Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Extreme multiexciton emission from deterministically assembled single-emitter subwavelength plasmonic patch antennas

Abstract

Coupling nano-emitters to plasmonic antennas is a key milestone for the development of nanoscale quantum light sources. One challenge, however, is the precise nanoscale positioning of the emitter in the structure. Here, we present a laser etching protocol that deterministically positions a single colloidal CdSe/CdS core/shell quantum dot emitter inside a subwavelength plasmonic patch antenna with three-dimensional nanoscale control. By exploiting the properties of metal–insulator–metal structures at the nanoscale, the fabricated single-emitter antenna exhibits a very high-Purcell factor (>72) and a brightness enhancement of a factor of 70. Due to the unprecedented quenching of Auger processes and the strong acceleration of the multiexciton emission, more than 4 photons per pulse can be emitted by a single quantum dot, thus increasing the device yield. Our technology can be applied to a wide range of photonic nanostructures and emitters, paving the way for scalable and reliable fabrication of ultra-compact light sources.

Introduction

The interaction between an emitter and its local electromagnetic field can be engineered by increasing the local density of states for applications in quantum information1 and single-photon generation2. This approach has been widely explored with a large variety of dielectric3,4,5 or plasmonic environments6,7,8,9,10 and solid-state emitters such as self-assembled11 or colloidal12 quantum dots (QDs), single molecules13, and defects in diamond14. Achieving an intense light–matter interaction using extremely small mode volume plasmonic structures12,15 requires very precise, and hence challenging, spatial positioning of the emitter at the nanoscale. A large majority of the works so far have relied on randomly positioned emitters to demonstrate strong acceleration of the spontaneous emission of single emitters coupled to plasmonic antennas16,17,18. The challenge of deterministically positioning individual emitters inside nanophotonic structures with three-dimensional nanoscale control has to be overcome to realize efficient devices operating at room temperature and benefiting from highly optimized light–matter interaction regimes16,19.

Several approaches have been developed to precisely position single self-assembled quantum dots grown by molecular beam-epitaxy in cavities20,21,22,23. These approaches rely on optically measuring the QD position through emission mapping with subwavelength accuracy and defining the photonic structure around the QD using optical20,21,22 or electronic23 lithography. However, these techniques cannot be extended to chemically synthetized emitters such as colloidal QDs or molecules that have strong potential for inexpensive and room-temperature applications. The main reason for this limitation is the exacerbated sensitivity of these emitters to technological processing. Because of the high sensitivity of the emission process to surface states, preserving the properties of the colloidal QDs during technological protocols, involving, for example, e-beam or laser exposure, dry or wet etchings and solvents, is highly challenging.

Here, we report a non-destructive in situ far-field laser etching lithography technique that allows control—at the nanoscale—of the position of fragile emitters in plasmonic structures. Our technique employs multilayer structures and a dual-wavelength protocol to deterministically position a single CdSe/CdS colloidal QD in a plasmonic patch antenna and fabricate subwavelength antennas of different shapes. As a result, we deterministically achieve a high Purcell factor for a single emitter. Strong electromagnetic interactions in the plasmonic antenna decrease the relative efficiency of the Auger recombination channels, which results in very high brightness and extreme multiexciton radiative recombination. The technique can be used to fabricate a variety of photonic structures embedding fragile emitters.

Results

Plasmonic patch antenna for spontaneous emission control

Optimizing the coupling between an emitter and a nanostructure makes it possible to control the emission directivity and the dynamics of the spontaneous emission. The latter is quantified by the Purcell factor FP, which scales as the inverse of the electromagnetic confinement volume provided by the photonic structure4,24,25. Plasmonic nanoantennas6 exhibit a very low mode volume and a wide spectral resonance and therefore are excellent structures for obtaining high Purcell factors FP with broadband emitters.

Figure 1a depicts the system that is explored in the present work: a single emitter coupled to a plasmonic patch antenna. The antenna consists of a thin dielectric layer (typically 30–40 nm) sandwiched between an optically thick bottom layer of gold and a thin gold patch on top; the patch thickness is on the order of 20 nm, and its diameter is in the range of 0.2–2.5 μm. This system has been both theoretically and experimentally shown to be an excellent tool for accelerating and directing fluorescence emission26,27.

Fig. 1: A plasmonic patch antenna coupled to a single colloidal quantum dot.
figure1

a Schematic of the structure under study consisting of a single colloidal core/shell QD coupled to a plasmonic patch antenna. b Schematic and transmission electron microscopy image of the investigated emitters

The optimal positioning of the emitter inside the antenna couples the radiation of the emitter to surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) at both nano-spaced metal-dielectric interfaces, and the SPPs in the patch are confined by the geometry of the patch. These SPPs at the two interfaces further couple and create strong confinement of the electromagnetic field around the emitter. The SPPs generated in the thin plasmonic metal patch (thinner than the skin depth) lead to the emission of photons26 as depicted in Fig. 1a. The antenna operation depends on the dipole orientation of the emitter (stronger acceleration of the spontaneous emission for the vertical dipole orientation), the patch size (large patches are more directive, but small patches show stronger resonances), and the dielectric spacer26. In this work, we insert chemically synthetized28 relatively large quasi-spherical individual CdSe/CdS semiconductor core/shell colloidal QDs29,30 in the antenna. These QDs have CdSe cores that are ~3 nm in diameter and encapsulated by slowly grown CdS shells with a thickness of 6–8 nm (Fig. 1b), which make them almost non-blinking31. Due to their high absorption cross-section, these QDs exhibit bright fluorescence at room temperature. Under ultra-violet (UV) excitation at room temperature, they emit at 633 nm with a spectral width of 30 nm. We characterize these QDs in the low-excitation limit, where Auger processes are efficient enough to lead to single-photon emission. We note that under strong pumping, these large single QDs emit multiple photons because their multiexciton emission rate becomes comparable to the non-radiative Auger rate (see Supplementary Information).

In situ subwavelength laser etching on fragile emitters

The proposed technological protocol is illustrated in Fig. 2 and consists of deterministic and non-destructive in situ laser etching, which allows the positioning of a single QD within an antenna with a 3 nm vertical precision and a 50 nm lateral precision (see Supplementary Information). We use a low-luminescence bi-layer polymer32 to locate single emitters by mapping their luminescence.

Fig. 2: In situ laser etching for the deterministic assembly of single-emitter plasmonic antenna nanostructures.
figure2

Figures (ae) illustrate the in situ laser etching protocol used to fabricate the antennas (see the details in the text). The image at the top right of (a) shows a confocal image of the emission from a QD, and the image on the top of (b) shows the AFM topography and height profile of a hole etched by the laser into the resist bi-layer. The undercut created by the selective etching of the LOR (c) allows the lift-off in step (d) of the lithography to produce the single-emitter antennas (e). The image above (e) depicts the AFM image and corresponding height profile of a fabricated antenna patch. f Emission lifetime of a QD before (blue) and after (red) laser etching

The process starts by evaporating a thick layer of gold (200 nm) on a Si substrate using an intermediate adhesion layer of Ti/Cr. A 10-nm thick layer of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is then spin-coated above gold. Then, a layer of spatially well-isolated single QDs is spin-coated using a dispersion of QDs in hexane of an appropriate dilution. To create an optimized spacing around the single emitters and to protect them from direct dielectric vapour deposition, a 35-nm thick smooth PMMA film is spin-coated, which embeds the emitters in a dielectric layer. This protects the emitters in the proceeding lithographic steps. A bi-layer consisting of lift-off resist (LOR) and PMMA is then spin-coated. The low luminosity of this bi-layer permits the detection of the emission from the single QDs embedded beneath and excited by a low-intensity spectrally filtered broadband supercontinuum laser emitting at 473–478 nm (Fig. 2a). As in the case of in situ lithography methods20,23, we map the QD fluorescence with nanoscale accuracy. The laser wavelength is then tuned to 550–605 nm, which corresponds to a wavelength range where the laser light is absorbed substantially more by the lift-off resist than by the QD. The excitation power can thus be chosen to burn the resist bi-layer and locally create a hole directly above the selected QD without photobleaching the QD (Fig. 2b). We note in Fig. 2f, the emission lifetime of a QD does not change after the resist burns—this demonstrates that the laser etching process does not photodegrade the QD. After selective chemical etching of the LOR, an undercut is created in the PMMA (Fig. 2c). Finally, gold is deposited by evaporation (Fig. 2d), and a lift-off step is performed to obtain patch antennas embedding a single emitter (Fig. 2e). The undercut in the PMMA leads to a discontinuous deposition of gold (thus making the patch), and in step (e), the undercut provides a passage for the chemical etching agent to attack the LOR and lift-off the layers above the LOR while leaving the patch. The atomic force microscopy (AFM) image above Fig. 2e shows an antenna patch after the final lift-off step.

This laser etching technique has several advantages over previous methods. Standard optical in situ lithography would require intense UV laser light for the exposure, which would degrade the QDs due to excessive light absorption. Here, by using a selected wavelength of 550–605 nm for the laser etching, we avoid such a detrimental effect. Moreover, this technique allows one to scan and locate the emitter without exposing the photoresist. Finally, as the etching process is highly nonlinear with respect to the excitation power, subwavelength structures can be obtained. The AFM image and height profile of the antenna patch in Fig. 3a, b, respectively, show a nano-antenna with dimensions as small as 200 × 450 nm2, while the mean wavelength of the etching laser is 580 nm. As the technique is deterministic, it is possible to characterize the emitter (in terms of the emission decay, polarization response, photon correlation, and spectral response) before it is embedded in the antenna. By noting antibunching in the QD emission before the in situ lithography, it is assured that the subsequent antenna will contain only one QD. The power, wavelength and exposure time of the laser can be optimized to prevent the degradation of the QDs after a successful lithography process. For the QD batch discussed in the paper, we noted that more than 80% of the QDs survived the laser etching process, from which all of the QDs survived the patch deposition process. This protocol ensures that all the fabricated antennas are single-emitter antennas.

Fig. 3: Topography and emission pattern of the emitter-antenna structures.
figure3

a AFM image of a small patch antenna and b the corresponding height profiles. c Electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera image of the radiation pattern of the same antenna measured in the far field by imaging the Fourier plane of the QD emission and d the associated polar plot. e (θ, φ) polar plot of the numerically simulated emission pattern of a similar elliptical patch antenna and f the polar plot along the maximum intensity axis

Emission from a subwavelength antenna

We study the emission pattern of the very small antenna (Fig. 3a, b) coupled to a single QD. Such subwavelength plasmonic patch antennas have been predicted to show a very strong Purcell effect and directive emission7,26. Simulation studies have shown that these antennas exhibit a higher FP if the emitter dipole is perpendicular rather than parallel to the patch. Moreover, for a perpendicular dipole, by reducing the patch diameter and employing specific patch sizes, FP can increase from 70 (patch diameter of ~1.6 μm) to more than 160 (patch diameter of ~0.15 μm). Therefore, the ability to reduce the antenna patch to a subwavelength size is a tool that can be used to control the emission acceleration.

Figure 3c, d shows the radiation pattern of the antenna measured in the far field by Fourier plane imaging. The antenna radiates through a cone in the far field, centred around 45°. This measurement is in good agreement with the numerical simulation of an elliptical patch antenna using the Fourier modal method33,34,35,36 as depicted in Fig. 3e, f for the resonance wavelength at 604 nm.

A striking feature of the measured radiative pattern is its high symmetry in the far field. Indeed, if the emitter is slightly off-centred with respect to the antenna patch, the radiation pattern rapidly exhibits angular asymmetry7. The lobes of Fig. 3d, f demonstrate that the emitter is centred with respect to the antenna within 5 nm, thus exhibiting the precision of the fabrication method used to position the QD laterally at the centre of the patch.

Acceleration of spontaneous emission

Figure 4a displays the fluorescence decay of a given QD before and after it is placed inside the patch antenna of Fig. 3. Before the deposition of the upper gold patch, when the QD is embedded in the PMMA layer and is 10 nm above the gold surface, its emission decay is monoexponential in character, which is indicative of single-exciton recombination with a decay of \(\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{ref}}}\) = 36 ns. After the deposition of a gold patch centred on this single QD, the emission lifetime is considerably reduced from \(\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{ref}}}\) to \(\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}\), and the acceleration of the spontaneous emission \(F_{\mathrm{P}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}} = \frac{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}}}{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{ref}}}}}\) of a given single QD can be measured. As the proximity to gold shortens the emitter lifetime37,38,39,40, we estimate that, on average, the lifetime \(\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{ref}}}\) of a single QD just above the gold (and not inside the antenna) is three times shorter than the decay time of the same colloidal QDs in a homogeneous PMMA layer, i.e., \(\frac{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{homogeneous}}}}}{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{ref}}}}}\) = 3 (see Supplementary Information), where \(\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{homogeneous}}}\) is the exciton lifetime of the emitter in a homogeneous medium (infinite dielectric medium with a refractive index of 1.5, such as PMMA). The Purcell factor is calculated using the exciton decay rate and is given as \(F_{\mathrm{P}} = \frac{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{homogeneous}}}}}{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{ref}}}}} \times \frac{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{ref}}}}}{{\tau _{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}}}\).

Fig. 4: Emission characteristics of a highly accelerated antenna.
figure4

a Fluorescence decay of the QD before (blue line) and after (red line) it is placed inside the antenna. The instrument response function is shown in black. b Normalized photon coincidences measured for the QD before insertion in the antenna and c inside the antenna under a pulsed excitation of 0.03 W/cm2 at 405 nm. d QD energy-level diagram showing the biexciton (BX), exciton (X), and ground states. e Detected photon rate (red) and the corresponding photon emission rate after the detection efficiency correction (green). The blue line denotes the pulsed laser repetition rate

Note that the acceleration of the spontaneous emission observed in Fig. 4a is so strong that we are limited by the response time of the measurement instrument to precisely quantify FP. By analysing the instrument response function (see Supplementary Information), we find that the emission acceleration is >24 with respect to the lifetime of the same QD before the gold patch deposition, which results in FP > 72 (detailed in Supplementary Information), when compared with the case of a QD embedded in a homogeneous dielectric medium. We remark that the stated value of FP was found by comparing the exciton lifetime of the QD with the slowest component of the instrument response function and not the faster component, resulting in a lower but more accurate value of FP. The method is detailed and justified in the Supplementary Information. In comparison to previous studies7,12,41, this extreme Purcell effect for a single emitter constitutes a high value that is obtained by the controlled and deterministic positioning of the emitter at the nanoscale in a highly confining subwavelength antenna structure.

Quenching of the Auger processes and multiexciton emission

As a consequence of such a significant Purcell effect, the electromagnetic decay channels are accelerated, making the radiative multiexciton recombination more efficient than the Auger non-radiative channels. The photon-correlation curve of Fig. 4b shows the measured second-order intensity correlation of the QD emission before it is placed in the antenna, exhibiting single-photon emission with g(2)(0) = 0.2 (calculated using a 15 ns binning interval). When inserted in the antenna, this value increases to g(2)(0) = 1 (Fig. 4c, calculated using a 0.5 ns binning interval), confirming the radiative multiexciton recombination.

Inside the plasmonic antenna, the radiative decay rates are accelerated by the Purcell factor FP not only at the exciton level but also at the multiexciton level. As a result, the Auger processes that are very efficient at the multiexciton level become relatively inefficient in the high-Purcell-factor regime, which facilitates the radiative recombination of the multiexcitons42,43,44. This is substantiated by the loss of single-photon emission in Fig. 4c. The three-level system in Fig. 4d shows the different decay channels for a QD in a homogeneous medium (black colour) and the QD in an environment with a Purcell effect (red colour), such as a plasmonic antenna. In the homogeneous medium, the QD decays in a cascade from the biexciton (BX) to the exciton (X) state with a rate of \({\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{{\mathrm{BX}}} = \alpha {\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{\mathrm{X}} + {\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{{\mathrm{Auger}}}\) and from the exciton to the ground state with a rate of ΓX. When the same QD is placed in an environment such as a plasmonic antenna, due to the Purcell effect, the QD decays in a cascade from the biexciton to the exciton state with a rate of \({\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{{\mathrm{BX}}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}} = F_{\mathrm{P}}(\alpha {\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{\mathrm{X}}) + {\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{{\mathrm{Auger}}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}\) and from the exciton to the ground state with a rate of FPΓX. For the homogeneous and antenna media, ΓBX and \({\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{{\mathrm{BX}}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}\) are the biexciton decay rates, ΓX and \({\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}\) are the exciton decay rates, and ΓAuger and \({\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{{\mathrm{Auger}}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}\) are the Auger decay rates, respectively. The Purcell factor FP accelerates all channels except the Auger channels. The factor α ≥ 2 relates the biexciton and exciton decay rates45,46. To calculate FP, we use the experimentally measured ΓX and \({\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{\mathrm{X}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}\) and avoid comparing ΓBX and \({\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{{\mathrm{BX}}}^{{\mathrm{Antenna}}}\) to find FP as this requires a separation of the Auger decay rates, which are not measured distinctively.

The plot of Fig. 4e illustrates very strong radiative multiexciton emission from a single-emitter plasmonic optical antenna. Under 405 nm pulsed excitation at a rate of 31.25 kHz with a pulse width of ~100 ps, the photon rate detected by the photodiodes is ~34 kHz. Considering the 25% detection efficiency of the experimental setup, the photon emission rate from the QD is estimated to be ~136 kHz. Therefore, for each laser pulse, the single emitter in the antenna emits ~4–5 photons. This demonstrates extremely efficient quenching of the Auger processes for at least 5 levels of radiative multiexciton recombination. Most likely, the relaxation of the QD inside the antenna includes many more higher multiexciton levels for which the non-radiative Auger recombination is not completely quenched, which therefore do not contribute to the radiation.

While a high Purcell effect in plasmonic antennas has often been associated with low brightness due to the predominance of non-radiative channels47,48,49,50, the structures developed here exhibit a very high fluorescence enhancement. Figure 5a, b are charge-coupled device (CCD) camera fluorescence images of the same area, including the small antenna of Fig. 3 and some QDs scattered outside the antenna. Under excitation with a lamp (438 ± 12 nm), with an acquisition time of 10 ms, only the antenna emission (indicated by the yellow circle in Fig. 5a) can be detected. An acquisition time of 200 ms (Fig. 5b) is required to detect the emission from the QDs outside antennas. To quantify the brightness of the antenna, we use a pulsed laser at 405 nm to excite the QD before and after insertion in the antenna. For the same excitation power, the antenna signal is 72 times more intense (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5: Fluorescence enhancement by a plasmonic antenna.
figure5

a, b Fluorescence microscopy image of the antenna excited by a mercury lamp at 438 ± 12 nm and captured by a CCD camera with an acquisition time of 10 ms (a) or 200 ms (b). The fluorescing antenna is encircled in yellow. Note that the two lighter spots above and below the saturated antenna spot in (b) are reflections on the protecting glass before the CCD camera sensor. c Photon detection rate from the QD before (blue) and after (red) it is placed inside the antenna. The antenna is excited at 405 nm with a pulsed laser at 2.5 MHz

We also note the high optical quality and stability of the fabricated antenna. The antenna can sustain laser pulses with an instantaneous power of 120 mW for more than 10 min before it is photobleached—evidencing the quality of the QDs under study and their preservation during the laser etching protocol reported here. We finally note that the onset of multiexciton emission depends strongly on the antenna size and the Purcell effect due to the antenna. In general, the appearance of multiexciton emission depends on the relative weight of the radiative decay of the multiexciton states and the Auger rate. When increasing the number of excitons, the corresponding multiexciton emission rate increases. In the presence of efficient Auger processes, it is thus possible to observe multiexciton emission when increasing the excitation power to the extent that the multiexciton radiative decay rate exceeds the Auger rate. We have observed this effect studying several antennas of different Purcell factors. For larger (hence slower) antennas, the onset of multiexciton emission is typically observed at a larger excitation power than for smaller (hence faster) antennas. This effect can be used in applications that demand switching from single-photon emission to multiphoton emission51. Controlled room-temperature multiexciton radiation can benefit photonic technologies52 and improve the efficiency of light-emitting devices53,54.

Discussion

We have developed a novel deterministic laser etching protocol that enables the fabrication of subwavelength plasmonic antennas centred with a 50 nm lateral accuracy on a single colloidal QD. Due to the low mode volume and high field confinement, such an antenna exhibits a remarkable Purcell effect, directive emission and high brightness.

Further developments of the protocol include the selection of well-oriented emitters by polarization analysis49,50,51 for fully deterministic matching of the spectrum, location and orientation between the emitter and the antenna modes for optimized light–matter interactions. To reduce the losses in such structures, where more than 90% of the plasmonic energy can be lost as heat48, the fabrication capabilities of the protocol can be extended to produce hybrid structures such as metallo-dielectric antennas.

The same protocol can be used to synthesize other nanophotonic devices, plasmonic waveguides55 and nanolasers56,57, which require deterministic and controlled positioning of a variety of sensitive emitters operating at room temperature, such as small colloidal QDs (e.g., CdSe/CdS and PbSe/PbS), nanodiamonds with vacancy centres such as nitrogen vacancies and silicon vacancies, and fluorescent molecules. Using this technique, while controlling the antenna shape and size and the dipolar orientation of the emitter inside the antenna and by using emitters with low multiexciton emission, very bright and directive single-photon sources based on such antennas can be obtained.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

The CdSe cores of the colloidal CdSe/CdS core/shell QDs were synthesized using a protocol based on the work of Peng et al.28, and the CdS shells were grown using the continuous slow injection method. On a 0.28-mm thick polycrystalline Si substrate, a 200 nm layer of Au (refractive index of n = 0.0534 + i3.8249 at 630 nm after deposition measured by ellipsometry) was grown by thermal evaporation using an adhesion layer of Cr (10 nm). A 10-nm-thick film of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was deposited on the Au substrate by spin-coating a solution of 0.5% [m/m] PMMA (average molar mass of 101,000) in toluene at 4000 rpm for 40 s. The sample was baked at 150 °C for 2 min. Then, a dispersion of CdSe/CdS QDs in hexane was spin-coated at 4000 rpm for 40 s to obtain well-distributed individual QDs. Then, by spin-coating 1.5% [m/m] of PMMA solution in toluene at 4000 rpm for 40 s on the QDs and baking the substrate at 150 °C for 2 min, individual QDs were embedded inside a dielectric layer of PMMA with n = 1.50 at 630 nm. To perform optical lithography on the sample, a lift-off resist (LOR®3A) was spin-coated at 7000 rpm for 40 s, and the sample was baked at 150 °C for 2 min, which produced a 300-nm thick layer. Then a 10-nm thick PMMA layer was deposited by spin-coating a solution of 0.5% [m/m] PMMA in toluene, and the sample was baked at 150 °C for 2 min.

Lithography protocol

The protocol has been described in the paper.

Optical characterization and microscopy

The sample was mounted on a PI P-713 XY Piezo Scanner nanopositioning stage and viewed with an inverted Olympus IX71 microscope using a 0.8NA 100× microscope air objective (Olympus LMPlanFL-100×). Light from a Hg lamp (Olympus USH-1030L) was filtered at 438 ± 12 nm for widefield fluorescence imaging, and images were recorded by a CCD camera (Photonic Science CMOS). In a confocal setup, lifetime and photon-correlation histograms were obtained using a 405 nm pulsed laser (pulse width of 100 ps) at 2.5 MHz (PicoQuant LDH series), and optical lithography was performed by a supercontinuum laser (NKT Photonics SuperK Extreme with a SuperK Varia filter) as described previously. The emitted light was spectrally filtered by a 630 ± 46 nm bandpass filter (Semrock 630/92 nm BrightLine®) and spatially filtered by a 150-μm pinhole. Time-resolved photoluminescence and time-correlated single-photon counting were performed using PicoHarp300 and two MPD PDM series single-photon avalanche diodes in a Hanbury-Brown and Twiss arrangement. The antenna emission pattern was recorded using a 0.95NA 100× microscope air objective (Olympus MPLAPON 100×) by Fourier plane imaging in the far field with an electron-multiplied CCD (EMCCD) camera (Andor iXon Ultra 897). The AFM images were recorded using a Veeco Dimension 3100 microscope with a Bruker RTESPA (Model: MPP-11120-10) tip in tapping mode. The transmission electron microscopy images were recorded with a Joel F2010 microscope.

References

  1. 1.

    Tame, M. S. et al. Quantum plasmonics. Nat. Phys. 9, 329–340 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. & Toth, M. Solid-state single-photon emitters. Nat. Photonics 10, 631–641 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gérard, J. M. et al. Enhanced spontaneous emission by quantum boxes in a monolithic optical microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1110–1113 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Solomon, G. S., Pelton, M. & Yamamoto, Y. Modification of spontaneous emission of a single quantum dot. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 178, 341–344 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lodahl, P. et al. Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals. Nature 430, 654–657 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kinkhabwala, A. et al. Large single-molecule fluorescence enhancements produced by a bowtie nanoantenna. Nat. Photonics 3, 654–657 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Belacel, C. et al. Controlling spontaneous emission with plasmonic optical patch antennas. Nano Lett. 13, 1516–1521 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bernal Arango, F., Kwadrin, A. & Koenderink, A. F. Plasmonic antennas hybridized with dielectric waveguides. ACS Nano 6, 10156–10167 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Patel, S. K. & Argyropoulos, C. Plasmonic nanoantennas: enhancing light-matter interactions at the nanoscale. EPJ Appl. Metamaterials 2, 4 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Giannini, V. et al. Plasmonic nanoantennas: fundamentals and their use in controlling the radiative properties of nanoemitters. Chem. Rev. 111, 3888–3912 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Senellart, P., Solomon, G. & White, A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1026–1039 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ji, B. T. et al. Non-blinking quantum dot with a plasmonic nanoshell resonator. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 170–175 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chikkaraddy, R. et al. Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities. Nature 535, 127–130 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Aharonovich, I., Greentree, A. D. & Prawer, S. Diamond photonics. Nat. Photonics 5, 397–405 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ureña, E. B. et al. Excitation enhancement of a quantum dot coupled to a plasmonic antenna. Adv. Mater. 24, OP314–OP320 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hoang, T. B., Akselrod, G. M. & Mikkelsen, M. H. Ultrafast room-temperature single photon emission from quantum dots coupled to plasmonic nanocavities. Nano Lett. 16, 270–275 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Le-Van, Q. et al. Temperature dependence of quantum dot fluorescence assisted by plasmonic nanoantennas. Phys. Rev. B 91, 085412 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hoang, T. B. et al. Ultrafast spontaneous emission source using plasmonic nanoantennas. Nat. Commun. 6, 7788 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vahala, K. J. Optical microcavities. Nature 424, 839–846 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dousse, A. et al. Controlled light-matter coupling for a single quantum dot embedded in a pillar microcavity using far-field optical lithography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 267404 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Somaschi, N. et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat. Photonics 10, 340–345 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gazzano, O. et al. Evidence for confined Tamm plasmon modes under metallic microdisks and application to the control of spontaneous optical emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 247402 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gschrey, M. et al. Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three-dimensional in situ electron-beam lithography. Nat. Commun. 6, 7662 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Purcell, E. M. in Confined Electrons and Photons (eds Burstein, E. & Weisbuch, C.) 839 (Springer, Boston, MA, 1995).

  25. 25.

    Grynberg, G., Aspect, A. & Fabre, C. Introduction to Quantum Optics: From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

    MATH  Book  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Esteban, R., Teperik, T. V. & Greffet, J. J. Optical patch antennas for single photon emission using surface plasmon resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 026802 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Novotny, L. & Van Hulst, N. Antennas for light. Nat. Photonics 5, 83–90 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Peng, X. G., Wickham, J. & Alivisatos, A. P. Kinetics of II–VI and III–V colloidal semiconductor nanocrystal growth: “Focusing” of size distributions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 5343–5344 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Reiss, P., Protière, M. & Li, L. Core/shell semiconductor nanocrystals. Small 5, 154–168 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Klimov, V. I. Nanocrystal Quantum Dots. 2nd edn (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mahler, B. et al. Towards non-blinking colloidal quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 7, 659–664 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Forsén, E. et al. Laser lithography on resist bi-layer for nanoelectromechanical systems prototyping. Microelectron. Eng. 73-74, 491–495 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yang, J. J., Hugonin, J. P. & Lalanne, P. Near-to-far field transformations for radiative and guided waves. ACS Photonics 3, 395–402 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hugonin, J. & Lalanne, P. Perfectly matched layers as nonlinear coordinate transforms: a generalized formalization. J. Optical Soc. Am. A 22, 1844–1849 (2005).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bai, Q. et al. Efficient and intuitive method for the analysis of light scattering by a resonant nanostructure. Opt. Express 21, 27371–27382 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    David, A., Benisty, H. & Weisbuch, C. Fast factorization rule and plane-wave expansion method for two-dimensional photonic crystals with arbitrary hole-shape. Phys. Rev. B 73, 075107 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vion, C. et al. Controlled modification of single colloidal CdSe/ZnS nanocrystal fluorescence through interactions with a gold surface. Opt. Express 18, 7440–7455 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chance, R. R., Prock, A. & Silbey, R. Comments on the classical theory of energy transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 62, 2245–2253 (1975).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Novotny, L. & Hecht, B. Principles of Nano-Optics. 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lukosz, W. Theory of optical-environment-dependent spontaneous-emission rates for emitters in thin layers. Phys. Rev. B 22, 3030–3038 (1980).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Canneson, D. et al. Enhancing the fluorescence of individual thick shell CdSe/CdS nanocrystals by coupling to gold structures. N. J. Phys. 14, 063035 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Naiki, H. et al. Single-photon emission behavior of isolated cdse/zns quantum dots interacting with the localized surface plasmon resonance of silver nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 115, 23299–23304 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    LeBlanc, S. J. et al. Enhancement of multiphoton emission from single CdSe quantum dots coupled to gold films. Nano Lett. 13, 1662–1669 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Park, Y. S. et al. Super-poissonian statistics of photon emission from single CdSe-CdS core-shell nanocrystals coupled to metal nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 117401 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nair, G. & Bawendi, M. G. Carrier multiplication yields of CdSe and CdTe nanocrystals by transient photoluminescence spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 76, 081304 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nair, G., Zhao, J. & Bawendi, M. G. Biexciton quantum yield of single semiconductor nanocrystals from photon statistics. Nano Lett. 11, 1136–1140 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ozbay, E. Plasmonics: merging photonics and electronics at nanoscale dimensions. Science 311, 189–193 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bigourdan, F. et al. Design of highly efficient metallo-dielectric patch antennas for single-photon emission. Opt. Express 22, 2337–2347 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Markel, V. A. & Sarychev, A. K. Propagation of surface plasmons in ordered and disordered chains of metal nanospheres. Phys. Rev. B 75, 085426 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kuttge, M. et al. Loss mechanisms of surface plasmon polaritons on gold probed by cathodoluminescence imaging spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 113110 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kambhampati, P. Multiexcitons in semiconductor nanocrystals: a platform for optoelectronics at high carrier concentration. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 1182–1190 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Fisher, B. et al. Multiexciton fluorescence from semiconductor nanocrystals. Chem. Phys. 318, 71–81 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dang, C. et al. Red, green and blue lasing enabled by single-exciton gain in colloidal quantum dot films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 335–339 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Malko, A. V. et al. From amplified spontaneous emission to microring lasing using nanocrystal quantum dot solids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1303–1305 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kumar, S. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Excitation of hybrid plasmonic waveguide modes by colloidal quantum dots. ACS Photonics 6, 1587–1593 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Oulton, R. F. et al. Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale. Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sidiropoulos, T. P. H. et al. Ultrafast plasmonic nanowire lasers near the surface plasmon frequency. Nat. Phys. 10, 870–876 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Willy Daney de Marcillac for the spectrometric measurements, Loic Becerra, Bruno Gallas, Stéphane Chenot, and Stéphan Suffit for precious advice and help with the vapour deposition and ellipsometry, and Jean-Jacques Greffet and François Marquier for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the regional funding DIM NanoK through the project PATCH and by the ANR DELIGHT.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.R.D., C.B., P.S. and A.M. conceived and developed the fabrication protocol, A.R.D. and J.U.E. performed the optical characterization, M.N. and B.D. synthesized the QDs, J.P.H. performed the simulations, A.R.D., A.M., C.S., L.C. and Z.W. investigated the optical characterization data, and A.R.D., A.M. and P.S. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnès Maître.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

41377_2020_269_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Information: Extreme multiexciton emission from deterministically assembled single-emitter subwavelength plasmonic patch antennas

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhawan, A.R., Belacel, C., Esparza-Villa, J.U. et al. Extreme multiexciton emission from deterministically assembled single-emitter subwavelength plasmonic patch antennas. Light Sci Appl 9, 33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0269-0

Download citation

Search

Quick links