ICD and DSM, the standard manuals for psychiatric diagnosis, have each recently been revised. These newest versions have modest updates and retain primarily categorical models. There is growing evidence that these primarily categorical structures of both ICD and DSM do not fit either the clinical presentations of patients, recent discoveries from genetics and neurobiology, nor therapeutic choices well. This commentary reviews the state of current evidence on the structure of psychiatric disorders, focusing on psychotic and mood disorders. That review suggests that future revisions should consider the widely replicated findings that patients present with an individual combination of symptoms or factors, each of specific severity, and that it is these symptoms and factors and their severity that clinicians identify and treat. Moving to such a system loses no details from the current models and adds crucial information on personal aspects of illness and the dimensionality of their conditions. The result would be updated versions of ICD and DSM with improved validity and utility. And such a model would be practical, because clinicians already use it in their work.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Kendler KS, Engstrom EJ. Criticisms of Kraepelin’s Psychiatric Nosology: 1896-1927. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:316–26.
Kendler KS. The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: replacing the organic-functional/hardware-software dichotomy with empirically based pluralism. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:377–88.
Cohen BM, Ravichandran C, Öngür D, Harris PQ, Babb SM. Use of DSM-5 diagnoses vs. other clinical information by US academic-affiliated psychiatrists in assessing and treating psychotic disorders. World Psychiatry. 2021;20:447–8.
Hyman SE. New evidence for shared risk architecture of mental disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:235–6.
McGrath JJ, Lim CCW, Plana-Ripoll O, Holtz Y, Agerbo E, Momen NC, et al. Comorbidity within mental disorders: a comprehensive analysis based on 145 990 survey respondents from 27 countries. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e153.
Brainstorm Consortium, Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Walters RK, Bras J, et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science. 2018;360;eaap8757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8757.
Repple J, Gruber M, Mauritz M, de Lange SC, Winter NR, Opel N, et al. Shared and specific patterns of structural brain connectivity across affective and psychotic disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2023;93:178–86.
Cohen BM, Öngür D, Babb SM. Alternative diagnostic models of the psychotic disorders: evidence-based choices. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90:373–85.
Smoller JW, Andreassen OA, Edenberg HJ, Faraone SV, Glatt SJ, Kendler KS. Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:409–20.
Cohen BM. Embracing complexity in psychiatric diagnosis, treatment, and research. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:1211–2.
Manchia M, Zai CC, Fanni D, Faa G. Editorial: Looking for a culprit: The role of environmental co-factors in complex neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1000783.
Shah JL, Jones N, van Os J, McGorry PD, Gülöksüz S. Early intervention service systems for youth mental health: integrating pluripotentiality, clinical staging, and transdiagnostic lessons from early psychosis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9:413–22.
First MB, Rebello TJ, Keeley JW, Bhargava R, Dai Y, Kulygina M, et al. Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:187–95.
Davis KA, Sudlow CL, Hotopf M. Can mental health diagnoses in administrative data be used for research? A systematic review of the accuracy of routinely collected diagnoses. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:263.
Fava GA, Rafanelli C, Tomba E. The clinical process in psychiatry: a clinimetric approach. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73:177–84.
Ravichandran C, Öngür D, Cohen BM. Clinical features of psychotic disorders: comparing categorical and dimensional models. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2020;3:29–37.
Kotov R, Jonas KG, Lian W, Docherty AR, Carpenter WT. Reconceptualizing schizophrenia in the Hierarchical Taxonomy Of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Schizophr Res. 2022;242:73–77.
Cuthbert BN. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): progress and potential. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2022;31:107–14.
Krueger RF, Hobbs KA. An overview of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders. Psychopathology 2020;53:126–132.
Acknowledgements
Work was funded by institutional sources. Funding sources had no involvement in any aspect of the design, performance, or reporting of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors have made significant contributions to the paper and approve the final version. BMC proposed the topic, reviewed paper, and drafted and edited the paper. DO reviewed paper and contributed to the drafting and editing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Dr BMC reports no competing interests. Dr DÖ received honoraria from Neumora Inc. and Guggenheim LLC for scientific presentations in the past 36 months.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, B.M., Öngür, D. The need for evidence-based updating of ICD and DSM models of psychotic and mood disorders. Mol Psychiatry 28, 1836–1838 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-01967-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-01967-7
This article is cited by
-
Psychosis and autism spectrum disorder: a special issue of Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry (2023)