Abstract
Diabetes progression is marked by damage to vascular and neural networks. Raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy holds the potential to measure extent of diabetes progression by analyzing changes in skin vasculature.
It is estimated that over half a billion adults worldwide are living with diabetes1 including over five million people in the UK2 and over 37 million in the US3. The costs spent on treating diabetes and its complications is staggering: over $750 billion worldwide and nearly $200 billion in the US alone4. Half to two thirds of these costs are attributable to complications of diabetes5. Diabetes disrupts angiogenesis which causes damage to large and small blood vessels, leading to a host of complications that include impaired wound healing, cardiovascular complications, and dysregulation of neovascularization causing retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, diabetic microangiopathy, and peripheral vascular disease6,7 (Fig. 1).
Because of the fine network of microvasculature that runs through the dermis, researchers have long suspected that the extent of vascular deficiencies associated with diabetes might also be detected or monitored through skin imaging8. A range of imaging technologies have been employed for this purpose, including purely optical techniques such as confocal or two-photon microscopy9,10, hyperspectral imaging11,12, laser speckle contrast imaging13, optical coherence tomography14,15, nailfold capillaroscopy16,17, and a purely acoustic technique, high frequency ultrasound18,19,20,21. These studies have generally shown they are capable of differentiationg between healthy subjects and persons with diabetes, but have not had sufficient resolution, contrast, or penetration depth to confidently differentiate among people with diabetes exhibiting different complications.
Ultra-wideband raster scan optoacoustic mesoscopy (UWM-RSOM) is particularly valuable for capturing deep microvasculature because it combines optical contrast and ultrasound’s high spatial resolution and penetration depth. Hemoglobin is a highly absorbing chromophore capable of generating a strong optoacoustic signal, enabling RSOM to visualize dermal microvasculature features up to 1.5 mm deep. This suggests that RSOM could potentially image microangiopathy in the skin to not only detect diabetes, but grade the extent of change of microvasculature, which may enable it to grade the expected extent of complications currently or anticipated to be found in a person with diabetes. This is crucially important because current methods for quantifying diabetes complications are very imprecise, relying more on predictions by risk factors and/or assessment of clinical symptoms and signs, such as presence and quality of symptoms.
In a newly published paper in Light: Science & Applications, a team led by Vasilis Ntziachristos have demonstrated that RSOM can not only detect but also quantify levels of changes in dermal microvasculature that correlate with extent of complications associated with diabetes. 98 subjects with diabetes and 48 healthy matched controls (HC) were recruited for their study22. Approximately half of the subjects with diabetes had no existing complications (NC), one quarter had neuropathy, but no atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and one quarter had both neuropathy and ASCVD/PAD. For those with neuropathy but no ASCVD/PAD, the subjects were further divided into those with a low neuropathy score (LN) and those with a high neuropathy score (HN). The authors then went on to demonstrate that the number of small vessels (SVN) in pretibial dermal skin were statistically significantly different between HC and NC (p < 0.01), and between NC and LN (p < 0.05) and between LN and HN (<0.001). Total blood volume within the dermal layer was similarly statistically significantly different. SVN and total blood volume was also compared between participants with neuropathy with no ASCVD/PAD (NnA) and subjects with neuropathy and ASCVD or PAD (NA). Again, SVN and total blood volume were statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). Researchers also analyzed other potential features for their ability to differentiate subjects by extent of disease, looking at number of large vessels and total vessels in the dermal layer, epidermal thickness, and epidermal signal density. Some of these also showed statistical intergroup differences. Mice with and without diabetes were also imaged and a number of the findings were confirmed through histological analysis.
Currently, clinicians collect characteristics which correlate, in a general way, with increases in complications and might predict actual worsening of disease. These characteristics include age, disease duration, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), type of diabetes (type 1 or type 2), and sex. Even taken together, and even using advanced AI modeling techniques, these characteristics have not been able to predict onset or likelihood of complications with much success23. Thus, not surprisingly, these characteristics did not correlate with the RSOM biomarkers: there was no significant correlation between age, disease duration, HbA1C, and BMI and either SVN or total blood volume22.
Looking forward, the method as applied in the study is not yet ready for clinical adoption. Patients were asked to consume no caffeine or food for 4 h before the RSOM measurements and left to relax in a dark room for 5 min prior to imaging, and the room temperature was carefully maintained. Each image took 70 s to acquire, and motion, including arterial pulsation and hearbeat, can lead to inconsistent results, leading to exclusion of RSOM datasets from 8 participants due to serious motion and low image quality. The imaging system was a custom-built in-house portable RSOM imaging system (central frequency 50 MHz) which is not commercially available. Image post-processing was not fully automated. Clearly, modifications to the collection method, instrument, and post-processing analysis would be necessary before clinical implementation. Yet the method holds great promise. Physicians believe that rate of disease progression in a person with diabetes can in many cases be altered by lifestyle changes. A tool for measuring extent of microangiography may offer caregivers a metric to better communicate potential risks to patients with diabetes and help patients implement lifestyle changes before complications worsen. Alternatively, this tool might be able to elucidate other biological risks outside of a person’s control that accelerate complications and disease progression. Diabetes is one of the most significant causes of morbidity worldwide (and, indirectly, mortality). This promising result suggests a possible path forward for utilizing RSOM imaging to enable clinicians, working with persons with diabetes, to reduce the burden of this disease.
References
International Diabetes Foundation. Diabetes around the world in 2021, IDF Diabetes Atlas (2022), Publisher: International Diabetes Foundation. https://diabetesatlas.org/. Accessed Oct 2023.
The British Diabetic Association. Number of people living with diabetes in the uk tops 5 million for the first time, Diabetes UK (2023), Publisher: The British Diabetic Association. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about_us/news/number-people-living-diabetes-uk-tops-5-million-first-time. Accessed Oct 2023.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States, National Diabetes Statistics Report (2022), Publisher: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html. Accessed Oct 2023.
Kansra, P. & Oberoi, S. Cost of diabetes and its complications: results from a STEPS survey in Punjab, India. Glob. Health Res. Policy 8, 11 (2023).
Zhuo, X. H., Zhang, P. & Hoerger, T. J. Lifetime direct medical costs of treating type 2 diabetes and diabetic complications. Am. J. Prevent. Med. 45, 253–261 (2013).
King, G. L. & Brownlee, M. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of diabetic complications. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 25, 255–270 (1996).
Tahergorabi, Z. & Khazaei, M. Imbalance of angiogenesis in diabetic complications: the mechanisms. Int. J. Prevent. Med. 3, 827 (2012).
Greenman, R. L. et al. Early changes in the skin microcirculation and muscle metabolism of the diabetic foot. Lancet 366, 1711–1717 (2005).
Azmi, S. et al. Corneal confocal microscopy identifies small-fiber neuropathy in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance who develop type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 38, 1502–1508 (2015).
Papanas, N. & Ziegler, D. Corneal confocal microscopy: recent progress in the evaluation of diabetic neuropathy. J. Diabetes Investig. 6, 381–389 (2015).
Nouvong, A. et al. Evaluation of diabetic foot ulcer healing with hyperspectral imaging of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. Diabetes Care 32, 2056–2061 (2009).
Yudovsky, D., Nouvong, A. & Pilon, L. Hyperspectral imaging in diabetic foot wound care. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 4, 1099–1113 (2010).
Li, D. Y. et al. Transmissive-detected laser speckle contrast imaging for blood flow monitoring in thick tissue: from Monte Carlo simulation to experimental demonstration. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 241 (2021).
Yi, J. et al. Visible light optical coherence tomography measures retinal oxygen metabolic response to systemic oxygenation. Light Sci. Appl. 4, e334 (2015).
Argarini, R. et al. Visualizing and quantifying cutaneous microvascular reactivity in humans by use of optical coherence tomography: impaired dilator function in diabetes. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 319, E923–E931 (2020).
Uyar, S. et al. Assessment of the relationship between diabetic retinopathy and nailfold capillaries in type 2 diabetics with a noninvasive method: nailfold videocapillaroscopy. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 7592402 (2016).
Hsu, P. C. et al. Nailfold capillary abnormalities are associated with type 2 diabetes progression and correlated with peripheral neuropathy. Medicine 95, e5714 (2016).
Nouveau-Richard, S. et al. In vivo epidermal thickness measurement: ultrasound vs. confocal imaging. Ski. Res. Technol. 10, 136–140 (2004).
Chao, C. Y. L., Zheng, Y. P. & Cheing, G. L. Y. Epidermal thickness and biomechanical properties of plantar tissues in diabetic foot. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 37, 1029–1038 (2011).
Collier, A. et al. Relationship of skin thickness to duration of diabetes, glycemic control, and diabetic complications in male IDDM patients. Diabetes Care 12, 309–312 (1989).
Gnyawali, S. C. et al. High resolution ultrasound imaging for repeated measure of wound tissue morphometry, biomechanics and hemodynamics under fetal, adult and diabetic conditions. PLoS One 15, e0241831 (2020).
He, H. L. et al. Opening a window to skin biomarkers for diabetes stage with optoacoustic mesoscopy. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 231 (2023).
Fiarni, C., Sipayung, E. M. & Maemunah, S. Analysis and prediction of diabetes complication disease using data mining algorithm. Procedia Comput. Sci. 161, 449–457 (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Siegel, A.P., Avanaki, K. The power of light and sound: optoacoustic skin imaging for diabetes progression monitoring. Light Sci Appl 12, 283 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01322-z
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01322-z