Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Electrically controlled white laser emission through liquid crystal/polymer multiphases


White lasers are becoming increasingly relevant in various fields since they exhibit unprecedented properties in terms of beam brightness and intensity modulation. Here we introduce a white laser based on a polymer matrix encompassing liquid crystals and multiple organic chromophores in a multifunctional phase-separation system. The separation of the hydrophilic matrix and the hydrophobic liquid crystals leads to the formation of a complex optically active layer, featuring lasing emission tuneable from blue to red. White laser emission is found with an optical excitation threshold of approximately 12 mJ/cm2. Importantly, an external electric field can be used to control the device emission intensity. White lasers with low-voltage (≤10 V) controllable emission might pave the way for a new generation of broadband light sources for analytical, computational, and communication applications.


Controllable systems for generating intense, multicolour, and white light are introducing new paradigms in many applications, including spectroscopy1, optical sensing2, communication3, lighting4, and display technologies5. The high directionality, brightness, and capability to modulate the intensity of multicolour light sources are highly important in this respect, allowing for enhancement of the signal-to-noise ratio in spectroscopic systems, the sensitivity in detection devices, data transmission rates, and the colour rendering in lighting elements. This has motivated researchers to develop multicolour and white laser sources, which inherently feature the aforementioned properties. Lasers are routinely realized with emission at a well-defined, single wavelength by using various materials and cavity geometries. Multicolour and white lasers that encompass active media with broadband optical gain are generally much more challenging. For instance, a monolithic white laser has recently been realized by using multisegment heterostructure nanosheets made of ZnCdSSe alloys6.

In the framework of broadband laser devices, multicolour or white light-emitting systems that exploit organic compounds in their active layers are especially interesting since they can be easily tuned and embedded in portable and wearable platforms for diagnostics, communication, and anti-counterfeiting7,8,9,10,11,12. Spectral tunability and large stimulated emission cross-sections can be realized in organics either by chemical synthesis and functionalization or by blending various fluorescent molecules in dielectric and transparent polymer matrices11,12. Recent advances have allowed pulsed and quasi-continuous-wave coherent emission to be obtained at single frequencies under incoherent ultraviolet excitation by light-emitting diodes13,14, as well as pumping in the near-infrared via two-photon and multiphoton excitation15. Many cavity architectures have been explored for organic lasers in the visible and near-infrared spectral range, showing low excitation thresholds, narrow linewidths, and broad spectral tunability11,12. Demonstrated architectures include various disordered and random structures16 utilizing complex inhomogeneous materials such as nanofibres17,18, organic crystals19, biomaterials20, and bio-mimicking and bio-derived materials21,22. Different from conventional lasers where an external cavity determines the optical modes, in such systems, the conditions for lasing are affected by multiple scattering in amorphous materials16,23. Light is amplified along its random walk in disordered media that exhibit optical gain, leading to either intensity feedback random lasing or resonant feedback random lasing24,25. The former is characterized by a broad and smooth lasing spectrum, with light amplified mainly by diffusional processes. In contrast, in resonant feedback random lasing, relevant interference effects can occur, and emission typically features multiple narrow peaks. Random architectures can potentially lase in a broad spectral range by combining them with a disordered sample morphology, which provides multiple scattering, with organic materials featuring stimulated emission over large intervals of wavelength.

However, laser systems that emit white light and are based on organic active materials have only been reported in a very few pioneering works26,27,28,29. Such organic white lasers (oWLs) are mostly achieved by combining the output beams of individual lasers, each emitting at a single (blue, green, and red) colour. Unfortunately, the emission of such lasers cannot be modulated by external electrical or optical signals. In this respect, multiphase optical media, such as emulsions30, might provide desirable features when loading them with chromophores with varied optical gain bands, as well as with compounds responsive to external stimuli for emission modulation (spectrum, polarization, or intensity). In addition, such heterogeneous compositions, with associated spatial variations in the refractive index and optical gain, efficiently function to induce coherent light emission by random lasing.

Here we report multiphase devices supporting broadband and white laser emission. The active material is composed of a hydrophilic, solid polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) matrix, and the phase-separated hydrophobic liquid crystalline mixture E7 (Merck). The incorporation of liquid crystals (LCs) into optical media is very effective for controlling the polarization, wavelength, intensity, and scattering properties of organic lasers31,32. LCs show long-range orientational order, optical anisotropy, and fluid-like behaviour. Moreover, their molecular alignment can be easily changed by controlling the temperature and electric or magnetic fields33 and via proper molecular and surface interactions30. For multicolour light generation, a blue-emitting molecule is incorporated into PVA, whereas the LC droplets contain either a green- or a red-emitting component. The resulting multiphase disordered material undergoes random lasing at various colours, including white light at an excitation fluence of 12 mJ/cm2. The intensity of the oWL devices can be varied by applying an external direct current (DC) voltage in the range of 0–10 V without degrading the white light emission. Based on these results, notably, the electrically controllable intensity, multiphase oWLs constitute very promising components for diagnostic, lighting, and communication platforms.


Devices are prepared following the procedure schematized in Fig. S1. Emulsions are obtained by sonication of LC/chromophore mixtures and PVA dissolved in deionized water. The choice of PVA is advantageous for preventing flocculation of the LC droplets through steric stabilization30. The process involves three elementary optically active materials that can be combined in various forms: (i) PVA with blue-emitting 2,2’-([1,1’-biphenyl]-4.4’-diyldi-2,1-ethenediyl)bis-benzenesulfonic acid disodium salt (SB420), (ii) PVA with LC droplets containing green-emitting (3-(2-benzothiazolyl)-7-(diethylamino)-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one) (CM540), and (iii) PVA with LC droplets containing red-emitting 4-(dicyanomethylene)-2-methyl-6-(4-dimethylaminostyryl)-4H-pyran (DCM), with emission peaks at 438, 519, and 590 nm, respectively (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1: Optical properties and morphology of multiphase active systems.

a Absorption (dashed lines) and photoluminescence (continuous lines) spectra of the three elementary light-emitting materials. Blue lines: PVA/SB420; green lines: PVA+LC/CM540; red lines: PVA+LC/DCM. b Sample photograph: SB420 and LC droplets are embedded in the PVA matrix. CM540 and DCM molecules are incorporated into the LC droplets. c, d Corresponding optical bright field micrograph (c) and optical micrograph acquired with crossed polarizers (d). CM540- and DCM-containing droplets appear green and red, respectively. e Graphical representation of a cross-section of a region surrounding a single LC droplet in the multiphase system. SB420 molecules are uniformly distributed in the PVA matrix, and the LC molecules form phase-separated droplets surrounded by PVA

The laser device embedding the multiphase active system is realized in a layer-by-layer fashion by spin-casting a film of PVA/SB420 on top of a quartz substrate, followed by films of PVA/LC/CM540 and PVA/LC/DCM (details in “Materials and methods”). This approach minimizes coalescence and mixing of the phase-separated LC/dye droplets, while diffusion of SB420 in PVA provides a uniformly distributed blue component around the green and red droplets. Other tested methods, such as directly adding LC/CM540 and LC/DCM mixtures to the PVA/SB420 solution followed by single layer casting, lead instead to coalescence of CM540- and DCM-incorporating droplets, i.e., to poor control of the ultimately achieved composition.

A photograph of the resulting sample is displayed in Fig. 1b. The average distance between adjacent droplets in PVA is approximately 170 μm, and the droplet size ranges between 10 and 300 μm (average size 100 μm, Fig. S2), as highlighted by optical microscopy (Fig. 1c). In Fig. 1c, one notes that some of the droplets are blurred, being positioned out of the focal plane as a consequence of the three-dimensional (3D) architecture of the sample. The presence of LC ordering in the droplets is confirmed by the polarized optical microscopic (POM) image, showing bright green and red droplets immersed in a dark background (Fig. 1d). Here incident polarized light can only be detected through the analyser with an axis at 90° with respect to that of the polarizer in the presence of an optically anisotropic medium, such as a birefringent sample, which causes rotation of the polarization of the incident light and a consequent non-zero transmission through the analyser. POM analysis allows us to clearly identify the phase separation between the birefringent LC domains and the isotropic polymer matrix, appearing as a dark uniform background. Therefore, two features can be inferred from Fig. 1d, namely, (i) the presence of LC in the droplets and (ii) their planar alignment as a characteristic of the nematic order, as sketched in Fig. 1e. Different from previous evidence of cholesteric order of LCs inside individual microdroplets, with an onion-like arrangement forming a well-ordered photonic structure30, here the LC molecules lie in a planar configuration. An analogous, conformal alignment is expected for the CM540 and DCM dopants34,35,36.

The emission spectral features and the resulting colour of the multiphase system can be tailored by simply varying the combination of the elementary optically active materials. Figures 2 and S3 summarize the emission properties of a series of samples with individual blue, green, and red colours and their binary and ternary combinations. Fluorescence confocal microscopy supports the occurrence of phase separation between PVA and the LC droplets (Figs. 2a–e and S3a, b) and allows the dyes incorporated in each region to be easily identified. For instance, samples functionalized with SB420 appear as uniform blue-emitting layers (Fig. 2a), whereas those with LC/CM540 and LC/DCM in pristine PVA display green- and red-fluorescent droplets in a dark matrix (Figs. 2e and S3a). These images allow diffusion of CM540 and DCM into PVA, as well as potential mixing with SB420, to be ruled out in the multicomponent system (Fig. 2c). Figures 2f–j and S3c, d show the emission spectra of these materials for various excitation conditions. Clear emission line narrowing is found upon increasing the excitation fluence, with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) decreasing from 62 to 9 nm for SB420 and from 48 and 74 nm to 17 and 24 nm for LC/CM540 and LC/DCM, respectively (Figs. 2f, j, S3c, and S4). Interestingly, the same behaviour is found for each spectral band of the multicomponent systems. Furthermore, all the samples exhibit a well-defined threshold in their light-in light-out (LL) plots, in the range of 8–12 mJ/cm2 (Figs. 2k, o and S3e).

Fig. 2: Confocal fluorescence and lasing characteristics of oWLs.

ae Confocal fluorescence micrographs of samples containing different combinations of blue-, green-, and red-emitting components: a PVA with SB420, b PVA with SB420 and LC/CM540, c PVA with SB420, LC/CM540, and LC/DCM, d PVA with LC/CM540 and LC/DCM, and e PVA with LC/DCM. fj Corresponding lasing spectra obtained with different excitation fluences of the samples shown in (ae), respectively. Excitation fluence values (in mJ/cm2) are shown in each panel and correspond to the shown spectra (from bottom to top). ko Corresponding plots of the emitted intensity vs. the excitation fluence. The dashed and continuous lines are linear fits to the data in the range of excitation below and above the threshold, respectively. Measured threshold values are given at the top of each plot

The oWL output beam, imaged on a screen, is shown in Fig. 3a. The white emission is bright and directional, with a 6.4° overall measured divergence of the output laser beam (Fig. S5). Overall, the occurrence of white lasing is supported by the decrease in the linewidth (Fig. S6), by the threshold-like behaviour of the LL characteristics, and by the well-defined and directional output beam above the excitation threshold. The oWL device shows an operational half-life (τ1/2, defined as the number of excitation pulses at which the emission intensity drops to half of its initial value) of approximately 5 × 104 excitation pulses under continuous operation in ambient conditions (Fig. S7), in line with other classes of organic lasers37,38,39. The operational lifetime of these oWLs can be further improved by operating them in vacuum conditions (Fig. S7) and, in perspective, by device encapsulation14,37,40. Figure 3b summarizes the CIE chromaticity coordinates of the devices analysed in Figs. 2 and S3. The CIE coordinates are calculated for the emission spectra at an excitation fluence of 15 mJ/cm2, above the threshold for lasing, and highlight the possibility of precisely calibrating the emission colour and obtaining balanced white light (CIE coordinates of 0.31, 0.32, and 0.37). The white emission can also be finely tuned from cool to warm tones by slightly varying the excitation intensity (Fig. S8). Figure 3c compares the photoluminescence (PL) decay for the three active components in the oWLs with that measured for the individual chromophores. The PL decays exponentially for all the systems, with the lifetimes reported in Table S1. An increase in the fluorescence lifetime of DCM is observed upon embedment in the oWL, together with a slight decrease in the CM540 fluorescence lifetime and a stable SB420 fluorescence lifetime of approximately 0.7–0.8 ns.

Fig. 3: Properties of oWLs devices.

a Photograph of the oWL device under optical excitation, showing the white light-emitted beam. b CIE chromaticity coordinates above the lasing threshold for devices with various combinations of the blue-, green-, and red-emitting components: SB420: PVA with SB420; RB: PVA with SB420 and LC/DCM; DCM: PVA with LC/DCM; GR: PVA with LC/CM540 and LC/DCM; CM540: PVA with LC/CM540; GB: PVA with SB420 and LC/CM540; oWL: PVA with SB420, LC/CM540, and LC/DCM. c PL intensity temporal profiles for the three chromophores measured in an oWL sample (red symbols) and in samples with the individual dyes (blue symbols). The vertical axis is in a logarithmic scale. Dashed and continuous lines are exponential fits to the data of oWLs and individual dyes, respectively

Importantly, the emission of the oWLs can be controlled by an external DC field. This property directly comes from the embedded LC molecules, whose director (i.e., direction of the long-range average orientational order of the LC domains) aligns with the applied electric field. Figure 4a shows a picture of an oWL device with suitable electrical contacts, namely, the active material is sandwiched between two conductive and transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) layers deposited on quartz substrates. In this way, the oWL emission intensity is directed, with a variation up to approximately 80% of the maximum value for applied voltages up to 10 V (Fig. 4b). This allows the oWL output to be easily controlled by switching on and off the applied field (inset of Fig. 4b). In contrast, the spectral emission features of the oWLs are not affected by the electric field, with the CIE coordinates almost unchanged upon repeatedly switching on and off the electric field (Fig. S9). Similarly, the spatial profile and divergence of the output beam are stable upon switching on the electric field, with measured variations <3% (Fig. S10).

Fig. 4: Control of the device emission by external electric field.

a Photograph of an oWL device whose emission intensity is controlled by an external applied voltage. b oWL emission intensity vs. applied DC voltage. The device is pumped at an excitation fluence of 11.9 mJ/cm2. Inset: lasing intensity for consecutive voltage cycles of 0–5 V applied to the device


Various mechanisms might affect this white lasing, related to the complex and inhomogeneous oWL structure. The above-threshold spectral linewidth (9–24 nm) and the lack of sharp emission peaks are indicative of intensity feedback random lasing due to diffusive amplification of light, as found in various polymers doped with LCs and chromophores32,41,42,43. Indeed, the contrast between the ordinary (no = 1.53) and extraordinary (ne = 1.75) refractive indices of the LC domains32 and the PVA matrix (nPVA = 1.48–1.50 in the visible spectral range44) leads to light scattering through the complex material. The characteristic transport length, lT, for light propagating in the disordered optical medium with LC droplets is expected to be of the same order of magnitude as the droplet average distance, i.e., 102 µm, much smaller than the excitation slab length (5 mm, see “Materials and methods”), thus priming a regime of multiple scattering.

Moreover, the slab geometry favours in-plane waveguiding and diffusion of light. Waveguiding enhances the probability of generating stimulated emission, and it might lead to optical interplay of components emitting at different colours. In fact, along the slab, photons emitted by components with emission at higher energies can be absorbed by those with emission at lower energies. This effect would enhance the population inversion of low-energy chromophores, decreasing their threshold for lasing and concomitantly increasing the threshold for high-energy emitters. Indeed, while the single dyes have different excitation thresholds in the range of 0.4–9.1 mJ/cm2, the thresholds values for the individual components in the oWL spectra are quite close (7–12 mJ/cm2, Fig. S6), which is indicative of the interaction triggered by re-absorption and stimulated emission events. Finally, nonradiative energy transfer processes can be sustained at the interface between PVA/SB420 and the LC/dye droplets. Overall, the PL decay data are consistent with the contribution to the decrease of the blue component mainly coming from the bulk PVA/SB420 regions (see Fig. 2c). Indeed, these regions account for by far the largest fraction of SB420 excited within the pumped volume (excitation spot diameter approximately equal to a few hundreds of μm), while nonradiative energy transfer involving SB420 molecules at the interface with droplets is expected to occur to a minor extent within the excitation spot.

Finally, to rationalize the behaviour of the oWLs controlled by an external DC field, one has to consider that the dipole moments of LCs featuring positive dielectric anisotropy, such as the one used here, E7, are oriented parallel to the applied electric field. At zero voltage bias, the orientation of LC molecules is mainly driven by the polarization of the pumping laser, as schematized in Fig. 5, thus enhancing the absorption of the dyes embedded in the LC, which are expected to be aligned parallel to their surrounding LC molecules34,35,36. In contrast, upon activating the voltage bias between the device electrodes, the LC molecules and incorporated chromophores align along the new field direction, namely, perpendicular to the polarization of the excitation light. This effectively decreases the number of absorbed excitation photons and, consequently, the intensity of the green and red components of the oWL emission. Furthermore, a transition from a 3D, isotropic diffusive regime to a two-dimensional, anisotropic multiple scattering regime for light within the slab waveguides can occur upon switching on an external electric field, which would shift the refractive index seen by light to a higher extraordinary value (n = 1.75)32. Such variation of the paths accessible to photons might especially affect the blue component of the oWL emission, which would be sensitive to the multiple scattering induced by the LC droplets and to absorption by the dyes embedded in the LC. Hence, the intensity of the blue component would also be decreased, thus balancing the overall spectral emission of the oWL. We anticipate that LCs with negative dielectric anisotropy, which align perpendicular to external fields, can instead be exploited to enhance the intensity of the oWL upon applying a voltage bias45. Overall, the multiphase optical media developed here can act as very versatile lasing systems whose stimuli-responsive gain material can provide not only spectral tunability and white light emission but also tight emission control using low-voltage DC signals.

Fig. 5

Schematic graphical representation of the effect of a DC electric field on the alignment of LC molecules

In conclusion, organic laser devices with white light emission based on multiphase optical media containing liquid crystalline emulsions are introduced. The combination of various chromophores in a polymer matrix and/or in LC droplets allows single-colour and multicolour laser emission to be achieved in the visible range through compositional control, with an excitation threshold of approximately 12 mJ/cm2. Moreover, modulation of the lasing intensity is implemented by applying a low voltage to the device, directing LC and chromophore alignment. These collective results suggest the utility of multiphase materials and lasers made with them in a variety of communication platforms, optical sensors, and diagnostic devices, with the potential for establishing innovative design rules for oWLs in large areas.

Materials and methods

Device realization

The steps of device realization are shown in Fig. S1. PVA powder (Mw = 85–124 kDa, Sigma-Aldrich) is dissolved in deionized water at a concentration of 7.5% weight/weight (w/w). Afterwards, 0.4 mg of SB420 (Exciton Inc.) is dissolved in 1 mL of PVA water solution by mechanical mixing for 1 min. CM540 and DCM (Exciton Inc.) are separately dissolved in a LC (E7, Merck) by utilizing 1.5 mg of each dye and 0.3 mL of E7. PVA/LC emulsions are obtained by mixing 20 µL of each LC/dye mixture and 1 mL of PVA water solution46 and subjecting the mixture to an ultrasonic water bath for tbath = 10 min at 60 °C. The use of the bath allows the distribution of the size of the droplets of the emulsions to be controlled to some extent since droplets with smaller average sizes are obtained by increasing the duration of ultrasonication46. The tbath value is selected to obtain an average droplet size matching the optical gain length of the used dyes, which is up to a few hundreds of μm47. This allows effective light amplification to be achieved by the dyes in the droplets. Multilayers of the so-prepared emulsions are realized on quartz substrates (1 × 1 cm2) by consecutively spin-casting the mixtures composed of PVA/SB420, PVA/LC/CM540, and PVA/LC/DCM. For the deposition of each layer, the following steps are applied: (i) casting of 0.1 mL of each mixture, (ii) realization of a film by spin-coating at 750 rpm for 1 min, and (iii) drying for 4 min under nitrogen flow.

For the fabrication of electrical contacts, 50 µL of PVA with SB420, LC/CM540, and LC/DCM is placed on a quartz substrate (2 × 2 cm2) coated with ITO, and a second piece of ITO-covered quartz is placed on top of the active multiphase layer. The sample is stored in ambient conditions for 1 day to let the water evaporate and the cell stabilize. The applied voltage is delivered by a DC power supply (DF1750SL3A, NDN) through the ITO electrodes.

Optical characterization

Optical microscopy is carried out using an upright microscope (ME600 Nikon) equipped with cross polarizers. Confocal microscopy is performed using an inverted microscope equipped with a confocal laser scanning head (FV1000, Olympus), exciting samples with a laser emitting at 405 nm through a ×10 objective with a 0.4 numerical aperture. Fluorescence is collected by the same objective and measured by three photomultipliers, which simultaneously detect the blue, green, and red spectral components of the emitted light. Absorption spectra are measured by means of a Jasco V-550 system, while fluorescence spectra are measured by a spectrofluorometer (Cary Eclipse, Varian). To measure the PL temporal evolution, samples are excited by the second harmonic of a pulsed laser (Legend, Coherent, emission wavelength of 400 nm, pulse duration of 90 fs, and repetition rate of 1 kHz), and the emission is analysed by a streak camera (C10910, Hamamatsu) equipped with a spectrometer (Acton SpectraPro® SP-2300, Princeton Instruments).

The lasing properties are studied by exciting samples at 405 nm by the third harmonic of a ns pulsed Nd:YAG laser (Surelite II, Continuum) coupled to a parametric oscillator (mod. Horizon I, Continuum). The excitation beam is shaped into a stripe with a size of 0.5 × 5 mm2 (height × width), and the light emitted from the sample edge is collected by an optical fibre and analysed with an Ocean Optics spectrometer equipped with a diode array detector. The stability of the oWL is studied by continuously pumping the device by the third harmonic of a pulsed Nd:YAG laser (emission wavelength of 355 nm, pulse width of approximately 10 ns, and repetition rate of 10 Hz) and by measuring the emission in real time using a monochromator (iHR320, Jobin Yvon) equipped with a charge coupled device detector (Symphony, Jobin Yvon). To this aim, the oWL device is placed in a chamber, allowing for measurement of the operational lifetime both in air and vacuum (4 × 10−2 mbar). The divergence of the output beam of the white lasers is measured based on the spatial intensity profiles at various distances, D, from the light source, as schematized in Fig. S5a. A mask with a slit aperture (width of 1 mm and height of 10 mm) is positioned in front of the light sources at various distances D. The measurement of the intensity of the light transmitted through this mask as a function of the position along the axis perpendicular to the sample plane (x) allows the spatial intensity profile of the output beam and the spot size (calculated as the FWHM of the beam profile) to be determined.


  1. 1.

    Rushworth, C. M. et al. On-chip cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy using a white light-emitting diode and polymer mirrors. Lab Chip 15, 711–717 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kotani, A. et al. EndoV/DNA ligase mutation scanning assay using microchip capillary electrophoresis and dual-color laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal. Methods 4, 58–64 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cossu, G. et al. 3.4 Gbit/s visible optical wireless transmission based on RGB LED. Opt. Express 20, B501–B506 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wierer, J. J. Jr., Tsao, J. Y. & Sizov, D. S. Comparison between blue lasers and light-emitting diodes for future solid-state lighting. Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 963–993 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Li, X. M. et al. CsPbX3 quantum dots for lighting and displays: room-temperature synthesis, photoluminescence superiorities, underlying origins and white light-emitting diodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 2435–2445 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fan, F. et al. A monolithic white laser. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 796–803 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schneider, D. et al. An ultraviolet organic thin‐film solid‐state laser for biomarker applications. Adv. Mater. 17, 31–34 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Clark, J. & Lanzani, G. Organic photonics for communications. Nat. Photonics 4, 438–446 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Morello, G. et al. Multifunctional polymer nanofibers: UV emission, optical gain, anisotropic wetting, and high hydrophobicity for next flexible excitation sources. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 21907–21912 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Karl, M. et al. Flexible and ultra-lightweight polymer membrane lasers. Nat. Commun. 9, 1525 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Samuel, I. D. W. & Turnbull, G. A. Organic semiconductor lasers. Chem. Rev. 107, 1272–1295 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kuehne, A. J. C. & Gather, M. C. Organic lasers: recent developments on materials, device geometries, and fabrication techniques. Chem. Rev. 116, 12823–12864 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Herrnsdorf, J. et al. Micro-LED pumped polymer laser: a discussion of future pump sources for organic lasers. Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 1065–1078 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sandanayaka, A. S. D. et al. Toward continuous-wave operation of organic semiconductor lasers. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602570 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tsiminis, G. et al. A two-photon pumped polyfluorene laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 253304 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wiersma, D. S. The physics and applications of random lasers. Nat. Phys. 4, 359–367 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Montinaro, M. et al. Diverse regimes of mode intensity correlation in nanofiber random lasers through nanoparticle doping. ACS Photonics 5, 1026–1033 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang, R. et al. Plasmon-enhanced random lasing in bio-compatible networks of cellulose nanofibers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 011103 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Camposeo, A. et al. Random lasing in an organic light-emitting crystal and its interplay with vertical cavity feedback. Laser Photonics Rev. 8, 785–791 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sznitko, L. et al. J. Surface roughness induced random lasing in bio-polymeric dye doped film. Chem. Phys. Lett. 576, 31–34 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Polson, R. C. & Vardeny, Z. V. Random lasing in human tissues. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1289–1291 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Moffa, M. et al. Biomineral amorphous lasers through light‐scattering surfaces assembled by electrospun fiber templates. Laser Photonics Rev. 12, 1700224 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wiersma, D. S. Disordered photonics. Nat. Photonics 7, 188–196 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wiersma, D. S. & Lagendijk, A. Light diffusion with gain and random lasers. Phys. Rev. E 54, 4256–4265 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cao, H. et al. Random laser action in semiconductor powder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2278–2281 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yamashita, K. et al. Simple fabrication technique of distributed-feedback polymer laser by direct photonanoimprint lithography. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 243306 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Foucher, C. et al. RGB and white-emitting organic lasers on flexible glass. Opt. Express 24, 2273–2280 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chang, S. W. et al. A white random laser. Sci. Rep. 8, 2720 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhao, J. Y. et al. Full-color laser displays based on organic printed microlaser arrays. Nat. Commun. 10, 870 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Petriashvili, G. et al. Mixed emulsion of liquid crystal microresonators: towards white laser systems. Soft Matter 13, 6227–6233 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jakubiak, R. et al. Dynamic lasing from all-organic two-dimensional photonic crystals. Adv. Mater. 17, 2807–2811 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gottardo, S. et al. Quasi-two-dimensional diffusive random laser action. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 263901 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yeh, P. & Gu, C. Optics of Liquid Crystal Displays 2nd edn (Wiley, New York, 2009).

  34. 34.

    Iwanaga, H. Development of highly soluble anthraquinone dichroic dyes and their application to three-layer guest-host liquid crystal displays. Materials 2, 1636–1661 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sims, M. T. Dyes as guests in ordered systems: current understanding and future directions. Liq. Cryst. 43, 2363–2374 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sims, M. T. et al. Principal molecular axis and transition dipole moment orientations in liquid crystal systems: an assessment based on studies of guest anthraquinone dyes in a nematic host. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 813–827 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Richardson, S. et al. Improved operational lifetime of semiconducting polymer lasers by encapsulation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 261104 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Morales-Vidal, M. et al. Carbon-bridged oligo(p-phenylenevinylene)s for photostable and broadly tunable, solution-processable thin film organic lasers. Nat. Commun. 6, 8458 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Morales-Vidal, M. et al. Carbon-bridged p-phenylenevinylene polymer for high-performance solution-processed distributed feedback lasers. Adv. Optical Mater. 6, 1800069 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Persano, L. et al. Rapid prototyping encapsulation for polymer light-emitting lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 123305 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hands, P. J. W. et al. Band-edge and random lasing in paintable liquid crystal emulsions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 141102 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nagai, Y., Fujimura, R. & Kajikawa, K. Coherent random laser fluid of nematic liquid crystal emulsions. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 01AE05 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lisinetskii, V. et al. Photochromic composite for random lasing based on porous polypropylene infiltrated with azobenzene-containing liquid crystalline mixture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 26595–26602 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bodurov, I. et al. Modified design of a laser refractometer. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16, 31–33 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Adamow, A. et al. The ultra-photostable and electrically modulated stimulated emission in perylene-based dye doped liquid crystal. Sci. Rep. 9, 2143 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Adamow, A., Sznitko, L. & Mysliwiec, J. The influence of homogenization process on lasing performance in polymer-nematic liquid crystal emulsions. Optical Mater. 69, 81–86 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nedumpara, R. J. et al. Light amplification in dye doped polymer films. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 9, 174–179 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Grant Agreement no. 682157, “xPRINT”). D.P. acknowledges the support from the project PRA_2018_34 (“ANISE”) from the University of Pisa and from the project PRIN 2017PHRM8X (“3D-Phys”) from the Italian Minister of University and Research. A.S. acknowledges the support from the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP). J.M. acknowledges the support of The National Science Center, Poland (2018/31/B/ST8/02832) and of the Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.

Author information




A.C., D.P., L.P. and J.M. supervised the work. A.A. prepared the devices and performed optical microscopy and confocal characterization of the samples. A.A., A.S. and L.S. performed optical characterization of the devices and analysed the data. All authors contributed to the design of the experiments, discussion of the results, and preparation and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Luana Persano or Andrea Camposeo or Jaroslaw Mysliwiec.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adamow, A., Szukalski, A., Sznitko, L. et al. Electrically controlled white laser emission through liquid crystal/polymer multiphases. Light Sci Appl 9, 19 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links