HMGB1 pre-intervention

In order to evaluate the role of recombinant murine HMGB1 protein (rHMGB1) in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice, we conducted experiments as shown in Fig. S6B. Age-matched BALB/c mice were randomly divided into two groups. After using PBS (Control group) or rHMGB1 (rHMGB1 pretreatment) (125 μg/kg (i.v.) every other day) for one week in advance, the mice were injected with 4T1 cells in situ, and then continued to intervene for 2 weeks. The mice were sacrificed 3 weeks after tumor inoculation, and lung tissues were taken for H&E staining.

Tumor cell metastasis in vivo assay

Short-term observation group (Fig. 2i): to evaluate 4T1 and EMT6 tumor cell form lung metastasis ability, 4T1-Control, 4T1-shHMGB1 and EMT6-Control, EMT6-HMGB1 tumor cell was inoculated in the female BALB/c mice right forth breast pad (1 × 10⁵/100 μl). then luciferase-expressing EMT6 (1 × 10⁶/100 μl) were injected (i.v.) after breast pad inoculation for 2 weeks and in vivo imaging was performed in 2 h.

Long-term observation group: to further evaluate the function of rHMGB1 and CD62L^dim neutrophils in lung metastasis formation, experimental grouping was showed as Figs. 7a and S6B. Briefly, luciferase-expressing EMT6 was injected (i.v.) (1 × 10⁶/100 μl) two weeks after EMT6 or 4T1 orthotopic implant, then rHMGB1 (125 μg/kg) or CD62L^dim neutrophils obtained from 4T1 2-week tumor-bearing mice’s PB (1 × 10⁷ cells/100 μl) were injected (i.v.) every other day for 2 weeks, as PBS was given meanwhile for control. Mice were injected D-luciferin (i.p.) (Promega, #E1601, 100 mg/kg) and suffered gas anesthesia with isoflurane (RWD, #R510-22) then in vivo bioluminescence imaging were operated using IVIS Lumina LT (Perkin Elmer) at 4-week.

In vivo therapeutic intervention

For in vivo imaging, luciferase-expressing 4T1 (1 × 10⁶ cells/100 μl) were injected (i.v.) at 2 weeks after 4T1 tumor breast pad inoculation (1 × 10⁵ cells/100 μl), then interventions were lasted for 2 weeks. The intervention strategy was described in Fig. 7b: glycyrrhizic acid (20 mg/kg), ethyl pyruvate (100 mg/kg), O-vanillin (50 mg/kg) were injected (i.p.) and DNAseI (Destroy NETs, Roche, #11284932001, 2.5 mg/kg) was injected (i.v.) every other day. mice were injected D-luciferin (i.p.) and suffered gas anesthesia with isoflurane then in vivo bioluminescence imaging were operated using IVIS Lumina LT.

For flow cytometry analysis, 4T1 tumor breast pad inoculation and the intervention were started simultaneously. Glycyrrhizic acid (20 mg/kg), Ethyl pyruvate (100 mg/kg), O-Vanillin (50 mg/kg) were injected (i.p.) and DNAseI (2.5 mg/kg) was injected (i.v.) every other day. After 2 weeks, lung tissue and PB were obtained for subsequently flow cytometry analysis.

Rescue assay

Aged matched BALB/c mice were randomly grouped into 4 groups: 1) 4T1-shHMGB1 group, 2) 4T1-shHMGB1 with rHMGB1 intervention group, 3) 4T1-shHMGB1-HMGB1 overexpression (4T1-shH-H) group, 4) 4T1-shH-H with Ethyl pyruvate (EP) intervention group. For in vivo imaging, luciferase-expressing 4T1 (1 × 10⁶ cells/100 μl) were injected (i.v.) at 2 weeks after different tumor cells inoculation (1 × 10⁵ cells/100 μl). Then EP (100 mg/kg) and rHMGB1 (125 μg/kg) were injected (i.v.) every other day. Interventions were lasted for 2 weeks, and the other two groups were given PBS meanwhile for control mice were injected D-luciferin (i.p.) and suffered gas anesthesia with isoflurane then in vivo bioluminescence imaging were operated using IVIS Lumina LT.

For flow cytometry analysis, different tumor breast pad inoculation and the intervention were started simultaneously. After 2 weeks, lung tissue and PB were obtained for subsequently flow cytometry analysis.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism (V6.0) software. Statistical significance (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001) between the means of a minimum of three groups was determined using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, two-way ANOVA. Results are expressed as the mean value ± SD. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

References

Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70, 7–30 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Foulkes, W. D., Smith, I. E. & Reis-Filho, J. S. Triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1938–1948 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kang, R., Zhang, Q., Zeh, H. J. 3rd, Lotze, M. T. & Tang, D. HMGB1 in cancer: good, bad, or both? Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 4046–4057 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jiao, Y., Wang, H. C. & Fan, S. J. Growth suppression and radiosensitivity increase by HMGB1 in breast cancer. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 28, 1957–1967 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Degenhardt, K. et al. Autophagy promotes tumor cell survival and restricts necrosis, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 10, 51–64 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Polanská, E., Dobšáková, Z., Dvořáčková, M., Fajkus, J. & Štros, M. HMGB1 gene knockout in mouse embryonic fibroblasts results in reduced telomerase activity and telomere dysfunction. Chromosoma 121, 419–431 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jube, S. et al. Cancer cell secretion of the DAMP protein HMGB1 supports progression in malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Res. 72, 3290–3301 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qin, S. et al. Role of HMGB1 in apoptosis-mediated sepsis lethality. J. Exp. Med. 203, 1637–1642 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mittal, D. et al. TLR4-mediated skin carcinogenesis is dependent on immune and radioresistant cells. EMBO J. 29, 2242–2252 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kusume, A. et al. Suppression of dendritic cells by HMGB1 is associated with lymph node metastasis of human colon cancer. Pathobiology 76, 155–162 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Falo, L. D. Jr. & You, Z. Knockdown of HMGB1 in tumor cells attenuates their ability to induce regulatory T cells and uncovers naturally acquired CD8 T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. J. Immunol. 187, 118–125 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
He, Y. et al. Tissue damage-associated “danger signals” influence T-cell responses that promote the progression of preneoplasia to cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 629–639 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moulder, J. E. & Rockwell, S. Hypoxic fractions of solid tumors: experimental techniques, methods of analysis, and a survey of existing data. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 10, 695–712 (1984).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jiang, J. et al. Hypoxia-induced HMGB1 expression of HCC promotes tumor invasiveness and metastasis via regulating macrophage-derived IL-6. Exp. cell Res. 367, 81–88 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Hypoxia induced HMGB1 and mitochondrial DNA interactions mediate tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma through Toll-like receptor 9. J. Hepatol. 63, 114–121 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nicolás-Ávila, J., Adrover, J. M. & Hidalgo, A. Neutrophils in homeostasis, immunity, and cancer. Immunity 46, 15–28 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Coffelt, S. B., Wellenstein, M. D. & de Visser, K. E. Neutrophils in cancer: neutral no more. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 431–446 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Tumor exosomal RNAs Promote lung pre-metastatic niche formation by activating alveolar epithelial TLR3 to recruit neutrophils. Cancer cell 30, 243–256 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Albrengues, J. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps produced during inflammation awaken dormant cancer cells in mice. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4227 (2018).
Fridlender, Z. G. et al. Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: “N1” versus “N2” TAN. Cancer Cell 16, 183–194 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sagiv, J. Y. et al. Phenotypic diversity and plasticity in circulating neutrophil subpopulations in cancer. Cell Rep. 10, 562–573 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Podaza, E. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells increase neutrophils survival and promote their differentiation into CD16(high) CD62L(dim) immunosuppressive subset. Int. J. Cancer 144, 1128–1134 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kang, R. et al. Intracellular HMGB1 as a novel tumor suppressor of pancreatic cancer. Cell Res. 27, 916–932 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ouzounova, M. et al. Monocytic and granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells differentially regulate spatiotemporal tumour plasticity during metastatic cascade. Nat. Commun. 8, 14979 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He, S. et al. HMGB1 released by irradiated tumor cells promotes living tumor cell proliferation via paracrine effect. Cell Death Dis. 9, 648 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Watts, E. R. & Walmsley, S. R. Getting DAMP(s) wets the whistle for neutrophil recruitment. Immunity 48, 846–848 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hayashi, F., Means, T. K. & Luster, A. D. Toll-like receptors stimulate human neutrophil function. Blood 102, 2660–2669 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bald, T. et al. Ultraviolet-radiation-induced inflammation promotes angiotropism and metastasis in melanoma. Nature 507, 109–113 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Curtin, J. F. et al. HMGB1 mediates endogenous TLR2 activation and brain tumor regression. PLoS Med. 6, e10 (2009).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Yoon, S. I. et al. Structural basis of TLR5-flagellin recognition and signaling. Science 335, 859–864 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, A. & Salgame, P. Toll-like receptor 2 in host defense against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: to be or not to be-that is the question. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 42, 76–82 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jorch, S. K. & Kubes, P. An emerging role for neutrophil extracellular traps in noninfectious disease. Nat. Med. 23, 279–287 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Walcheck, B., Moore, K. L., McEver, R. P. & Kishimoto, T. K. Neutrophil-neutrophil interactions under hydrodynamic shear stress involve L-selectin and PSGL-1. A mechanism that amplifies initial leukocyte accumulation of P-selectin in vitro. J. Clin. Investig. 98, 1081–1087 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ivetic, A. A head-to-tail view of L-selectin and its impact on neutrophil behaviour. Cell Tissue Res. 371, 437–453 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. L-selectin mechanochemistry restricts neutrophil priming in vivo. Nat. Commun. 8, 15196 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tak, T. et al. Human CD62L(dim) neutrophils identified as a separate subset by proteome profiling and in vivo pulse-chase labeling. Blood 129, 3476–3485 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leliefeld, P. H. C. et al. Differential antibacterial control by neutrophil subsets. Blood Adv. 2, 1344–1355 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Silva, L. M., Brenchley, L. & Moutsopoulos, N. M. Primary immunodeficiencies reveal the essential role of tissue neutrophils in periodontitis. Immunological Rev. 287, 226–235 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sauce, D. et al. Reduced oxidative burst by primed neutrophils in the elderly individuals is associated with increased levels of the CD16bright/CD62Ldim immunosuppressive subset. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72, 163–172 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Millrud, C. R. et al. NET-producing CD16(high) CD62L(dim) neutrophils migrate to tumor sites and predict improved survival in patients with HNSCC. Int. J. Cancer 140, 2557–2567 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Arelaki, S. et al. Gradient infiltration of neutrophil extracellular traps in colon cancer and evidence for their involvement in tumour growth. PLoS ONE 11, e0154484 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lee, W. et al. Neutrophils facilitate ovarian cancer premetastatic niche formation in the omentum. J. Exp. Med. 216, 176–194 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van der Windt, D. J. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote inflammation and development of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 68, 1347–1360 (2018).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The protocols for human and mice cell and tissue use were approved by the Ethics Committee of Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872317 to J.H., 81520108024 to J.H., 81902981 to Z.W., 81672802 to F.Q.) and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ17H160004, F.Q.).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Zhen Wang, Chenghui Yang

Authors and Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Therapy of Zhejiang Province, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Zhen Wang, Chenghui Yang, Lili Li, Xiaoyan Jin, Zhigang Zhang, Jun Pan, Zhou Jiang, Ke Su & Jian Huang
Cancer Institute, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Zhen Wang, Chenghui Yang, Lili Li, Jun Pan, Zhou Jiang, Ke Su & Jian Huang
Department of Breast Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Zhen Wang, Chenghui Yang, Haiyan Zheng, Jun Pan, Zhou Jiang, Ke Su, Xuan Shao & Jian Huang
Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Lili Li & Fuming Qiu
Department of Surgical Oncology, Zhejiang Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, 318008, China
Xiaoyan Jin
Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Zhigang Zhang
Department of Immunology and Medical Microbiology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
Liyun Shi
Department of Pathology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Baizhou Li
Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA
Jun Yan

Authors

Zhen Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chenghui Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lili Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaoyan Jin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhigang Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Haiyan Zheng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jun Pan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Liyun Shi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou Jiang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ke Su
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Baizhou Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xuan Shao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fuming Qiu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jun Yan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jian Huang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization (Z.W., C.Y., and J.H.); Methodology (Z.W. and C.Y.); Software (C.Y. and L.L.); Validation (C.Y. and L.L.); Formal analysis (Z.W. and C.Y.); Investigation (Z.W., C.Y., J.H., J.Y. and L.L.); Resources (X.J., H.Z., Z.Z. and L.S.); Data curation (J.P. and Z.J.); Writing-original draft (Z.W. and C.Y.); Writing-review and editing (Z.W., C.Y., L.L., J.H., and K.S.); Visualization (Z.W., C.Y., B.L., and X.S.); Supervision (F.Q. and J.Y.); Project administration (J.Y. and J.H.); Funding acquisition (Z.W., F.Q., J.Y., and J.H.).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure and Table Legends

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 2

Supplementary Figure 3

Supplementary Figure 4

Supplementary Figure 5

Supplementary Figure 6

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Table 2

Supplementary Table 3

Authorship sign

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Yang, C., Li, L. et al. Tumor-derived HMGB1 induces CD62L^dim neutrophil polarization and promotes lung metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogenesis 9, 82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-020-00267-x

Download citation

Received: 03 April 2020
Revised: 23 August 2020
Accepted: 02 September 2020
Published: 17 September 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-020-00267-x

This article is cited by

Drug repositioning for immunotherapy in breast cancer using single-cell analysis
- Elyas Mohammadi
- Samira Dashti
- Mohammad Hadi Sekhavati
npj Systems Biology and Applications (2024)
Identification and validation of Golgi apparatus-related signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in breast cancer
- Xin Chen
- Pengting Tang
- Kejun Tang
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (2024)
Circulating neutrophils from patients with early breast cancer have distinct subtype-dependent phenotypes
- Anisha Ramessur
- Bana Ambasager
- Ilaria Malanchi
Breast Cancer Research (2023)
Neutrophils in triple-negative breast cancer: an underestimated player with increasingly recognized importance
- Chanjuan Zheng
- Xi Xu
- Xiyun Deng
Breast Cancer Research (2023)
Chronic pulmonary bacterial infection facilitates breast cancer lung metastasis by recruiting tumor-promoting MHCIIhi neutrophils
- Teng Ma
- Yu Tang
- Xikun Zhou
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2023)