Chemotherapy is the preferred treatment for advanced stage gastric cancer (GC) patients and chemotherapy resistance is the major obstacle to effective cancer therapy. Increasing evidence suggests that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) make important contributions to development of drug resistance. However, the underlying mechanism remains elusive. In this study, we discovered that abundant MSCs in tumor tissues predicted a poor prognosis in GC patients. MSCs promoted stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells through fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in vitro and in vivo. Mechanically, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) secretion by MSCs activated SMAD2/3 through TGF-β receptors and induced long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) MACC1-AS1 expression in GC cells, which promoted FAO-dependent stemness and chemoresistance through antagonizing miR-145-5p. Moreover, pharmacologic inhibition of FAO with etomoxir (ETX) attenuated MSC-induced FOLFOX regiment resistance in vivo. These results suggest that FAO plays an important role in MSC-mediated stemness and chemotherapy resistance in GC and FAO inhibitors in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs present as a promising strategy to overcome chemoresistance.
Gastric cancer (GC) is a critical health burden and the second common cause of cancer-related death globally . Chemotherapy is the preferred treatment for advanced stage GC patients. 5-Florouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimens, such as 5-FU in combination with cisplatin (DDP) or oxaliplatin, are generally accepted as the first-line treatments in advanced GC [2,3,4]. Despite the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients, the survival of patients with GC is substantially worse than that of patients with most other solid malignancies and chemotherapy still achieves a limited response rate [5, 6]. Development of chemoresistance, whether intrinsic or acquired, is a major challenge to efficacy of GC treatment.
The mechanism of GC developing chemotherapy resistance is complicated and not well understood. Both genetic and microenvironmental factors can lead to chemoresistance. As an important part of tumor environment, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play a significant role in the resistance of anticancer drugs [7, 8], wherein the acquisition of increased stemness property in cancer cells is one of the important mechanisms that MSCs confer resistance to chemotherapy [7,8,9]. However, little is known about the role of metabolic changes of stemness acquisition in cancer cells during MSC-induced chemoresistance.
Cancer cells undergo metabolic reprogramming to support their growth and progression in the complex tumor microenvironment. Fatty acids (FAs) are important energy resources through FA oxidation (FAO), which has been shown to be required for cancer cell growth and survival . Recently, it is reported that FAO is able to support breast cancer stem cell self-renewal and drug resistance but exert little effect on non-stem cancer cells . Inhibiting FAO represses stemness and alleviates tumor growth [10, 12, 13]. Nonetheless, whether FAO is involved in MSC-induced stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells remains unknown.
With the advancement in high-throughput transcriptome analysis by next-generation sequencing in recent years, a large number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been discovered . Increasing evidence has indicated that lncRNAs can participate in multiple tumor biological processes, including maintaining stemness properties and drug resistance [15,16,17]. We previously reported that lncRNA MACC1-AS1 can facilitate metabolic plasticity through antioxidant production, alleviating with a lower reactive oxygen species (ROS) load under metabolic stress . Lower ROS levels are critical for maintaining stemness and drug resistance [19,20,21]. Thus we hypothesized that MACC1-AS1 may contribute to stemness and chemoresistance.
Herein we provide evidence that MSCs promote stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells through FAO. Mechanically, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) secreted by MSCs activated SMAD2/3 through TGF-β receptors, which then induced lncRNA MACC1-AS1 expression in GC cells and promoted FAO-dependent stemness and chemoresistance through antagonizing miR-145-5p.
MSCs promote stemness and chemoresistance and predict a poor prognosis in GC
In order to determine whether MSCs can promote stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells, GC cell lines AGS and MKN45 were co-cultured with MSCs via transwell co-culture system. After co-culturing, stemness genes CD133, OCT4, SOX2 and LIN28 expression levels were enhanced in both mRNA and protein levels (Supplementary Fig. 1a-b). The population of CD44 positive (CD44+) GC cells, recognized as cancer stem cell (CSC) typical markers, was significantly increased as detected by flow cytometric analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Moreover, sphere-formation ability of GC cells and the expression levels of stemness genes in sphere-forming GC cells were obviously increased when co-cultured with MSCs indicating the enhanced self-renewal capability of GC cells (Fig. 1a, b). Colony-formation assay showed that growth inhibition effects of 1 μg/mL 5-FU and 3 μg/mL oxaliplatin on GC cells were remarkably decreased in the presence of MSCs (Fig. 1c). These findings suggested that MSCs can promote stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells.
To further investigate the effect of MSCs on tumor initiation, we subcutaneously injected limiting dilution of MKN45 cells at three dosages, 5 × 103, 5 × 104, and 5 × 105, with or without 5 × 106 admixed MSCs. Compared to injection of GC cells alone, the presence of MSCs increased the tumor-initiating frequencies from 0/6, 0/6, and 3/6 to 4/6, 6/6, and 6/6. Notably, injection of GC cells alone was not able to induce tumor formation even with the cell count of 5 × 103 or 5 × 104 cells after 6 weeks. However, when they were mixed with 5 × 106 MSCs, tumor formation occurred within 3 weeks or 1 week, which indicates that MSCs induce de novo tumor formation of GC cells (Fig. 1d, e). As measured by the extreme limiting dilution analysis (ELDA) , the frequency of tumor initiation in GC cells alone was from 3.88 × 10–7 to 3.70 × 10–6; in the presence of admixed MSCs the frequency was increased, from 7.86 × 10−5 to 6.15 × 10−4 (Fig. 1f). These results indicate that MSCs enhance tumor initiation and are responsible for facilitating de novo tumor formation.
To determine whether MSCs were recruited to tumor tissues and accounted for poor outcome of GC patients, we analyzed the expression levels of MSC surface antigen markers, CD29 and CD90, in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. CD29 and CD90 double-positive MSCs were more abundant in GC tissue as compared to non-cancerous gastric tissue and also associated with shortened recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients (Fig. 1g, h). Additionally, we analyzed the expression levels of CD29 and CD90 in primary GC samples and matched adjacent nontumorous gastric tissues from 151 patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The results showed that the expression levels of CD29 and CD90 were expression correlated with more advanced tumor, node metastasis stages, tumor invasion, lymph node, and distant metastases and recurrence (Fig. 1i, j and Table 1). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that higher co-expression of CD29 and CD90 was correlated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) (stage I–III GC patients) and overall survival (OS) (stage IV GC patients) (Fig. 1k, l). Additionally, the score of stemness gene OCT4 was higher in CD29 and CD90 double-positive GC tissues in comparison with CD29 and CD90 double-negative GC tissues (Supplementary Fig. 1d-e). These results suggest that MSCs promote stemness and chemoresistance and predict a poor outcome in GC patients.
FAO plays an important role in MSC induced-stemness and chemoresistance
During the past decade, researchers have gained better understanding in the relationship between cancer metabolism and cancer stemness [23,24,25]. However, the contribution of lipid catabolism to cancer stemness remains unclear. Recent studies have demonstrated that stemness maintenance benefits from FAO by mitochondrial metabolism of FAs [13, 26]. Hence, we wondered whether FAO played an important role in MSC-inducing stemness and chemotherapy resistance. We found that the expression levels of FAO-associated enzymes, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1) and acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase (ACS), were increased in both GC cells and sphere-forming GC cells when co-cultured with MSCs (Fig. 2a, b). Consistently, FA uptake, CPT1 activity, FAO rate, and ATP level of GC cells were enhanced in the presence of MSCs (Supplementary Fig. 2a and Fig. 2c–e).
To investigate the role of FAO in stemness and chemotherapy resistance, AGS and MKN45 cells were transfected with siCPT1 sequences, which decreased CPT1 mRNA and protein expression (Supplementary Fig. 2b-c). Expression levels of stemness genes were remarkably reduced with silencing of CPT1 (Fig. 2f). MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)−2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay showed that inhibition of CPT1 expression increased the growth inhibition effect in GC subjected to 5-FU and oxaliplatin, suggesting that silence of CPT1 enhances the sensitivity of GC cells to chemotherapy (Supplementary Fig. 2d).
Next FAO inhibitor etomoxir (ETX), which specifically suppresses CPT1, was employed to further investigate the contribution of FAO to MSC-induced stemness and chemoresistance. We treated GC cells with or without 100 μmol/L ETX for 48 h cultured either alone or with MSCs. As expected, the expression levels of stemness genes and the ability of sphere formation were decreased when GC cells co-cultured with MSCs were exposed to ETX, compared to their control group without ETX (Fig. 2g–i). Colony formation showed that sensitivity to 5-FU and oxaliplatin were increased in GC cells with MSCs when ETX was added (Fig. 2j). Besides, ETX impaired ATP production in GC cells co-cultured with MSCs (Fig. 2k). These results suggest that inhibition of FAO can abrogate the influence of MSCs in promoting stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells, implicating that FAO is required for maintaining MSC-regulated stemness and chemotherapy resistance.
MACC1-AS1 is induced by MSCs and contributes to stemness and chemoresistance
MACC1-AS1 is the antisense RNA of metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 (MACC1). We previously reported that MACC1-AS1 is overexpressed in GC tissues and facilitates metabolic plasticity through antioxidant production, resulting in a lower ROS load under metabolic stress . Lower ROS levels are critical for maintaining stemness and drug resistance [19,20,21]. Thus we hypothesized MACC1-AS1 may contribute to stemness and chemoresistance. We found that the expression of MACC1-AS1 was obviously increased both in GC cells and sphere-forming GC cells after co-culture with MSCs (Fig. 3a, b). Additionally, compared to injection of GC cells alone, the expression of MACC1-AS1 in subcutaneous tumor of nude mice was significantly increased in GC cells admixed with MSCs (Fig. 3c). We also performed in situ hybridization (ISH) to evaluate the correlation between MACC1-AS1 expression and co-expression of CD29 and CD90 in GC specimens (Supplementary Fig. 3a). The score of MACC1-AS1 was higher in CD29 and CD90 double-positive GC tissues in comparison to CD29 and CD90 double-negative GC tissues (Fig. 3d). These results indicate that MSCs promote the expression of MACC1-AS1 in GC cells.
Given the promotion of MSCs on MACC1-AS1 expression in GC cells, we next investigated the role of MACC1-AS1 in stemness and chemoresistance. To evaluate whether MACC1-AS1 is functionally involved in GC progression, MACC1-AS1 was overexpressed in stable lentivirus transfected way and the overexpression efficiency was examined (Supplementary Fig. 3b). qRT-PCR and western blotting showed that stemness genes were enhanced after stable transfection with MACC1-AS1 (Fig. 3e, f). The population of CD44+ GC cells evaluated by flow cytometric analysis was significantly increased (Supplementary Fig. 3c) and sphere-formation assay showed that sphere-formation capability of GC cells was obviously increased after overexpression of MACC1-AS1 (Fig. 3g). Moreover, overexpression of MACC1-AS1 facilitated the ability of clone formation and reduced growth inhibition when treated with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (Fig. 3h and Supplementary Fig. 3d). To further investigate the role of MACC1-AS1 in chemotherapy, 5FU and oxaliplatin-resistant cell lines were established (Supplementary Fig. 3e). We found that the expression of MACC1-AS1 was gradually increased with augment of 5-FU and oxaliplatin concentration during the establishment of the chemotherapy-resistant cells (Supplementary Fig. 3f). Additionally, the expression levels of stemness genes and FAO relative genes and CPT1 activity were increased in 5-FU and oxaliplatin-resistant cells, compared to 5-FU and oxaliplatin-sensitive cells (Supplementary Fig. 3g–h). Collectively, the results suggest a possible role of MACC1-AS1 in the cross-talk of MSCs and GC cells, participating in MSC-mediated stemness and chemoresistance of GC cells.
MSC-derived TGF-β1 contributes to MACC1-AS1 upregulation in GC cells
It is reported that MSCs communicate with cancer cells mostly by secreting soluble factors. We collected and fractioned MSC-conditioned medium (CM) based on molecular weight into <3-kD and >3-kD fractions via selective filters and centrifugation. We found that only >3 kD MSC-CM induced MACC1-AS1 upregulation in GC cells (Fig. 3i). These results strongly suggest that the >3-kD fraction of the MSC-CM contains at least one soluble factor that contributes to MSC-mediated stemness and chemoresistance through MACC1-AS1. TGF-β1, a key cytokine that can be secreted by MSCs, has been considered as a critical factor involved in epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metastasis, and stemness [27,28,29]. Based on the fact that >3 kD MSC-CM induced MACC1-AS1 upregulation, it is likely that TGF-β1 secreted by MSCs contributes to MACC1-AS1 induction.
To verify this possibility, TGF-β1 level from MSC-CM of <3-kD and >3-kD fractions was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Compared to MSC-CM of <3 kD and the GC medium collected from AGS and MKN45, the level of TGF-β1 in >3-kD fractions was significantly higher (Fig. 3j). As we have known, TGF-β exerts cellular effects by binding to heterotetrameric complexes of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors (TGFβR-I and TGFβR-II) and activates the downstream SMAD family [30,31,32]. We found that the expression levels of p-TGFβR-I, p-TGFβR-II, p-SMAD2, and p-SMAD3 were increased when GC cells were co-cultured with MSCs (Fig. 3k), whereas that of SMAD7 were decreased (Supplementary Fig. 3i). These results suggest that TGF-β1 secreted by MSCs contributes to stemness and chemoresistance through binding to TGF-β receptors and activating SMAD2 and SMAD3. To test the effect of TGF-β1 on MACC1-AS1, TGF-β1 (20 μg/mL) was supplemented to GC medium for 24 h. We found that MACC1-AS1 was obviously increased with TGF-β1 treatment (Fig. 3l). Furthermore, TGF-β1 inhibitor disitertide and TGFβR-I inhibitor LY-364947 abrogated the MACC1-AS1 expression in GC cells treated with MSC-CM of >3-kD fraction (Fig. 3m, n). These findings suggest that TGF-β1, as one of the soluble factors secreted by MSCs, is essential for MACC1-AS1 upregulation.
The role of MACC1-AS1 on stemness and chemoresistance is dependent on FAO
Based on the existing results, we hypothesized that MACC1-AS1 may be a key participant in FAO-regulated stemness and chemoresistance. We performed RNA sequencing technique (RNA-seq) to profile gene expression after MACC1-AS1 overexpression. BioCyc pathway enrichment revealed that FAO pathway was activated in cancer cells with MACC1-AS1 overexpression (Fig. 4a). Then we found that overexpression of MACC1-AS1 gradually upregulated the levels of CPT1 and ACS as the concentration of MACC1-AS1 transient plasmid increased (Fig. 4b, c and Supplementary Fig. 4a). Consistent results were obtained from detection of FAO rate, ATP production, and FA uptake (Fig. 4d, e and Supplementary Fig. 4b). Next we further assessed whether the promoting effect of MACC1-AS1 in stemness and chemoresistance depended on FAO. As expected, the expression levels of stemness genes were decreased in MACC1-AS1-overexpressing GC cells with 100 μmol/L ETX for 48 h in comparison to MACC1-AS1-overexpressing GC cells without ETX (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 4c). The same result was obtained by suppression of CPT1 with siRNA#1 (Fig. 4g). Moreover, ETX abrogated the promoting effect of MACC1-AS1 on the ability of self-renewal and reduced mitochondria ATP production accelerated by MACC1-AS1 (Fig. 4h, i). MTT assay showed that ETX treatment partially reversed MACC1-AS1-mediated resistance to 5-FU and oxaliplatin (Fig. 4j). Taken together, FAO is greatly responsible for MACC1-AS1-mediated stemness and chemoresistance of GC cells.
miR-145-5p is downstream of MACC1-AS1 to promote stemness and chemoresistance through FAO
Emerging evidences suggest that lncRNAs are likely to function through interaction with microRNAs (miRNAs). To elucidate the mechanism underlying the contribution of MACC1-AS1 to FAO-dependent stemness and chemoresistance, we found that miR-145-5p was one of the target miRNAs of MACC1-AS1 predicted by LncRNASNP database (Fig. 5a). Previous studies have reported that miR-145-5p exerts an inhibitory effect on drug resistance [33, 34] and is correlated with lipid metabolism [35, 36]. Therefore, we wondered whether miR-145-5p played a role in MACC1-AS1-induced stemness and chemoresistance.
First, miR-145-5p expression was significantly decreased after overexpression of MACC1-AS1 and it was decreased as the concentration of MACC1-AS1 transient plasmid increased (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 5a). Thus dual luciferase reporter assay was employed to further confirm their relationship. The result showed that overexpression of miR-145-5p decreased the reporter activity of MACC1-AS1 wild type (WT) in 293T cell and MKN45 cell but not that of MACC1-AS1 mutant type (MUT), confirming the direct binding sites predicted by LncRNASNP database (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 5b). For validation, we performed RNA pull down assay to capture RNA complexes associated with miR-145-5p probes. Compared to the control probe, miR-145–5p positive probe successfully pulled down MACC1-AS1 in MKN45 cells (Fig. 5d). Taken together, these data suggest that MACC1-AS1 is able to directly bind to miR-145-5p and regulate its activity.
To determine the role of miR-145-5p in FAO-dependent stemness and chemoresistance, we found that miR-145-5p significantly repressed stemness genes and FAO enzyme expression levels (Supplementary Fig. 5c–d). Moreover, miR-145-5p reduced FAO rate and ATP production and promoted ROS production and sensitivity to 5-FU and oxaliplatin (Supplementary Fig. 5e–h). When MACC1-AS1 and miR-145-5p were co-transfected into GC cells, miR-145–5p remarkably repressed the promoting effect of MACC1-AS1 on the expression levels of stemness genes and FAO enzymes (Fig. 5e, f). In addition, overexpression miR-145-5p significantly reduced the FA uptake, FAO rate, and ATP production induced by MACC1-AS1 overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 5i and Fig. 5g, h). MTT assay showed that miR-145-5p partially rescued the inhibitory impact of MACC1-AS1 on sensitivity of GC cells to 5-FU and oxaliplatin (Fig. 5i). These data suggest that MACC1-AS1/miR-145-5p signaling axis contributes to the FAO-dependent stemness and chemoresistance.
Inhibition of FAO attenuates MSC-induced chemoresistance in vivo
We found that higher CPT1 expression in GC patients was associated with shorter OS and progression-free survival (PFS) analyzed by the online Kaplan Meier Plotter database (Fig. 6a, b). Then we analyzed the expression of CPT1 in primary GC samples and matched adjacent nontumorous gastric tissues by IHC. Compared to the matched adjacent nontumorous gastric tissues, CPT1 score was higher in GC (Fig. 6c, d). It was also higher in CD29 and CD90 double-positive GC tissues in comparison to CD29 and CD90 double-negative GC tissues (Fig. 6e). Moreover, higher CPT1 expression was linked to worse DFS in stage I–III patients and worse OS in stage IV patients (Fig. 6f, g).
We further investigated whether inhibition of FAO attenuated MSC-induced chemoresistance in vivo. FOLFOX regiment, composed of 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and calcium folinate, is the first-line therapy of metastatic GC . The results showed that the tumor volumes of FOLFOX-treated mice were remarkably decreased compared to mice without FOLFOX treatment. MSCs remarkably abolished the antitumor effects of FOLFOX, but intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection with ETX significantly reduced the tumor volumes (Fig. 6h, i). Furthermore, IHC staining of tumors showed that the expression levels of OCT4, CPT1, and proliferation-related nuclear antigen ki-67 were decreased after ETX treatment, while marker of apoptosis cleaved caspase 3 was increased (Fig. 6j). No significant difference was observed in tissues and structures between groups treated with or without ETX by hematoxylin–eosin staining of the lungs, livers, spleens, kidneys, and hearts of xenograft nude mice (Fig. 6k). Taken together, these results suggest that inhibition of FAO attenuates MSC-induced chemoresistance in vivo.
Stroma cells in tumor microenvironment were recognized as important contributors in facilitating the development of chemotherapy resistance. As an important component of tumor environment, MSCs can promote chemotherapy resistance by secreting protective cytokines or even generating genetic mutations and altering transcriptional expression to help cancer cells overcome the anticancer effect of chemotherapeutic agents [8, 37]. Recently, the role of tumor metabolism has been increasingly recognized in the field of chemoresistance in tumors. It was reported that MSCs can secrete polyunsaturated FAs KHT and 16:4(n3) and subsequently induce resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy . Thus MSCs play a significant role in metabolic reprogramming in regulation of chemotherapy resistance.
Our findings demonstrated that MSCs promoted GC cell self-renewal and chemoresistance through FAO. FAO inhibitor ETX remarkably reversed the stemness features and resistance to 5-FU and oxaliplatin, which indicated that GC cells undergo metabolic reprogramming when interacting with MSCs. Actually, there is little known about the role of MSCs on FAO in cancer cells. To our knowledge, FAs are important energy sources for cancer cells, as FAO in mitochondria provides 2.5 times as much ATP in comparison with oxidation of glucose . We presented evidence that MSCs promoted FAO and mitochondrial ATP production to maintain stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells, which suggests that MSCs promote ATP production in GC cells to satisfy the demand of overcoming the chemotherapeutic agents. Our study also showed an elevated CPT1 expression in GC tissues and that was linked to worse DFS and OS in GC patients. Inhibition of FAO by ETX prominently reversed the MSC-induced FOLFOX resistance in vivo, which implicates that chemotherapeutic drugs in combination with agents targeting cellular FAO can be a feasible approach for overcoming chemoresistance in GC.
Researches on the metabolic phenotype of CSCs and drug-resistant cells have been getting increasing attention in recent years. In our study, we found that silencing CPT1, FAO rate-limiting enzyme, decreased stemness gene expression levels and resistance to 5-FU and oxaliplatin. Metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells toward FAO benefits stemness maintenance [13, 26] and this alteration is able to modulate chemoresistance by maximizing ATP production . On the other hand, FAO is an important source of NADPH . Inhibition of FAO decreased NADPH and elevated intracellular ROS and eventually induced cancer cell death . Recent studies have showed that CSCs tend to have low ROS level, which is crucial to maintain their self-renewal and stemness properties [19, 40, 41]. Thus upregulating antioxidant capacity to maintain low ROS may contribute to stemness and chemoresistance in GC cells.
Increasing evidence has indicated that lncRNAs are involved in cancer stemness and drug resistance [15,16,17]. We previously reported that MACC1-AS1 is overexpressed in GC tissues and facilitates metabolic plasticity through increased glutathione and NADPH levels and a lower ROS load under metabolic stress , which are critical for maintaining stemness and drug resistance [19,20,21]. Here we showed that MSCs promoted MACC1-AS1 expression in GC cells and MACC1-AS1 positively regulated FAO-dependent stemness and chemoresistance, suggesting the important role of MACC1-AS1 in the cross-talk between MSCs and GC cells. Moreover, we found TGF-β1 was the upstream molecular of MACC1-AS1 secreted by MSCs. Previous studies have demonstrated that, when interacting with cancer cells, MSCs release elevated levels of TGF-β, which supports the growth and invasion abilities of cancer cells [42, 43]. Meanwhile, the role of TGF-β in maintaining stem cell self-renewal is well established [27,28,29]. In our study, MSCs secreted TGF-β1 and led to subsequent upregulation of MACC1-AS1 in GC cells through activation of SMAD2 and SMAD3. TGF-β1 inhibitor disitertide and TGFβR-I inhibitor LY-364947 abrogated the MACC1-AS1 expression in GC cells, suggesting that targeting TGF-β signaling pathway may be a potential strategy to inhibit MSC-induced stemness and chemoresistance.
Additionally, we found that MACC1-AS1 promoted stemness and chemoresistance through antagonizing miR-145-5p. The localization of lncRNAs is important for their function and MACC1-AS1 mainly locates in the cytoplasm , where lncRNAs typically participate in posttranscriptional regulation by interacting with microRNAs [44, 45]. Luciferase reporter assay and pull down assay demonstrated that MACC1-AS1 directly bound to miR-145-5p and MACC1-AS1 negatively regulated miR-145-5p. However, the binding sites between miR-145-5p and CPT1 cannot be found. Interestingly, our results showed that miR-145-5p depressed CPT1 expression. When MACC1-AS1 and miR-145-5p were co-transfected into GC cells, miR-145-5p partially reversed the promoting effect of MACC1-AS1 on expression of CPT1, which strongly suggested that they are connected through some regulatory networks. Besides, previous studies have reported that miR-145-5p exerts an inhibitory effect on drug resistance. miR-145-5p can directly target multidrug resistance protein 1 to increase the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drug . Moreover, miR-145-5p was able to target stemness genes to decrease chemoresistance. miR-145 bound to the SOX2 mRNA 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) and affected the anticancer response of isorhapontigenin in glioblastoma . In our study, we found that miR-145-5p increased ROS production and cell apoptosis in GC cells, which indicated that ROS-induced apoptosis was one of the important mechanisms in MACC1-AS1-promoted chemoresistance.
In summary, our study demonstrated that MSCs secreted TGF-β1 and induced lncRNA MACC1-AS1 expression in GC cells, which promoted FAO-dependent stemness and chemoresistance through miR-145-5p. Combining chemotherapeutic drugs with targeting cellular FAO may be a promising strategy to overcome chemotherapeutic resistance (Fig. 6l).
Materials and methods
CPT1 (#15184–1-AP), CD29 (#12594–1-AP), CD133 (#18470–1-AP), OCT4 (#11263–1-AP), SOX2 (66411–1-Ig), LIN28 (#60344–1-Ig), TGF-β receptor I (55391–1-ap), SMAD2 (#12570–1-ap), SMAD3 (#25494–1-ap), GAPDH (#10494–1-AP), and α-Tubulin antibodies (#11224–1-AP) were obtained from Proteintech (Wuhan, China). ACS (#ab133664), TGF-β receptor II (ab184948), phosphor-TGF-β receptor II (Ser225, #ab183037), and CD90 (#ab133350) antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Phosphor-SMAD2 (Ser465/467, #138D4) and phosphor-SMAD3 (Ser423/425, #C25A9) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA). Phosphor TGF-β receptor I (Ser-165, #orb335748) antibody was from Biorbyt (Shanghai, China). TGF-β1 (#AF-100–21C-10), epidermal growth factor (EGF; #AF-100–15–100), fibroblast growth factor (FGF; #100–18B-10) were from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), while B27 (#17504044) was from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). ETX and TGF-β1 inhibitors Disitertide (#HY-P0118) and TGFβR-I inhibitor LY-364947 (#HY-13462) were provided by MedChemExpress (NJ, USA). Lipofectamine 2000 reagent was obtained from Invitrogen (#11668019, CA, USA). 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and calcium folinatc was from Xudong (Shanghai, China), Sanofi (Shanghai, China), and Yaoyou (Chongqing, China), respectively. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) Mouse Anti-Human CD44 was provided by BD Biosciences (#560977, NY, USA).
Cell lines and cell culture
The GC cell lines AGS was purchased from KeyGene Biotechnology Development Company (Nanjing, China). MKN45 was obtained from Cellcook Biotechnology Company (Guangzhou, China). AGS and MKN45 cancer cells stably overexpressing MACC1-AS1 were constructed with lentivirus combined with pLenti-EF1a-LUC-F2A-CMV-MCS vector or blank vector and selected with 2 μg/mL puromycin at 72 h after infection. The cells mentioned above were cultured with RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo scientific Hyclone, USA) under conditions of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Adult bone marrow MSCs, purchased from Cyagen Biosciences (Guangzhou, China), were cultured in adult bone marrow MSC medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Authenticity of the cells was regularly tested by short tandem repeat. MSCs and GC cells were grown in a Corning chamber where MSCs were cultured in the top insert at a density of 2 × 105 cells and GC cells were cultured in the bottom well at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells for 48 h. The two populations were separated by a 0.4-µm porous membrane that allows for soluble factor exchange.
Generation of 5-FU- and oxaliplatin-resistant cell lines
The 5-FU- and oxaliplatin-resistant cell lines were established by continuously exposing GC cells to increasing concentrations of 5-FU (0.125–8 μg/mL for AGS and 0.5–12 μg/mL for MKN45) and oxaliplatin (1–12.5 μg/mL for AGS and 0.8–8 μg/mL for MKN45).
CPT1 activity assay
Cell mitochondrial proteins were extracted using the Cell Mitochondria Isolation Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and quantified using BCA assay (Cpr). CPT1 activity was measured using a CPT1 Spectrophotometric Detection Kit (Zikerbio, Guangzhou, China). Briefly, CPT1 activity was determined spectrophotometrically by the reaction between DNTB and CoA-SH released from palmitoyl CoA. Mitochondrial proteins (40 μL) were mixed with 880 μL carnitine (reagent 5) and 40 μL palmitoyl CoA (reagent 6) in a clean cuvette and the absorbance of the mixtures was measured at 412 nm by spectrophotometry (OD1). The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 2 min followed by the detection of absorbance at 412 nm again (OD2). The difference between the absorbances was used to measure the release of CoA-SH. CPT1 activity was calculated according to the following formula: nmol/min/mg = 880 × (OD2 − OD1)/Cpr.
A total of 151 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded GC tissue samples were obtained from patients who were diagnosed with GC in Nanfang Hospital (Guangzhou, China) between January 2006 and December 2010. Patients’ staging data were defined according to the Seventh Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Stomach (2010) . The use of human tissue samples and clinical data was approved by the ethics committee of Nanfang Hospital Ethics Review Board (Guangzhou, China). Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
ISH staining and IHC staining
ISH was performed as previously described . Briefly, MACC1-AS1 was detected using a double digoxigenin-labeled mercury locked nucleic acid probe (5′DigN/TCAATGCAGATCTAATACTCCT/3′Dig_N) (miRCURY LNA™, Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark). IHC staining was applied to detect the expression levels of CD29, CD90, OCT4, CPT1, cleaved caspase 3, and ki67. The staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (medium), or 3 (strong), whereas the staining extent was scored as 0 (0% of the staining area), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%), and 4 (76–100%). The final scores of the targeted protein expression were calculated by the products of the staining intensity and extent scores, low expression group (score 0–5), and high expression group (score 6–12).
Female BALB/C nude mice (4-week old) were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Nanfang Hospital (Guangzhou, China) and were assigned randomly into different groups. The study was approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital. For in vivo limiting dilution assay, serial dilutions of MKN45 cell suspensions (5 × 105, 5 × 104, and 5 × 103 cells) admixed with or without 5 × 106 MSCs were injected subcutaneously into nude mice. After 6 weeks, the mice were euthanized and tumor formation was examined. Tumor-initiating cell frequencies were determined using the ELDA webtool (http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda). To assess the role of FAO in MSC-induced chemoresistance, 1 × 106 MKN45 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of nude mice. Tumor volume measurements were evaluated by digital calipers and calculated by the formula (π)/6 × (large diameter) × (small diameter) . When tumor volume reached to 50–100 mm3, FOLFOX regiment was administered i.p. weekly (oxaliplatin 6 mg/kg followed 2 h later by 5-FU 50 mg/kg and calcium folinatc 90 mg/kg). ETX (40 mg/kg) was administered i.p. every other day (n = 5). Mice were weighed and tumor volumes were scaled every 3 days by one of the authors who did not know any of the experiment groups throughout the duration of the study.
Gene expression data and clinical data of 384 GC patient samples and 37 normal gastric samples were downloaded from TCGA (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) on November 8, 2017. The expression values of CD29 (ITGB1) and CD90 (THY1) were separated into two parts according to the median. The RFS of patients sharing expression values greater than the median of CD29 and CD90 were compared with those patients sharing expression values below the median of these genes using the log-rank test. RNA-seq was applied to profile gene expression after MACC1-AS1 overexpression. R package limma was employed to perform gene expression analysis. Fold change > 2 and adjusted P value <0.05 were set as the threshold for significant differential expression. KOBAS software was used to perform pathway enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes to explore their biological functions using BioCyc metabolic database. Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS and PFS corresponding to the expression of CPT1 was analyzed by the online Kaplan Meier Plotter database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/).
Cells were plated in 96-well plates and exposed to various concentrations of oxaliplatin or 5-FU for 48 h. Thiazolyl blue (MTT) was added to the cells and incubated for 4–6 h, followed by replacement of 150 μL per well dimethyl sulfoxide as previously described . Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from specific GC cells using the Trizol Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by reverse transcription with Takara RT reagent (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). qRT-PCR was performed using a LightCycler 480 system Version 1.5 (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) as described in our previous study . The sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table 2.
Western blotting was performed as previously described  using anti-ACS, anti-CPT1, anti-CD133, anti-OCT4, anti-SOX2, and anti-LIN28 antibodies. GAPDH and α-Tubulin served as the loading controls. Immunoblots were detected with fluorophore-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) by an Odyssey imaging system (LI-COR).
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection
The GC cell lines AGS and MKN45 were transfected with targeted or control siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 as previously reported . The sequences of CPT1 siRNA were GAGAGAACCTCATCAATTT, GGAGGAAATCAAACCAATT, and GCCTTTACGTGGTGTCTAA. The efficiency of sequences were verified by qRT-PCR and western blotting.
Flow cytometric analysis
GC cells were harvested and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells were fixed with bovine serum albumin and stained with FITC Mouse Anti-Human CD44. Flow cytometry was analyzed with a FACS Aria II instrument (BD Biosciences).
Cells were seeded into 6-well low attachment plates (Corning, Shanghai, China) as single-cell suspension at 1 × 103 cells per well and cultured with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium-F12 medium Gibco (NY, USA) containing 2% B-27, 20 ng/mL EGF, and 10 ng/mL FGF. Seven days later, spheroids were observed and photographed with inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan). All assays were performed in three replicates.
Cells were seeded into 6-well plates (BIOFIL, Guangzhou, China) at a concentration of 5 × 102 cells per well and cultured for 14 days. Culture medium was replaced every 4 days. The colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min, and then photographed.
Detection of FA β oxidation rate
Cells were collected and mitochondria were extracted using the Cell Mitochondria Isolation Kit (Beyotime, China). FA β oxidation rate was measured using a FA β Oxidation Rate Colorimetric Detection Kit (Haling, Shanghai, China). Briefly, a clean cuvette was filled with 750 μL reagent A, 100 μL reagent B, 50 μL reagent C, and 50 μL reagent D and the mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 3 min after turning it upside down. Fifty μL mitochondria solution or 50 μL negative reagent was added to the mixture for sample detection or blank control. Immediately, absorbance was measured at 420 and 470 nm for 5 min by dual-wavelength spectrophotometry. The β oxidation rate was calculated according to the following formula: μmol/min/mg = [(sample reading − blank reading) × 1 mL] ÷ (0.5 mg × 105 × 5 min); sample/blank reading = (OD420 − OD470)0 min − (OD420 − OD470)5 min. All assays were performed in three replicates.
Detection of cellular ATP levels
Cells were collected and schizolysized with 200 μL lysis buffer, followed by centrifugation at 1.2 × 104 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred for ATP detection using a Firefly Luciferase-based ATP Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). Twenty μL of each supernatant was added to 10 μL ATP detection working dilution. Luminance (relative luminsescence unit) was measured using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The protein levels of each sample was also detected using BCA assay and standard curves of ATP and protein were generated. Cellular relative ATP levels were calculated by the ratio of ATP value to protein value.
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
The MACC1-AS1–3′UTR vectors, including pMIR-REPORT-MACC1-AS1–3′UTR WT and pMIR-REPORT-MACC1-AS1–3′UTR mutant type (MUT), were purchased from OBiO (Shanghai, China). Cells were seeded with a concentration of 5000 per well in 96-well plates and transfected with MACC1-AS1–3′UTR vectors, renilla luciferase plasmid, miR-145-5p mimics, or miR-NC using Lipofectamine 2000. The cells were harvested after 36 h and the luciferase activity was assessed using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA pull down assay
The biotinylated miR-145-5p probes were synthesized by CLOUD-SEQ Company (Shanghai, China). The miR-145-5p probe: 5′ GUCCAGUUUUCCCAGGAAUCCCU-Biotin 3′; and the control probe: 5′ AGGGATTCCTGGGAAAACTGGAC-Biotin 3′. The cells were washed with PBS twice and incubated in lysis buffer on ice for 10 min. The lysates were precleared by centrifugation. The probes were incubated with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads to generate probe-coated magnetic beads. The lysates were incubated with probe-coated beads and washed with the wash buffer. The RNA complexes bound to the beads were eluted and subjected to qRT-PCR for detection of the expression of relative MACC1-AS1.
All the experimental data were expressed as means ± SD and statistically analyzed with the SPSS v. 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For comparisons, two-tailed Student’s t test, Fisher’s exact test, one-way analysis of variance test, and Dunnett’s test were performed. Survival and recurrence rates were analyzed with Kaplan–Meier’s method and examined by log-rank test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.
Digklia A, Wagner AD. Advanced gastric cancer: current treatment landscape and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:2403–14.
Davidson M, Okines AF, Starling N. Current and future therapies for advanced gastric cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:239–50.
Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P, et al. Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016;14:1286–312.
Shitara K. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: future perspective in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:102–10.
Roberto M, Romiti A, Onesti CE, Zullo A, Falcone R, Marchetti P. Evolving treatments for advanced gastric cancer: appraisal of the survival trend. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;16:717–29.
Roodhart JM, Daenen LG, Stigter EC, Prins HJ, Gerrits J, Houthuijzen JM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells induce resistance to chemotherapy through the release of platinum-induced fatty acids. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:370–83.
Houthuijzen JM, Daenen LG, Roodhart JM, Voest EE. The role of mesenchymal stem cells in anti-cancer drug resistance and tumour progression. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1901–6.
Li HJ, Reinhardt F, Herschman HR, Weinberg RA. Cancer-stimulated mesenchymal stem cells create a carcinoma stem cell niche via prostaglandin E2 signaling. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:840–55.
Carracedo A, Cantley LC, Pandolfi PP. Cancer metabolism: fatty acid oxidation in the limelight. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:227–32.
Wang T, Fahrmann JF, Lee H, Li YJ, Tripathi SC, Yue C, et al. JAK/STAT3-regulated fatty acid beta-oxidation is critical for breast cancer stem cell self-renewal and chemoresistance. Cell Metab. 2018;27:1357.
Pike LS, Smift AL, Croteau NJ, Ferrick DA, Wu M. Inhibition of fatty acid oxidation by etomoxir impairs NADPH production and increases reactive oxygen species resulting in ATP depletion and cell death in human glioblastoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1807:726–34.
Ito K, Carracedo A, Weiss D, Arai F, Ala U, Avigan DE, et al. A PML-PPAR-delta pathway for fatty acid oxidation regulates hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nat Med. 2012;18:1350–8.
Guttman M, Rinn JL. Modular regulatory principles of large non-coding RNAs. Nature. 2012;482:339–46.
Liu B, Ma X, Liu Q, Xiao Y, Pan S, Jia L. Aberrant mannosylation profile and FTX/miR-342/ALG3-axis contribute to development of drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:688.
Yuan SX, Wang J, Yang F, Tao QF, Zhang J, Wang LL, et al. Long noncoding RNA DANCR increases stemness features of hepatocellular carcinoma by derepression of CTNNB1. Hepatology. 2016;63:499–511.
Wang Y, He L, Du Y, Zhu P, Huang G, Luo J, et al. The long noncoding RNA lncTCF7 promotes self-renewal of human liver cancer stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:413–25.
Zhao Y, Liu Y, Lin L, Huang Q, He W, Zhang S, et al. The lncRNA MACC1-AS1 promotes gastric cancer cell metabolic plasticity via AMPK/Lin28 mediated mRNA stability of MACC1. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:69.
Diehn M, Cho RW, Lobo NA, Kalisky T, Dorie MJ, Kulp AN, et al. Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells. Nature. 2009;458:780–3.
Di Francesco AM, Toesca A, Cenciarelli C, Giordano A, Gasbarrini A, Puglisi MA. Metabolic modification in gastrointestinal cancer stem cells: characteristics and therapeutic approaches. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231:2081–7.
Zhao Y, Hu X, Liu Y, Dong S, Wen Z, He W, et al. ROS signaling under metabolic stress: cross-talk between AMPK and AKT pathway. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:79.
Hu Y, Smyth GK. ELDA: extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays. J Immunol Methods. 2009;347:70–78.
Simsek T, Kocabas F, Zheng J, Deberardinis RJ, Mahmoud AI, Olson EN, et al. The distinct metabolic profile of hematopoietic stem cells reflects their location in a hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:380–90.
Gurumurthy S, Xie SZ, Alagesan B, Kim J, Yusuf RZ, Saez B, et al. The Lkb1 metabolic sensor maintains haematopoietic stem cell survival. Nature. 2010;468:659–63.
Nakada D, Saunders TL, Morrison SJ. Lkb1 regulates cell cycle and energy metabolism in haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2010;468:653–8.
Samudio I, Harmancey R, Fiegl M, Kantarjian H, Konopleva M, Korchin B, et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation sensitizes human leukemia cells to apoptosis induction. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:142–56.
Pickup M, Novitskiy S, Moses HL. The roles of TGFbeta in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:788–99.
Penuelas S, Anido J, Prieto-Sanchez RM, Folch G, Barba I, Cuartas I, et al. TGF-beta increases glioma-initiating cell self-renewal through the induction of LIF in human glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:315–27.
Naka K, Hoshii T, Muraguchi T, Tadokoro Y, Ooshio T, Kondo Y, et al. TGF-beta-FOXO signalling maintains leukaemia-initiating cells in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2010;463:676–80.
Groppe J, Hinck CS, Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Zubieta C, Schuermann JP, Taylor AB, et al. Cooperative assembly of TGF-beta superfamily signaling complexes is mediated by two disparate mechanisms and distinct modes of receptor binding. Mol Cell. 2008;29:157–68.
Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700.
Massague J. TGFbeta in cancer. Cell. 2008;134:215–30.
Zhan M, Zhao X, Wang H, Chen W, Xu S, Wang W, et al. miR-145 sensitizes gallbladder cancer to cisplatin by regulating multidrug resistance associated protein 1. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:10553–62.
Liu RL, Dong Y, Deng YZ, Wang WJ, Li WD. Tumor suppressor miR-145 reverses drug resistance by directly targeting DNA damage-related gene RAD18 in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:5011–9.
Lin YY, Chou CF, Giovarelli M, Briata P, Gherzi R, Chen CY. KSRP and MicroRNA 145 are negative regulators of lipolysis in white adipose tissue. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:2339–49.
Wang H, Shi H, Luo J, Yi Y, Yao D, Zhang X, et al. MiR-145 regulates lipogenesis in goat mammary cells via targeting INSIG1 and epigenetic regulation of lipid-related genes. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:1030–40.
Meads MB, Hazlehurst LA, Dalton WS. The bone marrow microenvironment as a tumor sanctuary and contributor to drug resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2519–26.
Kastaniotis AJ, Autio KJ, Keratar JM, Monteuuis G, Makela AM, Nair RR, et al. Mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis, fatty acids and mitochondrial physiology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1862:39–48.
Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Bjerregaard JK, Pfeiffer P, Mortensen MB. Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Clin Exp Metastasis. 2017;34:309–14.
Chen CT, Hsu SH, Wei YH. Upregulation of mitochondrial function and antioxidant defense in the differentiation of stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1800:257–63.
Kim HM, Haraguchi N, Ishii H, Ohkuma M, Okano M, Mimori K, et al. Increased CD13 expression reduces reactive oxygen species, promoting survival of liver cancer stem cells via an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like phenomenon. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(Suppl 3):S539–548.
Ye H, Cheng J, Tang Y, Liu Z, Xu C, Liu Y, et al. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells produced TGFbeta contributes to progression and metastasis of prostate cancer. Cancer Invest. 2012;30:513–8.
Hung SP, Yang MH, Tseng KF, Lee OK. Hypoxia-induced secretion of TGF-beta1 in mesenchymal stem cell promotes breast cancer cell progression. Cell Transplant. 2013;22:1869–82.
Novikova IV, Hennelly SP, Tung CS, Sanbonmatsu KY. Rise of the RNA machines: exploring the structure of long non-coding RNAs. J Mol Biol. 2013;425:3731–46.
Wang KC, Chang HY. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2011;43:904–14.
Ricci-Vitiani L, Fabrizi E, Palio E, De Maria R. Colon cancer stem cells. J Mol Med (Berl). 2009;87:1097–104.
Xu Z, Zeng X, Xu J, Xu D, Li J, Jin H, et al. Isorhapontigenin suppresses growth of patient-derived glioblastoma spheres through regulating miR-145/SOX2/cyclin D1 axis. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:830–9.
Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3077–9.
Hao S, Yu J, He W, Huang Q, Zhao Y, Liang B, et al. Cysteine dioxygenase 1 mediates erastin-induced ferroptosis in human gastric cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2017;19:1022–32.
This study was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2017YFC1105000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81702398), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (grant number 2016A020215232).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
He, W., Liang, B., Wang, C. et al. MSC-regulated lncRNA MACC1-AS1 promotes stemness and chemoresistance through fatty acid oxidation in gastric cancer. Oncogene 38, 4637–4654 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0747-0
OncoTargets and Therapy (2021)
Regulation of TGFβ/SMAD signaling by long non-coding RNAs in different cancers: Dark Knight in the Castle of molecular oncology
Non-coding RNA Research (2021)
Experimental Cell Research (2021)
Seminars in Cancer Biology (2021)
Long non-coding RNAs MACC1-AS1 and FOXD2-AS1 mediate NSD2-induced cisplatin resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids (2021)