Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:

The nested hierarchical model of self and its non-relational vs relational posttraumatic manifestation: an fMRI meta-analysis of emotional processing

Abstract

Different kinds of traumatic experiences like natural catastrophes vs. relational traumatic experiences (e.g., sex/physical abuse, interpersonal partner violence) are involved in the development of the self and PTSD psychopathological manifestations. Looking at a neuroscience approach, it has been proposed a nested hierarchical model of self, which identifies three neural-mental networks: (i) interoceptive; (ii) exteroceptive; (iii) mental. However, it is still unclear how the self and its related brain networks might be affected by non-relational vs relational traumatic experiences. Departing from this background, the current study aims at conducting a meta-analytic review of task-dependent fMRI studies (i.e., emotional processing task) among patients with PTSD due to non-relational (PTSD-NR) and relational (PTSD-R) traumatic experiences using two approaches: (i) a Bayesian network meta-analysis for a region-of-interest–based approach; (ii) a coordinated-based meta-analysis. Our findings suggested that the PTSD-NR mainly recruited areas ascribed to the mental self to process emotional stimuli. Whereas, the PTSD-R mainly activated regions associated with the intero-exteroceptive self. Accordingly, the PTSD-R compared to the PTSD-NR might not reach a higher symbolic capacity to process stimuli with an emotional valence. These results are also clinically relevant in support of the development of differential treatment approaches for non-relational vs. relational PTSD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Visual representation of network meta-analysis results.
Fig. 3: Visual representation of ALE contrast analysis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Scalabrini A, De Amicis M, Brugnera A, Cavicchioli M, Çatal Y, Keskin K, et al. The self and our perception of its synchrony–Beyond internal and external cognition. Conscious Cognition. 2023;116:103600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scalabrini A, De Amicis M, Brugnera A, Cavicchioli M, Çatal Y, Keskin K, et al. Feeling out of synchrony: investigating the vulnerability of self in subclinical realms. Asian J psychiatry. 2023;91:103859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scalabrini A, Mucci C, Northoff G. The nested hierarchy of self and its trauma: In search for a synchronic dynamic and topographical re-organization. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:980353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Northoff G. Is the self a higher-order or fundamental function of the brain? The “basis model of self-specificity” and its encoding by the brain’s spontaneous activity. Cogn Neurosci. 2016;7:203–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Northoff G, Vatansever D, Scalabrini A, Stamatakis EA. Ongoing brain activity and its role in cognition: dual versus baseline models. The Neuroscientist. 2022;29:393–420.

  6. Scalabrini A, Xu J, Northoff G. What COVID‐19 tells us about the self: The deep intersubjective and cultural layers of our brain. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021;75:37–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Northoff G, Bermpohl F. Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scalabrini A, Mucci C, Esposito R, Damiani S, Northoff G. Dissociation as a disorder of integration–On the footsteps of Pierre Janet. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020;101:109928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scalabrini A, Schimmenti A, De Amicis M, Porcelli P, Benedetti F, Mucci C, et al. The self and its internal thought: In search for a psychological baseline. Conscious cognition. 2022;97:103244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin P, Wang M, Northoff G. Linking bodily, environmental and mental states in the self—A three-level model based on a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;115:77–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mucci C, Scalabrini A. Traumatic effects beyond diagnosis: the impact of dissociation on the mind–body–brain system. Psychoanal Psychol. 2021;38:279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan NW, Hayes DJ, Wiebking C, Tiret B, Pietruska K, Chen DQ, et al. Negative childhood experiences alter a prefrontal‐insular‐motor cortical network in healthy adults: A preliminary multimodal rsfMRI‐fMRI‐MRS‐dMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36:4622–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakao T, Matsumoto T, Morita M, Shimizu D, Yoshimura S, Northoff G, et al. The degree of early life stress predicts decreased medial prefrontal activations and the shift from internally to externally guided decision making: an exploratory NIRS study during resting state and self-oriented task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Northoff G, Scalabrini A. Project for a spatiotemporal neuroscience”–brain and psyche share their topography and dynamic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:717402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Northoff G, Wainio-Theberge S, Evers K. Is temporo-spatial dynamics the “common currency” of brain and mind? In quest of “spatiotemporal neuroscience. Phys Life Rev. 2020;33:34–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Northoff G, Wainio-Theberge S, Evers K. Spatiotemporal neuroscience–what is it and why we need it. Phys Life Rev. 2020;33:78–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (p. 317). Washington: American Psychiatric Association. (1997).

  18. Association AAP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). (2013).

  19. Ehlers A, Mayou RA, Bryant B. Psychological predictors of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder after motor vehicle accidents. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998;107:508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, Weiss DS. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Briere J, Scott C, Weathers F. Peritraumatic and persistent dissociation in the presumed etiology of PTSD. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:2295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Organization WH International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11). (2019).

  23. Barbano AC, van der Mei WF, Bryant RA, Delahanty DL, deRoon-Cassini TA, Matsuoka YJ, et al. Clinical implications of the proposed ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic criteria. Psychol Med. 2019;49:483–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Farina B, Liotti M, Imperatori C. The role of attachment trauma and disintegrative pathogenic processes in the traumatic-dissociative dimension. Front Psychol. 2019;10:933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Liotti G. A model of dissociation based on attachment theory and research. J Trauma Dissociation. 2006;7:55–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mucci C Beyond individual and collective trauma: Intergenerational transmission, psychoanalytic treatment, and the dynamics of forgiveness: Routledge; (2013).

  27. Mucci C Borderline Bodies: Affect Regulation Therapy for Personality Disorders (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology): WW Norton & Company; (2018).

  28. Mucci C. Dissociation vs repression: a new neuropsychoanalytic model for psychopathology. Am J Psychoanal. 2021;81:82–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mucci C. Resilience and Survival. Understanding and Healing Intergenerational Trauma: Confer Ltd; 2022.

  30. King CD, Hill SB, Wolff JD, Bigony CE, Winternitz S, Ressler KJ, et al. Childhood maltreatment type and severity predict depersonalization and derealization in treatment-seeking women with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2020;292:113301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hagan MJ, Gentry M, Ippen CG, Lieberman AF. PTSD with and without dissociation in young children exposed to interpersonal trauma. J Affect Disord. 2018;227:536–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stein DJ, Koenen KC, Friedman MJ, Hill E, McLaughlin KA, Petukhova M, et al. Dissociation in posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence from the world mental health surveys. Biol psychiatry. 2013;73:302–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lingiardi V, McWilliams N Psychodynamic diagnostic manual: PDM-2: Guilford Publications; (2017).

  34. Brewin CR, Cloitre M, Hyland P, Shevlin M, Maercker A, Bryant RA, et al. A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;58:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Herman JL. Complex PTSD: A syndrome in survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma. J Trauma stress. 1992;5:377–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bromberg PM Multiple self-states, the relational mind, and dissociation: A psychoanalytic perspective. (2009).

  37. Liotti G. Disorganized/disoriented attachment in the etiology of the dissociative disorders. Dissociation. 1992;5:196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mucci C Implicit memory, unrepressed unconscious, and trauma theory: The turn of the screw between contemporary psychoanalysis and neuroscience. Unrepressed unconscious, implicit memory, and clinical work: Routledge; p. 99–129. (2018).

  39. Schimmenti A, Caretti V. Linking the overwhelming with the unbearable: Developmental trauma, dissociation, and the disconnected self. Psychoanalytic Psychol. 2016;33:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schore AN. Relational trauma, brain development, and dissociation. Treating complex traumatic stress disorders in children and adolescents: Scientific foundations and therapeutic models. 3-23. (2013).

  41. Bluhm R, Frewen P, Coupland N, Densmore M, Schore A, Lanius R. Neural correlates of self‐reflection in post‐traumatic stress disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012;125:238–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Frewen P, Lanius R. Healing the traumatized self: consciousness, neuroscience, treatment (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology): WW Norton & Company; (2015).

  43. Frewen PA, Dozois DJ, Neufeld RW, Densmore M, Stevens TK, Lanius RA. Self-referential processing in women with PTSD: Affective and neural response. Psychol Trauma: Theory Res Pract Policy. 2011;3:318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Frewen PA, Lanius RA. Toward a psychobiology of posttraumatic self‐dysregulation: reexperiencing, hyperarousal, dissociation, and emotional numbing. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1071:110–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Terpou BA, Densmore M, Théberge J, Frewen P, McKinnon MC, Nicholson AA, et al. The hijacked self: Disrupted functional connectivity between the periaqueductal gray and the default mode network in posttraumatic stress disorder using dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage: Clin. 2020;27:102345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Terpou BA, Densmore M, Théberge J, Thome J, Frewen P, McKinnon MC, et al. The threatful self: midbrain functional connectivity to cortical midline and parietal regions during subliminal trauma-related processing in PTSD. Chronic Stress. 2019;3:2470547019871369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lanius RA, Vermetten E, Loewenstein RJ, Brand B, Schmahl C, Bremner JD, et al. Emotion modulation in PTSD: Clinical and neurobiological evidence for a dissociative subtype. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:640–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chiba T, Ide K, Taylor JE, Boku S, Toda H, Kanazawa T, et al. A reciprocal inhibition model of alternations between under-/overemotional modulatory states in patients with PTSD. Mol psychiatry. 2021;26:5023–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roydeva MI, Reinders AA. Biomarkers of pathological dissociation: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;123:120–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cavicchioli M, Ogliari A, Maffei C, Mucci C, Northoff G, Scalabrini A. Neural responses to emotional stimuli across the dissociative spectrum: Common and specific mechanisms. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023;77:315–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tan Y, Yan R, Gao Y, Zhang M, Northoff G. Spatial-topographic nestedness of interoceptive regions within the networks of decision making and emotion regulation: Combining ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis. NeuroImage. 2022;260:119500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Brieant AE, Sisk LM, Gee DG. Associations among negative life events, changes in cortico-limbic connectivity, and psychopathology in the ABCD Study. Dev. Cogn Neurosci. 2021;52:101022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kuhar M, Zager Kocjan G. Adverse childhood experiences and somatic symptoms in adulthood: a moderated mediation effects of disturbed self-organization and resilient coping. Psychol Trauma: Theory Res Pract Policy. 2022;14:1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nijenhuis ER, Spinhoven P, Van Dyck R, van der Hart O, Vanderlinden J. Degree of somatoform and psychological dissociation in dissociative disorder is correlated with reported trauma. J Trauma stress. 1998;11:711–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Oehlman Forbes D, Lee M, Lakeman R. The role of mentalization in child psychotherapy, interpersonal trauma, and recovery: A scoping review. Psychotherapy. 2021;58:50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pearlman LA. Trauma and the self: a theoretical and clinical perspective. J Emot Abus. 1997;1:7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schore AN. Dysregulation of the right brain: a fundamental mechanism of traumatic attachment and the psychopathogenesis of posttraumatic stress disorder. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2002;36:9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades A, Welton NJ. Automating network meta‐analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:285–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Efthimiou O, Debray TP, van Valkenhoef G, Trelle S, Panayidou K, Moons KG, et al. GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology. Res Synth methods. 2016;7:236–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Psychol A. Reporting standards for research in psychology. Am Psychol. 2008;63:839–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88:105906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C, Wang LE, Zilles K, Fox PT. Coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data: A random‐effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:2907–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Laird AR, Fox PM, Price CJ, Glahn DC, Uecker AM, Lancaster JL, et al. ALE meta‐analysis: Controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25:155–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF, Jones KM, Zeffiro TA. Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage. 2002;16:765–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Cent Study Emot Atten. 1997;1:3.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schore AN Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development: Routledge; (2015).

  67. Cavicchioli M, Scalabrini A, Northoff G, Mucci C, Ogliari A, Maffei C. Dissociation and emotion regulation strategies: a meta-analytic review. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;143:370–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Morawetz C, Bode S, Derntl B, Heekeren HR. The effect of strategies, goals and stimulus material on the neural mechanisms of emotion regulation: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;72:111–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fusar-Poli P, Placentino A, Carletti F, Allen P, Landi P, Abbamonte M, et al. Laterality effect on emotional faces processing: ALE meta-analysis of evidence. Neurosci Lett. 2009;452:262–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Liberzon I, Abelson JL. Context processing and the neurobiology of post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuron. 2016;92:14–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Eichenbaum H. A cortical–hippocampal system for declarative memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000;1:41–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Joshi SA, Duval ER, Kubat B, Liberzon I. A review of hippocampal activation in post‐traumatic stress disorder. Psychophysiology. 2020;57:e13357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Craig A. Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body. Ann N. Y Acad Sci. 2011;1225:72–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Craig AD. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:655–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Craig AD. How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:59–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Schulz SM. Neural correlates of heart-focused interoception: a functional magnetic resonance imaging meta-analysis. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2016;371:20160018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Gogolla N. The insular cortex. Curr Biol. 2017;27:R580–R6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Scalabrini A, Wolman A, Northoff G. The self and its right insula—Differential topography and dynamic of right vs. left insula. Brain Sci. 2021;11:1312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Graziano M. The organization of behavioral repertoire in motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:105–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Berkman ET, Burklund L, Lieberman MD. Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex. Neuroimage. 2009;47:705–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Jabbi M, Keysers C. Inferior frontal gyrus activity triggers anterior insula response to emotional facial expressions. Emotion. 2008;8:775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Barbieri A, Visco-Comandini F, Alunni Fegatelli D, Schepisi C, Russo V, Calò F, et al. Complex trauma, PTSD and complex PTSD in African refugees. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019;10:1700621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Elklit A, Hyland P, Shevlin M. Evidence of symptom profiles consistent with posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder in different trauma samples. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014;5:24221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Damasio A Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain: Vintage; (2012).

  85. Panksepp J. The periconscious substrates of consciousness: Affective states and the evolutionary origins of the self. J Conscious Stud. 1998;5:566–82.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Golier J, Harvey P, Steiner A, Yehuda R. Source monitoring in PTSD. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1997;821:472–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Oulton JM, Takarangi MK, Strange D. Memory amplification for trauma: Investigating the role of analogue PTSD symptoms in the laboratory. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;42:60–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Dijkstra N, Kok P, Fleming SM. Perceptual reality monitoring: neural mechanisms dissociating imagination from reality. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;135:104557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Lebois LA, Kumar P, Palermo CA, Lambros AM, O’Connor L, Wolff JD, et al. Deconstructing dissociation: a triple network model of trauma-related dissociation and its subtypes. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47:2261–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. de Jongh A, Amann BL, Hofmann A, Farrell D, Lee CW. The status of EMDR therapy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder 30 years after its introduction. J EMDR Pract Res. 2019;13:261–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Schore AN Right brain psychotherapy (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology): WW Norton & Company; (2019).

  92. Northoff G, Scalabrini A “Project for a Spatiotemporal Neuroscience”–Brain and Psyche Share Their Topography and Dynamic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:717402.

  93. Northoff G, Daub J, Hirjak D. Overcoming the translational crisis of contemporary psychiatry–converging phenomenological and spatiotemporal psychopathology. Molecular Psychiatry. 2023;1-8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS and MC designed the theoretical framework and the logic of the study, analyzed the data and wrote a first draft of the manuscript that was critically revised by GN. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrea Scalabrini or Marco Cavicchioli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted following the Meta-Analysis Reporting Standards (MARS) of American Psychological Association and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scalabrini, A., Cavicchioli, M., Benedetti, F. et al. The nested hierarchical model of self and its non-relational vs relational posttraumatic manifestation: an fMRI meta-analysis of emotional processing. Mol Psychiatry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02520-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02520-w

Search

Quick links