Abstract
Preadolescence is a critical period characterized by dramatic morphological changes and accelerated cortico-subcortical development. Moreover, the coordinated development of cortical and subcortical regions underlies the emerging cognitive functions during this period. Deviations in this maturational coordination may underlie various psychiatric disorders that begin during preadolescence, but to date these deviations remain largely uncharted. We constructed a comprehensive whole-brain morphometric similarity network (MSN) from 17 neuroimaging modalities in a large preadolescence sample (N = 8908) from Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study and investigated its association with 10 cognitive subscales and 27 psychiatric subscales or diagnoses. Based on the MSNs, each brain was clustered into five modules with distinct cytoarchitecture and evolutionary relevance. While morphometric correlation was positive within modules, it was negative between modules, especially between isocortical and paralimbic/subcortical modules; this developmental dissimilarity was genetically linked to synapse and neurogenesis. The cortico-subcortical dissimilarity becomes more pronounced longitudinally in healthy children, reflecting developmental differentiation of segregated cytoarchitectonic areas. Higher cortico-subcortical dissimilarity (between the isocortical and paralimbic/subcortical modules) were related to better cognitive performance. In comparison, children with poor modular differentiation between cortex and subcortex displayed higher burden of externalizing and internalizing symptoms. These results highlighted cortical-subcortical morphometric dissimilarity as a dynamic maturational marker of cognitive and psychiatric status during the preadolescent stage and provided insights into brain development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
GWAS summary statistics of MSN could be downloaded on (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cOfYZe60PAI2JjlEhKL3N-qcJCGtmzUv?usp=sharing).
References
Bethlehem RAI, Seidlitz J, White SR, Vogel JW, Anderson KM, Adamson C, et al. Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature. 2022;604:525–33.
Paus T, Keshavan M, Giedd JN. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:947–57.
Fuhrmann D, Knoll LJ, Blakemore S-J. Adolescence as a sensitive period of brain development. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015;19:558–66.
Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, Castellanos FX, Liu H, Zijdenbos A, et al. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:861–3.
Thompson PM, Sowell ER, Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Vidal CN, Hayashi KM, et al. Structural MRI and brain development. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;67:285–323.
Mechelli A, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, Price CJ. Structural covariance in the human cortex. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8303–10.
Zielinski BA, Gennatas ED, Zhou J, Seeley WW. Network-level structural covariance in the developing brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:18191–6.
Casey BJ, Getz S, Galvan A. The adolescent brain. Dev Rev. 2008;28:62–77.
King DJ, Seri S, Beare R, Catroppa C, Anderson VA, Wood AG. Developmental divergence of structural brain networks as an indicator of future cognitive impairments in childhood brain injury: Executive functions. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020;42:100762.
Montembeault M, Joubert S, Doyon J, Carrier J, Gagnon J-F, Monchi O, et al. The impact of aging on gray matter structural covariance networks. Neuroimage. 2012;63:754–9.
DuPre E, Spreng RN. Structural covariance networks across the life span, from 6 to 94 years of age. Netw Neurosci. 2017;1:302–23.
Alexander-Bloch A, Raznahan A, Bullmore E, Giedd J. The convergence of maturational change and structural covariance in human cortical networks. J Neurosci. 2013;33:2889–99.
Palaniyappan L, Park B, Balain V, Dangi R, Liddle P. Abnormalities in structural covariance of cortical gyrification in schizophrenia. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220:2059–71.
Bethlehem RA, Romero-Garcia R, Mak E, Bullmore E, Baron-Cohen S. Structural covariance networks in children with autism or ADHD. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:4267–76.
Spreng RN, DuPre E, Ji JL, Yang G, Diehl C, Murray JD, et al. Structural covariance reveals alterations in control and salience network integrity in chronic schizophrenia. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29:5269–84.
Ajnakina O, Das T, Lally J, Di Forti M, Pariante CM, Marques TR, et al. Structural Covariance of Cortical Gyrification at Illness Onset in Treatment Resistance: A Longitudinal Study of First-Episode Psychoses. Schizophr Bull. 2021;47:1729–39.
Lenroot RK, Giedd JN. Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:718–29.
Stiles J, Jernigan TL. The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010;20:327–48.
Brown TT, Kuperman JM, Chung Y, Erhart M, McCabe C, Hagler DJ Jr., et al. Neuroanatomical assessment of biological maturity. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1693–8.
Seidlitz J, Váša F, Shinn M, Romero-Garcia R, Whitaker KJ, Vértes PE, et al. Morphometric similarity networks detect microscale cortical organization and predict inter-individual cognitive variation. Neuron. 2018;97:231–47. e7.
Wei Y, Scholtens LH, Turk E, Van Den Heuvel MP. Multiscale examination of cytoarchitectonic similarity and human brain connectivity. Netw Neurosci. 2018;3:124–37.
Seidlitz J, Nadig A, Liu S, Bethlehem RAI, Vértes PE, Morgan SE, et al. Transcriptomic and cellular decoding of regional brain vulnerability to neurogenetic disorders. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–14.
King DJ, Wood AG. Clinically feasible brain morphometric similarity network construction approaches with restricted magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions. Netw Neurosci. 2020;4:274–91.
Galdi P, Blesa M, Sullivan G, Lamb GJ, Stoye DQ, Quigley AJ, et al. Neonatal morphometric similarity networks predict atypical brain development associated with preterm birth. Connect NeuroImaging. 2018;11083:47–57.
Galdi P, Blesa M, Stoye DQ, Sullivan G, Lamb GJ, Quigley AJ, et al. Neonatal morphometric similarity mapping for predicting brain age and characterizing neuroanatomic variation associated with preterm birth. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;25:102195.
Fenchel D, Dimitrova R, Seidlitz J, Robinson EC, Batalle D, Hutter J, et al. Development of microstructural and morphological cortical profiles in the neonatal brain. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:5767–79.
Li J, Seidlitz J, Suckling J, Fan F, Ji G, Meng Y, et al. Cortical structural differences in major depressive disorder correlate with cell type-specific transcriptional signatures. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1647–1647.
Morgan SE, Seidlitz J, Whitaker KJ, Romero-Garcia R, Clifton NE, Scarpazza C, et al. Cortical patterning of abnormal morphometric similarity in psychosis is associated with brain expression of schizophrenia-related genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:9604–9.
Konrad K, Firk C, Uhlhaas PJ. Brain development during adolescence: neuroscientific insights into this developmental period. Dtsch Ärzteblatt Int. 2013;110:425.
Casey BJ, Heller AS, Gee DG, Cohen AO. Development of the emotional brain. Neurosci Lett. 2019;693:29–34.
Mills KL, Goddings A-L, Clasen LS, Giedd JN, Blakemore S-J. The developmental mismatch in structural brain maturation during adolescence. Dev Neurosci. 2014;36:147–60.
Romero-Garcia R, Whitaker KJ, Váša F, Seidlitz J, Shinn M, Fonagy P, et al. Structural covariance networks are coupled to expression of genes enriched in supragranular layers of the human cortex. Neuroimage. 2018;171:256–67.
Doucet GE, Moser DA, Rodrigue A, Bassett DS, Glahn DC, Frangou S. Person-based brain morphometric similarity is heritable and correlates with biological features. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29:852–62.
Casey B, Cannonier T, Conley MI, Cohen AO, Barch DM, Heitzeg MM, et al. The adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Devl Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:43–54.
Hagler DJ Jr, Hatton S, Cornejo MD, Makowski C, Fair DA, Dick AS, et al. Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Neuroimage. 2019;202:116091.
Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62:774–81.
Norbom LB, Doan NT, Alnæs D, Kaufmann T, Moberget T, Rokicki J, et al. Probing brain developmental patterns of myelination and associations with psychopathology in youths using gray/white matter contrast. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85:389–98.
Panizzon MS, Fennema-Notestine C, Kubarych TS, Chen C-H, Eyler LT, Fischl B, et al. Genetic and environmental influences of white and gray matter signal contrast: a new phenotype for imaging genetics?. Neuroimage. 2012;60:1686–95.
White NS, Leergaard TB, D’Arceuil H, Bjaalie JG, Dale AM. Probing tissue microstructure with restriction spectrum imaging: histological and theoretical validation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34:327–46.
Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS. Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:316–29.
Soares J, Marques P, Alves V, Sousa N. A hitchhiker’s guide to diffusion tensor imaging. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:31.
White NS, McDonald CR, Farid N, Kuperman JM, Kesari S, Dale AM. Improved conspicuity and delineation of high-grade primary and metastatic brain tumors using “restriction spectrum imaging”: quantitative comparison with high B-value DWI and ADC. Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:958–64.
Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31:968–80.
Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33:341–55.
A. Fornito, A. Zalesky, and E. Bullmore, Fundamentals of brain network analysis. Academic Press, 2016.
Yun J-Y, Boedhoe PS, Vriend C, Jahanshad N, Abe Y, Ameis SH. et al. Brain structural covariance networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a graph analysis from the ENIGMA Consortium. Brain. 2020;143:684–700.
Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:1125–65.
C. F. von Economo and G. N. Koskinas, Die cytoarchitektonik der hirnrinde des erwachsenen menschen. Springer, 1925.
Modabbernia A, Reichenberg A, Moser DA, Doucet GE, Artiges E, Banaschewski T, et al. Linked patterns of biological and environmental covariation with brain structure in adolescence: a population-based longitudinal study. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:4905–18.
Brouwer RM, Klein M, Grasby KL, Schnack HG, Jahanshad N, Teeuw J, et al. Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:421–32.
Ferschmann L, Vijayakumar N, Grydeland H, Overbye K, Mills KL, Fjell AM, et al. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression relate differentially to longitudinal structural brain development across adolescence. Cortex. 2021;136:109–23.
Tooley UA, Bassett DS, Mackey AP. Environmental influences on the pace of brain development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22:372–84.
Kwon D, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Pohl KM. Regional growth trajectories of cortical myelination in adolescents and young adults: longitudinal validation and functional correlates. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020;14:242–66.
Palaniyappan L, Das TK, Winmill L, Hough M, James A, Palaniyappan L. Progressive post-onset reorganisation of MRI-derived cortical thickness in adolescents with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2019;208:477–8.
Weintraub S, Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Tulsky DS, Zelazo PD, Bauer PJ, et al. Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013;80:S54–S64.
T. M. Achenbach, The Child Behavior Checklist and related instruments. 1999.
Townsend L, Kobak K, Kearney C, Milham M, Andreotti C, Escalera J, et al. Development of three web-based computerized versions of the Kiddie Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia child psychiatric diagnostic interview: preliminary validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59:309–25.
J. Kaufman, B. Birmaher, D. Brent, U. Rao, C. Flynn, P. Moreci et al., Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 36, 980–8, 1997.
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Rescorla LA, Almqvist F, Weintraub S, et al. Testing the 8-syndrome structure of the child behavior checklist in 30 societies. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2007;36:405–17.
Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Rescorla LA. DSM-oriented and empirically based approaches to constructing scales from the same item pools. J Clin child Adolesc Psychol. 2003;32:328–40.
T. Achenbach and L. Rescorla, Multicultural supplement to the manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles Burlington VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, 2007.
Barch DM, Albaugh MD, Avenevoli S, Chang L, Clark DB, Glantz MD, et al. Demographic, physical and mental health assessments in the adolescent brain and cognitive development study: Rationale and description. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:55–66.
Paulus MP, Squeglia LM, Bagot K, Jacobus J, Kuplicki R, Breslin FJ, et al. Screen media activity and brain structure in youth: evidence for diverse structural correlation networks from the ABCD study. Neuroimage. 2019;185:140–53.
S. G. Heeringa and P. A. Berglund, A guide for population-based analysis of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study baseline data BioRxiv, 2020.
Paul SE, Hatoum AS, Fine JD, Johnson EC, Hansen I, Karcher NR, et al. Associations between prenatal cannabis exposure and childhood outcomes: results from the ABCD study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78:64–76.
Price AL, Zaitlen NA, Reich D, Patterson N. New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:459–63.
Watanabe K, Taskesen E, Van A, et al. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–11.
Gene Oncology Consortium The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348:648–60.
Ramasamy A, Trabzuni D, Guelfi S, Varghese V, Smith C, Walker R, et al. Genetic variability in the regulation of gene expression in ten regions of the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:1418–28.
Fromer M, Roussos P, Sieberts SK, Johnson JS, Kavanagh DH, Perumal TM, et al. Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1442–53.
Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1739–40.
Scholtens LH, de Reus MA, de Lange SC, Schmidt R, van den Heuvel MP. An mri von economo–koskinas atlas. Neuroimage. 2018;170:249–56.
Gene Oncology Consortium Gene ontology consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D1049–D1056.
Steinberg L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev Rev. 2008;28:78–106.
Belsky J, de Haan M. Annual Research Review: Parenting and children’s brain development: the end of the beginning. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52:409–28.
Johnson SB, Blum RW, Giedd JN. Adolescent maturity and the brain: the promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. J Adolesc Health: Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2009;45:216–21.
Pizzagalli DA, Holmes AJ, Dillon DG, Goetz EL, Birk JL, Bogdan R, et al. Reduced caudate and nucleus accumbens response to rewards in unmedicated individuals with major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:702–10.
Benningfield MM, Blackford JU, Ellsworth ME, Samanez-Larkin GR, Martin PR, Cowan RL, et al. Caudate responses to reward anticipation associated with delay discounting behavior in healthy youth. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014;7:43–52.
LeDoux J. The amygdala. Curr Biol. 2007;17:R868–R874.
Steinberg L. A dual systems model of adolescent risk‐taking. Dev Psychobiol: J Int Soc Dev Psychobiol. 2010;52:216–24.
Glasser MF, Goyal MS, Preuss TM, Raichle ME, Van Essen DC. Trends and properties of human cerebral cortex: correlations with cortical myelin content. Neuroimage. 2014;93:165–75.
Margulies DS, Ghosh SS, Goulas A, Falkiewicz M, Huntenburg JM, Langs G, et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:12574–9.
Slater DA, Melie-Garcia L, Preisig M, Kherif F, Lutti A, Draganski B. Evolution of white matter tract microstructure across the life span. Human Brain Mapp. 2019;40:2252–68.
Lacerda ALT, Nicoletti MA, Brambilla P, Sassi RB, Mallinger AG, Frank E, et al. Anatomical MRI study of basal ganglia in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging. 2003;124:129–40.
Canbeyli R. Sensorimotor modulation of mood and depression: an integrative review. Behav Brain Res. 2010;207:249–64.
Kropf E, Syan SK, Minuzzi L, Frey BN. From anatomy to function: the role of the somatosensory cortex in emotional regulation. Braz J Psychiatry. 2018;41:261–9.
K. S. Saladin and C. Porth, Anatomy & physiology: the unity of form and function. McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA:, 2010.
Oldham MC, Horvath S, Geschwind DH. Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:17973–8.
Lodato S, Arlotta P. Generating neuronal diversity in the mammalian cerebral cortex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31:699–720.
Lui JH, Hansen DV, Kriegstein AR. Development and evolution of the human neocortex. Cell. 2011;146:18–36.
Acknowledgements
JZ was supported by Science and Technology Innovation 2030 - Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence Project (Grant No. 2021ZD0200204), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No.2018SHZDZX01) and ZJLab, NSFC 61973086, and Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, China. KZ was supported by National Natural Science Foundation 62276099, and Shanghai Pujiang Program. LP acknowledges research support from the Tanna Schulich Chair of Neuroscience and Mental Health (Schulich School of Medicine, Western University: 2019 – 2022); Monique H. Bourgeois Chair in Developmental Disorders and Graham Boeckh Foundation (Douglas Research Centre, McGill University) and a salary award from the Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Sante ́ (FRQS). JF was supported by the 111 Project (No. B18015), the key project of Shanghai Science and Technology (No. 16JC1420402), National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC1312900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 91630314). Xiang-Zhen Kong is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171031), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021XZZX006), and Information Technology Center of Zhejiang University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XW and JZ contributed to the conception of the study; XW, GY and KZ performed the data analysis; XW, JZ and LP wrote the manuscript; LP, KZ, ZL helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions; LP, KZ, JS, ZL, GS, JF, BS, TR, EB helped with the revision of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
LP reports personal fees for serving as chief editor from the Canadian Medical Association Journals (https://www.jpn.ca/), speaker/consultant fee from Janssen Canada and Otsuka Canada, SPMM Course Limited, UK, Canadian Psychiatric Association; book royalties from Oxford University Press; investigator-initiated educational grants from Janssen Canada, Sunovion and Otsuka Canada outside the submitted work. All other authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. None of the above-listed companies or funding agencies have had any influence on the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, X., Palaniyappan, L., Yu, G. et al. Morphometric dis-similarity between cortical and subcortical areas underlies cognitive function and psychiatric symptomatology: a preadolescence study from ABCD. Mol Psychiatry 28, 1146–1158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01896-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01896-x