Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mitochondrial uncoupler MB1-47 is efficacious in treating hepatic metastasis of pancreatic cancer in murine tumor transplantation models


Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is aggressive cancer characterized by rapid progression, metastatic recurrence, and highly resistant to treatment. PDA cells exhibit aerobic glycolysis, or the Warburg effect, which reduces the flux of pyruvate into mitochondria. As a result, more glycolytic metabolites are shunted to pathways for the production of building blocks (e.g., ribose) and reducing agents (e.g., NADPH) for biosynthesis that are necessary for cell proliferation. In addition, PDA cells are highly addicted to glutamine for both maintaining biosynthetic pathways and achieving redox balance. Mitochondrial uncoupling facilitates proton influx across the mitochondrial inner membrane without generating ATP, leading to a futile cycle that consumes glucose metabolites and glutamine. We synthesized a new mitochondrial uncoupler MB1-47 and tested its effect on cancer cell metabolism and the anticancer activity in pancreatic cancer cell models and murine tumor transplantation models. MB1-47 uncouples mitochondria in the pancreatic cancer cells, resulting in: (1) the acceleration of pyruvate oxidation and TCA turnover; (2) increases in AMP/ATP and ADP/AMP ratios; and (3) a decrease in the synthesis rate of nucleotides and sugar nucleotides. Moreover, MB1-47 arrests cell cycle at G0–G1 phase, reduces clonogenicity, and inhibits cell growth of murine and human pancreatic cancer cells. In vivo studies showed that MB1-47 inhibits tumor growth in murine tumor transplantation models, and inhibits the hepatic metastasis when tumor cells were transplanted intrasplenically. Our results provide proof of concept for a potentially new strategy of treating PDA, and a novel prototype experimental drug for future studies and development.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The schematic of the mitochondrial uncoupling mechanism and the synthetic route of MB1-47.
Fig. 2: MB1-47 uncouples mitochondria in pancreatic cancer cells.
Fig. 3: Effect of MB1-47 on pancreatic cancer cell metabolism.
Fig. 4: Effect of MB1-47 on cell cycle progression, clonogenicity, and cell proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells.
Fig. 5: MB1-47 inhibits the growth of intrahepatically transplanted Panc02 cancer cells.
Fig. 6: MB1-47 inhibits liver metastasis of the intrasplenically injected Panc02 cells.
Fig. 7: MB1-47 increases phosphorylation of AMPK and ACC and downregulates mTOR activities in the pancreatic cancer cells.


  1. 1.

    Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mimeault M, Brand RE, Sasson AA, Batra SK. Recent advances on the molecular mechanisms involved in pancreatic cancer progression and therapies. Pancreas. 2005;31:301–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stathis A, Moore MJ. Advanced pancreatic carcinoma: current treatment and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:163–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer zum Büschenfelde C, Friess H, Kleeff J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLOS Med. 2010;7:e1000267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouché O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1605–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maitra A, Hruban RH. Pancreatic cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:157–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Efthimiou E, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Lemoine NR. Pancreatic cancer genetics. Pancreatology. 2001;1:571–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jones S, Zhang X, Parsons DW, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Science. 2008;321:1801–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhou W, Capello M, Fredolini C, Racanicchi L, Piemonti L, Liotta LA, et al. Proteomic analysis reveals Warburg effect and anomalous metabolism of glutamine in pancreatic cancer cells. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:554–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Blum R, Kloog Y. Metabolism addiction in pancreatic cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1065.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008;7:11–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Faubert B, Boily G, Izreig S, Griss T, Samborska B, Dong Z, et al. AMPK is a negative regulator of the Warburg effect and suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Cell Metab. 2013;17:113–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lunt SY, Vander Heiden MG. Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:441–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Levine B. Cell biology: autophagy and cancer. Nature. 2007;446:745–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Levine AJ, Puzio-Kuter AM. The control of the metabolic switch in cancers by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Science. 2010;330:1340–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wise DR, DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Sayed N, Zhang XY, Pfeiffer HK, et al. Myc regulates a transcriptional program that stimulates mitochondrial glutaminolysis and leads to glutamine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:18782–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Livingstone LR, White A, Sprouse J, Livanos E, Jacks T, Tlsty TD. Altered cell cycle arrest and gene amplification potential accompany loss of wild-type p53. Cell. 1992;70:923–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, Nissim I, Yudkoff M, Wehrli S, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:19345–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Son J, Lyssiotis CA, Ying H, Wang X, Hua S, Ligorio M, et al. Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway. Nature. 2013;496:101–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jastroch M, Divakaruni AS, Mookerjee S, Treberg JR, Brand MD. Mitochondrial proton and electron leaks. Essays Biochem. 2010;47:53–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Harper J, Dickinson K, Brand M. Mitochondrial uncoupling as a target for drug development for the treatment of obesity. Obes Rev. 2001;2:255–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Parascandola J. Dinitrophenol and bioenergetics: an historical perspective. Mol Cell Biochem. 1974;5:69–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Frayha GJ, Smyth JD, Gobert JG, Savel J. The mechanisms of action of antiprotozoal and anthelmintic drugs in man. Gen Pharm. 1997;28:273–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tao H, Zhang Y, Zeng X, Shulman GI, Jin S. Niclosamide ethanolamine-induced mild mitochondrial uncoupling improves diabetic symptoms in mice. Nat Med. 2014;20:1263–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Alasadi A, Chen M, Swapna GVT, Tao H, Guo J, Collantes J, et al. Effect of mitochondrial uncouplers niclosamide ethanolamine (NEN) and oxyclozanide on hepatic metastasis of colon cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang Y, Nasiri AR, Damsky WE, Perry CJ, Zhang XM, Rabin-Court A, et al. Uncoupling hepatic oxidative phosphorylation reduces tumor growth in two murine models of colon cancer. Cell Rep. 2018;24:47–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shimizu M, Yano E. Mutagenicity of mono-nitrobenzene derivatives in the Ames test and rec assay. Mutat Res. 1986;170:11–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Terada H. Uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation. Environ Health Perspect. 1990;87:213–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sun S-Y, Yue P, Dawson MI, Shroot B, Michel S, Lamph WW, et al. Differential effects of synthetic nuclear retinoid receptor-selective retinoids on the growth of human non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4931–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2004;363:1049–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang W, Guan KL. AMP-activated protein kinase and cancer. Acta Physiol. 2009;196:55–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fryer LG, Parbu-Patel A, Carling D. The anti-diabetic drugs rosiglitazone and metformin stimulate AMP-activated protein kinase through distinct signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:25226–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xu J, Ji J, Yan X-H. Cross-talk between AMPK and mTOR in regulating energy balance. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52:373–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors want to thank Frank Leu for reviewing and editing the paper. The project was partially funded by Rutgers Busch Biomedical Award (2014), HCED Iraq Scholarship program, New Jersey Cancer Commission Research (NJCCR) Fellowship, and Mito BioPharma, LLC. AA is supported by HCED Iraq Scholarship program. HT was supported in part by NJCCR. AA, HT, JG, and SJ are partially supported by NIH (1R21CA216604 and 1R21 AA027050).

Author information




Conception and design: SJ and AA. Development of methodology: AA, SJ, BC, and DA. Acquisition of data: BC synthesized the compound, AA conducted most of the biological experiments, AA and HT conducted OCR Seahorse experiment, AA, JG, and XS conducted the LC-MS experiment. Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, LC-MS): AA, XS, and SJ. Writing, review, and/or revision of the paper: AA and SJ. Study supervision: SJ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengkan Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SJ is a founder of Mito BioPharma, which has a license right from Rutgers University for developing safe mitochondrial uncouplers for treating cancer and metabolic diseases. BC, HT, and DA are co-inventors of the patents covering the rights of MB1-47 and its derivatives. The rest of the authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alasadi, A., Cao, B., Guo, J. et al. Mitochondrial uncoupler MB1-47 is efficacious in treating hepatic metastasis of pancreatic cancer in murine tumor transplantation models. Oncogene 40, 2285–2295 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links