An unanticipated tumor-suppressive role of the SUMO pathway in the intestine unveiled by Ubc9 haploinsufficiency


Sumoylation is an essential posttranslational modification in eukaryotes that has emerged as an important pathway in oncogenic processes. Most human cancers display hyperactivated sumoylation and many cancer cells are remarkably sensitive to its inhibition, thus supporting application of chemical sumoylation inhibitors in cancer treatment. Here we show, first, that transformed embryonic fibroblasts derived from mice haploinsufficient for Ubc9, the essential and unique gene encoding the SUMO E2 conjugating enzyme, exhibit enhanced proliferation and transformed phenotypes in vitro and as xenografts ex vivo. To then evaluate the possible impact of loss of one Ubc9 allele in vivo, we used a mouse model of intestinal tumorigenesis. We crossed Ubc9+/− mice with mice harboring a conditional ablation of Apc either all along the crypt–villus axis or only in Lgr5+ crypt-based columnar (CBC) cells, the cell compartment that includes the intestinal stem cells proposed as cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. While Ubc9+/− mice display no overt phenotypes and no globally visible hyposumoylation in cells of the small intestine, we found, strikingly, that, upon loss of Apc in both models, Ubc9+/− mice develop more (>2-fold) intestinal adenomas and show significantly shortened survival. This is accompanied by reduced global sumoylation levels in the polyps, indicating that Ubc9 levels become critical upon oncogenic stress. Moreover, we found that, in normal conditions, Ubc9+/− mice show a moderate but robust (15%) increase in the number of Lgr5+ CBC cells when compared to their wild-type littermates, and further, that these cells display higher degree of stemness and cancer-related and inflammatory gene expression signatures that, altogether, may contribute to enhanced intestinal tumorigenesis. The phenotypes of Ubc9 haploinsufficiency discovered here indicate an unanticipated tumor-suppressive role of sumoylation, one that may have important implications for optimal use of sumoylation inhibitors in the clinic.


SUMO modification has emerged as an essential and highly dynamic posttranslational modification (PTM) that targets hundreds of cellular proteins (the “sumoylome”), thus affecting most, if not all, fundamental processes carried out by eukaryotic cells [1, 2]. As with other, “small-molecule” PTMs (phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, etc.), the covalent attachment of the ~11 KDa SUMO peptide changes the interacting properties of its target proteins and hence their functions as parts of larger molecular complexes or pathways.

Numerous stresses and pathological conditions, notably infection and cancer, result in the rapid modification, but also de-modification, of numerous substrates with, at times, profound effects on the composition of the cellular sumoylome [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Conversely, strong perturbation of the SUMO system by inhibiting the activity of the unique E1 (SAE1/SAE2) or E2 (Ubc9) enzymes, for example, provokes significant cell stress that leads to growth arrest, senescence or apoptosis [8,9,10,11].

As with stress, the cancerous state is associated with dysregulated cellular sumoylation dynamics stemming from the altered, mostly upregulated expression of SUMO pathway components (i.e., SUMO, E1, E2, and SENPs) that affects numerous SUMO-targeted cellular factors, including key tumor suppressors and oncoproteins [6, 7]. The concept of “non-oncogene addiction” [12, 13] has been suggested as a possible view of SUMO’s roles in cancer: the idea that with strong oncogenic signaling, for example by elevated Myc or Ras activity, the stress-mitigating functions of sumoylation become indispensable for cancer cell survival [14,15,16]. Clearly, this makes SUMO modification an attractive target for cancer therapy, particularly in cases such as Myc-driven cancers in which the oncoprotein itself remains out of range.

Our understanding of the origins of colorectal cancer (CRC) has greatly benefited from a large body of work, including elegant lineage tracing studies in mice [17]. These studies provided a detailed spatial and temporal description of the rapid, continuous and orderly developmental progression that links the Lgr5+ intestinal stem cell, Paneth and transit-amplifying cell compartment with the differentiated epithelial cells to constitute the functional crypt–villus anatomy of the small intestinal epithelium. Ninety percent of CRC cases follow a well-defined and ordered chain of genetic events starting with perturbation of APC/β-catenin signaling followed by dysregulation of the KRAS, TP53, and/or PIK3CA pathways [18,19,20]. Significantly, the progression from normal intestinal mucosa, through aberrant crypt foci, small intestinal adenomas or polyps to malignant tumors (but rarely to colonic tumors) is recapitulated in mouse models for the specific and inducible ablation of the Apc tumor suppressor [20]. The characterization of Lgr5+ crypt-based columnar (CBC) cells, that include the intestinal stem cells (ISCs) shown to act as cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer [21, 22], attests to the value of these models.

We have shown previously that complete loss of Ubc9, and hence of sumoylation, is early embryonic lethal in mice [10]. Similarly, acute loss of Ubc9 in adult mice leads to rapid death caused by degeneration of the intestinal epithelium [23]. In this setting, lack of sumoylation primarily affects the crypt compartment by causing the disappearance of the Lgr5+ CBC cells that leads to rapid disorganization of the crypt–villus axis, thereby severely compromising the genesis, function, positioning and survival of all differentiated epithelial cells. Since sumoylation is essential for cell and animal viability, we analyzed here the role of the SUMO pathway in cancer-related processes using in vitro and in vivo Ubc9 haploinsufficient models. Loss of a single Ubc9 allele in transformed fibroblasts conferred enhanced proliferative and transformed phenotypes. In addition, while without any major phenotypic effects in mice in normal conditions, Ubc9 haploinsufficiency was found to enhance intestinal tumorigenesis and to provoke earlier death in Apc-deficient backgrounds. Furthermore, we found this phenotype to be associated with both increased numbers of crypt-based Lgr5+ CBC cells and exacerbated stemness, inflammatory and cancer-related gene expression programs in this cellular context. These results uncover an unexpected oncosuppressive role of sumoylation with potential impact for cancer treatment.


Ubc9 haploinsufficiency promotes cell growth and transformed phenotypes in vitro and ex vivo

To address the role of Ubc9 in controlling cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, we used mice haploinsufficient for Ubc9 which harbour a floxed and a null Ubc9 allele (Ubc9f/) [23]. While Ubc9/− animals are embryonic lethal, Ubc9f/−, like Ubc9+/− mice display no overt phenotype in normal conditions, apart from a slight (10%) decrease in body size and body weight, when compared to wild-type (WT) littermates [10]. Murine embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from a pool of three E12.5 WT or Ubc9f/− embryos were transformed by retroviral transduction of a dominant-negative (DN) p53 mutant together with the HRASV12 oncogene. Ubc9f/− MEFs were found to grow significantly faster than Ubc9+/+ MEFs and inducible deletion of the remaining floxed Ubc9 allele by 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) [23] expectedly abrogated their proliferation capacity (Fig. 1a). This pattern correlated with suppression of Ubc9 protein expression, reduction in global sumoylation and appearance of free SUMO1 and SUMO2/3 (hereafter SUMO2−) (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1: Ubc9 haploinsufficiency promotes cell growth and malignant phenotypes in vitro.

a Growth curve of p53DN/HRASV12-transformed MEFs derived from 3 pooled embryos Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9f/− Rosa26-CreERT2 treated with 100 μg/mL 4-OHT or EtOH (control). 590 nm absorbance of cell-trapped crystal violet was measured to estimate relative cell numbers. Mean ± SD, n = 3 biological replicates. b Western-blotting showing SUMO1 and SUMO2 conjugates and Ubc9 expression in Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9f/ Rosa26-CreERT2 MEFs treated with 100 μg/mL 4-OHT for 0, 2, 4, and 7 days. c Capacity of transformed MEFs for anchorage-dependent 2D plate colony formation. Representative images and quantification showing mean ± SD. n = 3 biological replicates in duplicates. Unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was used. d Capacity of transformed MEFs for loss of contact inhibition and foci formation, as in (c), with n = 3 biological replicates. e Capacity of transformed MEFs for anchorage-independent 3D soft-agar colony formation, as in (c), with n = 4 biological replicates in triplicates. f Growth curve of p53DN/HRASV12-transformed MEF xenografts in mice. Mean ± SD, n = 6 mice injected with Ubc9f/ and Ubc9+/+ transformed MEFs in opposite flanks of each animal. g Representative picture of tumors, as in (f), taken from the same mouse 12 days after inoculation.

To further characterize the proliferative advantage of non-treated Ubc9f/− over Ubc9+/+ transformed MEFs, we analyzed cell cycle distribution and apoptosis rates at 4 days post-passage, when cells are still non-quiescent but the difference in cell numbers is clearly evident (Fig. S1a). While the cell cycle distribution was very similar for cells of both genotypes (Fig. S1b), we found a slightly larger fraction of apoptotic cells in Ubc9+/+ (mean 9.8%) compared to Ubc9f/− (6.7%) cells (Fig. S1c), a difference, however, likely insufficient to fully explain the observed, significant 1.7-fold difference in cell numbers after 4 days’ growth. To next see whether the growth difference could be related to the levels of the exogenous oncogenes, we compared the expression of p53 and HRAS between both genotypes. RT-qPCR analysis showed that levels of endogenous p53 and HRas are similar in both contexts (Fig. S1d). Interestingly, however, expression of exogenous murine p53DN and human HRASV12 mRNA was higher in Ubc9+/+ cells (Fig. S1e), a finding also confirmed for HRAS proteins by Western blot (Fig. S1f). Together, this suggests that the increased proliferation capacity displayed by mutant MEFs is not driven by higher oncogene activity but might rather be a consequence of a more transformation-prone basal state in Ubc9 haploinsufficient MEFs.

The ability of transformed cells to form colonies of clonal origin on plates and in agar, or to form foci when seeded at high densities, is related to their capacity to grow and divide in an anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent manner, or to lose contact inhibition, respectively [24,25,26]. Transformed Ubc9f/− MEFs formed colonies and foci more efficiently than their WT counterparts, as seen by the 1.6-, 4- and 12-fold growth increase in 2D plate colony-, foci formation and 3D soft-agar colony assays, respectively (Fig. 1c–e). To transpose these findings in vivo, we xenografted nude mice with transformed Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9f/− MEFs and found that Ubc9 haploinsufficiency greatly enhanced tumor growth, consistent with the findings obtained in vitro (Fig. 1f–g). Altogether, these data suggest that mild Ubc9 downregulation confers a growth advantage consistent with the establishment of an exacerbated transformed state.

Ubc9 haploinsufficiency favors polyp formation in an Apcf/+ intestinal cancer mouse model

We next investigated the effect of Ubc9 haploinsufficiency on tumor initiation and development in vivo, using the Apcf/+ intestinal cancer mouse model. First, and in agreement with the situation in WT and Ubc9f/− MEFs (compare “0” lanes in Fig. 1b), we found that global profiles of SUMO-conjugated proteins in whole intestinal extracts from WT and Ubc9+/− mice are indistinguishable (Fig. 2a), although this does not exclude that effects on specific substrates go undetected by this global analysis. Of note, the Ubc9 protein level was reduced to about a half of normal levels in Ubc9f/− intestines, indicating the absence of compensatory mechanisms for Ubc9 expression in these animals (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, anatomopathological analysis of intestines from mice of both genotypes did not reveal significant differences in the general architecture of crypts (Fig. S2a).

Fig. 2: Ubc9 haploinsufficiency favors polyp formation in Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ intestinal cancer mouse model.

a Western-blotting of SUMO1 and SUMO2 conjugates and Ubc9 in intestines from healthy mice. b Kaplan–Meier survival curves of Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mice treated with 4-OHT (0.1 mg per g of body weight). Log-rank test was used. c Median with min, 25 and 75 percentiles, and max number of small intestinal adenomas (≥0.5 mm in diameter) in Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− mice 12 weeks after treatment with 4-OHT as in (b). Unpaired two-tailed t test was used. d Histological analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained small intestinal sections obtained as in (c). Arrows indicate lesions. e Western-blotting of Ubc9 and c-Myc in polyps (P) and normal (N) intestine samples obtained as in (c) in three different mice per group.

Next, we generated Ubc9;Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mouse strains in which CreERT2 recombinase expression is driven by the intestine-specific Villin promoter [27, 28]. After CreERT2 activation by intraperitoneal injections of 4-OHT, the loxP-flanked exon 14 in one allele of the Apc tumor suppressor is deleted all along the crypt–villus axis leading to the initial stage of the multi-step transformation process [19, 20] in either the WT or Ubc9+/− genetic background. Surprisingly, we found that 4-OHT treatment resulted in shortened survival of Ubc9+/− mice compared to their Ubc9+/+ counterparts (Fig. 2b). To determine whether this effect was related to tumor incidence and/or load, we assessed the number of adenomatous polyps (≥0.5 mm in diameter) generated 12 weeks after 4-OHT treatment. We found that Ubc9+/− mice developed twofold more adenomas, with medians of 10 and 22 polyps per animal in small intestines of Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− mice, respectively (Figs. 2c, S2b). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of these samples further confirmed the increased frequency of both dysplasia and tumors in Ubc9+/− mice (Figs. 2d, S2c). No differences in the morphology and general organization of tumors and dysplasia foci were found (Figs. 2d, S2b–d). Finally, the median size of Ubc9+/− polyps appears to be half that of WT (Fig. S2e), although, due to rounding off the measurements to the nearest 1 mm increment, the real median size difference may likely be less pronounced. A control experiment to address the possibility that Ubc9 haploinsufficiency merely accelerates Apc loss, and hence tumorigenesis, revealed that reduction of Ubc9 levels, here carried out in human U2OS cells, likely does not affect homologous recombination (HR), a process strictly required for tumorigenesis by loss of the second, WT Apc allele in the intestines of Ubc9;Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mice (Fig. S2h–j). This suggests that the higher adenoma frequency seen in Ubc9+/− mice is unlikely due to enhanced HR-dependent inactivation of the native Apc allele. Together, these data indicate that decreasing Ubc9 levels to a half-dose promotes intestinal tumorigenesis. Moreover, they suggest that tumor initiation, rather than development, is enhanced in this process.

Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− mice display similar transcriptomic profiles in adenomatous polyps or in normal intestinal tissue

We next sought to pinpoint the molecular pathways responsible for the stimulated intestinal tumorigenesis observed in Ubc9+/− mice. For this, we first compared Ubc9 protein levels in normal (N) and polyp (P) intestinal samples from Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mice 12 weeks after 4-OHT treatment. Higher c-Myc levels confirmed the transformed nature of polyp samples from both Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− genotypes (Fig. 2e). Besides the expected reduction in Ubc9+/− samples, interestingly, Ubc9 levels were nevertheless higher in polyps than in adjacent normal tissue in both the WT and the Ubc9+/− contexts (Fig. 2e).

Transcriptomic analysis of dissected polyps as well as of neighboring normal intestinal tissues from these animals revealed a total of only 11 differentially-expressed genes (DEGs, |log2FC| > log2(1.5) and adj. p value (FDR) < 0.05), with 7 and 4 up- and downregulated, respectively, in Ubc9+/− polyps when compared to WT (Fig. S2f, Table S1). Similar analysis of the neighboring normal intestinal tissue yielded only a set of 31 DEGs, of which 8 and 23 were up- and downregulated, respectively, in the Ubc9+/− animals (Fig. S2g, Table S2). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis applied to these small lists of genes failed to discern any specific ontology term related to cancer development, suggesting that Ubc9 status has little or no effect on the specific gene expression signatures of polyps or normal intestinal tissue, or that analysis of these “bulk” tissues may have failed to unmask cell type-specific transcriptional differences.

Ubc9 haploinsufficiency increases tumorigenesis upon Apc loss in Lgr5+ CBC cells

Given the enhancing effect of reduced Ubc9 levels on intestinal tumorigenesis, yet the absence of a clear transcriptomic effect in either bulk polyps or normal intestine, we focused subsequent analyses on the more restricted set of CBC cells that includes early progenitors, and importantly, the intestinal stem cells [22]. For this, we generated Ubc9;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mouse strains in which deletion of one loxP-flanked Apc allele is restricted to CBC cells [21]. In line with previous results (Fig. 2b), Ubc9+/− 4-OHT-treated mice displayed shorter survival than their Ubc+/+ counterparts (Figs. 3a, S3a). Moreover, mutant mice developed >2-fold more adenomas (≥0.5 mm in diameter), albeit with smaller size, in the small intestine 16 weeks after 4-OHT treatment (Figs. 3b, S3b). It is noteworthy that transformation rates in Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice were approximately threefold lower than previously seen in Ubc9;Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ animals, with medians of 2.5 and 6.5 polyps per mouse counted in Ubc9+/+ and Ubc+/− mice, respectively. This is also in line with the improved overall survival of Ubc9;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2;Apcf/+ compared to Ubc9;Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mice (compare Figs. 2b, 3a). Histological analysis again revealed no differences in morphology or general organization of lesions attributable to Ubc9 status (Fig. 3c). Altogether, these data show that loss of one Ubc9 allele also enhances tumor formation in vivo in an Apc-null background limited to CBC cells.

Fig. 3: Ubc9 haploinsufficiency favors polyp formation in Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2;Apcf/+ intestinal cancer mouse model.

a Kaplan–Meier survival curves of Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mice treated with 4-OHT as in Fig. 1b. Log-rank test was used. b Median number of small intestinal adenomas (≥0.5 mm in diameter) with min, 25 and 75 percentiles, and max values in Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− mice 16 weeks after treatment with 4-OHT, as in Fig. 1a. Unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was used. c Histological analysis of H&E-stained small intestinal sections obtained as in (b). Arrows indicate lesions also shown in the magnified insets.

Transcriptomic analysis of Lgr5+ CBC cells reveals a cancer-related and pro-inflammatory basal state under Ubc9 haploinsufficiency

Taking advantage of Lgr5-driven expression of EGFP in Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice, we obtained fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified Lgr5-EGFP+ cells derived from normal (Apc+/+) intestines from both Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− mice and performed a comparative analysis of their transcriptomic profiles (Fig. S4a). We found 205 DEGs (|log2FC| > log2(1.5) and adj. p value (FDR) < 0.05) in Ubc9+/− Lgr5-EGFP+ cells, when compared to Ubc9+/+ Lgr5-EGFP+ cells, of which 92 and 113 were up- and downregulated, respectively (Fig. 4, Table S3).

Fig. 4: Ubc9+/− CBC cells exhibit inflammatory and cancer-related transcriptomic signatures.

a Heatmap of 205 differentially-expressed genes (|log2FC| > log2(1.5) and adj. p value (FDR) < 0.05) in Ubc9+/− Lgr5-EGFP+ CBC cells from intestines of healthy Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice purified by FACS. n = 5 per group. b Gene Ontology (GO) and Pathway analysis of differentially-expressed genes upregulated (upper) and downregulated (lower) in Ubc9+/− Lgr5-EGFP+ CBC cells with adjusted p value (FDR Benjamini-Hochberg) < 0.05. GO’s Biological Process, and pathways from KEGG and REACTOME and MSigDB databases were challenged.

Interrogation of curated gene expression databases, using as template up- and downregulated genes separately, now revealed a group of DEGs that have been associated with different types of cancers. Among the upregulated genes were genes reported to have increased expression in HRas-transformed rat fibroblasts (Fig. 4b, Tables S3, S4). Among downregulated DEGs in Ubc9+/− Lgr5-EGFP+ cells, up to 17% were genes found to be repressed in early gastric cancer, colorectal adenocarcinoma, E2F1-overexpressing hepatocellular carcinoma and a subtype of basal breast cancer. Significantly, some downregulated genes (Capn9, Pnliprp1, Pnliprp2, Cgref1, Cyp2u1, Aldh1a1, and Car4) had also been found previously [29] to be upregulated in intestinal crypts upon deletion of β-catenin (CTNNB1; Fig. 4b, Tables S3, S4).

A further significant feature suggested by GO analysis of genes upregulated in Ubc9+/− Lgr5-EGFP+ cells were top-hit signatures for the inflammatory response, innate immune response, genes involved in the response mediated by the membrane-bound toll-like receptors, complement activation and response to bacteria (Fig. 4b, Table S4). Genes from the above-mentioned signatures represent 25% of the upregulated DEGs found in Ubc9+/− Lgr5-EGFP+ cells (Table S3), indicating that loss of one Ubc9 allele triggers a pro-inflammatory state in Lgr5+ CBC cells.

Ubc9+/− crypts harbor more Lgr5+ CBC cells

We next assessed whether Ubc9 haploinsufficiency could be associated with changes in intestinal crypts in Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice. In order to evaluate the localization of both Lgr5+ and Paneth cells, intestines from Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− mice were prepared for confocal microscopy and analyzed for EGFP and lysozyme, respectively. No differences were detected in the general architecture or localization of Lgr5-EGFP+ cells and Paneth cells within crypts from mice of both genotypes (Figs. 5a, S2a). Strikingly, blinded counting, however, revealed an elevated number of small intestinal Lgr5-EGFP+ CBC cells in Ubc9+/− crypts (medians of 21 and 24 per crypt for Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/−, respectively; Fig. 5a, b). This trend was consistent all along the small intestine but was not seen in colonic crypts (Fig. S5a, b). Thus, Ubc9 haploinsufficiency leads to a modest (15%) but significant expansion of the cell compartment containing intestinal stem cells. In addition, comparison of our transcriptomic data with a previously identified Lgr5+ stem cell signature gene set [30] revealed a significant enrichment of the signature genes in the Ubc9+/− CBC cells, suggesting a higher stemness state in mutant cells compared to the WT (Fig. 5c, Table S5).

Fig. 5: Ubc9+/− crypts harbor more Lgr5+ CBC cells.

a Confocal images of small intestinal crypts Ubc9+/+;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 and Ubc9+/−;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice in an Apc+/+ background. EGFP (Lgr5+ CBC cells, green), Lysozyme (Paneth Cells, red), and DAPI are shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. b Median (M, shown on graph) with min, 25 and 75 percentiles, and max values of Lgr5-EGFP+ CBC cells per crypt in small intestines as detected in (a). n = 137 crypts, 5 mice and 127 crypts, 5 mice for Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/−, respectively. Unpaired two-tailed t test was used. c Significant enrichment of ISC signature genes in Ubc9+/− FACS-purified Lgr5+-GFP CBC cells analyzed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). ES enrichment score, NES normalized enrichment score. d Western-blotting of SUMO1 and SUMO2 conjugates, Ubc9, c-Myc and Hoxa5 in intestinal villi (V)- and crypt (C)-enriched populations from healthy Ubc9;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice. *Non-specific.

Enhanced sumoylation in intestinal crypts and polyps

Finally, we analyzed the sumoylation status in partially-purified villi and crypt-based cells from Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− animals. For this, washed, longitudinally-opened intestines were first scraped to release villi cells and then treated with EDTA to liberate crypt-based cells for analysis by western blotting. As expected, expression of markers for undifferentiated cells, c-Myc [31], and differentiated cells, Hoxa5 [32], was higher and lower, respectively, in crypt-enriched compared to villi-containing samples (Fig. 5d). In line with this observation, mRNA expression of β-catenin/Wnt pathway components known to be highly expressed in crypts, such as c-Myc, Smoc2 and Axin2 [30] was also found to be elevated (Fig. S5c, “C”), whereas expression of the differentiation marker Krt20 [33] was found to be higher in villi-enriched samples (Fig. S5c, “V”), thus also validating the proper separation of cell populations. Significantly, total free SUMO and SUMO conjugate levels were higher in crypt-enriched cell fraction (Fig. 5d, “C”), with, however, no clear differences between Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− samples, as also seen in whole intestine (Fig. 2a). Higher Ubc9 (see also Fig. 2e) and free SUMO levels were similarly observed in adenomatous polyps (P) when compared to normal tissue (N) in both Ubc9+/+ and Ubc9+/− mice in an Apc-loss background (Fig. S5d). Remarkably, while this was accompanied by increased levels of SUMO conjugates in polyps from WT mice, we failed to detect such globally enhanced sumoylation in the tumors from Ubc9+/− mice, indicating that, in the latter, Ubc9 levels appear limiting for efficient sumoylation. Together, these results point towards a greater global SUMO pathway activity in both the proliferative crypt compartment and in the dysplastic polyp tissue. Of note, this is consistent with findings in human colon adenocarcinomas that also exhibit elevated Ubc9 protein expression [34] and almost twofold increases in median transcript levels in tumors (n = 275) compared to non-tumor (n = 349) tissues (GEPIA database,, queried for UBE2I (Ubc9)) [35].


Here we have shown that Ubc9 haploinsufficiency enhances tumorigenesis and lethality in Apc loss-driven mouse models of intestinal neoplasia. This surprising outcome is associated with a moderate but detectable (15%) increase in the number of Lgr5+ CBC cells, which, in addition, display a higher degree of stemness and cancer-, inflammation- and innate immunity-related gene expression signatures. We also found that Ubc9 haploinsufficiency enhances the proliferative capacities of transformed MEFs both in vitro and ex vivo. Together, these studies establish an as yet unappreciated tumor-suppressive activity for sumoylation.

A basic question emerging from these results is whether Ubc9 haploinsufficiency indeed translates into reduced cellular sumoylation, given that globally visible SUMO conjugate levels appear largely unaffected by loss of one Ubc9 allele, notably in transformed MEFs and healthy intestine (Figs. 1b, 2a). It is difficult to imagine, however, that the observed phenotypes under haploinsufficiency result from compromised sumoylation-independent Ubc9 activity. Rather, we suggest the involvement of specific “under-modified” substrate conjugates, whose detection is masked here by other, abundantly-modified proteins in such global analysis. The identification of these specific substrates, although technically challenging, may thus shed important light on the pathways and molecular mechanisms involved. Moreover, while Ubc9 haploinsufficiency does not always reduce sumoylation visibly, it does reduce sumoylation capacity, as seen most clearly in polyps, a tumor state highly demanding in sumoylation (Fig. S5d). This indicates that different cell types make different demands on the SUMO system and, conversely, that they might therefore display different sensitivities to its reduction. The smaller polyp size under Ubc9 haploinsufficiency (Figs. S2e, S3b) indeed suggests that insufficient sumoylation capacity may be a handicap for tumor growth.

Why, in contrast, Ubc9 haploinsufficiency in transformed MEFs results in enhanced proliferation (Fig. 1) could be explained by both the reduction of an as yet uncharacterized growth-inhibiting function of sumoylation, that may also apply to Lgr5+ CBC cells (Fig. 5a, b), and to a reduced sensitivity to inhibition of these different cell types. In both cases our results show that reduced sumoylation capacity, when mild, is not necessarily associated with reduced proliferative capacity.

Our findings that Ubc9+/− Lgr5+ CBC cells display a pro-inflammatory state under normal conditions (Fig. 4b and Tables S3, S4) are in line with sumoylation acting as a general repressor of the inflammatory response, as shown in myeloid cells [36]. Inhibition of Ubc9 has been shown to activate pro-inflammatory regulators, such as RelA, cFos, cJun, and IFN-γ in cultured HCT-8 epithelial cells, and to lead to decreased amounts of the anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokine in primary intestinal epithelial cells [37]. Lower sumoylation rates, possibly due to enhanced SENP7 desumoylase activity, were also detected in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and were described as a prerequisite for the onset of inflammation in colons from mice with dextran sodium sulfate- (DSS-) induced colitis [37, 38]. Significantly, previous studies also indicate a link between increased CBC cell numbers, as seen here, and inflammation. For example, a small increase in the number of Lgr5+ CBC cells and a significant rise in BrdU+ proliferating cells per crypt in the large intestine has been described in mice administrated with the inflammatory agent DSS [39]. Similarly, intestinal organoids treated with low doses of pro-inflammatory IL-22 [40] or the chronic colitis-associated cytokine TNF-α [39], displayed a small but significant increase in the percentage of Lgr5+ CBC cells. These observations indicate that mild and non-pathogenic levels of inflammation may indeed promote CBC cell renewal, consistent with our results (Figs. 5a, b, S5a) and the known roles of inflammation in tumorigenesis and tissue regeneration [41, 42]. Conditions, such as Ubc9 haploinsufficiency that increases the number of stem cells together with promoting a pro-inflammatory state, would thereby also increase the number of cells with tumor-initiating potential, and hence tumorigenesis.

Recent findings showing that sumoylation represents a significant barrier to cell fate change [43, 44] may provide a further explanation for increased CBC cell number (Figs. 5a, b, S5a). While CBC cells dividing symmetrically at the crypt base represent the normal source of intestinal stem cells for tissue maintenance, mounting evidence indicates that during injury, lost stem cells in the crypt can be replenished from the “+4” “reserve” cell population [45], from committed secretory progenitor cells [46], from Paneth and enteroendocrine lineage precursors [47, 48] or from early enterocyte lineage (absorptive) cell precursors [49]. It would thus be interesting to determine if Ubc9 haploinsufficiency, like injury, increases such cellular plasticity leading to increased CBC cell number. Moreover, in this scenario, this may also contribute to a second function, enhanced inflammatory signaling, shown necessary for the conversion of such non-stem cells to cells with tumor-initiating potential [50].

Finally, our finding of a tumor-suppressive function of sumoylation appears at odds with previously established roles of sumoylation in cancer. Indeed, the pro-tumorigenic role of sumoylation is inferred from the enhanced levels of SUMO pathway enzymes, and hence, sumoylation dynamics, and from the accrued sensitivity to inhibition of global sumoylation seen in many cancer cells [reviewed in ref. 7]. It must be borne in mind, however, that, as shown here, Ubc9 haploinsufficiency increases the frequency of tumor initiation events, as seen by the increased number of polyps. Indeed, under normal (Apc+/+) conditions, reduced (i.e., haploinsufficient) Ubc9 activity appears sufficient to ensure cell functionality. However, when cells face stress, such as loss of Apc tumor suppressor activity, this may become a handicap for maintaining the controlled nonmalignant state, in line also with the observed cancer-related transcriptome signature.

Together, our findings support a view of sumoylation as a buffering system against stress. As such, this system must first be overcome (aided experimentally by Ubc9 haploinsufficiency) during the initiation phase of tumorigenesis, to be then rewired, or even enhanced, to serve in mechanisms that ultimately protect the cancerous state. Given the “druggability” of the SUMO pathway [16], deeper understanding of these dose- and cell type dependent, seemingly paradoxical consequences of targeting the SUMO system may have important therapeutic implications.

Materials and methods


Ubc9+/− [10] and Ubc9f/−;Rosa26CreERT2 [23] mice have been described previously. Ubc9+/−;Villin-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mice were obtained by crossing Ubc9+/− with Villin-CreERT2 mice [28] and then with Apcf/+ mice [27]. Ubc9+/−;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 animals were obtained by crossing Ubc9+/− with Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice [21]. Ubc9+/−;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2;Apcf/+ mice were created by crossing Ubc9+/−;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 with Apcf/+ mice [27]. See Supplementary Information for details.


Paraffin-embedded 4 µm sections were stained using H&E solution and blindly analyzed by a pathologist. See Supplementary Information for details.

Cell culture and growth of transformed MEFs

MEFs were obtained from three Ubc9f/−;Rosa26CreERT2 or Ubc9+/+;Rosa26CreERT2 embryos at day E12.5 and pooled. Low-passage Rosa26-CreERT2 p53DN and HRASV12-transformed MEFs were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT; Sigma-Aldrich) or ethanol (EtOH) as control for the indicated time for growth experiments and were also used for 2D plate colony formation (low density), foci formation (high density), and 3D soft-agar colony formation assays. See Supplementary Information for details.

Homologous recombination reporter assay

HR was determined as described previously [51] using a DR-GFP reporter stably integrated into U2OS human osteosarcoma cells. See Supplementary Information for details.

Western blotting

Protein extracts from cultured cells were obtained by lysing the cells directly in Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA, USA). Protein extracts from tissues were obtained by immersing the tissue in RIPA buffer in Lysing Matrix D-containing tubes (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France). See Supplementary Information for details.

Flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

Analysis of cell cycle and apoptosis in transformed MEFs was carried out using the Muse Cell Analyzer (Millipore, Hayward CA, USA) and the Muse Cell Cycle and Muse Annexin V and Dead Cell kits, respectively (Luminex, Austin TX, USA). Purification of Lgr5-EGFP+ CBC cells from normal non-treated Ubc9;Lgr5-IRES-EGFP-CreERT2 mice and preparation of villi- and crypt-enriched populations were performed adapting previously-described protocols [30, 52]. Single EGFPhigh, CD24middle, EpCampositive, and PInegative CBC cells were sorted using MoFlo Astrios Cell Sorter (Beckman Coulter). See Supplementary Information for details.

Quantitative PCR

RNA was purified using Trizol (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati OH, USA) according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the primer sets specified in Supplementary Table S6.

Transcriptome profiling

RNA profiling was performed using GeneChip MoGene 2.0 ST Array (Applied Biosystems) and normalized and analyzed using open-source Bioconductor packages on R [53, 54]. Differentially-expressed genes (adj. p value (FDR) < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 1.5) were used to challenge curated databases [55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. For GSEA analysis, all differentially and non-differentially-expressed genes in FACS-purified EGFPhigh CBC cells were queried against a previously published intestinal stem cell signature [30]. See Supplementary Information for details.

Detection of Lgr5-EGFP+ CBC cells

Cryo-sections (50 μm thick) of intestines from Ubc9;Lgr5-EGFP-IRES-CreERT2 were analyzed for EGFP and Lysozyme expression by confocal microscopy and blindly analyzed using Fiji (ImageJ). See Supplementary Information for details.


Cell-based experiments were carried out with at least three biological replicates. Experiments involving mice were performed in at least six animals per group. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 8 software. See Supplementary Information for details.

Data availability

Transcriptomic data from this study were deposited in the GEO database ( under accession numbers GSE146106 (Fig. 4) and GSE146039 (Fig. S2).

Code availability

Computer code can be accessed upon request.


  1. 1.

    Flotho A, Melchior F. Sumoylation: a regulatory protein modification in health and disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013;82:357–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hendriks IA, Vertegaal AC. A comprehensive compilation of SUMO proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:581–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Golebiowski F, Matic I, Tatham MH, Cole C, Yin Y, Nakamura A, et al. System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stankovic-Valentin N, Melchior F. Control of SUMO and Ubiquitin by ROS: signaling and disease implications. Mol Asp Med. 2018;63:3–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jackson SP, Durocher D. Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol Cell. 2013;49:795–807.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bettermann K, Benesch M, Weis S, Haybaeck J. SUMOylation in carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2012;316:113–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Seeler JS, Dejean A. SUMO and the robustness of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:184–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Seufert W, Futcher B, Jentsch S. Role of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in degradation of S- and M-phase cyclins. Nature. 1995;373:78–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hayashi T, Seki M, Maeda D, Wang W, Kawabe Y, Seki T, et al. Ubc9 is essential for viability of higher eukaryotic cells. Exp Cell Res. 2002;280:212–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nacerddine K, Lehembre F, Bhaumik M, Artus J, Cohen-Tannoudji M, Babinet C, et al. The SUMO pathway is essential for nuclear integrity and chromosome segregation in mice. Dev Cell. 2005;9:769–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Neyret-Kahn H, Benhamed M, Ye T, Le Gras S, Cossec JC, Lapaquette P, et al. Sumoylation at chromatin governs coordinated repression of a transcriptional program essential for cell growth and proliferation. Genome Res. 2013;23:1563–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Luo J, Solimini NL, Elledge SJ. Principles of cancer therapy: oncogene and non-oncogene addiction. Cell. 2009;136:823–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nagel R, Semenova EA, Berns A. Drugging the addict: non-oncogene addiction as a target for cancer therapy. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:1516–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kessler JD, Kahle KT, Sun T, Meerbrey KL, Schlabach MR, Schmitt EM, et al. A SUMOylation-dependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis. Science. 2012;335:348–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yu B, Swatkoski S, Holly A, Lee LC, Giroux V, Lee CS, et al. Oncogenesis driven by the Ras/Raf pathway requires the SUMO E2 ligase Ubc9. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E1724–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    He X, Riceberg J, Soucy T, Koenig E, Minissale J, Gallery M, et al. Probing the roles of SUMOylation in cancer cell biology by using a selective SAE inhibitor. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:1164–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Clevers H. The intestinal crypt, a prototype stem cell compartment. Cell. 2013;154:274–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996;87:159–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pino MS, Chung DC. The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2059–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jackstadt R, Sansom OJ. Mouse models of intestinal cancer. J Pathol. 2016;238:141–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, Kujala P, van den Born M, Cozijnsen M, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Barker N, Ridgway RA, van Es JH, van de Wetering M, Begthel H, van den Born M, et al. Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature. 2009;457:608–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Demarque MD, Nacerddine K, Neyret-Kahn H, Andrieux A, Danenberg E, Jouvion G, et al. Sumoylation by Ubc9 regulates the stem cell compartment and structure and function of the intestinal epithelium in mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:286–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Alvarez A, Barisone GA, Diaz E. Focus formation: a cell-based assay to determine the oncogenic potential of a gene. J Vis Exp. 2014.

  25. 25.

    Borowicz S, Van Scoyk M, Avasarala S, Karuppusamy Rathinam MK, Tauler J, Bikkavilli RK, et al. The soft agar colony formation assay. J Vis Exp. 2014.

  26. 26.

    Rafehi H, Orlowski C, Georgiadis GT, Ververis K, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC. Clonogenic assay: adherent cells. J Vis Exp. 2011.

  27. 27.

    Colnot S, Decaens T, Niwa-Kawakita M, Godard C, Hamard G, Kahn A, et al. Liver-targeted disruption of Apc in mice activates beta-catenin signaling and leads to hepatocellular carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:17216–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    el Marjou F, Janssen KP, Chang BH, Li M, Hindie V, Chan L, et al. Tissue-specific and inducible Cre-mediated recombination in the gut epithelium. Genesis. 2004;39:186–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fevr T, Robine S, Louvard D, Huelsken J. Wnt/beta-catenin is essential for intestinal homeostasis and maintenance of intestinal stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:7551–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Muñoz J, Stange DE, Schepers AG, van de Wetering M, Koo BK, Itzkovitz S, et al. The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent ‘+4’ cell markers. EMBO J. 2012;31:3079–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, Hermeking H, Zawel L, da Costa LT, et al. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science. 1998;281:1509–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ordonez-Moran P, Dafflon C, Imajo M, Nishida E, Huelsken J. HOXA5 counteracts stem cell traits by inhibiting Wnt signaling in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:815–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Moll R, Zimbelmann R, Goldschmidt MD, Keith M, Laufer J, Kasper M, et al. The human gene encoding cytokeratin 20 and its expression during fetal development and in gastrointestinal carcinomas. Differentiation. 1993;53:75–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Moschos SJ, Jukic DM, Athanassiou C, Bhargava R, Dacic S, Wang X, et al. Expression analysis of Ubc9, the single small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) E2 conjugating enzyme, in normal and malignant tissues. Hum Pathol. 2010;41:1286–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W98–W102.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Decque A, Joffre O, Magalhaes JG, Cossec JC, Blecher-Gonen R, Lapaquette P, et al. Sumoylation coordinates the repression of inflammatory and anti-viral gene-expression programs during innate sensing. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:140–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mustfa SA, Singh M, Suhail A, Mohapatra G, Verma S, Chakravorty D, et al. SUMOylation pathway alteration coupled with downregulation of SUMO E2 enzyme at mucosal epithelium modulates inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Open Biol. 2017;7

  38. 38.

    Suhail A, Rizvi ZA, Mujagond P, Ali SA, Gaur P, Singh M, et al. DeSUMOylase SENP7-mediated epithelial signaling triggers intestinal inflammation via expansion of gamma-delta T cells. Cell Rep. 2019;29:3522–38.e3527.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bu P, Wang L, Chen KY, Srinivasan T, Murthy PK, Tung KL, et al. A miR-34a-numb feedforward loop triggered by inflammation regulates asymmetric stem cell division in intestine and colon cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:189–202.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lindemans CA, Calafiore M, Mertelsmann AM, O’Connor MH, Dudakov JA, Jenq RR, et al. Interleukin-22 promotes intestinal-stem-cell-mediated epithelial regeneration. Nature. 2015;528:560–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Karin M, Clevers H. Reparative inflammation takes charge of tissue regeneration. Nature. 2016;529:307–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cheloufi S, Elling U, Hopfgartner B, Jung YL, Murn J, Ninova M, et al. The histone chaperone CAF-1 safeguards somatic cell identity. Nature. 2015;528:218–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cossec JC, Theurillat I, Chica C, Bua Aguin S, Gaume X, Andrieux A, et al. SUMO safeguards somatic and pluripotent cell identities by enforcing distinct chromatin states. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:742–57.e748.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tian H, Biehs B, Warming S, Leong KG, Rangell L, Klein OD, et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature. 2011;478:255–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    van Es JH, Sato T, van de Wetering M, Lyubimova A, Yee Nee AN, Gregorieff A, et al. Dll1+ secretory progenitor cells revert to stem cells upon crypt damage. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:1099–104.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Buczacki SJ, Zecchini HI, Nicholson AM, Russell R, Vermeulen L, Kemp R, et al. Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5. Nature. 2013;495:65–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Basak O, van de Born M, Korving J, Beumer J, van der Elst S, van Es JH, et al. Mapping early fate determination in Lgr5+ crypt stem cells using a novel Ki67-RFP allele. EMBO J. 2014;33:2057–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tetteh PW, Basak O, Farin HF, Wiebrands K, Kretzschmar K, Begthel H, et al. Replacement of lost Lgr5-positive stem cells through plasticity of their enterocyte-lineage daughters. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:203–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Schwitalla S, Fingerle AA, Cammareri P, Nebelsiek T, Goktuna SI, Ziegler PK, et al. Intestinal tumorigenesis initiated by dedifferentiation and acquisition of stem-cell-like properties. Cell. 2013;152:25–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pierce AJ, Johnson RD, Thompson LH, Jasin M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2633–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N, Stange DE, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459:262–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Carvalho BS, Irizarry RA. A framework for oligonucleotide microarray preprocessing. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2363–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    The Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D330–8.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Fabregat A, Jupe S, Matthews L, Sidiropoulos K, Gillespie M, Garapati P, et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D649–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D353–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Chen J, Bardes EE, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W305–311.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by grants from INCa, LNCC (Equipe labellisée), Odyssey, ANR and ERC-AdG “SUMOSTRESS” and “SUMiDENTITY” to AD, and by the Josef Steiner Cancer Foundation and ERC-CoG “Cancer Recurrence” to JvR. IL was supported by Fondation ARC (PDF20170505624). We thank Dr. Giulia Nigro and the Institut Pasteur UTechS facility for technical input and Drs. Bob Weinberg, Maria Jasin, and Sérgio F. de Almeida for providing reagents.

Author information




IL, EC, and AD planned the studies. IL and EC performed most of the experiments and analyzed the data. SIJE analyzed the Lgr5+ CBC cell content by immunofluorescence and interpreted the data with JvR. AA contributed to the mouse studies. P-FR and JPC performed the transcriptomic analysis, GJ the histological analysis. IL, J-SS and AD analyzed data and wrote the paper with input from JvR and SIJE.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jacob-S. Seeler or Anne Dejean.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Mice were bred at the Pasteur Institute animal facility in specific-pathogen-free conditions and studies were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and French and European law (Institut Pasteur animal experimentation ethics committee approval number 2016-0025).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López, I., Chalatsi, E., Ellenbroek, S.I.J. et al. An unanticipated tumor-suppressive role of the SUMO pathway in the intestine unveiled by Ubc9 haploinsufficiency. Oncogene 39, 6692–6703 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links