Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Viral integration in BK polyomavirus-associated urothelial carcinoma in renal transplant recipients: multistage carcinogenesis revealed by next-generation virome capture sequencing

Abstract

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated cancer after transplantation has gained increasing attention. However, the role of BKPyV integration on oncogenesis is still unclear. In this study, next-generation virome capture sequencing of primary and metastatic tumors were performed in three patients with BKPyV-associated urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation. As a result, a total of 332 viral integration sites were identified in the six tumors. Integration of BKPyV in both primary and metastatic tumors followed the mechanism of microhomology-mediated end joining mostly, since microhomologies between human and BKPyV genomes were significantly enriched in flanking regions of 84% of the integration sites. Viral DNA breakpoints were nonrandom and tended to assemble in large T gene, small T gene and viral protein 2 gene. There were three, one and one consensus integration sites between the primary and metastatic tumors, which affected LINC01924, eIF3c, and NEIL2 genes in the three cases respectively. Thus, we concluded that integration of BKPyV was a continuous process occurring in both primary and metastatic tumors, generating heterogenous tumor cell populations. Through this ongoing process, certain cell populations might have gained growth advantage or metastatic potential, as a result of viral integration either affecting the cellular genes where the viral DNA integrated to or altering the expression or function of the viral genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Pathological findings of Cases 1–3.
Fig. 2: Number of detected integration sites in each sample by WGS and virome capture sequencing.
Fig. 3: Patterns of viral integration.
Fig. 4: Distribution and corresponding supporting reads of the BK poliomavirus (BKPyV) integration sites in three cases.
Fig. 5: The role of viral integration in multi-staged progression of tumor.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Whole genome sequencing data of the six samples are available at NCBI Sequence ReadArchive with the BioProject accession number of PRJNA643598. Integration sites identified by capture sequencing were summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Virome capture sequencing data and probe sequences are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Knowles WA, Pipkin P, Andrews N, Vyse A, Minor P, Brown DW, et al. Population-based study of antibody to the human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV and the simian polyomavirus SV40. J Med Virol. 2003;71:115–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Egli A, Infanti L, Dumoulin A, Buser A, Samaridis J, Stebler C, et al. Prevalence of polyomavirus BK and JC infection and replication in 400 healthy blood donors. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:837–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwarz A, Linnenweber-Held S, Heim A, Brocker V, Rieck D, Framke T, et al. Factors influencing viral clearing and renal function during polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2012;94:396–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Starrett GJ, Buck CB. The case for BK polyomavirus as a cause of bladder cancer. Curr Opin Virol. 2019;39:8–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Delbue S, Ferrante P, Provenzano M. Polyomavirus BK and prostate cancer: an unworthy scientific effort? Oncoscience. 2014;1:296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brugge JS, Butel JS. Role of simian virus 40 gene A function in maintenance of transformation. J Virol. 1975;15:619–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cicala C, Pompetti F, Carbone M. SV40 induces mesotheliomas in hamsters. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1524–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kenan DJ, Mieczkowski PA, Burger-Calderon R, Singh HK, Nickeleit V. The oncogenic potential of BK-polyomavirus is linked to viral integration into the human genome. J Pathol. 2015;237:379–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenan DJ, Mieczkowski PA, Latulippe E, Cote I, Singh HK, Nickeleit V. BK polyomavirus genomic integration and large T antigen expression: evolving paradigms in human oncogenesis. Am J Transpl. 2017;17:1674–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu F, Deng W, Yu S, Liu Y, Yu L, Liu R, et al. Occurrence and regression of BK polyomavirus associated carcinoma: a clinical and next-generation sequencing study. Clin Sci. 2018;132:1753–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jin Y, Zhou Y, Deng W, Lee R, Liu Y, Blute M, et al. Genome-wide profiling of BK polyomavirus integration in urothelial carcinoma of kidney transplant recipients reveals a potential microhomology or nonhomologous end joining mediated integration mechanism. Am J Transpl. 2019;193:1158.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borchert S, Czech-Sioli M, Neumann F, Schmidt C, Wimmer P, Dobner T, et al. High-affinity Rb binding, p53 inhibition, subcellular localization, and transformation by wild-type or tumor-derived shortened Merkel cell polyomavirus large T antigens. J Virol. 2014;88:3144–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Houben R, Dreher C, Angermeyer S, Borst A, Utikal J, Haferkamp S, et al. Mechanisms of p53 restriction in Merkel cell carcinoma cells are independent of the Merkel cell polyoma virus T antigens. J Investig Dermatol. 2013;133:2453–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, Dalgliesh GL, Hunter C, Bignell G, et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2007;446:153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Merid SK, Goranskaya D, Alexeyenko A. Distinguishing between driver and passenger mutations in individual cancer genomes by network enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 2014;15:308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA. The cancer genome. Nature. 2009;458:719–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferber MJ, Thorland EC, Brink AA, Rapp AK, Phillips LA, McGovern R, et al. Preferential integration of human papillomavirus type 18 near the c-myc locus in cervical carcinoma. Oncogene. 2003;22:7233–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masutani M, Sonenberg N, Yokoyama S, Imataka H. Reconstitution reveals the functional core of mammalian eIF3. EMBO J. 2007;26:3373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu J, Luo H, Xu Y, Luo G, Xu S, Zhu J, et al. The prognostic significance of EIF3C gene during the tumorigenesis of prostate cancer. Cancer Investig. 2019;37:199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei H, Kamat A, Chen M, Ke HL, Chang DW, Yin J, et al. Association of polymorphisms in oxidative stress genes with clinical outcomes for bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. PLos ONE. 2012;7:e38533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jin L, Gibson PE, Booth JC, Clewley JP. Genomic typing of BK virus in clinical specimens by direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products. J Med Virol. 1993;41:11–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moens U, Van Ghelue M. Polymorphism in the genome of non-passaged human polyomavirus BK: implications for cell tropism and the pathological role of the virus. Virology. 2005;331:209–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Starrett GJ, Thakuria M, Chen T, Marcelus C, Cheng J, Nomburg J, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of virus-positive and virus-negative Merkel cell carcinoma. Genome Med. 2020;12:30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Muller DC, Ramo M, Naegele K, Ribi S, Wetterauer C, Perrina V, et al. Donor-derived, metastatic urothelial cancer after kidney transplantation associated with a potentially oncogenic BK polyomavirus. J Pathol. 2018;244:265–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anzivino E, Zingaropoli MA, Iannetta M, Pietropaolo VA, Oliva A, Iori F, et al. Archetype and rearranged non-coding control regions in urothelial bladder carcinoma of immunocompetent individuals. Cancer Genom Proteom. 2016;13:499–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao LH, Liu X, Yan HX, Li WY, Zeng X, Yang Y, et al. Genomic and oncogenic preference of HBV integration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mouw KW, Goldberg MS, Konstantinopoulos PA, D’Andrea AD. DNA damage and repair biomarkers of immunotherapy response. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:675–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenfeldt MT, O’Prey J, Morton JP, Nixon C, MacKay G, Mrowinska A, et al. p53 status determines the role of autophagy in pancreatic tumour development. Nature. 2013;504:296–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Javorka P, Raxwal VK, Najvarek J, Riha K. artMAP: a user-friendly tool for mapping ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations in Arabidopsis. Plant Direct. 2019;3:e146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zeitouni B, Boeva V, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Loeillet S, Legoix-né P, Nicolas A, et al. SVDetect: a tool to identify genomic structural variations from paired-end and mate-pair sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1895–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [grant number 2020A1515010674], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81500573], Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [grant number 201803010109] and President Funding of Nanfang Hospital [grant number 2018B009, 2018C003]. And we thanked Dr. Min-Hua Luo (Wuhan Institute of Virology, Wuhan, China) for her assisstant in the study design and critical revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chin-Lee Wu or Yun Miao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Deng, W. et al. Viral integration in BK polyomavirus-associated urothelial carcinoma in renal transplant recipients: multistage carcinogenesis revealed by next-generation virome capture sequencing. Oncogene 39, 5734–5742 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01398-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01398-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links