Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Structured 3D linear space–time light bullets by nonlocal nanophotonics

## Abstract

We propose the generation of 3D linear light bullets propagating in free space using a single passive nonlocal optical surface. The nonlocal nanophotonics can generate space–time coupling without any need for bulky pulse-shaping and spatial modulation techniques. Our approach provides simultaneous control of various properties of the light bullets, including the external properties such as the group velocity and the propagation distance, and internal degrees of freedom such as the spin angular momentum and the orbital angular momentum.

## Introduction

Light bullets are propagation-invariant optical wave packets localized in all three spatial dimensions and temporal dimension. Such diffraction-dispersion-free pulses have been extensively discussed for potential applications including communications, bioimaging, lithography, and quantum key distribution1,2.

The fundamental property of all light bullets (also known as “localized waves”1,3) propagating in free space is the specific “space–time coupling”1,4,5,6 between their temporal and spatial frequency components in the form of ω = vgkz + b, where ω is the angular frequency, kz the wavenumber in the direction of propagation, vg the group velocity of the light bullet, and b a constant that is positive when vg < c. (See ref. 7 for classification of propagation-invariant wave packets in free space.) Developing techniques that can create such a specific space–time coupling for wide ranges of parameters of vg and b represents a significant challenge.

Previous efforts for 3D light-bullet generation in free space have realized special types of light bullets with constrained forms of space–time coupling8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. These include the X-waves where b = 0 and vg > c9,10,16,17,18, and the focus wave modes where b ≠ 0 and vg = c19,20,21,22. In a series of recent works14,23, Abouraddy et al. demonstrated a two-dimensional (2D) version of a light bullet, or a light sheet, by directly synthesizing the general form of space–time coupling using a technique combining spatial-beam modulation and ultrafast pulse-shaping. Such a method was used to synthesize light sheet with an arbitrary group velocity24. However, this technique cannot be easily extended to synthesize 3D light bullets, since it requires an idle spatial dimension to spread the temporal spectrum. Very recently, Li et al. proposed to control the group velocity of a Gauss–Bessel pulse by adding a conical-pulse-front pre-deformation25. However, such generated wave packets exhibit significant variation under propagation (see Figs. 1–3 in ref. 25). Up till now, there is no route toward the synthesis of general propagation-invariant 3D light bullets with controllable group velocity, especially for vg < c.

In this paper, we show that a nonlocal ultrathin nanophotonic layer provides a compact and versatile platform to generate controllable 3D light bullets in free space. Unlike the conventional local nanophotonics characterized by space-dependent transfer functions, nonlocal nanophotonics have wavevector-dependent transfer functions, the controlling of which has enabled important functionalities including optical differentiation6,26,27, image filtering28, and squeezing free space29. Here we show that the wavevector-dependent transfer function can be engineered to achieve the space–time coupling that is required for light-bullet generation. Our approach consists of sending a Gaussian wave packet, i.e., a wave packet that is Gaussian in time as well in the three spatial directions (Fig. 1a), into a single-layer periodic nanophotonic structure supporting guided resonance (Fig. 1c). By designing the band dispersion of the guided resonance (Fig. 1d), we can generate the required space–time coupling to achieve a 3D light bullet as the output (Fig. 1b). Our method offers straightforward control of the external degrees of freedom of the light bullet including the group velocity and the propagation distance by altering the band dispersion and quality factor, respectively. Moreover, by exploiting the wavevector-dependency of the field distributions of the guided resonance, we can sculpt the internal structures of the light bullet and endow it with nontrivial spin angular momentum (SAM) and orbital angular momentum (OAM). Such light bullets with controllable complex internal structures provide significant opportunities for applications such as imaging metrology, optical communications, and quantum key distribution1,2,30,31.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows: in the section “Theoretical background: space–time coupling of light bullets,” we briefly review the theoretical background for the space–time coupling of light bullets. In the section “Theory of light bullet generation by nonlocal nanophotonics,” we explain the general principles of light bullet generation using nonlocal nanophotonics, including realization of the space–time coupling, control of the external degrees of freedom such as group velocity and propagation distance, control of the internal degrees of freedom such as SAM distribution and OAM. In the section “Concrete photonic design”, we provide a concrete design of a photonic crystal slab that realizes the controllable light bullet generation. We conclude in the section “Discussion.”

## Results

### Theoretical background: space–time coupling of light bullets

We start by briefly reviewing the main features of linear light bullets propagating in free space. We follow the treatment in ref. 32 and extend it to two transverse dimensions. As a brief clarification of the nomenclature, we use the term “linear space–time light bullet,”33 or “light bullet” for conciseness, to emphasize the 3D and linear nature of the wave packet that we consider. Such a light bullet is a 3D extension of the “space–time light sheet” recently studied by Abouraddy et al.14, which is intrinsically 2D. Both light bullets and light sheets are subsets of “space–time wave packet” as coined by Abouraddy et al.23. The effects we consider here are purely linear, thus the linear light bullets here are fundamentally different from the nonlinear light bullets34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41, including the pioneering work on light bullets by Silberberg34.

Consider a scalar optical wave of complex field $$U\left( {x,y,t,z} \right) = A\left( {x,y,t,z} \right){{{\mathrm{exp}}}}\left[ {i\omega _0\left( {z/c - t} \right)} \right]$$ propagating along the z-direction in free space, where $$A\left( {x,y,t,z} \right)$$ is its complex envelope42, $$\omega _0$$ is the carrier angular frequency, and $$k_0 = \omega _0/c$$ is the carrier wavenumber. The free-space propagation is a spatiotemporally shift-invariant linear map from $$A\left( {x,y,t,0} \right)$$ to $$A\left( {x,y,t,d} \right)$$43:

$$A\left( {x,y,t,d} \right) = {\int\!\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty }} {{{{\mathrm{d}}}k_x{{{\mathrm{d}}}}k_y{{{\mathrm{d}}}}{\Omega} } } \,\tilde A\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right)e^{i\left\{ {k_xx + k_yy - {\Omega} t + \left[ {k_z\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right) - k_0} \right]d} \right\}}$$
(1)

where $$\left( {k_x,k_y} \right)$$ is the transverse wavevector, $${\Omega} = \omega - \omega _0$$ is the detuning of the angular frequency ω relative to $$\omega _0$$, and

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\widetilde A\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right) = \frac{1}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^3}}{\int\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty }} {{{{\mathrm{d}}}xdydt} } \,A\left( {x,y,t,0} \right)e^{ - i\left( {k_xx + k_yy - {\Omega} t} \right)}} \end{array}$$
(2)

is the spatiotemporal spectrum of the pulse with

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {k_z\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right) = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {\omega _0 + {\Omega} } \right)^2}}{{c^2}} - k_x^2 - k_y^2} } \end{array}$$
(3)

In general, optical wave packets diffract since different plane-wave wavevector components acquire different phases during propagation. Light bullets are special wave packets that can propagate rigidly in free space with no diffraction. All ideal light bullets must have the following specific spatiotemporal spectrum1,4,14:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\widetilde A\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right) = \widetilde A_s\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right)\delta \left\{ {{\Omega} - v_g\left[ {k_z\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right) - k_0} \right]} \right\}} \end{array}$$
(4)

where $$\widetilde A_s\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right)$$ is an arbitrary complex function, $$v_g$$ is an arbitrary constant, and $$\delta \left( \cdot \right)$$ is the Dirac delta function that enforces the important “space–time coupling”1,14 between the frequencies and the wavevectors:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{\Omega} = v_g\left[ {k_z\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right) - k_0} \right]} \end{array}$$
(5)

Substituting Eq. (4) in Eq. (1), we obtain

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {A\left( {x,y,t,d} \right) = {\int\!\!\!\!\!\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty }} {{{{\mathrm{d}}}k_x{{{\mathrm{d}}}}k_y} } \,\widetilde A_s\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} \left( {k_x,k_y} \right),0} \right)e^{i\left\{ {k_xx + k_yy + {\Omega} \left( {k_x,k_y} \right)\left( {\frac{d}{{v_g}} - t} \right)} \right\}}} \end{array}$$
(6)

hence the envelope propagates without deformation with a group velocity $$v_g$$:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {A\left( {x,y,t,d} \right) = A\left( {x,y,t - \frac{d}{{v_g}},0} \right)} \end{array}$$
(7)

Ideal light bullets, which exhibit the delta-function form of space–time coupling as described by Eq. (4), are untenable in any finite system. In practice, one can only produce approximate light bullets with an unavoidable finite “fuzziness” introduced in the space–time coupling23. The corresponding spectrum $$\widetilde A\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right)$$ has a form that approximates the δ function but is square-integrable1. An example is a Lorentzian lineshape with narrow linewidth. Such an approximate light bullet has finite energy. It can propagate undistorted for a long but finite distance with the intensity gradually decaying.

The above analysis highlights the essential role of space–time coupling in light bullet generation. Such a coupling is depicted geometrically in Fig. 2a as a conic section determined by Eq. (3) and Eq. (5) in the $$\left( {k_ \bot ,k_z,\omega } \right)$$ space, where $$k_ \bot = \sqrt {k_x^2 + k_y^2}$$ is the transverse wavenumber. Light bullets are comprised of plane waves corresponding to points on the conic section. Figure 2b shows the projection of the conic section on $$\left( {\omega ,k_ \bot } \right)$$ plane. Figure 2c shows the projection on $$\left( {\omega ,k_z} \right)$$ plane, which is a straight line with slope $$\frac{{\partial \omega }}{{\partial k_z}} = v_g$$.

In many cases of interest, light bullets operate in the paraxial wave regime for which $$k_ \bot ^2 \ll k_0^2$$. Then Eq. (5) can be simplified as:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\frac{{\Omega} }{{\omega _0}} \equiv \frac{{\omega - \omega _0}}{{\omega _0}} \approx \beta \left( {\frac{{k_ \bot }}{{k_0}}} \right)^2} \end{array}$$
(8)

where β is a dimensionless coefficient:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\beta = - \frac{{\frac{{v_g}}{c}}}{{2\left( {1 - \frac{{v_g}}{c}} \right)}}} \end{array}$$
(9)

As confirmed in Fig. 2b, the $${\Omega} \left( {k_ \bot } \right)$$ curve is fitted well with the quadratic function of Eq. (8) for $$k_ \bot ^2 \ll k_0^2$$.

### Theory of light bullet generation by nonlocal nanophotonics

#### Realization of space–time coupling

The form of Eq. (8), which describes the required space–time coupling, is reminiscent of the band dispersion of periodic photonic structures. This observation leads to our nanophotonic approach to generate light bullets. Our objective is to create a thin optical device that operates as a nonlocal narrowband bandpass filter with a quadratic transverse wavevector-dependent frequency determined by Eq. (8). This can be achieved using guided resonances in periodic nanophotonic structures44,45,46.

Consider a single band of guided resonances in a 2D photonic crystal slab with periodicity in the x and y directions. Here we analyze reflection; however, the analysis also applies to transmission. For such a system, the reflected amplitude near resonant frequencies can be expressed as47:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {r\left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot ,\omega } \right) = r_d + f\frac{{\gamma \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)}}{{ - i\left( {\omega - \omega \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)} \right) + \gamma \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)}}} \end{array}$$
(10)

where $$f = \left( {r_d + t_d} \right)$$, with $$r_d$$ and $$t_d$$ being the reflection and transmission coefficient as determined for an effective uniform slab, $${{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot = \left( {k_x,k_y} \right)$$ is the in-plane wavevector, $$\omega \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)$$ and $$\gamma \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)$$ are the center frequencies and radiative linewidths of the guided resonance band, respectively. Both $$r_d$$ and $$t_d$$ are assumed to be slowly varying in both ω and $$k_ \bot$$, and they are approximately constants in the range of frequencies and wavevectors of interest.

To realize the space–time coupling required by light bullets, the desired device should satisfy the following three conditions:

1. 1.

No direct (background) reflection: $$r_d = 0$$, so that the reflectivity from the slab exhibits a Lorentzian lineshape.

2. 2.

Narrow linewidth: $$\gamma \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right) \ll \omega \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)$$, so that the Lorentzian approximates the δ function.

3. 3.

Isotropic quadratic band dispersion: $$\omega \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right) \approx \omega _0 + \alpha \left( {k_x^2 + k_y^2} \right)$$, where $$\alpha = c^2\beta /\omega _0$$. We note that Eq. (8) is isotropic in the ($$k_x,k_y$$) plane, hence the required band dispersion should also be isotropic.

As an illustration of the theoretical conditions above, we consider a hypothetical photonic crystal slab with a lattice constant $$a = 1$$ μm, which supports a single band of guided resonances with the parameters $$\omega _0 = 1.0 \times 2\pi c/a$$, $$\beta = - 2.0$$, $$\gamma \left( {k_ \bot } \right) = 1.67 \times 10^{ - 6} \times 2\pi c/a$$. We will later show that these parameters are achievable with actual photonic crystal slab structures. Figure 2e shows its reflectance spectrum $$r\left( {\omega ,{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)$$. Such a device reflects an incident Gaussian wave packet with a spectrum as shown in Fig. 2d into a light wave packet with a spectrum as shown in Fig. 2f. We depict the propagation of the reflected wave packet in real space and time as viewed from a moving frame defined by $$\tau = t - z/c$$. Figure 2g shows the incident Gaussian wave packet immediately before the device, which has a center frequency $$\omega _c = 1.0 \times 2\pi c/a$$, a waist radius $$W_0 = 30\,a$$, and temporal width $$t_0 = 1500\,a/c$$43. Since we have $$a = 1$$ μm, the incident wave packet has a center wavelength $$\lambda _c = 1$$ μm, and a Rayleigh range $$z_R = \pi W_0^2/\lambda _c = 2.83$$ mm. Figure 2h, i shows the reflected wave packet at $$z = 50$$ mm and $$z = 100$$ mm away from the slab, respectively. These plots clearly demonstrate that the reflected light wave packet propagates rigidly without apparent deformation, while its peak intensity exhibits gradual decay due to the finite-energy nature of the pulse that necessitates some diffraction. The group velocity as calculated from Fig. 2h, i is $$v_g = 0.8c$$, which agrees with Eq. (9) with $$\beta = - 2.0$$ as obtained from the band dispersion.

#### Controlling the external degrees of freedom

The real and imaginary parts of the guided resonance dispersion provide convenient handles to control the external degrees of freedom of light bullets including the group velocity $$v_g$$ and the propagation distance $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}}$$, respectively.

### Group velocity

As indicated by Eq. (9), the group velocity $$v_g$$ is solely determined by β that is directly proportional to the band dispersion coefficient α. Since α can be designed by choosing suitable geometry parameters or even tuned dynamically48,49, $$v_g$$ can be consequently controlled.

As a numerical demonstration, we consider the same setting as that in Fig. 2, except that now we consider three band dispersions with different values of $$\beta = - 4.50,\, - 2.00,\, - 1.17$$, which correspond to $$v_g/c = 0.9,\,0.8,\,0.7$$, respectively. For each value of β, we plot in Fig. 3 the reflectance spectrum $$r\left( {\omega ,k} \right)$$, and the spatiotemporal profile of the reflected wave packets at $$z = 50$$ mm and $$z = 100$$ mm away from the device. Such distances are $$17.7$$ and $$35.4$$ times the Rayleigh range of the incident wave packet, respectively. We adopt a moving frame defined by $$\tau = t - z/c$$. All the three reflectance spectra in Fig. 3a, d, g are similar: at each wavevector, the reflectance spectrum features a resonant peak with zero background at frequencies away from the peak. And the frequency of the peak varies quadratically as a function of the wavevector. βs are related to the effective masses of the band dispersion: the smaller $$\left| \beta \right|$$, the larger the effective mass. In all the cases, the generated wave packets are space–time light bullets propagating without deformation in free space. However, the group velocities $$v_g$$ are different: the larger the effective mass, the longer the temporal delay of the wave packet, thus the smaller $$v_g$$. From the plots we calculate group velocity of the light bullets, which are indeed $$v_g = 0.9c,\,0.8c,\,0.7c$$, respectively. All these observations clearly show that the group velocity can be controlled by varying the band dispersion of the guided resonances.

### Propagation distance

The propagation distance of the light bullet where the peak intensity drops to a ratio of $$1/e^2$$ is

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}} = \frac{c}{\gamma }\frac{1}{{\left| {1 - \frac{c}{{v_g}}} \right|}}} \end{array}$$
(11)

$$L_{{\rm{max}}}$$ is determined by the spectral linewidth γ of the resonance and the group velocity $$v_g$$. The derivation of Eq. (11) can be found in ref. 32, which discusses the relation between the spectral linewidth and the propagation distance. Under the free space propagation, the shape of the light bullet is preserved, but its peak intensity would exponentially decay due to its finite-energy nature. Importantly, $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}}$$ does not depend on the spatial or temporal width of the light bullet. By choosing a small spectral linewidth γ for the resonance, the propagation distance of the light bullet can be much larger than the Rayleigh range of a Gaussian wave packet of a similar size. Moreover, since the spectral linewidth γ can be readily designed or tuned dynamically44, $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}}$$ can also be consequently controlled. The significant controllability of $$v_g$$ and $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}}$$ would benefit applications including particle manipulation and microscopy25.

We now illustrate numerically the control of the propagation distance. First, we verify Eq. (11). We consider the same setting as that in Fig. 2. The relevant parameters are $$v_g = 0.8c$$, $$\gamma \left( {k_ \bot } \right) = 1.67 \times 10^{ - 6} \times 2\pi c/a$$, and $$a = 1$$ μm. Substituting these parameters in Eq. (11), we obtain $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}} = 382$$ mm. As comparison, the Rayleigh range of the incident wave packet is $$z_R = 2.83$$ mm, thus $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}} \approx 135\,z_R$$. Then we calculate the free space propagation of the generated light bullets as plotted in Fig. 4. For comparison, we use the same color scale for the intensity in Fig. 4a–d, but normalize the intensity by the peak value in each plot of Fig. 4e–h. Figure 4e–h shows that the shape of the light bullet remains invariant as it propagates. Figure 4a–d shows that its total intensity gradually decays due to its finite-energy nature. Figure 6a plots the natural logarithm of the peak intensity of the light bullet as a function of the propagation distance z. It clearly shows the exponential decay of the peak intensity as a function of propagation distance. By linear fitting, we determine the propagation distance where the intensity drops to $$1/e^2$$ is 382 mm, which is the same as $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}}$$ obtained from Eq. (11).

Now we proceed to demonstrate the control of the propagation distance by varying the spectral linewidth of the guided resonances. We consider another case where the setting is the same as above except that the spectral linewidth is doubled: $$\gamma \left( {k_ \bot } \right) = 3.34 \times 10^{ - 6} \times 2\pi c/a$$. Therefore, the maximum propagation distance should be halved: $$L_{{{{\mathrm{max}}}}} = 191$$ mm. For comparison, we plot the spatiotemporal evolution of the generated light bullets in Fig. 5a–d for the old case and Fig. 5e–h for the new case. In both cases, the generated light bullets propagate with the same group $$v_g = 0.8c$$ and gradually decay under propagation. However, the decay rate is faster for the new case. Figure 6a, b plots the natural logarithm of the peak intensity of the light bullet as a function of the propagation distance z for both cases. It clearly shows that the peak intensity exponentially decays. By linear fitting, we determine the propagation distance where the intensity drops to $$1/e^2$$ is indeed 191 mm for $$\gamma \left( {k_ \bot } \right) = 3.34 \times 10^{ - 6} \times 2\pi c/a$$.

#### Controlling the internal degrees of freedom

Besides the external degrees of freedom, the rich sets of physics and phenomena in photonic crystal guided resonances provide significant opportunities to control the internal degrees of freedom of the light bullet. These include vectorial field features such as the SAM and specific in-plane wavevector distribution such as those related to OAM. Such structured light bullets are important for applications including optical imaging and communications50.

### Spin angular momentum distribution

To incorporate SAM, we must extend the scalar theory to include the polarization of light. In paraxial optics, this can be readily done using the formalism of matrix Fourier optics51,52,53, where one replaces scalar fields by Jones vectors, and the scalar reflection coefficient by the Jones matrix:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {A\left( {x,y,t,z} \right) \to \left| {A\left( {x,y,t,z} \right)}\rangle \right. = \left[ {A_x\left( {x,y,t,z} \right),A_y\left( {x,y,t,z} \right)} \right]^T} \end{array}$$
(12)
$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {r\left( {k_x,k_y,{{{\mathrm{{\Omega}}} }}} \right) \to \overline r \left( {k_x,k_y,{{{\mathrm{{\Omega}}} }}} \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {r_{xx}\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right)} & {r_{xy}\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right)} \\ {r_{yx}\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right)} & {r_{yy}\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right)} \end{array}} \right)} \end{array}$$
(13)

In the case of our interest where at each wavevector the reflectance spectrum of the system due to the guided resonance exhibits Lorentzian lineshape and zero reflection background, $$\overline r \left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right)$$ becomes a dyadic (cf. Eq. (10)):

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\overline r \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot ,{\Omega} } \right) = \frac{{\gamma \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)}}{{ - i\left[ {\omega - \omega \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)} \right] + \gamma \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)}}\left| {p\left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)} \right.\left. \rangle\langle{p\left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)} \right|} \end{array}$$
(14)

where $$\left. {|p\left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)} \right\rangle$$ is a unit vector indicating the polarization state of the leakage radiation from the guided resonance at $${{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot$$.

For an incident wave $$\left. {|A_i\left( {x,y,t,z} \right)} \right\rangle$$, the reflected wave from the device at z = 0 is

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\left| {A_o\left( {x,y,t,z} \right)}\rangle \right. = {\int\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty }} {{\bar r} } \,\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right)\left| {\widetilde A_i\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right)} \right.} \\ {e^{i\left\{ {k_xx + k_yy - {\Omega} t + \left[ {k_z\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} } \right) - k_0} \right]z} \right\}}{{{\mathrm{d}}}}k_x{{{\mathrm{d}}}}k_y{{{\mathrm{d}}}}{\Omega} } \end{array}$$
(15)

where

$$\left| {\widetilde A_i\left( {k_x,k_y,{\Omega} ,0} \right)}\rangle \right. = \frac{1}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^3}}{\int\!\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty }} {{{{\mathrm{d}}}x{{{\mathrm{d}}}}y{{{\mathrm{d}}}}t} } \left| {A_i\left( {x,y,t,0} \right)} \right.e^{ - i\left( {k_xx + k_yy - {\Omega} t} \right)}\,$$
(16)

The above formalism indicates that the polarization texture associated with the photonic band structure can be directly imprinted onto the generated light bullet. This allows controllable generation of novel light bullets with a complex internal distribution of SAM that may benefit chiral imaging54.

As an example of imprinting the SAM texture onto a light bullet, we consider a two-band model of guided resonances as described by an effective Hamiltonian

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\widehat H\left( {k_x,k_y} \right) = \omega _0\widehat I + v_D\left( { - k_y\widehat {\sigma _z} + k_x\widehat {\sigma _x}} \right) + {\Delta} \widehat {\sigma _y}} \end{array}$$
(17)

which describes the pair of valley states in a valley photonic crystal55,56. We consider the lower band only, which is isotropic and approximately quadratic for small $${{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot$$ with a negative effective mass. Moreover, as shown in ref. 56, it can be achieved using an actual design of a photonic crystal slab where the guided resonance has a narrow linewidth, and there is no background reflection/transmission in the high-order diffraction channels. Thus, all the three conditions for light bullet generation can be satisfied. Importantly, the band exhibits a nontrivial meron-type pseudospin texture (Fig. 7a). This texture is imprinted on the reflected wave packet56. Consequently, the generated light bullet exhibits a meron-type polarization texture in the frequency-wavevector space: at $${{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot = 0$$, the light bullet exhibits circular polarization. At larger $$\left| {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right|$$ values, the polarizations are linear and wind around $${{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot = 0$$.

Such nontrivial polarization textures in frequency-wavevector space also manifest in real space and time, resulting in a spatiotemporally patterned vector field. We numerically demonstrate the generation of light bullets with such spin textures. In the calculation, we set the parameters of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (17) as: $$v_D = 0.26c$$, $${\Delta} = - 0.0056 \times 2\pi c/a$$, $$\omega _0 = 0.8646 \times 2\pi c/a$$, and $$\gamma \left( {{{\mathbf{k}}}} \right) = \gamma _0 = 1 \times 10^{ - 5} \times 2\pi c/a$$, where $$a = 1$$ μm. We consider an incident Gaussian wave packet with a uniform right circular polarization, which has a center angular frequency $$\omega _c = \omega _0$$, a center wavelength $$\lambda _c = 1.16$$ μm, a waist radius $$W_0 = 15$$ μm, a temporal width $$t_0 = 0.4\,$$ ps, and a Rayleigh range $$z_R = \pi W_0^2/\lambda _c = 0.61$$ mm. The generated wave packet is a light bullet propagating with a group velocity $$v_g = 0.90c$$. We plot the spatiotemporal distribution of Stokes parameters of the light bullet at z = 8 mm in Fig. 7. Figure 7c–f shows the distribution in the $$x - \tau$$ plane (y = 0) where $$\tau = t - z/c$$. Figure 7g–j shows the distribution in the $$x - y$$ plane at the peak time $$\tau = \tau _1 = 3.2\,$$ ps for z = 8 mm. These plots clearly show that the light bullet indeed exhibits a nontrivial internal SAM distribution. For example, in the $$x - y$$ plane at $$\tau = \tau _1$$, the linear polarization components $$S_1$$ and $$S_2$$ wind in the $$x - y$$ plane, while the circular polarization component $$S_3$$ is almost uniform.

Importantly, such a nontrivial SAM texture of the light bullet is robust under the free space propagation. As an illustration, we calculate the spin texture of the light bullet at two different propagation distances: $$z = 8$$ mm and $$z = 16$$ mm, which are, respectively, 13.1 and 26.2 times the Rayleigh range of the incident Gaussian wave packet $$z_R = 0.61$$ mm. Figure 8a–d plots the Stokes parameters $$S_0$$, $$S_1$$, $$S_2$$, $$S_3$$ of the generated light bullet in the $$x - \tau$$ plane at y = 0, z = 8 mm. Figure 8e–h plots the corresponding quantities at y = 0, z = 16 mm. These plots show that the light bullet propagates without deformation with $$v_g = 0.90c$$ and gradually decays. Importantly, the spin texture also propagates rigidly together with the light bullet. Figure 8i–l plots the Stokes parameters in the $$x - y$$ plane at z = 8 mm and the peak time $$\tau = \tau _1 = 3.2\,$$ ps. Figure 8m–p plots the corresponding quantities at $$z = 16$$ mm and the peak time $$\tau = \tau _2 = 6.3\,$$ ps. These plots again confirm the robustness of the SAM distribution under propagation.

### Orbital angular momentum

Our approach can also generate 3D light bullets carrying arbitrary OAM57,58. This is achieved by starting with incident pulses with the requested OAM. The nanophotonic device thus acts as a “transformer” that promotes usual light pulses carrying OAM to light bullets carrying OAM. Since light pulses with OAM can be generated routinely57,58 and even with compact structures59,60, our approach points to a new direction in structured light by imprinting arbitrary OAM onto light bullets. OAM associated with the light bullet is robust under free-space propagation. Light bullets with OAM may find applications in free-space optical communications1,2,58, quantum key distribution30, and optical tweezers1,2.

For numerical demonstration, we will show the generation of light bullets with arbitrary OAM using a concrete device later in the section “Tunable orbital angular momentum”.

### Concrete photonic design

Based on the considerations above, we provide a concrete device design to generate linear space–time light bullets with controllable external and internal degrees of freedom.

#### Structure and reflection spectrum

Our device is a photonic crystal slab as shown in Fig. 9a. It has a thickness of $$d = 0.395a$$, and contains a triangular array of circular holes with radius $$r = 0.30a$$, where a is the lattice constant. The slab is made of material with a permittivity $$\varepsilon = 12$$, which approximates that of Si or GaAs in the near-infrared wavelength range. Such a photonic crystal slab hosts a single band of guided resonances near the frequency $$\omega _0 = 0.435 \times 2\pi c/a$$. In general, the band structure of guided resonances is anisotropic around the Γ point ($${{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot = 0$$). However, due to the $$C_{6v}$$ symmetry of our photonic crystal slab, the singly degenerate band is almost completely isotropic near the Γ point61,62. We calculate the band structure using the guided mode expansion method63,64. Figure 9b shows that the band is quadratic with the same effective mass along ΓK and ΓM direction. Figure 9c shows that the isofrequency contours of the band are almost circular. Therefore, the band dispersion satisfies Condition 1:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\omega \left( {{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right) \approx \omega _0 + \alpha \left( {k_x^2 + k_y^2} \right)} \end{array}$$
(18)

where $$\omega _0 = 0.435 \times 2\pi c/a$$, $$\alpha = - 0.366 \times ca/\left( {2\pi } \right)$$. Moreover, due to the $$C_{6v}$$ symmetry, the state at Γ point, which is singly degenerate, is a bound state in the continuum47. Near the Γ point, the states have finite but high quality factors. Therefore, Condition 2 is satisfied. Here we note that the bound state in the continuum is not essential for light bullet generation; it just provides a convenient approach to obtain high-Q resonances. In particular, the bound state in the continuum does not affect the propagation invariance of the light bullet. Furthermore, the direct reflection $$r_d$$ is related to the non-resonant reflection pathway. Hence, we can achieve $$r_d = 0$$ by choosing a suitable slab thickness $$d = 0.395\,a$$. Therefore, Condition 3 is also satisfied. The slab as designed thus serves as the required narrowband nonlocal filter in reflection. Actual designs should also take efficiency into consideration, which is further discussed in the section “Discussion”.

Using this specific photonic crystal, we calculate the reflection spectrum for the right-circularly polarized incident light65. Since the wavelength is greater than the lattice constant, there are no high-order propagating diffraction orders. Figure 9d depicts the power reflection spectra $$R_{{{{\mathrm{rcp}}}}}\left( \omega \right)$$ at two randomly chosen incident angles $$\theta = 8^\circ$$ and $$\theta = 11^\circ$$ along the ΓK direction. Due to the isotropic band structure, the results are the same for other azimuthal directions. Each spectrum exhibits a single sharp peak on a zero background $$\left( {\left| {r_d} \right|^2 = 0} \right)$$. Here we note that the zero background is relatively broadband that can be satisfactorily achieved for the whole range of angles of our interest. As θ increases, the resonant frequency decreases and the linewidth increases as expected. Figure 9e depicts the reflection spectrum $$R_{{{{\mathrm{rcp}}}}}\left( {\omega ,{{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot } \right)$$ along the ΓK and ΓM directions. The spectrum exhibits narrow peaks along the band dispersion, and the linewidth approaches zero as $${{{\mathbf{k}}}}_ \bot$$ approaches Γ. Except for the unexcited dark resonance mode at Γ, Fig. 9e agrees well with Fig. 9b. Figure 9f depicts the reflection $$R_{{{{\mathrm{rcp}}}}}\left( {k_x,k_y} \right)$$ at $$\omega = 0.432 \times 2\pi c/a$$, which shows a circular ring of sharp peaks with the same amplitude. All these plots confirm the device as the required nonlocal filter.

#### Light bullet generation

We numerically demonstrate the light bullet generation using the structure discussed above. The numerical methods for simulating the free-space propagation of light follow ref. 66. For concreteness, we set $$a = 1$$ μm below. We first consider an incident right-circularly polarized Gaussian wave packet with a center frequency $$\omega _c = 0.434 \times 2\pi c/a$$, a waist radius $$W_0 = 5$$ μm, a temporal width $$t_0 = 0.8\,$$ ps43, and a Rayleigh range $$z_R = 0.034\,$$ mm. The wave packet is normally incident on the device, and its waist is located at the front surface of the slab. The reflected wave packet is a light bullet propagating with a group velocity $$v_g = 0.24\,c$$, which agrees with that calculated from α. We plot the field distribution of the light bullet at $$z = 2\,$$ mm in Fig. 10a–c. Figure 10a depicts the intensity distribution in the $$x\left( y \right) - \tau$$ plane where $$\tau = t - z/c$$. Figure 10b plots the intensity distribution in the $$x - y$$ plane at the peak time $$\tau = \tau _0 = 21.2\,$$ ps for $$z = 2\,$$ mm, which shows isotropic localization. Figure 10c plots the phase distribution in the $$x - y$$ plane at $$\tau = \tau _0 = 21.2$$ ps, which is almost uniform.

#### Tunable group velocity

An important feature of such a device is the external parameter tunability: by varying the radius of air holes r in this structure, one can control the group velocity of the generated light bullets in a very wide range: $$v_g = 0.08\,c - 0.83\,c$$.

To demonstrate, we calculate the band dispersion for the structure with varying r and fixed d and ε. Figure 11a–e plots the results for $$r = 0.15a,\,0.25a,\,0.35a,\,0.40a,$$ and 0.45a, respectively. In all the cases, the band is isotropic and quadratic due to the $$C_{6v}$$ symmetry. However, the effective mass varies significantly as r changes. Consequently, the group velocity of the generated light bullets also varies significantly. Figure 11f plots the group velocity obtained from the quadratic fit as a function of r, which shows that a wide range of group velocity $$v_g = 0.08\,c - 0.83\,c$$ can be achieved by varying r.

Here we note that the single-layer structure with a varying hole radius r satisfies two of the three conditions required by light bullet generation as discussed in the section “Realization of space–time coupling”: narrow linewidth and isotropic quadratic band dispersion. These conditions are guaranteed by the $$C_{6v}$$ symmetry of the structure. The condition of zero background reflection $$r_d = 0$$ may not be satisfied for the single-layer structure with a varying hole radius r. However, such a condition of zero background reflection can always be satisfied by placing a uniform dielectric slab in the vicinity of the photonic crystal slab, and by tuning the distance between the slabs. See, e.g., ref. 26 for details of this approach. Such an approach has the advantage that we can tune $$r_d$$ without significantly affecting the band structure of the photonic crystal slab.

#### Tunable orbital angular momentum

The same device can also generate light bullets carrying OAM, by starting with incident pulses with the requested OAM. We first consider an incident right-circularly polarized Laguerre–Gaussian pulse with $$l = 1,m = 0$$. From the numerical simulation, we verify that the reflected pulse is also a light bullet propagating with a group velocity $$v_g = 0.24c$$. As shown in Fig. 10d–f, such a light bullet exhibits a donut-shaped intensity distribution and a 2π phase winding around the center in the wavefront. Thus, the generated light bullet has the same OAM l = 1 (in units of ħ per photon) as the incident pulse. We then consider an incident right-circularly polarized Laguerre–Gaussian pulse with $$l = 2,m = 0$$. As shown in Fig. 10g–i, the generated light bullet possesses an OAM l = 2 with a 4π phase winding in the wavefront. Light bullets with higher OAM can be generated analogously.

Importantly, such an OAM distribution associated with the light bullet is robust under propagation. To illustrate, we focus on the case when $$l = 1,m = 0$$. Figure 12a–c plots intensity and phase distribution of the generated light bullet at $$z = 2000$$ μm. Figure 12d–f plots the corresponding quantities at $$z = 4000$$ μm. As comparison, the Rayleigh range of the incident wave packet is $$z_R = 34.1$$ μm. These plots clearly show that OAM does not affect the propagation invariance of the light bullet.

## Discussion

As a final remark, we note that the nonlocal light bullet generators considered in this paper are passive. For a given input Gaussian wave packet, the fraction of energy coupled into the light bullet, which defines the efficiency of the device, decreases as the linewidth of the resonance decreases. Since the propagation distance increases as the resonant linewidth decreases, there is a trade-off between the propagation distance and the efficiency of the device. This trade-off is intrinsic to our scheme since the device is a spatiotemporal frequency selector3. A similar trade-off exists in Durnin’s annular-slit scheme to generate Bessel beam8. On the other hand, one might consider a mode-locked laser incorporating our device as the output coupler mirror. In this case, the energy efficiency of the device, defined as the fraction of the input energy that is transferred to the light bullet, is no longer strongly constrained by the quality factor of the resonance with a range of quality factors that still allow significant light output. Our construction, being a thin film, should facilitate direct integration onto light-emitting devices. Lastly, the realistic devices should exhibit high-Q resonances. This is within the capabilities of standard nanofabrication.

In conclusion, we have shown that 3D linear space–time light bullets can be generated using compact nonlocal nanophotonics. The crucial space–time correlation of light bullets is naturally imprinted by the photonic band dispersion. Such a simple method can therefore sculpt light pulses in both space and time with high precision. Our approach provides complete control of both the external and internal degrees of freedom of light bullets. It can endow 3D linear light bullets with complex internal structures including nontrivial SAM and OAM, which may lead to important applications in optical communication, optical bioimaging, optical lithography, and optical projection tomography67. Our work points to significant opportunities provided by nanophotonics in spatiotemporal wave shaping68 and in the emerging field of space–time optics.

## Materials and methods

The band structure was calculated using the guided mode expansion method63,64. The reflection spectrum was computed using the Fourier Modal Method using a freely available software package65.

## References

1. 1.

Hernández-Figueroa, H. E., Zamboni-Rached, M. & Recami, E. Localized Waves (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

2. 2.

Hernández-Figueroa, H. E., Recami, E. & Zamboni-Rached, M. Non-diffracting Waves (Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2013).

3. 3.

Turunen, J. & Friberg, A. T. Chapter 1 – propagation-invariant optical fields. Prog. Opt. 54, 1–88 (2010).

4. 4.

Zamboni-Rached, M., Recami, E. & Hernández-Figueroa, H. E. New localized Superluminal solutions to the wave equations with finite total energies and arbitrary frequencies. Eur. Phys. J. D. - At. Mol. Optical Plasma Phys. 21, 217–228 (2002).

5. 5.

Saari, P. & Reivelt, K. Generation and classification of localized waves by Lorentz transformations in Fourier space. Phys. Rev. E 69, 036612 (2004).

6. 6.

Kwon, H. et al. Nonlocal metasurfaces for optical signal processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 173004 (2018).

7. 7.

Yessenov, M. et al. Classification of propagation-invariant space-time wave packets in free space: theory and experiments. Phys. Rev. A 99, 023856 (2019).

8. 8.

Durnin, J., Miceli, J. J. Jr. & Eberly, J. H. Diffraction-free beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987).

9. 9.

Lu, J. Y. & Greenleaf, J. F. Nondiffracting X waves-exact solutions to free-space scalar wave equation and their finite aperture realizations. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics. Ferroelectr., Frequency Control 39, 19–31 (1992).

10. 10.

Saari, P. & Reivelt, K. Evidence of X-shaped propagation-invariant localized light waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4135–4138 (1997).

11. 11.

Valtna, H., Reivelt, K. & Saari, P. Methods for generating wideband localized waves of superluminal group velocity. Opt. Commun. 278, 1–7 (2007).

12. 12.

Siviloglou, G. A. et al. Observation of accelerating airy beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 213901 (2007).

13. 13.

Chong, A. et al. Airy-Bessel wave packets as versatile linear light bullets. Nat. Photonics 4, 103–106 (2010).

14. 14.

Kondakci, H. E. & Abouraddy, A. F. Diffraction-free space-time light sheets. Nat. Photonics 11, 733–740 (2017).

15. 15.

Efremidis, N. K. et al. Airy beams and accelerating waves: an overview of recent advances. Optica 6, 686–701 (2019).

16. 16.

Sõnajalg, H., Rätsep, M. & Saari, P. Demonstration of the Bessel-X pulse propagating with strong lateral and longitudinal localization in a dispersive medium. Opt. Lett. 22, 310–312 (1997).

17. 17.

Bowlan, P. et al. Measuring the spatiotemporal field of ultrashort Bessel-X pulses. Opt. Lett. 34, 2276–2278 (2009).

18. 18.

Shaarawi, A. M. & Besieris, I. M. On the superluminal propagation of X-shaped localized waves. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 7227–7254 (2000).

19. 19.

Brittingham, J. N. Focus waves modes in homogeneous Maxwell’s equations: transverse electric mode. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 1179–1189 (1983).

20. 20.

Sezginer, A. A general formulation of focus wave modes. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 678–683 (1985).

21. 21.

Reivelt, K. & Saari, P. Optical generation of focus wave modes. J. Optical Soc. Am. A 17, 1785–1790 (2000).

22. 22.

Reivelt, K. & Saari, P. Experimental demonstration of realizability of optical focus wave modes. Phys. Rev. E 66, 056611 (2002).

23. 23.

Yessenov, M. et al. Weaving the rainbow: space-time optical wave packets. Opt. Photonics N. 30, 34–41 (2019).

24. 24.

Kondakci, H. E. & Abouraddy, A. F. Optical space-time wave packets having arbitrary group velocities in free space. Nat. Commun. 10, 929 (2019).

25. 25.

Li, Z. Y. & Kawanaka, J. Velocity and acceleration freely tunable straight-line propagation light bullet. Sci. Rep. 10, 11481 (2020).

26. 26.

Guo, C. et al. Photonic crystal slab Laplace operator for image differentiation. Optica 5, 251–256 (2018).

27. 27.

Wang, H. W. et al. Compact incoherent image differentiation with nanophotonic structures. ACS Photonics 7, 338–343 (2020).

28. 28.

Guo, C. et al. Isotropic wavevector domain image filters by a photonic crystal slab device. J. Optical Soc. Am. A 35, 1685–1691 (2018).

29. 29.

Guo, C., Wang, H. W. & Fan, S. H. Squeeze free space with nonlocal flat optics. Optica 7, 1133–1138 (2020).

30. 30.

Mair, A. et al. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 412, 313–316 (2001).

31. 31.

Liao, S. K. et al. Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature 549, 43–47 (2017).

32. 32.

Yessenov, M. et al. What is the maximum differential group delay achievable by a space-time wave packet in free space? Opt. Express 27, 12443–12457 (2019).

33. 33.

Abdollahpour, D. et al. Spatiotemporal airy light bullets in the linear and nonlinear regimes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253901 (2010).

34. 34.

Silberberg, Y. Collapse of optical pulses. Opt. Lett. 15, 1282–1284 (1990).

35. 35.

Sukhorukov, A. A. & Kivshar, Y. S. Slow-light optical bullets in arrays of nonlinear Bragg-grating waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 233901 (2006).

36. 36.

Belić, M. et al. Analytical light bullet solutions to the generalized (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 123904 (2008).

37. 37.

Minardi, S. et al. Three-dimensional light bullets in arrays of waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 263901 (2010).

38. 38.

Eilenberger, F. et al. Observation of discrete, vortex light bullets. Phys. Rev. X 3, 041031 (2013).

39. 39.

Smetanina, E. O. et al. Light bullets from near-IR filament in fused silica. Laser Phys. Lett. 10, 105401 (2013).

40. 40.

Majus, D. et al. Nature of spatiotemporal light bullets in bulk Kerr media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 193901 (2014).

41. 41.

Panagiotopoulos, P. et al. Super high power mid-infrared femtosecond light bullet. Nat. Photonics 9, 543–548 (2015).

42. 42.

Mandel, L. & Wolf, E. Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

43. 43.

Saleh, B. E. A. & Teich, M. C. Fundamentals of Photonics 2nd edn (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience, 2007).

44. 44.

Zhou, W. D. et al. Progress in 2D photonic crystal Fano resonance photonics. Prog. Quantum Electron. 38, 1–74 (2014).

45. 45.

Limonov, M. F. et al. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photonics 11, 543–554 (2017).

46. 46.

Zhou, W. D. & Fan, S. H. Photonic Crystal Metasurface Optoelectronics, Vol. 100 (Cambridge: Academic Press, 2019).

47. 47.

Fan, S. H. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Analysis of guided resonances in photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. B 65, 235112 (2002).

48. 48.

Sautter, J. et al. Active tuning of all-dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Nano 9, 4308–4315 (2015).

49. 49.

Taghizadeh, A. & Chung, I. S. Dynamical dispersion engineering in coupled vertical cavities employing a high-contrast grating. Sci. Rep. 7, 2123 (2017).

50. 50.

Chong, A. et al. Generation of spatiotemporal optical vortices with controllable transverse orbital angular momentum. Nat. Photonics 14, 350–354 (2020).

51. 51.

Moreno, I. et al. Jones matrix treatment for polarization Fourier optics. J. Mod. Opt. 51, 2031–2038 (2004).

52. 52.

Moreno, I. et al. Jones matrix treatment for optical Fourier processors with structured polarization. Opt. Express 19, 4583–4594 (2011).

53. 53.

Rubin, N. A. et al. Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera. Science 365, eaax1839, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1839 (2019).

54. 54.

Hu, H. F., Gan, Q. Q. & Zhan, Q. W. Generation of a nondiffracting superchiral optical needle for circular dichroism imaging of sparse subdiffraction objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 223901 (2019).

55. 55.

Chen, X. D. et al. Valley-contrasting physics in all-dielectric photonic crystals: orbital angular momentum and topological propagation. Phys. Rev. B 96, 020202(R) (2017).

56. 56.

Guo, C. et al. Meron spin textures in momentum space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 106103 (2020).

57. 57.

Allen, L. et al. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).

58. 58.

Padgett, M. J. Orbital angular momentum 25 years on [Invited]. Opt. Express 25, 11265–11274 (2017).

59. 59.

Wang, B. et al. Generating optical vortex beams by momentum-space polarization vortices centered at bound states in the continuum. Nat. Photonics 14, 623–628 (2020).

60. 60.

Zhu, T. F. et al. Topological optical differentiator. Nat. Commun. 12, 680 (2021).

61. 61.

Notomi, M. Theory of light propagation in strongly modulated photonic crystals: Refractionlike behavior in the vicinity of the photonic band gap. Phys. Rev. B 62, 10696–10705 (2000).

62. 62.

Wang, X., Ren, Z. F. & Kempa, K. Unrestricted superlensing in a triangular two-dimensional photonic crystal. Opt. Express 12, 2919–2924 (2004).

63. 63.

Andreani, L. C. & Gerace, D. Photonic-crystal slabs with a triangular lattice of triangular holes investigated using a guided-mode expansion method. Phys. Rev. B 73, 235114 (2006).

64. 64.

Minkov, M. & Savona, V. Automated optimization of photonic crystal slab cavities. Sci. Rep. 4, 5124 (2014).

65. 65.

Liu, V. & Fan, S. H. S4: A free electromagnetic solver for layered periodic structures. Computer Phys. Commun. 183, 2233–2244 (2012).

66. 66.

Schmidt, J. D. Numerical Simulation of Optical Wave Propagation with Examples in MATLAB® (Bellingham: SPIE, 2010).

67. 67.

Sharpe, J. et al. Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science 296, 541–545 (2002).

68. 68.

Shaltout, A. M. et al. Spatiotemporal light control with frequency-gradient metasurfaces. Science 365, 374–377 (2019).

## Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Haiwen Wang and Dr Viktar Asadchy for helpful discussion. This work is supported by the U. S. National Science Foundation Grant No. CBET-1641069, by a Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship from the U. S. Department of Defense (Grant No. N00014-17-1-3030), and by the U. S. Office of Naval Research (Grant No. N00014-20-1-2450). M. X. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11904264).

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

C. G. designed the project and performed the theoretical and numerical study. S. F. supervised the project. All the authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanhui Fan.

## Ethics declarations

### Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Guo, C., Xiao, M., Orenstein, M. et al. Structured 3D linear space–time light bullets by nonlocal nanophotonics. Light Sci Appl 10, 160 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00595-6