Encephalitis has an estimated prevalence of ≤0.01%. Even with extensive diagnostic work-up, an infectious etiology is identified or suspected in <50% of cases, suggesting a role for etiologically unclear, noninfectious processes. Mild encephalitis runs frequently unnoticed, despite slight neuroinflammation detectable postmortem in many neuropsychiatric illnesses. A widely unexplored field in humans, though clearly documented in rodents, is genetic brain inflammation, particularly that associated with myelin abnormalities, inducing primary white matter encephalitis. We hypothesized that “autoimmune encephalitides” may result from any brain inflammation concurring with the presence of brain antigen-directed autoantibodies, e.g., against N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor NR1 (NMDAR1-AB), which are not causal of, but may considerably shape the encephalitis phenotype. We therefore immunized young female Cnp−/− mice lacking the structural myelin protein 2′-3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase (Cnp) with a “cocktail” of NMDAR1 peptides. Cnp−/− mice exhibit early low-grade inflammation of white matter tracts and blood–brain barrier disruption. Our novel mental-time-travel test disclosed that Cnp−/− mice are compromised in what–where–when orientation, but this episodic memory readout was not further deteriorated by NMDAR1-AB. In contrast, comparing wild-type and Cnp−/− mice without/with NMDAR1-AB regarding hippocampal learning/memory and motor balance/coordination revealed distinct stair patterns of behavioral pathology. To elucidate a potential contribution of oligodendroglial NMDAR downregulation to NMDAR1-AB effects, we generated conditional NR1 knockout mice. These mice displayed normal Morris water maze and mental-time-travel, but beam balance performance was similar to immunized Cnp−/−. Immunohistochemistry confirmed neuroinflammation/neurodegeneration in Cnp−/− mice, yet without add-on effect of NMDAR1-AB. To conclude, genetic brain inflammation may explain an encephalitic component underlying autoimmune conditions.
The discovery in 2007/2008 of autoantibodies directed against the NMDA receptor subunit NR1 (NMDAR1-AB = GluN1-AB) in the context of a paraneoplastic autoimmune disease, has stimulated extensive interest of clinicians and clinical researchers worldwide [1, 2]. As a consequence, diagnoses of autoimmune conditions underlying neuropsychiatric disorders of different severity and highly variable presentation began to boom [3,4,5]. Etiology and pathogenesis of “NMDAR encephalitis,” however, are still as ambiguous as the role of NMDAR1-AB in this condition. In fact, NMDAR1-AB, reaching the brain from the circulation via a compromised blood–brain barrier (BBB), or being produced intrathecally, act as NMDAR antagonists, i.e., they produce ketamine-like phenotypical effects [6, 7]. This is mechanistically accomplished by internalization of the receptor, resulting (sub)acutely in lower surface expression of neuronal NMDAR upon NMDAR1-AB binding [8,9,10,11,12]. Together with probably diverse local access to the brain , it matches well the broad spectrum and inconstant intensity of psychopathological and neurological symptoms, ranging from psychosis, cognitive decline and extrapyramidal signs to motor dysfunction, autonomic dysregulation and epileptic seizures [1, 2]. At certainly lower amounts and dependent on the condition, NMDAR1-AB may also act as antidepressants  or in certain situations even behave like a double-edged sword, e.g., in ischemic stroke, where they can protect acutely from evolution of lesion size , but upon long-term exposure seem to contribute to poststroke dementia .
Notably, numerous brain-directed AB—apart from NMDAR1-AB—have been reported in serum of healthy humans and of various other mammalian species, likely constituting the preexisting physiological “autoimmune repertoire.” These AB do have potential functionality and pathogenicity [3, 13, 17,18,19]. Regarding NMDAR1-AB, all immunoglobulin (Ig) classes are highly seroprevalent across mammals, with multiple possible inducers or boosters identified [2, 11, 14, 20,21,22]. But neither the “rules” of their induction nor the potentially different (patho)physiological significance of the various Ig classes has been elucidated yet, even though the class distribution of NMDAR1-AB is highly significantly predicted by the extracellular position of the antigen .
Importantly, a causal input of NMDAR1-AB themselves concerning encephalitis induction has not been convincingly demonstrated yet . At least mild neuroinflammation [25, 26], if not obvious viral encephalitis caused by infections like herpes or influenza [11, 20,21,22], most likely prevail already during early stages of brain autoimmune disease. This might ultimately explain the encephalitic component of these conditions, and seamlessly supports Karl Bechter’s mild encephalitis hypothesis of mental illness [25, 26]. Also the white matter damage described in “NMDAR encephalitis” patients with incomplete recovery blends into this view, highlighting the heterogeneity of underlying causes . Overall, origins of encephalitides amount to 20–50% documented viral infections [28,29,30]. The remaining causes are to a large degree unknown, including the roots of mild encephalitis, running mostly undiagnosed. Of particular interest in this regard are genetic reasons of neuroinflammation, mainly those associated with myelin abnormalities leading to mild primary white matter encephalitis [31,32,33].
We note that already the normal aging process is associated with slightly increased brain inflammation, characterized by, e.g., enhanced levels of proinflammatory cytokines, higher microglial numbers and heightened reactivity [31, 34,35,36]. In major psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia and depression, low-grade inflammation constitutes a crucial mechanism in the final common disease pathway (reviewed in, e.g., [37, 38]), that has been linked to white matter abnormalities, as documented by postmortem studies. CNP (2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase) is among the oligodendrocyte/myelin-associated genes most robustly reduced on mRNA and protein level in these brains [39,40,41]. In fact, Cnp/CNP is a structural protein, present in noncompacted myelin and accounting for about 4% of total central nervous system myelin proteins . Null mutant (Cnp−/−) mice constitute a translationally interesting model of genetically induced, progressive brain inflammation . Starting already at a few weeks of age, these animals develop behavioral abnormalities, low-grade white matter inflammation and progressive neurodegeneration [32, 44]. Analogously, in humans with a CNP loss-of-function allele (CNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, SNP: rs2070106-AA), diffusion tensor imaging points to axonal loss in the frontal corpus callosum , and white matter hyperintensities in rs2070106-AA carriers indicate mild signs of neuroinflammation and demyelination . These findings suggest that CNP reduction (and the herewith associated inflammation) might be critical in a more general disease process and that the potential role of this protein is not restricted to a single neuropsychiatric diagnostic category but of global relevance for severe mental disorders.
Here, we immunized young female Cnp−/− mice with a cocktail of 4 NMDAR peptides [9, 24] to generate a novel autoimmune model based on preexisting white matter encephalitis. This cocktail includes a peptide covering the NMDAR1-N368/G369 region, claimed to be pathognomonic for NMDAR1-AB encephalitis , and most importantly, it induces functionally highly active NMDAR1-AB, leading to psychosis-like symptoms in mice with compromised BBB . We report that NMDAR1-AB can substantially contribute to the behavioral abnormalities of an underlying white matter encephalitis, reflected by striking stair patterns of pathology. As indicated by additional behavioral phenotyping of conditional NR1 mutant mice, part of these behavioral NMDAR1-AB effects might be due to downregulation not only of neuronal, but also of oligodendroglial NMDAR.
Materials and methods
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the local authorities, i.e., the Animal Care and Use Committee (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, LAVES). Sample sizes were based on previous experience under consideration of the RRR principle and adjusted to technical limitations (e.g., maximum of 16 mice per IntelliCage). All experiments were performed by investigators unaware of group assignment (“fully blinded”). Animals were kept under standard laboratory conditions (20–22 °C, 12 h light/dark cycle, lights off at 6 p.m.) in conventional type IV (n = 13–16 per cage) or type II cages (n = 3–5 per cage) (Tecniplast, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany) and maintained within ventilated cabinets (Scantainers, Scanbur Karlsunde, Denmark), separated by gender and with access to food (Sniff Spezialdiäten, Bad Sodenberg, Germany) and water ad libitum. Genotyping was carried out as previously described for Cnp [31, 43] and NR1flox/flox [46, 47].
Immunization cohort: Female Cnp−/− (KO, n = 26) mice on a C57Bl/6 background along with their wild-type (WT, n = 14) littermates were immunized at age 8 weeks with either a cocktail of four GluN1 extracellular peptides (GluN135-53, GluN1361-376, GluN1385-399, and GluN1660-811, coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Synaptic Systems, Göttingen, Germany) plus chicken ovalbumin (WT, n = 14, KO, n = 13) or ovalbumin only (KO, n = 13) (“OVA,” A5503, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) as previously described [9, 24].
Oligodendroglial NR1 cKO cohorts: Female CnpCre+/−:NR1flox/flox (cKO, n = 16) mice and their NR1flox/flox (n = 16) littermate controls were employed to elucidate the effect of NR1 deficiency on behavior between 3 and 11 months of age. A separate cohort of aged (12–14 months) female CnpCre+/−:NR1flox/flox (n = 10) and NR1flox/flox controls (n = 12) was used to confirm findings.
Cnp deficiency control cohorts: Cnp+/− (n = 7) and WT (n = 9) littermates were used at age 12 months as controls to separate Cnp heterozygosity effects from oligodendroglial NR1 cKO. For BBB integrity analysis, male WT (n = 4) and Cnp−/− (n = 5) mice, aged 18 weeks, were used.
Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injections of 24 µL 2,2,2,-tribromoethanol (1.36%; T48402, Sigma) in ddH2O/g body weight (Avertin). ISO standard transponders (8.5 mm length, 1.2 mm diameter, PM162-8) were implanted below the skin of the neck to enable experimenter-independent phenotyping of mice in IntelliCages® (TSE Systems, Bad Homburg, Germany). Mice were introduced to the IntelliCages on the following day.
For detailed information on order of testing in all cohorts, we refer to the respective figures.
IntelliCage-based behavioral phenotyping and mental-time-travel (MTT): The IntelliCage battery was carried out as detailed before , covering cognitive functions like place learning, reversal learning, and sucrose preference for assessment of potential anhedonia. Subsequently, higher-order cognition was tested over 9 days using our novel IntelliCage-based MTT paradigm. For this, mice receive tap water via a nose poke at first from all four corners. Starting with the second experimental day, access to drinking water is limited to a brief time window only during the active phase of the mice (6–8 p.m.). In one of the corners, mice receive a 1.5 bar air puff as negative reinforcement (day I). The individually assigned “punished” corner changes for each mouse on a daily basis following a distinct pattern, namely diametrically opposed to the first punished corner (day II), horizontally opposed (day III) and again diametrically opposed (day IV) (training cycle). This pattern is then repeated for a second round (days V–VIII) and the preference (% visits) to each corner on each day of the second round is used to assess MTT abilities (assessment cycle). Each corner on each day is considered either currently (=0 days after punishment), recently (=1 day after punishment), intermediately (=2 days after punishment) or longer ago punished (=3 days after punishment). The average number of visits to each of these corners throughout the assessment cycle is calculated and used for statistical analyses. The steepness of the curve, best expressed as trend line, reflects the quality of MTT performance.
Spatial memory and reversal learning
To assess hippocampus-dependent cognitive functions such as spatial learning and memory, we conducted the classical Morris water maze (MWM) as previously described [49,50,51]. Immunized mice were tested at 50–64 days post-immunization (DPI); cKO mice at the age of 3 months, including a subsequent reversal learning period followed by a second probe trial.
Motor performance, motor learning and coordination: Motor coordination was analyzed by beam balance as previously described [31, 50]. Motor performance and learning was tested using rotarod as previously described [31, 49]. Female cKO mice, having revealed a pathological rotarod phenotype, as well as Cnp+/− mice as controls were exposed to 4 h of voluntary running on complex running wheels (CRW) as previously described [52, 53] to further assess motor-cognitive performance.
Blood sampling and NMDAR1-AB determination
Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital sinus prior to immunization, before transponder placement (29 DPI) and before perfusion (~3 months post-immunization). EDTA plasma aliquots were stored at −80 °C. Specific antigen ELISA was performed as previously described [9, 24] using plasma diluted 1:1000 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), to confirm successful immunization and persistence of NMDAR1-AB. To determine NMDAR1-AB IgG formation against full-length GluN1, a commercially available cell-based assay comprising Grin1-transfected and control-transfected HEK293 cells (FB 112d-1010-51, EUROIMMUN, Lübeck, Germany) was used as previously described . Terminal plasma samples were diluted 1:100 in 0.2% Tween20/PBS and spiked with a commercial rabbit anti-GluN1 antibody directed against the intracellular C-terminal domain (1:1000, G8913, Sigma). Bound mouse and rabbit IgG were detected with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-mouse-IgG (1:1000, A21202, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) and Alexa Fluor 647 labeled anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:1000, A31573, Thermo). Nuclei were stained 10 min at RT with 1 µg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole in PBS (DAPI, D9542, Sigma). Representative images were acquired on a confocal microscope (LSM 880, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Measurements assessing BBB integrity
BBB integrity was evaluated by quantifying extravasation of two distinct fluorescent tracers (Evans blue and fluorescein) as previously described [9, 54]. In addition, brain water content was determined by comparing wet and dry brain mass.
Mice were anesthetized with Avertin and transcardially perfused with Ringer (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany). Brains were collected and hemispheres separated. One hemisphere was snap-frozen and the other postfixed in 4% formaldehyde/PBS for 12 h, dehydrated in 30% sucrose/PBS for 48 h, embedded in optimal cutting medium (Tissue-Tek, #4583, Sakura, Umkirch, Germany) and frozen on dry ice. Fixed hemispheres were cut into 30 µm coronal sections on a cryostat (CM1950, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and stored at −20 °C in cryomedium (25% ethylene glycol/25% glycerol/PBS). Quantifications were performed as described previously [24, 51], using 3–5 regularly spaced sections per mouse (every 150 µm) between Bregma coordinates −1.34 and −2.24 mm. Free-floating frozen sections were blocked and permeabilized for 1 h at RT with 5% normal horse serum (NHS, 26050-088, Thermo) in 0.5% Triton X-100/PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Following primary antibodies were used: Mouse anti-GFAP (1:500, NCL-GFAP-GA5, Novocastra-Leica, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:1000, #019-19741, Wako, Neuss, Germany), guinea pig anti-parvalbumin (1:1000, #195004, Synaptic Systems), rat anti-CD3 (1:100, clone 17A2, BioLegend, Koblenz, Germany), rabbit anti-CD19 (1:500, clone D4V4B, Cell Signaling Technologies, Frankfurt am Main, Germany). Subsequently, sections were stained with corresponding fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies for 2 h at RT. Secondary antibodies included: Alexa Fluor 555 anti-rabbit (1:1000, A21428, Thermo), Alexa Fluor 633 anti-guinea pig (1:1000, A21105, Thermo), Alexa Fluor 647 anti-mouse (1:1000, A31571, Thermo), and Alexa Fluor 647 anti-rat (1:1000, A21247, Thermo). Nuclei were stained for 10 min at RT with 0.2 µg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole in PBS (DAPI, D9542, Sigma). Sections were mounted on SuperFrost®-Plus slides (J1800AMNZ, Thermo) with Aqua-Poly/Mount (#18606, Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA) and imaged on a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 880, Zeiss). For quantification of Iba1 and GFAP, 1 µm thick optical sections of hippocampi and corpora callosa were acquired as tile scans using a 40× oil objective (40×/1.4 NA Plan-APOCHROMAT, #420762-9900, Zeiss). Parvalbumin, CD3 and CD19 stainings were imaged using a 20× air objective (20×/0.8 Plan-APOCHROMAT, #420640-9903, Zeiss) with an optical thickness (Z-resolution) of 2 µm for parvalbumin and 5 µm for CD3 and CD19 stainings. Image acquisition parameters were kept constant within experiments. Quantifications and image processing were performed with FIJI-ImageJ software (Schindelin). Iba1+ cells (mostly microglia), parvalbumin+ cells (inhibitory neurons), CD3+ cells (T cells), and CD19+ cells (B cells) were manually counted. GFAP+ area was quantified densitometrically upon uniform thresholding. Cell counts and GFAP+ area were normalized to quantified areas. Data from 3–5 hippocampi/mouse was averaged. Fluorojade C staining of dying neurons was performed as previously described . Neuronal death was qualitatively evaluated in hippocampus and corpus callosum by a blinded investigator using two sections per mouse. Representative images were acquired as tile scans on a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 880, Zeiss). DAB-based APP staining and quantification of APP+ axonal swellings was carried out in corpus callosum and hippocampus (three sections per mouse) as described previously , using a monoclonal anti-APP antibody (1:850, MAB348, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in 3% NHS/0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 48 h at 4 °C. Biotinylated horse anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:200, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) in 3% NHS/0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS followed by Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories) were applied according to manufacturer’s instructions. Mayer’s hemalum (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) served as counterstain of nuclei. Quantifications were conducted with Stereoinvestigator 6.55 software (MicroBrightfield Inc.), using a light microscope (Olympus BX-50, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany), attached to a computer-driven motorized stage and a microfire video camera. Representative images were obtained on a light microscope (Zeiss Imager Z1) with a 40×/NA 1.30 oil objective lens.
Blood flow cytometry
Per mouse, 50 µL EDTA blood was diluted in 50 µL PBS and overlaid on 100 µL lymphocyte separation medium (1077, PromoCell). After centrifugation, cells were isolated from the interphase, washed and stained for 15 min at 4 °C with the following antibodies: PECy5 anti-CD4 (1:1000, clone H129.19, BioLegend), PECy7 anti-CD8 (1:500, clone 53-6.7, BioLegend), BV510 anti-B220 (1:333, clone RA3-6B2, BioLegend), PerCpCy5.5 anti-CD11b (1:1000, clone M1/70, BioLegend), PE anti-Gr1 (1:1000, clone RB6-8C5, BioLegend), and FITC anti-F4/80 (1:1000, BM8, BioLegend). After staining, cells were washed, suspended in 250 µL PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (#8076.3, Roth), and filtered through 40 µm cell strainers. Samples were measured on a FACSAria Sorp (BD). Total cell numbers were determined using forward and side scatter. Frequency of helper T cells (CD4+, CD8−), cytotoxic T cells (CD8+, CD4−), B cells (B220+), macrophages (CD11b+, F4/80+) and neutrophils/monocytes (CD11b+, Gr1+) were determined as percentage of total lymphocytes.
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism software (GraphPad Software, version 9) or R 4.0.5. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test with an alpha error of 0.05. Dependent on data distribution, two-tailed unpaired Welch’s corrected t-test or Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare groups of 2. Similarly, groups of three were compared by Welch’s ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test. Linear trends were tested via Jonckheere–Terpstra trend tests. Repeated measure data was analyzed using mixed-model ANOVA. Linear regression analyses of MTT datasets were performed in Prism 9 using least squares regression, a straight line model, and extra sum of squares F test to compare slopes. Results are presented as mean ± SEM; p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results and discussion
Immunization of Cnp −/− mice, a genetic model of mild primary white matter encephalitis, against NMDAR1
Young female Cnp−/− mice lacking the structural myelin protein 2′-3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase (Cnp), which is causal of progressive, genetically induced white matter inflammation , were immunized at the age of 8 weeks with a cocktail of four GluN1 extracellular peptides (GluN135-53, GluN1361-376, GluN1385-399, and GluN1660-811) [9, 24], including a peptide in the N-terminal domain containing the G7 epitope (N368/G369) , versus ovalbumin as control immunization. We used females to account for the 4:1 female/male ratio in human “NMDAR encephalitis” . WT mice receiving the identical cocktail of four GluN1 extracellular peptides served as controls (all same C57BL/6 background, age and gender as Cnp−/− mice). Transponders were implanted 4 weeks later and mice went through a series of tests as detailed in Fig. 1A.
Modeling autoimmune encephalitis: NMDAR1-AB aggravate behavioral consequences of white matter inflammation
Mouse behavior testing was started in an observer-independent setting, namely our previously designed, extensive cognitive, emotional and social phenotyping, using IntelliCages (Fig. 1B; ). This setting did not reveal notable differences between groups (Table 1), except for a reduction in the total number of corner visits (assessed over the first three IntelliCage paradigms), resulting in a stair pattern from WT to Cnp−/− without and with NMDAR1-AB (Fig. 1C). This paucity of differences in the IntelliCage setup is most likely explained by a relatively low sensitivity or ceiling effects of this paradigm, requiring prominent brain damage to show changes . However, in an attempt to provide more challenging tasks for testing of higher brain functions, including executive performance, we established a novel test, described here for the first time, which measures episodic-like memory in the IntelliCage setup (Fig. 1B). Mice have to show their ability of what–where–when discrimination [56,57,58]. Indeed, Cnp−/− mice with their progressing white matter inflammation reveal compromised MTT capacity. In this task, the presence of NMDAR1-AB had no add-on effect. These results are clearly visualized by the trend lines showing the steepest curve (best MTT performance) in WT controls (Fig. 1D).
Similar to the corner visits in the IntelliCage (Fig. 1C), nearly all subsequently conducted conventional tests, including MWM readouts of hippocampal learning and memory, presented with line and bar graphs (Fig. 1 E–J), as well as beam balance performance (Fig. 1K, L) revealed highly significant stair patterns. Just the final test, rotarod, did not show differences between groups, pointing to a widely normal motor performance. In conclusion, these data indicate that in many behavioral paradigms, the presence of NMDAR1-AB aggravated the measured pathology, consistent with a significant autoimmune shaping of the encephalitis phenotype. These findings in white matter inflammation are in interesting contrast to previously modeled gray matter inflammation—where only marginal shaping of the phenotype by NMDAR1-AB was observed . We note, however, that in the gray matter model, pyramidal neurons were induced to express diphtheria toxin, leading to a substantially reduced excitatory neuron number. Therefore, NMDAR were already highly diminished and their downregulation by NMDAR1-AB did not further exacerbate the resulting pathological picture .
Comparable formation and persistence of circulating NMDAR1-AB in all immunized mice
Testing the immunization efficiency of our cocktail of four GluN1 extracellular peptides with a respective NR1-antigen ELISA confirmed the presence of high circulating NMDAR1-AB levels in all immunized mice that persisted up to the end of the experiment at age 22 weeks (Fig. 2A, B). Moreover, a cell-based assay using NR1-transfected cells revealed the presence of specific NMDAR1-AB, additionally validated by double-labeling with a commercial rabbit anti-GluN1 IgG (Fig. 2C).
Peripheral immune cells in post-immunization flow cytometry remain unremarkable despite BBB disruption in Cnp −/− mice
Blood flow cytometry at 12 weeks of age, i.e. 4 weeks after immunization, did not show any abnormalities of Cnp−/− mice with or without NMDAR1-AB in number and distribution of circulating immune cells compared to WT or pre-immunization state (Fig. 2D, E). In contrast, determination of BBB integrity [9, 24, 54] showed distinctly enhanced tracer extravasation and brain water content (Fig. 2F, G), consistent with a clear BBB disruption, allowing NMDAR1-AB to readily reach the brain. Similar to the observations in gray matter encephalitis after diphtheria toxin-induction , the complete lack of peripheral changes in a situation of substantial white matter inflammation, including BBB breakdown and inflammatory degeneration, is intriguing. At the same time it is alarming for clinicians who are not infrequently confronted with the necessity to diagnose or exclude an encephalitis in vivo, particularly upon suddenly occurring behavioral abnormalities in neuropsychiatric practice .
Histological analysis of basic brain inflammation readouts fails to reveal any add-on effect of NMDAR1-AB
When employing MWM, we found clear behavioral changes in classical hippocampal tasks, magnified by the presence of NMDAR1-AB. Thus, we first checked whether Fluorojade staining would reveal neurodegeneration in the hippocampus. Using this method, however, we saw overall intact hippocampal structures and cells (Fig. 3A). Overview images of gliosis (both micro- and astrogliosis) uncovered clear respective signals in corpus callosum of Cnp−/− mice with or without NMDAR1-AB, but only weak signals in the hippocampus, consistent with the predominant white matter inflammation (Fig. 3B, C). Axonal degeneration, estimated by APP+ axonal swellings, was prominent both in callosal white matter tracts and hippocampus (Fig. 3D, E). The impressions gained by the overview images were subsequently confirmed by quantifications which additionally revealed T cell infiltration in Cnp−/− mice, regardless of NMDAR1-AB presence (Fig. 3F–M). B cell numbers were very low and not different between groups (not shown). Interestingly, in contrast to the diphtheria toxin-induced gray matter encephalitis , parvalbumin+ interneurons in total hippocampus or its subregions, cornu ammonis and dentate gyrus, were not quantitatively changed in any of the conditions compared to WT (Fig. 3N), likely explained by the morphologically intact pyramidal layer (Fig. 3A). Together, these histological data emphasize once more the predominant white matter inflammation in the Cnp−/− model with just moderate spreading of the inflammatory process to the hippocampus or other gray matter areas [32, 44]. The degenerative process, however, evaluated by APP+ axon counts, was clearly present in both compartments. Moreover, histological quantifications attest that NMDAR1-AB do not enhance the preexisting (before immunization) and progressing inflammatory condition. This obviously implies that the observed stair patterns of behavioral changes, with NMDAR1-AB playing an amplifier role, are due to an additional NMDAR1 dysfunction or downregulation by NMDAR1-AB rather than an exaggerated underlying encephalitis. Thus, NMDAR1-AB not only fail to induce an encephalitis on their own [9, 24, 59,60,61,62,63], but also to augment an underlying gray  or white matter inflammation as shown here. However, they can considerably shape the resulting behavioral phenotype. Of course, brain regions, other than those examined here, may well be involved in the behavioral NMDAR1-AB effects, too. Also, our findings with NMDAR1-AB, suggesting lack of any proinflammatory potential of these autoantibodies, may not necessarily be translatable to other conditions, e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus, where more toxic “autoantibody cousins,” targeting the NR2A and B subunits, may be at work [64,65,66].
Genetic elimination of oligodendroglial NMDAR uncovers a potential contribution of these receptors to behavioral consequences of NMDAR1-AB
NMDA receptors are not only expressed by excitatory neurons but also by other cell types, like oligodendrocytes [67,68,69]. These in turn play a key role in regulating glucose uptake in response to axonal glutamate release upon neuronal activity, thus mediating metabolic support of axons on demand. Targeted inactivation of oligodendroglial NMDA receptors impairs axonal energy metabolism [47, 70]. So far, consequences of NMDAR downregulation by NMDAR1-AB in oligodendrocytes have only been addressed in vitro, showing robust downregulation of the glucose transporter GLUT1 and diminished Ca2+ responses upon NMDAR agonist application after NMDAR1-AB exposure . Since in vivo aftereffects have remained unexplored, we wondered whether some of the impaired behavioral features, amplified by NMDAR1-AB in our model, might perhaps overlap with respective readouts measurable in mice with genetic elimination of oligodendroglial NMDAR. In other words, would such findings provide first hints of an involvement of oligodendroglial NMDAR in the overall consequences of NMDAR downregulation by NMDAR1-AB?
Thus, female conditional oligodendroglial NMDAR KO mice (CnpCre+/−*NR1flox/flox) went through an analogous test battery and were compared to NR1flox/flox controls (Fig. 4A). These mice did not show any abnormalities in IntelliCage, including MTT, and MWM (Fig. 4B–I; Table 1). Interestingly, beam balance at 8 and 12 months of age, i.e. walking on 10 mm versus 8 mm diameter beams, revealed inferior escape latency in cKO females as compared to controls. Rotarod performance and, in particular, motor learning, defined as improvement from day 1 to day 2, was clearly compromised, as was the average velocity on CRW. Collectively, these data disclose a predominant motor/coordination inferiority of oligodendroglial NMDAR cKO mice. Reassuringly, these phenotypes were not observed in an extra control group of CnpCre+/− and WT mice, employed to exclude effects of Cnp heterozygosity alone (Fig. 4J–P). Based on these observations, we speculate that the amplified MWM pathology in immunized Cnp−/− mice (compare Fig. 1E–J) is explained mainly through downregulation by NMDAR1-AB of neuronal NMDAR, whereas their beam balance phenotype (compare Fig. 1K, L) may be contributed by the downregulation of oligodendroglial NMDAR. Even though this postulation is just indirect at this point, it may stimulate further research on a multicellular input to NMDAR1-AB mediated phenotypes.
Conclusions and outlook
The present mild encephalitis model tested the hypothesis that high-level circulating NMDAR1-AB can shape the behavioral consequences of an underlying white matter inflammation in Cnp−/− mice with confirmed BBB dysfunction. Whereas in the previously tested gray matter model , the magnitude of phenotype shaping was slight, it is relatively strong in the genetically induced, mild white matter encephalitis employed here, resulting in an intriguing stair pattern of behavioral pathology. However, also in white matter inflammation, NMDAR1-AB failed to further expand any histological readouts of inflammation. Together, these data indicate that the nature, location and degree of an underlying encephalitic process ultimately determine the clinical picture upon NMDAR1-AB exposure. This may also well be the case in the mild encephalitis forms typically diagnosed only postmortem in various neuropsychiatric conditions. At the same time, they explain the highly variable presenting symptoms as well as the different courses of “NMDAR encephalitis.”
All data are available upon request.
Dalmau J, Tuzun E, Wu HY, Masjuan J, Rossi JE, Voloschin A, et al. Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:25–36.
Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, Rossi JE, Peng X, Lai M, et al. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:1091–8.
Pollak TA, Lennox BR, Muller S, Benros ME, Pruss H, Tebartz van Elst L, et al. Autoimmune psychosis: an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:93–108.
Mane-Damas M, Hoffmann C, Zong S, Tan A, Molenaar PC, Losen M, et al. Autoimmunity in psychotic disorders. Where we stand, challenges and opportunities. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18:1–14.
Endres D, Maier V, Leypoldt F, Wandinger KP, Lennox B, Pollak TA, et al. Autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes: a systematic literature review resulting in 145 cases. Psychol Med. 2020;1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002895.
Ehrenreich H. Autoantibodies against the N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit NR1: untangling apparent inconsistencies for clinical practice. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1–7.
Ehrenreich H. Autoantibodies against N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor 1 in health and disease. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31:306–12.
Hughes EG, Peng X, Gleichman AJ, Lai M, Zhou L, Tsou R, et al. Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. J Neurosci. 2010;30:5866–75.
Pan H, Oliveira B, Saher G, Dere E, Tapken D, Mitjans M, et al. Uncoupling the widespread occurrence of anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies from neuropsychiatric disease in a novel autoimmune model. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:1489–501.
Castillo-Gomez E, Oliveira B, Tapken D, Bertrand S, Klein-Schmidt C, Pan H, et al. All naturally occurring autoantibodies against the NMDA receptor subunit NR1 have pathogenic potential irrespective of epitope and immunoglobulin class. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:1776–84.
Hammer C, Stepniak B, Schneider A, Papiol S, Tantra M, Begemann M, et al. Neuropsychiatric disease relevance of circulating anti-NMDA receptor autoantibodies depends on blood-brain barrier integrity. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:1143–9.
Hammer C, Zerche M, Schneider A, Begemann M, Nave KA, Ehrenreich H. Apolipoprotein E4 carrier status plus circulating anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies: association with schizoaffective disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:1054–6.
Diamond B, Huerta PT, Mina-Osorio P, Kowal C, Volpe BT. Losing your nerves? Maybe it’s the antibodies. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:449–56.
Pan H, Steixner-Kumar AA, Seelbach A, Deutsch N, Ronnenberg A, Tapken D, et al. Multiple inducers and novel roles of autoantibodies against the obligatory NMDAR subunit NR1: a translational study from chronic life stress to brain injury. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:2471–82.
Zerche M, Weissenborn K, Ott C, Dere E, Asif AR, Worthmann H, et al. Preexisting serum autoantibodies against the NMDAR subunit NR1 modulate evolution of lesion size in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:1180–6.
Deutsch NR, Worthmann H, Steixner-Kumar AA, Schuppner R, Grosse GM, Pan H, et al. Autoantibodies against the NMDAR subunit NR1 are associated with neuropsychiatric outcome after ischemic stroke. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;96:73–9.
Crisp SJ, Kullmann DM, Vincent A. Autoimmune synaptopathies. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17:103–17.
Nagele EP, Han M, Acharya NK, DeMarshall C, Kosciuk MC, Nagele RG. Natural IgG autoantibodies are abundant and ubiquitous in human sera, and their number is influenced by age, gender, and disease. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60726.
Cohen IR, Young DB. Autoimmunity, microbial immunity and the immunological homunculus. Immunol Today. 1991;12:105–10.
Pruss H, Finke C, Holtje M, Hofmann J, Klingbeil C, Probst C, et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies in herpes simplex encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:902–11.
Armangue T, Moris G, Cantarin-Extremera V, Conde CE, Rostasy K, Erro ME, et al. Autoimmune post-herpes simplex encephalitis of adults and teenagers. Neurology. 2015;85:1736–43.
Castillo-Gomez E, Kastner A, Steiner J, Schneider A, Hettling B, Poggi G, et al. The brain as immunoprecipitator of serum autoantibodies against N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR1. Ann Neurol. 2016;79:144–51.
Dahm L, Ott C, Steiner J, Stepniak B, Teegen B, Saschenbrecker S, et al. Seroprevalence of autoantibodies against brain antigens in health and disease. Ann Neurol. 2014;76:82–94.
Wilke JBH, Hindermann M, Berghoff SA, Zihsler S, Arinrad S, Ronnenberg A, et al. Autoantibodies against NMDA receptor 1 modify rather than cause encephalitis. Mol Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01238-3.
Bechter K. Encephalitis, mild encephalitis, neuroprogression, or encephalopathy—not merely a question of terminology. Front Psychiatry. 2019;9:1–8.
Bechter K. Updating the mild encephalitis hypothesis of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;42:71–91.
Phillips OR, Joshi SH, Narr KL, Shattuck DW, Singh M, Di Paola M, et al. Superficial white matter damage in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89:518–25.
Messacar K, Fischer M, Dominguez SR, Tyler KL, Abzug MJ. Encephalitis in US Children. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018;32:145–62.
Sejvar JJ, Kohl KS, Bilynsky R, Blumberg D, Cvetkovich T, Galama J, et al. Encephalitis, myelitis, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM): case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2007;25:5771–92.
Venkatesan A, Tunkel AR, Bloch KC, Lauring AS, Sejvar J, Bitnun A, et al. Case definitions, diagnostic algorithms, and priorities in encephalitis: consensus statement of the international encephalitis consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1114–28.
Hagemeyer N, Goebbels S, Papiol S, Kastner A, Hofer S, Begemann M, et al. A myelin gene causative of a catatonia-depression syndrome upon aging. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4:528–39.
Janova H, Arinrad S, Balmuth E, Mitjans M, Hertel J, Habes M, et al. Microglia ablation alleviates myelin-associated catatonic signs in mice. J Clin Investig. 2018;128:734–45.
Poggi G, Boretius S, Mobius W, Moschny N, Baudewig J, Ruhwedel T, et al. Cortical network dysfunction caused by a subtle defect of myelination. Glia. 2016;64:2025–40.
Miller KR, Streit WJ. The effects of aging, injury and disease on microglial function: a case for cellular senescence. Neuron Glia Biol. 2007;3:245–53.
Sparkman NL, Johnson RW. Neuroinflammation associated with aging sensitizes the brain to the effects of infection or stress. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2008;15:323–30.
Streit WJ. Microglial senescence: does the brain’s immune system have an expiration date? Trends Neurosci. 2006;29:506–10.
Monji A, Kato T, Kanba S. Cytokines and schizophrenia: microglia hypothesis of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;63:257–65.
Weissleder C, North HF, Shannon, Weickert C. Important unanswered questions about adult neurogenesis in schizophrenia. Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2019;32:170–8.
Aston C, Jiang L, Sokolov BP. Transcriptional profiling reveals evidence for signaling and oligodendroglial abnormalities in the temporal cortex from patients with major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10:309–22.
Mitkus SN, Hyde TM, Vakkalanka R, Kolachana B, Weinberger DR, Kleinman JE, et al. Expression of oligodendrocyte-associated genes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008;98:129–38.
Tkachev D, Mimmack ML, Ryan MM, Wayland M, Freeman T, Jones PB, et al. Oligodendrocyte dysfunction in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Lancet. 2003;362:798–805.
Jahn O, Tenzer S, Werner HB. Myelin proteomics: molecular anatomy of an insulating sheath. Mol Neurobiol. 2009;40:55–72.
Lappe-Siefke C, Goebbels S, Gravel M, Nicksch E, Lee J, Braun PE, et al. Disruption of Cnp1 uncouples oligodendroglial functions in axonal support and myelination. Nat Genet. 2003;33:366–74.
Garcia-Agudo LF, Janova H, Sendler LE, Arinrad S, Steixner AA, Hassouna I, et al. Genetically induced brain inflammation by Cnp deletion transiently benefits from microglia depletion. FASEB J. 2019;33:8634–47.
Gleichman AJ, Spruce LA, Dalmau J, Seeholzer SH, Lynch DR. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis antibody binding is dependent on amino acid identity of a small region within the GluN1 amino terminal domain. J Neurosci. 2012;32:11082–94.
Tsien JZ, Huerta PT, Tonegawa S. The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory. Cell. 1996;87:1327–38.
Saab AS, Tzvetavona ID, Trevisiol A, Baltan S, Dibaj P, Kusch K, et al. Oligodendroglial NMDA Receptors regulate glucose import and axonal energy metabolism. Neuron. 2016;91:119–32.
Dere E, Ronnenberg A, Tampe B, Arinrad S, Schmidt M, Zeisberg E, et al. Cognitive, emotional and social phenotyping of mice in an observer-independent setting. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018;150:136–50.
Dere E, Dahm L, Lu D, Hammerschmidt K, Ju A, Tantra M, et al. Heterozygous ambra1 deficiency in mice: a genetic trait with autism-like behavior restricted to the female gender. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:1–19.
Netrakanti PR, Cooper BH, Dere E, Poggi G, Winkler D, Brose N, et al. Fast cerebellar reflex circuitry requires synaptic vesicle priming by munc13-3. Cerebellum. 2015;14:264–83.
Wilke JBH, Hindermann M, Moussavi A, Butt UJ, Dadarwal R, Berghoff SA, et al. Inducing sterile pyramidal neuronal death in mice to model distinct aspects of gray matter encephalitis. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021;9:121.
Wakhloo D, Scharkowski F, Curto Y, Javed Butt U, Bansal V, Steixner-Kumar AA, et al. Functional hypoxia drives neuroplasticity and neurogenesis via brain erythropoietin. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1313.
Butt UJ, Steixner-Kumar AA, Depp C, Sun T, Hassouna I, Wustefeld L, et al. Hippocampal neurons respond to brain activity with functional hypoxia. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:1790–807.
Berghoff SA, Duking T, Spieth L, Winchenbach J, Stumpf SK, Gerndt N, et al. Blood-brain barrier hyperpermeability precedes demyelination in the cuprizone model. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017;5:94.
Dalmau J, Armangue T, Planaguma J, Radosevic M, Mannara F, Leypoldt F, et al. An update on anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis for neurologists and psychiatrists: mechanisms and models. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:1045–57.
Pause BM, Zlomuzica A, Kinugawa K, Mariani J, Pietrowsky R, Dere E. Perspectives on episodic-like and episodic memory. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013;7:1–12.
Dere D, Zlomuzica A, Dere E. Fellow travellers in cognitive evolution: co-evolution of working memory and mental-time-travel? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;105:94–105.
Chao OY, de Souza Silva MA, Yang YM, Huston JP. The medial prefrontal cortex—hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;113:373–407.
During MJ, Symes CW, Lawlor PA, Lin J, Dunning J, Fitzsimons HL, et al. An oral vaccine against NMDAR1 with efficacy in experimental stroke and epilepsy. Science. 2000;287:1453–60.
Li Y, Tanaka K, Wang L, Ishigaki Y, Kato N. Induction of memory deficit in mice with chronic exposure to cerebrospinal fluid from patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015;237:329–38.
Planaguma J, Leypoldt F, Mannara F, Gutierrez-Cuesta J, Martin-Garcia E, Aguilar E, et al. Human N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antibodies alter memory and behaviour in mice. Brain. 2015;138:94–109.
Taraschenko O, Fox HS, Pittock SJ, Zekeridou A, Gafurova M, Eldridge E, et al. A mouse model of seizures in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Epilepsia. 2019;60:452–63.
Yue W, Caldwell S, Risbrough V, Powell S, Zhou X. Chronic presence of blood circulating anti-NMDAR1 autoantibodies impairs cognitive function in mice. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0256972.
Faust TW, Chang EH, Kowal C, Berlin R, Gazaryan IG, Bertini E, et al. Neurotoxic lupus autoantibodies alter brain function through two distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:18569–74.
Chan K, Nestor J, Huerta TS, Certain N, Moody G, Kowal C, et al. Lupus autoantibodies act as positive allosteric modulators at GluN2A-containing NMDA receptors and impair spatial memory. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–11.
Mackay M, Vo A, Tang CC, Small M, Anderson EW, Ploran EJ, et al. Metabolic and microstructural alterations in the SLE brain correlate with cognitive impairment. JCI Insight. 2019;4:1–18.
Salter MG, Fern R. NMDA receptors are expressed in developing oligodendrocyte processes and mediate injury. Nature. 2005;438:1167–71.
Karadottir R, Cavelier P, Bergersen LH, Attwell D. NMDA receptors are expressed in oligodendrocytes and activated in ischaemia. Nature. 2005;438:1162–6.
Micu I, Jiang Q, Coderre E, Ridsdale A, Zhang L, Woulfe J, et al. NMDA receptors mediate calcium accumulation in myelin during chemical ischaemia. Nature. 2006;439:988–92.
Krasnow AM, Attwell D. NMDA receptors: power switches for oligodendrocytes. Neuron. 2016;91:3–5.
Matute C, Palma A, Serrano-Regal MP, Maudes E, Barman S, Sanchez-Gomez MV, et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies in autoimmune encephalopathy alter oligodendrocyte function. Ann Neurol. 2020;87:670–6.
This study was supported by the Max Planck Society, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) TRR 274/1 2020 - 408885537. K-AN was funded by Adelson Medical Research Foundation and an ERC Advanced Grant.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Arinrad, S., Wilke, J.B.H., Seelbach, A. et al. NMDAR1 autoantibodies amplify behavioral phenotypes of genetic white matter inflammation: a mild encephalitis model with neuropsychiatric relevance. Mol Psychiatry 27, 4974–4983 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01392-8