Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation method widely used by neuroscientists and clinicians for research and therapeutic purposes. tDCS is currently under investigation as a treatment for a range of psychiatric disorders. Despite its popularity, a full understanding of tDCS’s underlying neurophysiological mechanisms is still lacking. tDCS creates a weak electric field in the cerebral cortex which is generally assumed to cause the observed effects. Interestingly, as tDCS is applied directly on the skin, localized peripheral nerve endings are exposed to much higher electric field strengths than the underlying cortices. Yet, the potential contribution of peripheral mechanisms in causing tDCS’s effects has never been systemically investigated. We hypothesize that tDCS induces arousal and vigilance through peripheral mechanisms. We suggest that this may involve peripherally-evoked activation of the ascending reticular activating system, in which norepinephrine is distributed throughout the brain by the locus coeruleus. Finally, we provide suggestions to improve tDCS experimental design beyond the standard sham control, such as topical anesthetics to block peripheral nerves and active controls to stimulate non-target areas. Broad adoption of these measures in all tDCS experiments could help disambiguate peripheral from true transcranial tDCS mechanisms.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Shiozawa P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:1443–52.
Agarwal SM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2013;11:118–25.
Brunelin J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2018;8:37.
Berryhill ME, Peterson DJP, Jones KTP, Stephens JAM. Hits and misses: leveraging tDCS to advance cognitive research. Front Psychol. 2014;5:800.
Salling MC, Martinez D. Brain stimulation in addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:2798–809.
Polanía R, Nitsche MA, Ruff CC. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4
Rahman A, et al. Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J Physiol. 2013;591:2563–78.
Valero-Cabré A, Amengual JL, Stengel C, Pascual-Leone A, Coubard OA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in basic and clinical neuroscience: A comprehensive review of fundamental principles and novel insights. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.006
Tavakoli AV, Yun K. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) mechanisms and protocols. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00214
Legon W, et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:322–9.
Conde V, et al. The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies. Neuroimage. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.052
Siebner HR, Conde V, Tomasevic L, Thielscher A, Bergmann TO. Distilling the essence of TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs): a call for securing mechanistic specificity and experimental rigor. Brain Stimul. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.076
Asamoah B, Khatoun A, Mc Laughlin M. tACS motor system effects can be caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves. Nat Commun. 2019;10:266.
Adair D, et al. Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease. Brain Stimul. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.019
Chase HW, Boudewyn MA, Carter CS, Phillips ML. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:397–407.
Opitz A, Paulus W, Will S, Antunes A, Thielscher A. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage. 2015;109:140–50.
Liu A, et al. Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5092.
Rampersad SM, et al. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22:441–52.
So PPM, Stuchly MA, Nyenhuis JA. Peripheral nerve stimulation by gradient switching fields in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.834251
Kessler SK, Turkeltaub PE, Benson JG, Hamilton RH. Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.007
Fanselow EE. Central mechanisms of cranial nerve stimulation for epilepsy. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:S247–54.
Mercante B, et al. Anatomo-physiologic basis for auricular stimulation. Med Acupunct 2018;30:141–50.
Radman T, Ramos RL, Brumberg JC, Bikson M. Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro. Brain Stimul. 2009;2:215–.e3.
Romero Lauro LJ, et al. TDCS increases cortical excitability: direct evidence from TMS-EEG. Cortex. 2014;58:99–111.
Chakraborty D, Truong DQ, Bikson M, Kaphzan H. Neuromodulation of axon terminals. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28:2786–94.
Kronberg G, Bridi M, Abel T, Bikson M, Parra LC. Direct current stimulation modulates LTP and LTD: activity dependence and dendritic effects. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:51–8.
Kronberg, G., Rahman, A., Sharma, M., Bikson, M. & Parra, L. C. Direct current stimulation boosts hebbian plasticity in vitro. Brain Stimul. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.014
Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra LC. Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. J Neurosci. 2010;30:15067–79.
Tang YY, Rothbart MK, Posner MI. Neural correlates of establishing, maintaining, and switching brain states. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16:330–7.
Gellner A-K, Reis J, Fritsch B. Glia: a neglected player in non-invasive direct current brain stimulation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:188.
Hoare JI, Rajnicek AM, McCaig CD, Barker RN, Wilson HM. Electric fields are novel determinants of human macrophage functions. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;99:1141–51.
Cohen-Gadol A, Kemp W III, Tubbs RS. The innervation of the scalp: a comprehensive review including anatomy, pathology, and neurosurgical correlates. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:178.
Rea P. Clinical anatomy of the cranial nerves. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-19192-1
Slavin KV. History of peripheral nerve stimulation. In: Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. Vol. 24, pp. 1–15. KARGER, 2011
Busch V, et al. Functional connectivity between trigeminal and occipital nerves revealed by occipital nerve blockade and nociceptive blink reflexes. Cephalalgia. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.00992.x
Monkhouse S. Cranial nerves: functional anatomy. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543524
Tyler WJ, et al. Transdermal neuromodulation of noradrenergic activity suppresses psychophysiological and biochemical stress responses in humans. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–17.
Schwartz MD, Kilduff TS. The neurobiology of sleep and wakefulness. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2015;38:615–44.
Kinomura S, Larsson J, Gulyás B & Roland PE. Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5248.512
Couto LB, et al. Descriptive and functional neuroanatomy of locus coeruleus-noradrenaline-containing neurons involvement in bradykinin-induced antinociception on principal sensory trigeminal nucleus. J Chem Neuroanat. 2006;32:28–45.
Sara SJ. The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:211–23.
Kuo H-I, et al. Acute and chronic noradrenergic effects on cortical excitability in healthy humans. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20:634–43.
Harley CW. Norepinephrine and dopamine as learning signals. Neural Plast. 2004;11:191–204.
Wagatsuma A, et al. Locus coeruleus input to hippocampal CA3 drives single-trial learning of a novel context. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;115:E310–6.
Kempadoo KA, Mosharov EV, Choi SJ, Sulzer D, Kandel ER. Dopamine release from the locus coeruleus to the dorsal hippocampus promotes spatial learning and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:14835–40.
Kuo H-I, et al. Acute and chronic effects of noradrenergic enhancement on transcranial direct current stimulation-induced neuroplasticity in humans. J Physiol. 2017;595:1305–14.
Monai H, et al. Calcium imaging reveals glial involvement in transcranial direct current stimulation-induced plasticity in mouse brain. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11100.
Joos K, De Ridder D, Van De Heyning P & Vanneste S. Polarity specific suppression effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus. Neural Plast. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/930860
Reis J, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805413106
Matsushita R, Andoh J, Zatorre RJ. Polarity-specific transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts auditory pitch learning. Front. Neurosci. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00174
Hopp FA, Zuperku EJ, Coon RL, Kampine JP. Effect of anodal blockade of myelinated fibers on vagal C-fiber afferents. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 1980;239:R454–62.
Berger JJ, Gravenstein JS, Munson ES. Electrode polarity and peripheral nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1982;56:402–4.
Bolzoni F, et al. Direct current stimulation modulates the excitability of the sensory and motor fibres in the human posterior tibial nerve, with a long-lasting effect on the H-reflex. Eur J Neurosci. 2017;46:2499–506.
Podda MV, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation boosts synaptic plasticity and memory in mice via epigenetic regulation of Bdnf expression. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–19.
Kim MS, et al. Repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation induces neural plasticity-associated gene expression in the rat cortex and hippocampus. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35:137–46.
Yu TH, Wu YJ, Chien ME, Hsu KS. Transcranial direct current stimulation induces hippocampal metaplasticity mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Neuropharmacology. 2019;144:358–67.
Kumar M, Chawla R, Goyal M. Topical anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31:450.
Lambertz CK, Johnson CJ, Montgomery PG, Maxwell JR & Fry SJ. Toxicity of topical lidocaine applied to the breasts to reduce discomfort during screening mammography. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.94859
Minhas P, et al. Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS. J Neurosci Methods 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.05.007
Alam M, Truong DQ, Khadka N & Bikson M. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Phys Med Biol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/12/4506
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
van Boekholdt, L., Kerstens, S., Khatoun, A. et al. tDCS peripheral nerve stimulation: a neglected mode of action?. Mol Psychiatry 26, 456–461 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00962-6
The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2021)