Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Liver x receptor alpha drives chemoresistance in response to side-chain hydroxycholesterols in triple negative breast cancer


Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is challenging to treat successfully because targeted therapies do not exist. Instead, systemic therapy is typically restricted to cytotoxic chemotherapy, which fails more often in patients with elevated circulating cholesterol. Liver x receptors are ligand-dependent transcription factors that are homeostatic regulators of cholesterol, and are linked to regulation of broad-affinity xenobiotic transporter activity in non-tumor tissues. We show that LXR ligands confer chemotherapy resistance in TNBC cell lines and xenografts, and that LXRalpha is necessary and sufficient to mediate this resistance. Furthermore, in TNBC patients who had cancer recurrences, LXRalpha and ligands were independent markers of poor prognosis and correlated with P-glycoprotein expression. However, in patients who survived their disease, LXRalpha signaling and P-glycoprotein were decoupled. These data reveal a novel chemotherapy resistance mechanism in this poor prognosis subtype of breast cancer. We conclude that systemic chemotherapy failure in some TNBC patients is caused by co-opting the LXRalpha:P-glycoprotein axis, a pathway highly targetable by therapies that are already used for prevention and treatment of other diseases.


Breast cancer (BCa) prognosis depends on tumor and host parameters. Breast tumors that don’t express the estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and Her2 receptors (ER-/PR-/Her2-), termed triple negative (TNBC), are challenging to treat successfully because therapies such as Tamoxifen and Herceptin that target ER and Her2 signaling, respectively, are not effective. Typically, TNBC patients undergo surgical resection of primary tumor and lymph nodes, radiotherapy, and systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can be given either before (neoadjuvant [NACT]) or after (adjuvant [ACT]) surgery.

NACT is increasingly common to downstage the tumor to allow breast conserving surgery to be performed [1]. A clinically measurable surrogate marker of likely outcome following NACT is pathological complete response (pCR) to treatment [2]. If pCR is observed after NACT then prognosis is generally very good and invasive surgery is minimized. If pCR is not observed then treatment and can be adapted, but prognosis is worse and patients are likely to have been better placed on alternative treatments, such as long term adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection [2]. If TNBC patients are going to relapse with their disease, they typically do so within 2–3 years [3], highlighting a substantial subset of patients in whom systemic therapy has failed and who now have a few remaining treatment options. Maximizing response to chemotherapy is a critical clinical need, yet the mechanisms responsible for resistance remain poorly understood [4].

Circulating cholesterol levels appear to be inversely linked to survival of BCa patients, and are extensively modifiable by diet, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions. Survival is worse for BCa patients who present with high LDL-cholesterol [5], but is improved with dietary [6,7,8] or pharmaceutical [9] regimens that are associated with normalized LDL-C. A clinical trial that promoted dietary methods to reduce LDL-cholesterol was found to reduce breast cancer recurrence rates [10]. Robust mechanistic evidence explaining these links remains sparse, thus the guidance that can be offered to different patient groups with respect to the potential benefits of reducing LDL-cholesterol remains limited [11]. Cholesterol is the precursor for an array of compounds including hormones, seco-steroids, and bile acids. During the synthesis of these compounds, a diverse array of oxysterol intermediates are produced that are potent signaling molecules in their own right. Hydroxylation of the cholesterol side chain produces side-chain hydroxycholesterols (scOHC), such as 24-hydroxycholesterol (24OHC), 26-hydroxycholesterol (26OHC/27OHC), epoxycholesterols (e.g. 24,25-epoxycholesterol), and oxysterol conjugation can produce a wider variety of signaling molecules such as dendrogenin A. Oxysterols are continually detected by the liver x receptor alpha (LXRα) and liver x receptor beta (LXRβ) transcription factors [12], allowing for homeostatic control of end product synthesis and simultaneously inhibiting potentially harmful build-up of oxysterol intermediates [13] or of cholesterol itself [14]. Selective modulation of LXRα and LXRβ by oxysterols leads to divergent effects in cancer pathophysiology. For example, the oxysterol-histamine conjugate dendrogenin A preferentially activates LXRβ, induces lethal autophagy [15] and differentiation of breast cancer cells [16]. Contrary to this, in TNBC scOHCs promote metastatic colonization [17] and epithelial mesenchymal transition, and in ER-positive breast cancers, scOHCs both reduce endocrine therapy efficacy [18] and are circulating biomarkers of recurrence [19].

Interestingly, there is evidence that LXRα and scOHCs may also play a role in chemotherapy resistance. LXRα maintains integrity of the blood brain barrier [20] via upregulation of the multi-drug resistance pump, P-glycoprotein, in response to oxysterols [21] and synthetic LXR ligands [22]. The ATP-Binding Cassette B1 (ABCB1)/P-glycoprotein (Pgp) is a highly promiscuous xenobiotic efflux transporter with substrate diversity that includes cholesterol [23] and an array of chemotherapy agents typically given to TNBC patients. LXR and Pgp therefore potentially link oxysterol signaling to chemotherapy efficacy. We previously demonstrated that ER-negative breast cancer was highly responsive to LXRα signaling compared to other breast cancer types [24] suggesting retention of the scOHC:LXR axis provided a survival advantage to TNBC tumors that persisted despite the anti-proliferative actions LXR confers. Here, we have explored the hypothesis that failure of systemic chemotherapy could be attributed to a cholesterol rich tumor environment, where aberrant activation of the scOHC:LXR:Pgp signaling axis is co-opted to confer resistance to common chemotherapy drugs.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and cell lines

Cell lines were originally obtained from ATCC. All cells were routinely maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Thermo Fisher, Cat: 31966047) supplemented with 10% FCS (Thermo Fisher, UK, Cat: 11560636). Cell lines were confirmed mycoplasma free at 6-monthly intervals, and cell line identities were authenticated at the start of the project.

Drugs and reagents

All stocks were stored at −20 °C. scOHCs were from Avanti (Alabama, US) and stored as 10 mM stocks in nitrogen flushed ethanol: 24OHC (#700061), 25OHC (#700019), 26OHC (#700021). Epirubicin (Cayman, UK Cat:12091) was stored at 10 mM in nuclease free water and protected from light. GSK2033 (ToCris, Abindon, UK – #5694) at 20 mM diluted in ETOH. ABC inhibitors: MK-571 (Cambridge Bioscience – Cat: 10029–1mg-CAY) and KO143 (Sigma – Cat: K2144–1mg) were diluted in DMSO, while Verapamil (Insight Biotechnology – Cat: sc-3590) was diluted in NFW; all at 10 mM. TaqMan assays (Thermo Fisher, Paisley, #4331182): LXRα [Hs00172885_m1] LXRβ [Hs01027215_g1], Pgp [Hs00184500_m1], ABCA1 [Hs01059137_m1], HPRT1 [Hs02800695_m1]. Origine trisilencer complexes (Maryland, US): LXRα #SR322981, LXRβ #SR305039). Antibodies: Pgp (Santa Cruz Biotech, CA, US - #sc73354), CYP27A1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK - #ab126785), CYP46A1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK - #ab198889), CH25H (Bioss, MA, US - #bs6480R), LXRα (R&D System, Minneapolis, US - #PP-PPZ0412-00), LXRβ (Active Motif, Carslbad, US - #61177). Antibody validation is described in detail in Supplementary Information.

Analysis of gene expression

Analysis of gene expression was performed as described previously [24]. Briefly, mRNA was extracted using Reliaprep Minipreps for cell cultures (Promega, UK, #Z6012) and RNA Tissue Miniprep System (Promega, UK, #Z6112) for tumor samples. GoScriptTM (Promega, UK, #A5003) was used for the cDNA synthesis. Taqman Fast Advanced Mastermix (Thermo Fisher, Paisley, #4444557) was mixed with Taqman assays and analysed in a 384 well QuantStudio Flex 7 (Applied Biosystems Life Tech, Thermo Scientific) in 5 μl reaction volumes. siRNA (30 nM) were transfected with RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher, #13778030) according to manufacturer’s instructions with following adaption. Cells were incubated for 22 h with reagent/siRNA mixture and then media was exchanged. After a further 14 h RNA was extracted. All experiments were conducted in technical triplicate and are presented as mean ± SEM of three or more independent replicates.

Cell viability assays


MTT were performed as previously described [24]. Briefly, 2 × 104 cells were seeded in 96 well plates and incubated overnight. For the combination treatment with EPI, cells were pre-treated with LXR synthetic ligands (0.1, 0.25, or 1 μM), or scOHC (1, 2.5, or 10 μM) for 24 h. After 24 h treatment, EPI was added and incubated for the next 48 h. Cells were washed with 100 μL PBS/well. 90 μL phenol red free DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was added to each well and followed with the addition of 10 μL of diluted MTT reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, UK, Cat: M2128; final concentration 0.5 mg/mL) to each well. After 4 h incubation at 37 °C, media was carefully removed and replaced with 100 μL of DMSO/well. The absorbance was read using a CLARIOstar plate reader (BMG LABTECH, Germany) at 540 nm. All experiments were conducted with six technical replicates and are presented as mean ± SEM of three or more independent replicates.

Colony forming assay

Colony forming assays (CFA) were performed as previously described [25]. Briefly, cells were suspended to 1 × 106 cells/mL, 250 μL/well of cell suspension was plated into 6-well plates and topped up to 2 mL with DMEM-10%. Cells were incubated overnight and then treated with GW3965, GSK2033, scOHC, or vehicle control (VC) (ETOH/DMSO/N2F ETOH) for 24 h. Epirubicin (25 nM) or VC (nuclease free water) was added for a further 24 h. Cells were then counted and 500 cells per treatment were plated in triplicate in six well plates (Nunc, Thermo Fisher, UK, Cat: 10119831) and incubated for 12 days. Colonies were washed with PBS and stained with a 0.1% crystal violet staining solution was this in 50% methanol, 30% ethanol, and 20% ddH20 (Sigma, UK, Cat: V5265-250 ML). Colonies were left to air dry overnight then counted. All experiments were conducted in technical triplicate and are presented as mean ± SEM of three or more independent replicates.

Chemotherapy efflux assay

Cells were plated (50,000 cells/well) in clear bottom black walled tissue culture 96 well plates (Greiner Bio-One, UK, Cat: 655986) and pre-treated with either VC (ETOH) or LXR ligands (GSK2033, GW3965 at 1 µM, 24OHC, 26OHC, 10 µM) for 16 h before exposure to 50 µM epirubicin for 1 h. Cells were gently washed with PBS twice taking care not to disrupt/detach cells and fresh PBS (100 µL) was placed in the wells and fluorescence was measured using a TECAN plate reader at 485 nm excitation and 590 nm emission. Cells were then placed in the incubator with fresh growth media in the wells and wash steps and fluorescence read at 15 min intervals for 2 h. Data for treated wells were normalised to vehicle controls. For pump inhibitor treatment, drugs were administered to the cells 30 min before epirubicin loading (verapamil − 20 µM, MK571–50 µM, and KO143–15 µM). All experiments were conducted in technical triplicate and are presented as mean ± SEM of three or more independent replicates.

In vivo model

All protocols involving mice were approved by the Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Illinois. Health related concerns were established as exclusion criteria, but as no mice displayed these symptoms, all mice were included for analysis. Mouse 4T1 BCa cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% calf serum. 1 × 106 cells in a 1:1 ratio of PBS:matrigel were grafted orthotopic into the axial mammary fat pad of BALB/c mice at ~11 weeks of age. After engraftment with 4T1 cells, mice were randomized onto treatment. Mice were split into four groups (ten mice per group was considered an appropriate number based on previous work) of placebo, GW3965, epirubicin, or GW3965 and epirubicin combined. Daily treatment with GW3965 (30 mg/kg) or placebo started 1 day post-graft. Treatment with epirubicin started 2 days post-graft and was administered every other day at 2.5 mg/kg. Subsequent tumor growth was determined by direct caliper measurement. At the end of the experiment, mice were humanely euthanized, and tumors were dissected and weighed. Personnel measuring tumor volumes were blinded to treatments groups. Quantification of mRNA was carried out as described previously [26]. Relative expression was determined via the 2-ΔΔCT method and normalized to housekeeping gene (TBP).

Human samples: ethical approval, collection, and processing

A total of 47 fresh/frozen tumor samples for LC-MS/MS and gene expression analysis were obtained with ethical approval from the Leeds Breast Research Tissue Bank (15/HY/0025). Selection criteria were all available ER-negative tumors with >3 yr follow-up with fresh-frozen tumor material available. Supplementary Table 1 summarizes the clinic-pathological features of the “fresh/frozen” cohort. For the tissue micro-array (TMA) 148 tumor samples were obtained with ethical approval from Leeds (East) REC (06/Q1206/180, 09/H1306/108) with informed patient consent. The patient cohort consisted of triple negative/ basal tumors as determined through immunohistochemistry. Further selection criteria were that selected tumors had not undergone neoadjuvant therapy, contained sufficient tumor stroma, had low levels of inflammatory cells or necrotic material, and whether normal tissue was available from archival resection blocks (n = 148). Suitable tumor areas were identified through haematoxylin/eosin stain and 0.6 mm cores of tumor tissue removed in triplicate and deposited into recipient wax block. Supplementary Table 1 summarizes the clinic-pathological features of the TMA cohort.


Analysis of colony forming assays was performed using paired t tests for comparisons between epirubicin treated cells with and without pre-treatment with LXR ligands, or one-way ANOVA after correction for multiple testing when comparing all treatments at once. Analysis of gene and protein correlations were assessed using Spearman’s correlation with linear regression. Significance in gene expression analyses of genes implicated in chemotherapy resistance pre- and post-gene silencing and inhibitor loading was assessed using 2-way ANOVA. The half-life of intra-cellular epirubicin signal was determined using dissociation one phase exponential decay and the expression of Pgp in patient tumors that had suffered an event compared with those who had not was assessed using Mann–Whitney U tests. Patient survival was assessed using log rank tests and in vivo mouse experiments were assessed using one-way ANOVA and corrected for multiple comparisons.

Supplementary methods are available in the Supplementary information file where antibody validation (Supplementary Fig. S1), immunohistochemistry (Supplementary Fig. S2), and LC-MS/MS (Supplementary Fig. S3) are described.


LXR ligands influence epirubicin response in TNBC cells in vitro

To establish if the scOHC-LXR axis influences TNBC chemotherapy response, in vitro assays were used to test how combinations of epirubicin and LXR ligands altered tumor cell survival and growth. MTT assays were used as a readout of cellular health. LXR agonist treatment generally impaired epirubicin cytotoxicity, while antagonism of LXR enhanced efficacy. Apply the LXR synthetic agonist GW3965 increased the concentration of epirubicin needed to induce cell death (p < 0.0001 for 0.1, 0.25, and 1 μM in MDA.MB.468 and p < 0.01 for all concentrations in MDA.MB.231), as did the endogenous agonists 24OHC (p < 0.05) for all concentrations in both cell lines, and 10 μM 26OHC (also known as 27-hydroxycholesterol, the product of CYP27A1; p < 0.05 for both cell lines, Fig. 1A). For all concentrations of the LXR antagonist GSK2033 tested (Fig. 1B) in MDA.MB.468 cells there was a significant increase in epirubicin effect (p < 0.0001). In MDA.MB.231 cells only 250 nM was effective (p < 0.05). Colony forming assays (CFA) were then conducted with cells pre-treated with LXR ligands or vehicle control, before being exposed to epirubicin. As expected, epirubicin treatment alone (25 nM for 24 h) resulted in a significant attenuation (p < 0.001) of between 40–70 % of the cells’ ability to form colonies in the following days (note y axis for epirubicin in Fig. 1C). When LXR agonists GW3965, 24OHC, or 26OHC were combined with epirubicin treatment (Fig. 1C) we observed significant rescue of colony formation compared to the epirubicin alone (p < 0.01 for all agonists in both MDA.MB.231 and MDA.MB.468). When the synthetic LXR antagonist GSK2033 was used however (Fig. 1D) the reverse was observed and the efficacy of epirubicin was enhanced (p < 0.05). All concentrations of LXR ligands tested could transactivate LXR [24]. Low doses that had no effect on proliferation (Supplementary Fig. S4A) or colony formation (Supplementary Fig. S4B), as well as higher doses that were antiproliferative in MTT were evaluated to avoid confounding chemoresistance with anti-proliferative effects. From these data we concluded that synthetic and endogenous LXR ligands conferred resistance to epirubicin.

Fig. 1: LXR ligands induce chemoresistance in triple negative breast cancer cell lines.

MTT assay of epirubicin dose response following pre-treatment of MDA.MB.468 and MDA.MB.231 cell lines with low, medium, and high doses of LXR agonists (A) or antagonist (B). Data shown are mean with SEM of three independent replicates each performed with six technical replicates. Statistical significance was determined using non-linear regression curve comparison against epirubicin (EPI) only curve. Colony Forming Assays measuring how the ability of MDA.MB.468 and MDA.MB.231 cell lines to generate colonies after epirubicin exposure is improved by pre-treating cells with LXR agonists (C) or antagonist (D). Three or four independent replicates were performed (as indicated), each independent replicate is the mean of three technical repeats. p values were calculated using paired t test.

LXRα is linked to Pgp expression and function in TNBC patients and in vitro

The chemotherapy efflux pump Pgp was a strong candidate as the mediator of this LXR ligand induced resistance to epirubicin, as it has previously been reported to be modulated by oxysterols in the blood brain barrier [21]. To establish if Pgp is potentially regulated by LXRα or LXRβ, and thus sensitive to cholesterol metabolic flux in the tumor, we mined publicly available transcriptomics datasets from TNBC tumors to determine correlation of mRNA expression, and binding of the LXRs to the Pgp promoter.

Expression of LXRα mRNA was weakly, although significantly, correlated with Pgp (Fig. 2A) in both METABRIC (n = 313; p = 0.0024; R = 0.17) and TCGA datasets (n = 95; p = 0.0076; R = 0.27). No correlations between LXRβ and Pgp were observed (p > 0.05). Other drug efflux pumps (MRP1 and BCRP) were not correlated with LXRα in either dataset (Supplementary Fig. S5A; p > 0.05). As LXR is autoregulated, and we expected LXR mRNA levels to associate with its transcriptional output, we hypothesized that expression of canonical LXR target genes should correlate with expression of the novel target gene, Pgp. Indeed, we found ABCA1 to significantly positively correlate with Pgp in both METABRIC and TCGA datasets (Supplementary Fig. S5B; p < 0.0001 for both). We next investigated if LXRα or LXRβ could directly bind the Pgp promoter using mouse macrophage and liver tissue datasets, available in the ChIP-Seq repository. LXRα but not LXRβ, accumulated in the promoter region of Pgp in response to treatment with LXR agonist (Supplementary Fig. S6). As a positive control, we also confirmed that both LXRα and LXRβ accumulated in the promoters of known LXR target genes ABCA1 and APOE (Supplementary Fig. S6). These data are consistent with the hypothesis that LXRα, but not LXRβ, is able to bind the Pgp promoter region. Furthermore, expression of LXRα, but not LXRβ, is positively correlated with Pgp expression in the tumors of TNBC patients in separate publicly available datasets.

Fig. 2: Pgp expression and function is linked to LXR activity.

A Correlation analysis in TNBC tumors of LXRα or LXRβ with ABCA1 and Pgp gene expression obtained from METABRIC (n = 313) and TCGA (n = 95) datasets accessed via cBioportal. Statistical significance was assessed using Pearson’s correlation test with linear regression. BG performed in MDA.MB.468 cells except where indicated. Pgp expression measured at 4 h and 16 h after ligand exposure at mRNA level (B) and after 24 h for protein analysis (C). D siRNA knockdown of LXRα or LXRβ. BF Symbols show independent replicates and bars show mean with SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA and is representative of three independent replicates with SEM. (E) Colony forming assay in MDA.MB.468 cells after siLXRα showing GW3965 (GW) no longer protects cells from epirubicin in the absence of LXRα. (F) MTT in MDA.MB.468 cells after siPGP shows GW no longer protects cells from epirubicin in the absence of Pgp. (G) MDA.MB.468 and MDA.MB.231 cells were pre-treated with LXR ligands or vehicle for 16 h and Pgp inhibitor (verapamil 20 μM [V20]) or vehicle for 30 min, before loading with epirubicin (50 μM) for 1 h. The half-life of the intra-cellular epirubicin signal was calculated using dissociation one phase exponential decay. NB: epirubicin curve data are replicated in each graph for visualization purposes. Data shown are mean with SEM of three or four independent replicates each made from six technical replicates. Significance was calculated using non-linear regression curve comparison against epirubicin (EPI) only curve.

To ascertain if Pgp was regulatable by LXR ligands in TNBC cells, we treated MDA.MB.468 cells with a range of LXR ligands and found significant up- and down-regulation of Pgp mRNA in response to agonists or antagonists, respectively, at two different time-points (Fig. 2B). Induction of Pgp by GW3665 at protein level was confirmed in MDA.MB.468 and MDA.MB.231 cells (Fig. 2C). To test which LXR isoform was primarily responsible for Pgp induction, siRNA was used to knock down LXRα and LXRβ separately. siLXRα significantly diminished Pgp expression (Fig. 2D; p < 0.01), demonstrating that LXRα positively regulates Pgp, and also halted the agonist GW3965’s ability to protect cells from epirubicin in CFA (Fig. 2E; p > 0.05), demonstrating the functional impact of LXRα’s control of Pgp. Knock-down of LXRβ did not reduce Pgp expression. Furthermore, siPgp ablated the ability of GW3965 to confer protection from epirubicin (Fig. 2F). siLXRα and siLXRβ knockdown efficiency was confirmed at protein (Supplementary Fig. S7A) and mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig. S7B), as was loss of expression of canonical target gene expression (Supplementary Fig. S7B). Knock down of either LXR isoform had no effect on expression of MRP1 (Supplementary Fig. S7C; p < 0.05) or BCRP efflux pumps (Supplementary Fig. S7D; p < 0.05).

After establishing Pgp expression was at least in part dependent on the scOHC-LXRα axis, and that this signaling pathway protected TNBC cells from chemotherapy, we hypothesized that Pgp’s drug efflux function was crucial. We developed a novel chemotherapy efflux assay allowing time-resolved monitoring of intracellular epirubicin concentration in a high throughput system by exploiting epirubicin’s natural fluorescence. After pre-treating MDA.MB.468 or MDA.MB.231 cells with vehicle control (VC; ethanol), LXR agonist (GW3965, 24OHC, or 26OHC), or antagonist (GSK2033) cells were then ‘loaded’ with epirubicin and intra-cellular epirubicin measured at 15 min intervals as the epirubicin was pumped out. The half-life (t½) of epirubicin signal in vehicle treated control cells was 13.05 min for MDA.MB.468 cells and 16 min for MDA.MB.231 (Fig. 2E) and all pre-treatments were compared back to this vehicle/epirubicin condition with one-phase decay non-linear regression model. GW3965 pre-treatment led to a significant reduction in epirubicin retention time to t½ = 10.98 min (p = 0.00899) and t½ = 12.28 min (p < 0.0001) in MDA.MB.468 and MDA.MB.231 cells, respectively, (note shift of Epi curve [open circles with solid line] to left with addition of GW3065 [open squares with dotted line]). scOHC pre-treatment also significantly (p < 0.0001 for all) shifted curves to the left, again indicating decreased epirubicin retention time (468 cells: 24OHC t½ = 8.27 min, 26OHC t½ = 9.62 min; 231 cells: 24OHC t½ = 12.28 min, 26OHC t½ = 12.38 min). This enhanced efflux of epirubicin was reversable by the Pgp specific inhibitor verapamil (V20) (note shift of curve to the right with V20 as denoted by closed squares), demonstrating the dependence on Pgp function. In contrast, inhibiting LXR activity with the synthetic antagonist GSK2033 led to significantly increased retention of epirubicin (468 cells: t½ = 20.19 min; 231 cells: 231 cells t½ = 25.86 min p = 0.0004), and this was not reversed or enhanced by verapamil (p > 0.05). Overall intra-cellular epirubicin accumulation was also lower in LXR agonist treated cells (Supplementary Fig. S8A). Experiments with selective inhibitors demonstrated that Pgp but not other drug efflux pumps (MRP1, BCRP) was necessary and sufficient for LXR mediated epirubicin efflux in control experiments (Supplementary Fig. S8B, C).

LXR activation confers chemoresistance and enhances Pgp expression in vivo

To corroborate in vivo these chemoprotective effects of the scOHC-LXR axis, a preclinical model using TNBC syngeneic 4T1 cells grafted in mammary fat pads of Balb/c mice was evaluated. Mice in four groups were treated with either vehicle control, GW3965, epirubicin, or GW3965 and epirubicin combined. As expected, epirubicin reduced tumor growth (Fig. 3A) and final size (Fig. 3B), as did GW3965. The tumors of mice in the combination group grew significantly more quickly (p < 0.0001) and were significantly larger (p < 0.0001) than the epirubicin alone group. Analysis of resected tumors indicated significantly increased expression of both canonical Abca1 (p < 0.001) and Abcb1b (the mouse gene for Pgp) (p < 0.0001) in GW3965 treated animals compared to controls (Fig. 3B), demonstrating that the LXR agonist had effectively activated relevant target genes within the tumor tissue. Mice in all groups gained weight at a similar rate through the experiment (p > 0.05) indicating mouse health was similar between groups over the experimental period (Supplementary Fig. S9A). Other drug efflux pumps were not found to induced by GW3965 in this model (Supplementary Fig. S9B). We concluded that activation of LXR in vivo induced expression of Pgp and confers chemoresistance as observed in vitro.

Fig. 3: LXR activation drives Pgp expression and chemotherapy resistance in vivo.

4T1 cells (TNBC) were grafted orthotopically into the axial mammary fat pad of BALB/C mice. Mice were treated with either placebo or the LXR ligand GW3965 (daily, 30 mg/kg) 24 h post-graft. Treatments with placebo or epirubicin (every other day, 2.5 mg/kg) commenced 48 h post-graft. Tumor volumes measured by calipers (A) or tumor weight (mg) after 12 days (B). Statistical analysis was assessed using non-linear regression. C Expression of Abca1, and Pgp was assessed by qPCR analysis. Statistical analysis was assessed using one way ANOVA with SNK test, with 10 mice per group (individual symbols) and shown with median and range.

LXR and its ligand regulators are correlated with Pgp and are prognostic indicators in ER-negative BCa patients

To investigate if LXRα protein was associated with Pgp expression in ER-negative breast cancer patients, ABCA1 mRNA, Pgp mRNA, LXRα protein expression were measured in a cohort of ER-negative tumor samples from the Leeds Breast Research Tissue Bank (LBRTB cohort: n = 47; patient characteristics reported in Supplementary Table S1; representative immunoblots shown in Supplementary Figure S10). LXRα protein was positively correlated with mRNA expression of Pgp (Fig. 4A; p = 0.0046; r = 0.43), validating previous mRNA analyses from public datasets (Fig. 2A). Kaplan–Meier survival analyses after the cohort was dichotomized into low and high expression groups for LXRα indicated that high LXRα (Fig. 4B; p = 0.0051) were associated with significantly worse prognosis.

Fig. 4: LXRα protein expression is correlated with Pgp expression and is a molecular marker of poor prognosis in ER-negative breast cancer patients.

A Correlation analysis between LXR protein expression and matched mRNA of Pgp in 47 ER-negative breast tumors (relative to HPRT). Line indicates linear regression, correlations calculated using Pearson correlation. Kaplan–Meier survival plots following stratification of the cohort into high and low LXRα (B) and Pgp (C) expression. Log-rank tests used to calculate significance. D Tissue microarray of 148 TNBC tumors stained for indicated proteins determined by immunohistochemistry and correlated with Pgp protein (left) and disease-free survival (right). E scOHC concentrations determined by LC-MS/MS and correlated with Pgp protein (left) and disease-free survival (right). Correlations calculated with Pearson’s test and survival differences with log-rank test and Kaplan–Meier curves.

To explore if Pgp protein expression and patient prognosis were associated with synthesis of OHC, we undertook two analyses. First, a large-scale analysis of scOHC synthesizing enzyme expression in TNBC tumors in a microarray of formalin fixed tissue (TMA cohort: n = 148; patient characteristics reported in Supplementary Table 1). Pgp protein expression in TNBC epithelial cells was a strong indicator or shorter disease-free survival (Fig. 4C; p = 0.004), and expression was strongly and significantly positively correlated with protein expression CYP46A1 (p < 0.0001; R2 = 0.3) and CH25H (p < 0.0001; R2 = 0.57), and weakly with CYP27A1 (p = 0.004; R2 = 0.07) (Fig. 4D – left panels), enzymes that synthesize 24OHC, 25OHC, and 26OHC, respectively.

Shorter disease-free survival was found in patients with high expression of CYP46A1 (p = 0.005) and CH25H (p = 0.0072), but not CYP27A1 (p > 0.05) (Fig. 4D – right panels). Second, a smaller analysis was performed in the LBRTB cohort where fresh-frozen tissue was available thus allowing direct LC-MS/MS measurements of scOHC concentrations in matched tumor samples to protein lysates measured in Fig. 4D. 24OHC (but not 25OHC or 26OHC) metabolite concentrations were significantly positively correlated with Pgp mRNA expression (Fig. 4E – left panels); high concentration of all three metabolites (24OHC p = 0.026; 25OHC p = 0.011; 26OHC p = 0.01) were prognostic of shorter disease-free survival (Fig. 4E – right panels). From these data we concluded that multiple components of the LXR signaling pathway were likely to converge on Pgp mediated drug resistance and contribute to shorter disease-free survival in TNBC patients.

LXRα and its ligands are decoupled from Pgp in surviving TNBC patients, but remain linked in patients who suffer relapse or die

After establishing a mechanism linking the cholesterol metabolic sensor, LXRα, with chemotherapy resistance at the molecular level, and discovering a discernable effect on survival in cell lines, pre-clinical models and patients, we wanted to explore if measuring activity of the scOHC:LXR pathway could separate surviving patients from those who relapse or died from their disease. We split the LBRTB cohort (Supplementary Table 1) into a “no event” group, i.e., those who did not have a recurrence during follow up (median follow up time = 96 months), and an “event” group, i.e., those who had either died from their disease or had relapsed (median time to event = 20 months). Protein expression of LXRα (p = 0.076), and mRNA expression of ABCA1 (p = 0.0121) and Pgp (p = 0.0015) were higher in the “event” group (Fig. 5A) indicating greater activity of the LXR signaling axis in the event group; interestingly, the concentrations of scOHC metabolites were not significantly different between the event and no event groups (Supplementary Fig. S11). We also tested the correlations between expression of Pgp and its regulators LXRα and 24OHC in the cohort, separating patients who had an event from those who didn’t; LXRα protein was only correlated with Pgp in the event group (Fig. 5B; p = 0.0012) and similarly, 24OHC was only correlated with Pgp in the event group (Fig. 5C; p = 0.01). We tested this relationship in the METABRIC cohort and found that LXRα only correlated with Pgp in patients who had died from their disease or who had relapsed (Supplementary Fig. S12; p = 0.017).

Fig. 5: LXR is decoupled from Pgp in the tumors of patients who survive.

A Protein expression (LXRα), and mRNA expression for ABCA1 and Pgp were assessed using one-tailed Mann–Whitney test in the LBRTB cohort comparing event and no event groups. Pearson correlation analysis between matched Pgp mRNA and either immunoblotting for LXRα protein (B), LC-MS/MS for 24OHC (C).


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of cholesterol side-chain hydroxylation products on chemotherapy resistance, specifically in TNBCs—the breast cancer subtype in which chemoresistance is most problematic. We demonstrated that LXRα activation is linked to chemotherapy resistance in vitro and in vivo, and to worse patient survival. We conclude that this is due, at least in part, to the chemotherapy efflux pump Pgp being a transcriptional target of the scOHC:LXR axis, thus linking cholesterol status with the innate ability of a triple negative tumor cells to evade chemotherapy. A major observation from our data was that patients stratified by survival status had divergent LXR signaling pathways; the tumors of the patients who died were enriched for scOHC synthesizing enzymes and the metabolite 24OHC, and there was a positive correlation between Pgp and individual components of the signaling axis. In patients who did not have recurrences, these signaling components were not correlated with Pgp, irrespective of which cohort we evaluated, indicating that actual decoupling of LXR from Pgp in these tumors was contributing to survival.

The role of drug efflux pumps such as Pgp, BCRP, and MRP1 in TNBC resistance have been described [27, 28]. Yet directly targeting these pumps has largely failed as a clinical strategy due to the essential roles that xenobiotic efflux pumps play in healthy tissue, from side effects from drug–drug interactions, and lack of specificity [29]. The factors that determine whether pCR is achieved are important to elucidate because patients for whom only a partial pathological response with NACT is achieved typically do worse than those who elect for ACT [2]. Cancer specific mechanisms of efflux pump regulation have been identified, but until now have largely been attributed to oncogenic signaling pathways converging on their transcriptional regulation [28, 30]. The data reported here however indicate a new direction; we provide evidence of a direct link between the expression and function of Pgp, and metabolic flux of cholesterol, a nutrient that is modifiable by diet, lifestyle, and existing pharmacological approaches. In this context, the findings presented here lead to speculation that two clinical hypotheses are appropriate for further evaluation. First, patients stratified based on LXR activity may be predicted to achieve different rates of pCR after NACT, or survival after ACT. Second, a therapeutic adjunct that limits scOHC synthesis may improve pCR rates. Cholesterol lowering approaches are already in clinical practice for the management of cholesterol related diseases. Excitingly, these interventions could be tailored to the patient to offer an element of control to individuals who may otherwise seek lifestyle an dietary guidance from sources that have not been peer reviewed [31]. It of course remains to be determined if such strategies would be beneficial in improving survival rates via chemosensitization, but it is encouraging that extra-hepatic scOHC levels are modifiable by diet [32, 33] as well as circulating levels being highly responsive to statins [34]. A meta-analysis of statin use in unstratified breast cancer patients has shown inhibition of cholesterol synthesis was associated with protection from relapse and death in the first 4 years post-diagnosis [35], which interestingly, is the period of highest relapse risk for TNBC patients [3].

LXR ligands are being explored in clinical trials as novel therapeutics, and as diagnostic and prognostic tools. Within these studies, important distinctions between activation of LXRα and LXRβ need consideration. The histamine conjugated oxysterol such as dendrogenin A, preferentially activates LXRβ and drives lethal autophagy [15] and differentiation of breast cancer cells [16], and synthetic the LXRβ agonist RGX-104 enhances cytotoxic T lymphocyte tumor destruction [36]. Dual LXRα/LXRβ ligands such as 26OHC convincingly slow tumor growth through the anti-proliferative activities of LXR, yet drive LXR dependent metastasis [37] and substitute for estrogen to drive ER dependent breast cancer growth [37, 38]. Furthermore, circulating dual LXR oxysterol ligands may be prognostic and therapeutic indicators [19]. Our data do not indicate the Pgp expression is the sole cause of LXRα mediated chemotherapy resistance. Pgp induction and repression by LXR ligands, and knock-down expression was modest, with between around 1.5-fold changes being observed. This would suggest that LXRα may be able to influence a wider repertoire of chemotherapy resistance mechanisms. Non-cancer cell sources of endogenous LXR ligands are frequently found in the tumor microenvironment. Macrophages, adipocytes, and fibroblasts are all highly efficient at producing hydroxycholesterols and their presence in the tumor microenvironment are also markers of outcome in several cancer types.

Mechanisms that lead to innate chemoresistance have previously been flagged as a critical research gap [4]. LXR is a sensor and homeostatic regulator of nutritional status, so our data support the hypothesis that a cholesterol rich environment during tumor development may actually contribute to innate chemoresistance, thus addressing a critical research gap. Ligand dependent activation of LXR in many tissues is controlled by factors that can be influenced by the diet and existing pharmacological agents, making this pathway attractive for therapeutic targeting. Our results suggest efficacy of cytotoxic therapies may be reduced if LXRα is stimulated; caution should be applied in clinical application of dual LXR ligands or of LXRα agonists, as novel cancer therapeutics. Encouragingly, further clinical investigation where dietary advice or statins that acutely lower circulating or tissue scOHC levels could evaluate LXR modulation to improve pCR rates in this hard to cure subgroup of breast cancer patients. In conclusion, endogenous synthesis of LXR ligands and LXRα activity are prognostic indicators for TNBC patient survival and should be explored prospectively in the clinical setting as functional and targetable prognostic indicators for response to chemotherapy.


  1. 1.

    Bagegni NA, Tao Y, Ademuyiwa FO. Clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer: a report from the National Cancer Database. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0222358.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Xia LY, Hu QL, Zhang J, Xu WY, Li XS. Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 36,480 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS, Armes J, Berditchevski F, et al. Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    dos Santos CR, Fonseca I, Dias S, de Almeida JCM. Plasma level of LDL-cholesterol at diagnosis is a predictor factor of breast tumor progression. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:132–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Thomson CA, Nixon DW, Shapiro A, Hoy MK, et al. Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1767–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brennan SF, Woodside JV, Lunny PM, Cardwell CR, Cantwell MM. Dietary fat and breast cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57:1999–2008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jiang L, Zhao X, Xu J, Li C, Yu Y, Wang W, et al. The protective effect of dietary phytosterols on cancer risk: a systematic meta-analysis. J Oncol. 2019;2019:11. (7479518).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu B, Yi Z, Guan X, Zeng YX, Ma F. The relationship between statins and breast cancer prognosis varies by statin type and exposure time: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164:1–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Toledo E, Salas-Salvado J, Donat-Vargas C, Buil-Cosiales P, Estruch R, Ros E, et al. Mediterranean diet and invasive breast cancer risk among women at high cardiovascular risk in the PREDIMED Trial: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1752–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    De Cicco P, Catani MV, Gasperi V, Sibilano M, Quaglietta M, Savini I. Nutrition and breast cancer: a literature review on prevention, treatment andrecurrence. Nutrients. 2019;11:1514–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Janowski BA, Willy PJ, Devi TR, Falck JR, Mangelsdorf DJ. An oxysterol signalling pathway mediated by the nuclear receptor LXR alpha. Nature. 1996;383:728–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Clare K, Hardwick SJ, Carpenter KL, Weeratunge N, Mitchinson MJ. Toxicity of oxysterols to human monocyte-macrophages. Atherosclerosis. 1995;118:67–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tabas I. Consequences of cellular cholesterol accumulation: basic concepts and physiological implications. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:905–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Poirot M, Silvente-Poirot S. The tumor-suppressor cholesterol metabolite, dendrogenin A, is a new class of LXR modulator activating lethal autophagy in cancers. Biochem Pharm. 2018;153:75–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bauriaud-Mallet M, Vija-Racaru L, Brillouet S, Mallinger A, de Medina P, Rives A, et al. The cholesterol-derived metabolite dendrogenin A functionally reprograms breast adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated thyroid cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;192:105390.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Baek AE, Yu Y-RA, He S, Wardell SE, Chang C-Y, Kwon S, et al. The cholesterol metabolite 27 hydroxycholesterol facilitates breast cancer metastasis through its actions on immune cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nguyen VT, Barozzi I, Faronato M, Lombardo Y, Steel JH, Patel N, et al. Differential epigenetic reprogramming in response to specific endocrine therapies promotes cholesterol biosynthesis and cellular invasion. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10044.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dalenc F, Iuliano L, Filleron T, Zerbinati C, Voisin M, Arellano C, et al. Circulating oxysterol metabolites as potential new surrogate markers in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: results of the OXYTAM study. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;169:210–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wouters E, de Wit NM, Vanmol J, van der Pol SMA, van Het Hof B, Sommer D, et al. Liver X receptor alpha is important in maintaining blood-brain barrier function. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1811.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Saint-Pol J, Candela P, Boucau MC, Fenart L, Gosselet F. Oxysterols decrease apical-to-basolateral transport of Ass peptides via an ABCB1-mediated process in an in vitro blood-brain barrier model constituted of bovine brain capillary endothelial cells. Brain Res. 2013;1517:1–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    ElAli A, Hermann DM. Liver X receptor activation enhances blood-brain barrier integrity in the ischemic brain and increases the abundance of ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCB1 and ABCC1 on brain capillary cells. Brain Pathol. 2012;22:175–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Garrigues A, Escargueil AE, Orlowski S. The multidrug transporter, P-glycoprotein, actively mediates cholesterol redistribution in the cell membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10347–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hutchinson SA, Lianto P, Roberg-Larsen H, Battaglia S, Hughes TA, Thorne JL. ER-Negative breast cancer is highly responsive to cholesterol metabolite signalling. Nutrients. 2019;11:2618–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thorne JL, Battaglia S, Baxter DE, Hayes JL, Hutchinson SA, Jana S, et al. MiR-19b non-canonical binding is directed by HuR and confers chemosensitivity through regulation of P-glycoprotein in breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2018;1861:996–1006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Shahoei SH, Kim YC, Cler SJ, Ma L, Anakk S, Kemper JK, et al. Small heterodimer partner regulates dichotomous T cell expansion by macrophages. Endocrinology. 2019;160:1573–89.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kim B, Fatayer H, Hanby AM, Horgan K, Perry SL, Valleley EM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces expression levels of breast cancer resistance protein that predict disease-free survival in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62766.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kim B, Stephen SL, Hanby AM, Horgan K, Perry SL, Richardson J, et al. Chemotherapy induces Notch1-dependent MRP1 up-regulation, inhibition of which sensitizes breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang M, Yu L, Guo R, Dong A, Lin C, Zhang J. A modular coassembly approach to all-in-one multifunctional nanoplatform for synergistic codelivery of doxorubicin and curcumin. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018;8:167–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Das S, Samant RS, Shevde LA. Nonclassical activation of Hedgehog signaling enhances multidrug resistance and makes cancer cells refractory to Smoothened-targeting Hedgehog inhibition. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:11824–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Thorne JL, Moore JB, Corfe BM. Nutrition and cancer: evidence gaps and opportunities for improving knowledge. Proc Nutr Soc.2020;79:367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sozen E, Yazgan B, Sahin A, Ince U, Ozer NK. High cholesterol diet-induced changes in oxysterol and scavenger receptor levels in heart tissue. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:8520746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Guillemot-Legris O, Mutemberezi V, Cani PD, Muccioli GG. Obesity is associated with changes in oxysterol metabolism and levels in mice liver, hypothalamus, adipose tissue and plasma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19694.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dias IHK, Milic I, Lip GYH, Devitt A, Polidori MC, Griffiths HR. Simvastatin reduces circulating oxysterol levels in men with hypercholesterolaemia. Redox Biol. 2018;16:139–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Liu B, Yi Z, Guan X, Zeng Y-X, Ma F. The relationship between statins and breast cancer prognosis varies by statin type and exposure time: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164:1–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tavazoie MF, Pollack I, Tanqueco R, Ostendorf BN, Reis BS, Gonsalves FC. et al. LXR/ApoE activation restricts innate immune suppression in Cancer. Cell. 2018;172:825–40.e818.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nelson ER, Wardell SE, Jasper JS, Park S, Suchindran S, Howe MK, et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol links hypercholesterolemia and breast cancer pathophysiology. Science. 2013;342:1094–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wu Q, Ishikawa T, Sirianni R, Tang H, McDonald JG, Yuhanna IS, et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol promotes cell-autonomous, ER-positive breast cancer growth. Cell Rep. 2013;5:637–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas A. Hughes or James L. Thorne.

Ethics declarations

Financial support

GC was supported by a grant funding from Breast Cancer Action (3T57/9R17–02). The human metabolite data collection and analysis, immunohistochemistry, and antibody validation performed by AW was supported by a grant from Breast Cancer UK (PO-180309) and by the University of Leeds School of Food Science and Nutrition. The British Endocrine Society provided an equipment award (NOV2016) allowing the development of the high throughput chemotherapy efflux assay. SAH, CS, and PL were supported with Leeds Doctoral Scholarships and School of Food Science and Nutrition consumables support. ERN was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01CA234025).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hutchinson, S.A., Websdale, A., Cioccoloni, G. et al. Liver x receptor alpha drives chemoresistance in response to side-chain hydroxycholesterols in triple negative breast cancer. Oncogene 40, 2872–2883 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links