Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

c-Src facilitates tumorigenesis by phosphorylating and activating G6PD

Abstract

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), excessive activation of which has been considered to be involved in tumorigenesis. Here, we show that tyrosine kinase c-Src interacts with and phosphorylates G6PD at Tyr 112. This phosphorylation enhances catalytic activity of G6PD by dramatically decreasing its Km value and increasing its Kcat value for substrate glucose-6-phosphate. Activated G6PD therefore augments the PPP flux for NADPH and ribose-5-phosphate production which is required for detoxification of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and biosynthesis of cancer cells, and eventually contributes to tumorigenesis. Consistently, c-Src activation is closely correlated with tyrosine phosphorylation and activity of G6PD in clinical colorectal cancer samples. We thus uncover another aspect of c-Src in promoting cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, deepening our understanding of c-Src as a proto-oncogene.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: G6PD interacts with c-Src in vivo and in vitro.
Fig. 2: c-Src phosphorylates G6PD at Tyr112.
Fig. 3: c-Src phosphorylation of G6PD promotes its activity.
Fig. 4: c-Src activation of G6PD promotes NADPH and nucleotides synthesis.
Fig. 5: c-Src activation of G6PD promotes tumor growth.
Fig. 6: Expression levels and activities of c-Src and G6PD show clinical correlation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41:211–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang C, Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Qin S. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: a biomarker and potential therapeutic target for cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2014;14:280–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stincone A, Prigione A, Cramer T, Wamelink MM, Campbell K, Cheung E, et al. The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015;90:927–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang M, Vousden KH. Serine and one-carbon metabolism in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:650–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho ES, Cha YH, Kim HS, Kim NH, Yook JI. The pentose phosphate pathway as a potential target for cancer therapy. Biomol Ther. 2018;26:29–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin R, Elf S, Shan C, Kang HB, Ji Q, Zhou L, et al. 6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:1484–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang P, Du W, Wu M. Regulation of the pentose phosphate pathway in cancer. Protein Cell. 2014;5:592–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu X, Olszewski K, Zhang Y, Lim EW, Shi J, Zhang X, et al. Cystine transporter regulation of pentose phosphate pathway dependency and disulfide stress exposes a targetable metabolic vulnerability in cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22:476–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsouko E, Khan AS, White MA, Han JJ, Shi Y, Merchant FA, et al. Regulation of the pentose phosphate pathway by an androgen receptor-mTOR-mediated mechanism and its role in prostate cancer cell growth. Oncogenesis. 2014;3:e103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Forteleoni G, Argiolas L, Farris A, Ferraris AM, Gaetani GF, Meloni T. G6PD deficiency and breast cancer. Tumori. 1988;74:665–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fang Z, Jiang C, Feng Y, Chen R, Lin X, Zhang Z, et al. Effects of G6PD activity inhibition on the viability, ROS generation and mechanical properties of cervical cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1863:2245–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cocco P. Does G6PD deficiency protect against cancer? A critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987;41:89–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan S, World CJ, Kovacs CJ, Berk BC. Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase is regulated through c-Src-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:895–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang YP, Zhou LS, Zhao YZ, Wang SW, Chen LL, Liu LX, et al. Regulation of G6PD acetylation by SIRT2 and KAT9 modulates NADPH homeostasis and cell survival during oxidative stress. EMBO J. 2014;33:1304–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao X, Duan X, Mao W, Li X, Li Z, Li Q, et al. O-GlcNAcylation of G6PD promotes the pentose phosphate pathway and tumor growth. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Biscardi JS, Ishizawar RC, Silva CM, Parsons SJ. Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Src interactions in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2000;2:203–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishizawar R, Parsons SJ. c-Src and cooperating partners in human cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:209–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:56–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Roskoski R Jr. Src protein-tyrosine kinase structure and regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:1155–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolen JB, Veillette A, Schwartz AM, DeSeau V, Rosen N. Activation of pp60c-src protein kinase activity in human colon carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:2251–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cartwright CA, Kamps MP, Meisler AI, Pipas JM, Eckhart W. pp60c-src activation in human colon carcinoma. J Clin Investig. 1989;83:2025–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fury MG, Baxi S, Shen R, Kelly KW, Lipson BL, Carlson D, et al. Phase II study of saracatinib (AZD0530) for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Anticancer Res. 2011;31:249–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gucalp A, Sparano JA, Caravelli J, Santamauro J, Patil S, Abbruzzi A, et al. Phase II trial of saracatinib (AZD0530), an oral SRC-inhibitor for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011;11:306–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rajeshkumar NV, Tan AC, De Oliveira E, Womack C, Wombwell H, Morgan S, et al. Antitumor effects and biomarkers of activity of AZD0530, a Src inhibitor, in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4138–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Musumeci F, Schenone S, Brullo C, Botta M. An update on dual Src/Abl inhibitors. Future Med Chem. 2012;4:799–822.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang J, Wang S, Jiang B, Huang L, Ji Z, Li X, et al. c-Src phosphorylation and activation of hexokinase promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:13732.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma H, Zhang J, Zhou L, Wen S, Tang HY, Jiang B, et al. c-Src promotes tumorigenesis and tumor progression by activating PFKFB3. Cell Rep. 2020;30:4235–49 e4236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W98–W102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pan JS, Hong MZ, Ren JL. Reactive oxygen species: a double-edged sword in oncogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1702–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ju HQ, Lu YX, Wu QN, Liu J, Zeng ZL, Mo HY, et al. Disrupting G6PD-mediated redox homeostasis enhances chemosensitivity in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:6282–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupte RS, Floyd BC, Kozicky M, George S, Ungvari ZI, Neito V, et al. Synergistic activation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and NAD(P)H oxidase by Src kinase elevates superoxide in type 2 diabetic, Zucker fa/fa, rat liver. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47:219–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tang HY, Ho HY, Wu PR, Chen SH, Kuypers FA, Cheng ML, et al. Inability to maintain GSH pool in G6PD-deficient red cells causes futile AMPK activation and irreversible metabolic disturbance. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;22:744–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li TY, Sun Y, Liang Y, Liu Q, Shi Y, Zhang CS, et al. ULK1/2 constitute a bifurcate node controlling glucose metabolic fluxes in addition to autophagy. Mol Cell. 2016;62:359–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ying H, Kimmelman AC, Lyssiotis CA, Hua S, Chu GC, Fletcher-Sananikone E, et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell. 2012;149:656–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (U1705287 and 91857102) and the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen University (SKLCSB2020KF002 and SKLCSB2019KF005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HM and QL conceived the project. HM, FZ, LZ, TC, DS, SW, JZ, ZX, and MT performed experiments. LH, MT, MC, and YZ helped with data analysis and discussion. QL and HM wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinxi Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments were carried out with the approval of Animal Care and Use Committee in Xiamen University (Ethics license, XMULAC20170330). The CRC specimens and surrounding nontumor colon tissues used in the current study were obtained from The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (Xiamen, China) with patient consent and institutional review board approval.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, H., Zhang, F., Zhou, L. et al. c-Src facilitates tumorigenesis by phosphorylating and activating G6PD. Oncogene 40, 2567–2580 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-01673-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-01673-0

Search

Quick links