Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The need for evidence-based updating of ICD and DSM models of psychotic and mood disorders

ICD and DSM, the standard manuals for psychiatric diagnosis, have each recently been revised. These newest versions have modest updates and retain primarily categorical models. There is growing evidence that these primarily categorical structures of both ICD and DSM do not fit either the clinical presentations of patients, recent discoveries from genetics and neurobiology, nor therapeutic choices well. This commentary reviews the state of current evidence on the structure of psychiatric disorders, focusing on psychotic and mood disorders. That review suggests that future revisions should consider the widely replicated findings that patients present with an individual combination of symptoms or factors, each of specific severity, and that it is these symptoms and factors and their severity that clinicians identify and treat. Moving to such a system loses no details from the current models and adds crucial information on personal aspects of illness and the dimensionality of their conditions. The result would be updated versions of ICD and DSM with improved validity and utility. And such a model would be practical, because clinicians already use it in their work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Kendler KS, Engstrom EJ. Criticisms of Kraepelin’s Psychiatric Nosology: 1896-1927. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:316–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kendler KS. The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: replacing the organic-functional/hardware-software dichotomy with empirically based pluralism. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:377–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen BM, Ravichandran C, Öngür D, Harris PQ, Babb SM. Use of DSM-5 diagnoses vs. other clinical information by US academic-affiliated psychiatrists in assessing and treating psychotic disorders. World Psychiatry. 2021;20:447–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hyman SE. New evidence for shared risk architecture of mental disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:235–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGrath JJ, Lim CCW, Plana-Ripoll O, Holtz Y, Agerbo E, Momen NC, et al. Comorbidity within mental disorders: a comprehensive analysis based on 145 990 survey respondents from 27 countries. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Brainstorm Consortium, Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Walters RK, Bras J, et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science. 2018;360;eaap8757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8757.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Repple J, Gruber M, Mauritz M, de Lange SC, Winter NR, Opel N, et al. Shared and specific patterns of structural brain connectivity across affective and psychotic disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2023;93:178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen BM, Öngür D, Babb SM. Alternative diagnostic models of the psychotic disorders: evidence-based choices. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90:373–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smoller JW, Andreassen OA, Edenberg HJ, Faraone SV, Glatt SJ, Kendler KS. Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:409–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen BM. Embracing complexity in psychiatric diagnosis, treatment, and research. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:1211–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manchia M, Zai CC, Fanni D, Faa G. Editorial: Looking for a culprit: The role of environmental co-factors in complex neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:1000783.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah JL, Jones N, van Os J, McGorry PD, Gülöksüz S. Early intervention service systems for youth mental health: integrating pluripotentiality, clinical staging, and transdiagnostic lessons from early psychosis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9:413–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. First MB, Rebello TJ, Keeley JW, Bhargava R, Dai Y, Kulygina M, et al. Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:187–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis KA, Sudlow CL, Hotopf M. Can mental health diagnoses in administrative data be used for research? A systematic review of the accuracy of routinely collected diagnoses. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fava GA, Rafanelli C, Tomba E. The clinical process in psychiatry: a clinimetric approach. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73:177–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ravichandran C, Öngür D, Cohen BM. Clinical features of psychotic disorders: comparing categorical and dimensional models. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2020;3:29–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kotov R, Jonas KG, Lian W, Docherty AR, Carpenter WT. Reconceptualizing schizophrenia in the Hierarchical Taxonomy Of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Schizophr Res. 2022;242:73–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cuthbert BN. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): progress and potential. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2022;31:107–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Krueger RF, Hobbs KA. An overview of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders. Psychopathology 2020;53:126–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work was funded by institutional sources. Funding sources had no involvement in any aspect of the design, performance, or reporting of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors have made significant contributions to the paper and approve the final version. BMC proposed the topic, reviewed paper, and drafted and edited the paper. DO reviewed paper and contributed to the drafting and editing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce M. Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr BMC reports no competing interests. Dr DÖ received honoraria from Neumora Inc. and Guggenheim LLC for scientific presentations in the past 36 months.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, B.M., Öngür, D. The need for evidence-based updating of ICD and DSM models of psychotic and mood disorders. Mol Psychiatry 28, 1836–1838 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-01967-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-01967-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links