Article | Open | Published:

Doped, conductive SiO2 nanoparticles for large microwave absorption

Light: Science & Applicationsvolume 7, Article number: 87 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Although many materials have been studied for the purpose of microwave absorption, SiO2 has never been reported as a good candidate. In this study, we present for the first time that doped, microwave conductive SiO2 nanoparticles can possess an excellent microwave absorbing performance. A large microwave reflection loss (RL) of −55.09 dB can be obtained. The large microwave absorption originates mainly from electrical relaxation rather than the magnetic relaxation of the incoming microwave field. The electrical relaxation is attributed to a large electrical conductivity that is enabled by the incorporation of heterogeneous (N, C and Cl) atoms. The removal of the magnetic susceptibility only results in a negligible influence of the microwave absorption. In contrast, the removal of the heterogeneous atoms leads to a large decrease in the electrical conductivity and microwave absorption performance. Meanwhile, the microwave absorption characteristics can be largely adjusted with a change of the thickness, which provides large flexibility for various microwave absorption applications.

Introduction

The utility of microwave absorption is significant in many applications, such as wireless communications and anti-radar detection of aircraft1,2,3. For example, many materials have been developed to reduce the radar signature of aircraft, ships and tanks in military fields. Material examples include carboneous materials such as graphite4, graphene5, carbon nanotubes (CNTs)6 and carbon fibers7, conducting polymers8, oxides such as Fe2O39, Fe3O410, MnO211, ZnO12, BaFe12O1913, BaTiO313, SrFe12O1914, and carbides such as SiC15 and SiCN16. Traditional mechanisms that are commonly believed to be responsible include dipole rotation and magnetic domain resonance due to the dielectric and magnetic losses inside the materials. For example, the microwave absorption of Ni-coated CNT/epoxy composites results from dielectric and magnetic losses, with the use of Ag nanowires shown to enhance the performance due to dielectric loss3. Conducting polymers such as polypyrrole, polyaniline and poly(3-octylthiophene) have been demonstrated to show good microwave absorption8. Suitable inclusion of Fe2O3 nanoparticles in polyaniline enhanced the microwave absorption properties due to simultaneous adjustment of dielectric loss and magnetic loss9. Hollow urchin-like MnO2 nanostructures with tetragonal nanorod clusters showed better performance due to proper electromagnetic impedance matching11. BaTiO3/polyaniline and BaFe12O19/polyaniline composites showed good compatible dielectric and magnetic properties for broadband microwave absorbing properties13. Recently, microwave absorption has been reported to be enhanced by defective or disorder structures such as oxygen vacancies, low crystallinity and use of a core/shell structure1,2,17,18,19. The dielectric properties of TiO21,2,17,18, ZnO2 and BaTiO319 nanoparticles can be modified through the perturbation of their crystalline structure by hydrogenation treatment to enhance their microwave absorption performance. Gao and colleagues20 have also found that the microwave dielectric properties of TiO2 nanoparticles can be largely altered by introducing partial crystalline phases in such TiO2 nanoparticles. Although these findings have provided a large pool of materials for microwave absorption applications, each material may have some advantages and disadvantages; therefore, it is highly desirable to discover new materials for microwave absorption. On the other hand, microwave absorption is also very useful for sample preparation with microwave irradiation in that rapid synthesis is enabled when compared to use of a traditional heating treatment21,22.

Up to now, pure SiO2 has not yet been reported to show a good microwave absorption performance, although an enhanced microwave performance for the composites of SiO2/carbon23, SiO2/carbonyl iron24 and SiO2/iron25 was obtained due to the combination of a proper electromagnetic impedance match23,24,25. This is understandable because in pure SiO2 there is no good source for traditional microwave absorption mechanisms including dipole rotation and magnetic domain resonance due to dielectric and magnetic losses. The lack of origin for the creation of dipoles in pure SiO2 nanoparticles is attributed to its symmetric structure where the dipoles are canceled in each tetrahedral unit of the SiO2 lattice. Meanwhile, it is also unlikely that there will be magnetic domains to echo with the microwave electromagnetic field due to the lack of charge spin centers in pure SiO2. Therefore, it is reasonable that pure SiO2 will not be able to possess good mechanisms for efficient microwave absorption. To enable effective microwave absorption, we intentionally create dipoles in SiO2 nanoparticles by introducing heterogeneous atoms such as C, N and Cl elements on the O sites inside the SiO4 tetrahedra or simply linked onto the surface of the SiO2 nanoparticles. Rotations of these induced dipoles can, therefore, echo with the incident microwave field to possess microwave absorption. Effective electrical loss can be achieved with such heterogeneous atoms by having higher electrical conductivity. Here, we report that the doped, microwave conductive SiO2 nanoparticles can show excellent microwave absorption performance. In contrast, only poor microwave absorption performance is observed for the SiO2 nanoparticles without the incorporation of the heterogeneous atoms, which lack dipole rotations and good electrical conductivity.

Materials and methods

Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), N,N’-dimethylformamide (DMF) and hydrazine monohydrochloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Typically, TEOS (2.2 mL) was slowly added to DMF (20.0 mL) under ambient conditions by vigorously stirring, producing a completely transparent solution. A desired amount of hydrazine monohydrochloride (2.74 g) was added and stirred for 5–10 min, which was then transferred into a Teflon-lined, stainless autoclave at a different temperature of 160 °C for 12 h, producing a light-yellow slurry, which was washed with anhydrous ethanol and dried at 100 °C. A light-yellow product was collected. For comparison, pure white SiO2 nanoparticles were also prepared followed by calcination of the light-yellow sample at 600 °C in air for 2 h.

The crystal structure was examined using a Rigaku Miniflex X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with a Cu Kα (λ = 0.15418 nm) radiation source. The morphology and crystallinity were probed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) on an FEI Tecnai F20 STEM under an electron accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The surface chemical properties were studied with a Kratos Axis 165 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) equipped with an Al/Mg dual-anode X-ray source. All the XPS spectra were calibrated with the C 1s peak from the carbon tape to 284.6 eV. The energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum was taken using a Tescan Vega 3 LMU scanning electron microscope equipped with a Bruker Quantax 6|10 EDX system. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected using a Thermo-Nicolet iS10 FT-IR spectrometer equipped with an attenuated total reflectance unit. The complex permittivity and permeability were measured in the frequency range of 1.0–18.0 GHz using an HP8722ES network analyzer with ring-shape samples containing 60 wt% SiO2 nanoparticles dispersed in paraffin wax. The ring had a thickness of 2.0 mm, an inner diameter of 3.0 mm and an outer diameter of 7.0 mm.

Results and discussion

The XRD pattern for the doped SiO2 nanoparticles matched well with the standard card of SiO2 (PDF#00-038-0360), as shown in Fig. 1b. The broadness of the broad peak at approximately 26.2° indicated that the nanoparticle size was small. The weak intensity suggested a poor crystallinity. From the TEM image in Fig. 1c, clearly, the nanoparticles were 4–8 nm in diameter (Fig. 1d). The HRTEM image in Fig. 1e exhibited clear lattice fringes with a plane distance of 0.245 nm corresponding to the (200) plane of monoclinic Moganite SiO2. Meanwhile, some amorphous regions were also observed between the crystalline domains, suggesting the likely existence of an amorphous phase (as pointed out by the dashed lines). The small size and amorphous phase matched well with the broad diffraction peak from the XRD pattern. This coexistence of amorphous and crystalline domains in the doped SiO2 nanoparticles was similar to that reported for TiO2 nanoparticles showing enhanced microwave absorption;1,2,20 this is because the amorphous phase may create some interfacial dipole rotations along the interface with the crystalline phase and induce active microwave absorption1,2,20. The existence of Si, O, C, N and Cl elements were confirmed using results from XPS and EDX, as shown in Figure S1-S7. The surface of the doped SiO2 nanoparticles was likely linked with the –NH2 groups from the hydrazine hydrochloride and some adsorbed water and HCl molecules (Figure S8). The Si 2p spectrum (Figure S2) showed one peak with a binding energy centered approximately 103.2 eV, corresponding to the Si 2p3/2 in the SiO226,27. In the O 1s XPS spectrum shown in Figure S3, one peak was found to be centered approximately 532.6 eV, consistent with the binding energy of the O 1s signal from SiO228,29. The C 1s XPS spectrum (Figure S4) showed one minor peak centered approximately 284.6 eV, and one major peak approximately 286.4 eV. The former was likely from the adsorbed carbon during the XPS measurement, with the latter likely from the alkyl groups from the TEOS on the surface of the SiO2 nanoparticles30,31. The N 1s spectrum in Figure S5 showed two peaks with a major contribution approximately 399.9 eV and a minor shoulder approximately 401.9 eV, likely from the N2H4 moiety and the conjugated NH2 moiety attached to the HCl group from the hydrazine hydrochloride on the surface of the SiO2 nanoparticles, respectively32,33. The Cl 2p XPS spectrum (Figure S6) displayed one higher peak approximately 197.6 eV and one lower peak near 199.3 eV, likely from the HCl coupled to the N2H4 moiety on the surface and the HCl coupled to the SiO2 surface, respectively34.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Physical properties of SiO2 nanoparticles. a XRD pattern, b, c TEM and d HRTEM images of SiO2 nanoparticles. The panel (a) also shows the standard (PDF#00-038-0360). The yellow dashed lines in (d) point out the amorphous phases

The variations of the microwave reflection loss (RL) with frequency (f) and thickness (d) were clearly displayed in a three-dimensional (3D) plot and two-dimensional (2D) contour, as shown in Fig. 2a, b. The 2D contour plot showed the projection of the 3D graph for the change of RL (indicated by the color ruler) on the frequency f and thickness d plane. The different colors indicated where (f and d) and which level of RL was achieved. Some representative RL curves were shown in Fig. 2c for varying d from 1.0 to 20.0 mm. The maximum microwave absorption frequency (fmax) was tunable with d. As d increased, fpeak shifted from higher frequency to lower frequency, as clearly seen in Fig. 2d. The relationship between fpeak and d was fitted very well with the formula f/GHz = 39.0/(d/mm)1.17 or c/4fpeakε’0.5 = λ/4ε’0.5, where c was the speed of light. Apparently, fpeak decreased reversibly with d. As d became bigger, fpeak decreased. The change in RLpeak with d (Fig. 2e) could be divided into two stages: a quick increase from −18.45 to −55.09 dB when d was changed from 2.0 to 4.2 mm, and a decay from −55.09 to −9.97 dB as d grew from 4.2 to 20.0 mm. The largest RLmax value (−55.09 dB) was observed when d was 4.2 mm. The change in Δf10 with d was shown in Fig. 2f and fitted very well with Δf10 /GHz = 12.4/(d/mm)0.68 – 1.65. As d became bigger, Δf10 almost decreased monotonically. This indicated that a thicker coating actually shielded a narrower region of microwave reflection frequency. It should be noted that the application of a thicker coating is very useful for the protection of important stationary objects on the ground from radar detection where a thin coating may not be able to shield such objects at a specific frequency, which is very important but frequently overlooked.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Microwave absorption characteristics of SiO2 nanoparticles. a The 3D plot and b 2D contour of the RL curves with d and f, c the RL curves, b the relationship for the d fpeak, c, e RLpeak and d, f Δf10 with d of the SiO2 nanoparticles in the frequency range of 1.0–18.0 GHz

The microwave absorption properties are dependent on the dielectric and magnetic properties:

$${\mathrm{RL}}\left( {{\mathrm{dB}}} \right) = 20log \left| {\left( {Z_{{\mathrm{in}}}- Z_{\mathrm{0}}} \right){\mathrm{/}}\left( {Z_{{\mathrm{in}}} + Z_{\mathrm{0}}} \right)} \right|$$
(1)
$${Z}_{{\mathrm{in}}} = Z_{\mathrm{0}}(\mu_{\mathrm{r}}/\varepsilon _{\mathrm{r}})^{1/2}{\mathrm{tanh}}\left[ {j(2\pi fd/c)(\varepsilon _{\mathrm{r}}\mu _{\mathrm{r}})^{{1/2}}} \right]$$
(2)

where RL(dB) is the reflection loss in dB, Zin is the input impedance of the absorber, Z0 is the impedance of free space, μr is the relative complex permeability, εr is the relative complex permittivity, f is the frequency of the electromagnetic wave, d is the thickness of the absorber and c is the velocity of light18. As shown in Fig. 3a, when f increased from 1.0 to 18.0 GHz, ε’ gradually decreased from 9.89 to 5.35, ε” decreased slowly from 7.63 to 2.06 and tgδε fell slowly from 0.77 to 0.39. Figure 3b showed that μ’ decreased from 1.05 to 0.99, μ” dropped from 0.06 to 0.03 and tgδμ changed from 0.06 to 0.03 when f increased from 1.0 to 18.0 GHz. These results suggested that the doped SiO2 nanoparticles had a smaller stored electrical and magnetic energy as the frequency of the incident electromagnetic field increased, indicating that some of the echoes of the electric field or dipoles to the oscillating field lagged behind and seemed consumed as the frequency increased.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The dielectric and magnetic properties of SiO2 nanoparticles. a The complex permittivity (ε’, ε”, tgδε), b complex permeability (μ’, μ”, tgδμ), electrical conductivity (σ) and d skin depth (δ) of the SiO2 nanoparticles in the frequency range of 1.0–18.0 GHz

The electrical conductivity (σ) shown in Fig. 3c was calculated with σ (S m−1) =2πfε0ε”, where ε0 was the free space permittivity (8.854 × 10−12 F m−1), f was the frequency (Hz) and ε” was the imaginary component of the permittivity35. The σ increased almost monotonically from 0.42 to 2.06 S m−1 as f increased from 1.0 to 18.0 GHz. The large conductivity was suggested to be possibly related to the existence of the heterogeneous atoms (C, N, Cl) on the surface of the SiO2 nanoparticles; for example, partial oxygen atoms were replaced with N atoms on the surface of the particles. The skin depth (δ) of the microwave irradiation in Fig. 3d was calculated with (δ/m) = (πfμ0μrσ)−1/2, where μ0 was the permeability of free space (4π × 10−7 H m−1), μr was the relative permeability and σ was the electrical conductivity (S m−1)33. The δ decreased from 23.84 to 2.63 mm as f increased from 1.0 to 18.0 GHz.

To reveal the contribution of the permeability or the magnetic properties of the SiO2 nanoparticles to the microwave absorption performance, we compared the microwave absorption results with and without the contribution of the magnetic components by assuming, for the latter case, a magnetic susceptibility parameter (χm) equal to zero, where μr = μ/μ0 = (1 + χm)μ0. The evolution of the RL curves in Fig. 4a when d was changed from 1.0 to 20.0 mm indicated that as d increased, fpeak shifted to lower values. As shown in Fig. 4b, fpeak decreased as d increased, with their relationships overlapping almost completely for nonzero and zero χm (see also Figure S9). RLpeak rapidly increased and then decayed with d, following the same trend for nonzero χm (Fig. 4c and Figure S10). Meanwhile, it was noticeable that the maximum RLpeak was smaller with a zero χm as d changed. Figure 4d compared the Δf10d relationships for nonzero and zero χm. The Δf10d trends overlapped very well (also see Figure S11) despite Δf10 being smaller at smaller d values and larger at larger d values for zero χm. This indicated that the influence of the none-zero χm for the SiO2 nanoparticles was mainly reflected in the change of the Δf10 values. Overall, the none-zero χm increased the RLpeak and the Δf10 values possibly achieved at certain d values despite the overall impact being small. The small contribution of the magnetic property on the microwave absorption was related to the small μ” and tgδμ values. The overall influence of the none-zero χm on the microwave absorption was clearly shown in Figure S12 as well.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Some microwave absorption characteristics of SiO2 nanoparticles with/out magnetic contribution. a The RL curves when χm is zero, and a comparison of the relationships for the b fpeak, c RLpeak and d Δf10 with d, when χm is nonzero vs. zero for the SiO2 nanoparticles in the frequency range of 1.0–18.0 GHz

Therefore, the large microwave absorption performance of the doped, conductive SiO2 nanoparticles was most likely related to their dielectric properties, or the rotations of dipoles in the material as indicated by the large electrical conductivity in the microwave frequency range, as shown in Fig. 3c. In pure SiO2 nanoparticles, no obvious origin was found for the creation of dipoles due to its symmetric structure where the dipoles likely canceled out each other in each tetrahedral unit of the SiO2. However, in the doped SiO2 nanoparticles, there were possible sources for the existence of dipoles due to the introduction of C, N and Cl elements as evidenced by the XPS results. Those atoms apparently broke down the symmetrical environment of the SiO2 lattice, and created dipoles on the surface, causing the variation of the dielectric property across the nanoparticles and the increased conductivity. Under microwave irradiation, those dipoles might rotate and echo with the electromagnetic field to produce resonance, causing reflection loss, as schematically shown in Figure S13. Therefore, a large RL was observed in the case of a good match between the dielectric/magnetic properties with the incident microwave field.

To verify this conclusion, we measured the microwave absorption performance along with the dielectric and magnetic properties of those doped SiO2 nanoparticles after removal of the heterogeneous atoms by calcination at 600 °C for 2 h in air. The removal of those atoms was confirmed using XPS results (Figure S14-17) where no N and Cl atoms were observed, with the remaining C due to atmospheric deposition. Meanwhile, calcination at high temperature normally led to high crystallization and removal of the amorphous phase in the material. Compared to the doped SiO2 nanoparticles, the calcinated, pure SiO2 nanoparticles showed much smaller ε’, ε” and tgδε values (Figure S18), which matched well with the values in the literature36, but showed similar μ’, much larger μ” and tgδμ values (Figure S19). As a result, these calcinated, pure SiO2 nanoparticles only showed very small σ values (Fig. 5a) and large δ (Fig. 5b) values in the microwave region. The small σ values indicated that these SiO2 nanoparticles were barely electrically conductive, with the large δ values suggesting that the microwave field was not efficiently decayed. Their poor microwave absorption performance was observed from the 2D contour plot of the RL over f and d in Fig. 5c and the RL plots in Fig. 5d, where the RL values were found to be less than −10 dB in most of the df regions. The poor microwave absorption performance of the calcinated SiO2 nanoparticles further confirmed that the good microwave absorption performance of the doped SiO2 nanoparticles was due to electrical relaxation, as the calcinated SiO2 nanoparticles had much smaller electrical relaxation but much large magnetic relaxation. Meanwhile, the fact that the associated C, N and Cl atoms were removed from the SiO2 nanoparticles after calcination also hinted that those heterogeneous atoms were likely linked onto the surface instead of being located in the bulk of the SiO2 nanoparticles. Table S1 listed the microwave absorption performance of various materials that have been studied. As seen, doped, microwave conductive SiO2 showed an impressive microwave absorption performance. Therefore, such materials are a promising candidate for microwave absorption. The importance of electrical relaxation on the microwave absorption is consistent with the conclusion made in the studies by Mao and colleagues37,38,39,40,41,42,43. Furthermore, such materials can be shown to be very useful in self-powered electromagnetic energy conversion and microwave attenuation, as demonstrated by Mao and colleagues40,41, which we plan to build in our future work.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Some dielectric and microwave absorption characteristics of calcinated, undoped SiO2 nanoparticles. a The σ curve, b δ curve, c 2D contour plot for RL vs. f and d and d representative RL curves for the pure, poorly conductive SiO2 nanoparticles obtained after calcination

Conclusions

In summary, in this study we have shown that doped, microwave conductive SiO2 nanoparticles possess an exciting microwave absorbing performance, benefiting from the good electrical conductivity that is induced by the incorporation of heterogeneous (N, C and Cl) atoms on the surface of the SiO2 nanoparticles. A large RL value of −55.09 dB can be obtained. The microwave absorption is mainly related to the dielectric loss resulting from the good electrical conductivity, while the small contribution of the magnetic property may be directly related to the small μ” and tgδμ. In contrast, calcinated, pure SiO2 nanoparticles show a poor electrical conductivity and microwave absorption performance even with a larger magnetic response. In addition, microwave absorption characteristics such as fpeak, RLpeak and Δf10 can be largely adjusted with the thickness of the doped, conductive SiO2 nanoparticles, which provides large flexibility for their microwave application towards various purposes.

References

  1. 1.

    Xia, T., Zhang, C., Oyler, N. A. & Chen, X. B. Hydrogenated TiO2 nanocrystals: a novel microwave absorbing material. Adv. Mater. 25, 6905–6910 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Xia, T. et al. Strong microwave absorption of hydrogenated wide bandgap semiconductor nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 10407–10413 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Zhao, D. L., Li, X. & Shen, Z. M. Microwave absorbing property and complex permittivity and permeability of epoxy composites containing Ni-coated and Ag filled carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci. Technol. 68, 2902–2908 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Fan, Y. Z., Yang, H. B., Li, M. H. & Zou, G. T. Evaluation of the microwave absorption property of flake graphite. Mater. Chem. Phys. 115, 696–698 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Broadband and tunable high‐performance microwave absorption of an ultralight and highly compressible graphene foam. Adv. Mater. 27, 2049–2053 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Fan, Z. J., Luo, G. H., Zhang, Z. F., Zhou, L. & Wei, F. Electromagnetic and microwave absorbing properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polymer composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 132, 85–89 (2006).

  7. 7.

    Li, G., Xie, T. S., Yang, S. L., Jin, J. H. & Jiang, J. M. Microwave absorption enhancement of porous carbon fibers compared with carbon nanofibers. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 9196–9201 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Olmedo, L., Hourquebie, P. & Jousse, F. Microwave absorbing materials based on conducting polymers. Adv. Mater. 5, 373–377 (1993).

  9. 9.

    Wang, Z. Z., Bi, H., Liu, J., Sun, T. & Wu, X. L. Magnetic and microwave absorbing properties of polyaniline/γ-Fe2O3 nanocomposite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 2132–2139 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Jia, K., Zhao, R., Zhong, J. C. & Liu, X. B. Preparation and microwave absorption properties of loose nanoscale Fe3O4 spheres. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322, 2167–2171 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Zhou, M. et al. Morphology-controlled synthesis and novel microwave absorption properties of hollow urchinlike α-MnO2 nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 1398–1402 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Li, H. F. et al. Directed growth and microwave absorption property of crossed ZnO netlike micro-/nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 10088–10091 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Yang, C. C., Gung, Y. J., Hung, W. C., Ting, T. H. & Wu, K. H. Infrared and microwave absorbing properties of BaTiO3/polyaniline and BaFe12O19/polyaniline composites. Compos Sci. Technol. 70, 466–471 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Kuruva, P., Matli, P. R., Mohammad, B., Reddigari, S. & Katlakunta, S. Effect of Ni–Zr codoping on dielectric and magnetic properties of SrFe12O19 via sol–gel route. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 382, 172–178 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Kuang, J. L., Jiang, P., Ran, F. Y. & Cao, W. B. Conductivity-dependent dielectric properties and microwave absorption of Al-doped SiC whiskers. J. Alloy. Compd. 687, 227–231 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Li, Q. et al. Dielectric and microwave absorption properties of polymer derived SiCN ceramics annealed in N2 atmosphere. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34, 589–598 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Xia, T., Zhang, C., Oyler, N. A. & Chen, X. B. Enhancing microwave absorption of TiO2 nanocrystals via hydrogenation. J. Mater. Res. 29, 2198–2210 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Tian, L. H. et al. Broad range energy absorption enabled by hydrogenated TiO2 nanosheets: from optical to infrared and microwave. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 4645–4653 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Tian, L. H. et al. Effect of hydrogenation on the microwave absorption properties of BaTiO3 nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 12550–12556 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Dong, J. Y. et al. Partially crystallized TiO2 for microwave absorption. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 5285–5288 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Guo, Y. F. et al. A rapid microwave-assisted thermolysis route to highly crystalline carbon nitrides for efficient hydrogen generation. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 55, 14693–14697 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Xu, W. T. et al. A general and rapid approach to crystalline metal sulfide nanoparticle synthesis for photocatalytic H2 generation. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 21669–21673 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Chen, L. Y., Duan, Y. P., Liu, L. D., Guo, J. B. & Liu, S. H. Influence of SiO2 fillers on microwave absorption properties of carbonyl iron/carbon black double-layer coatings. Mater. Des. 32, 570–574 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Qing, Y. C., Zhou, W. C., Jia, S., Luo, F. & Zhu, D. M. Microwave electromagnetic property of SiO2-coated carbonyl iron particles with higher oxidation resistance. Phys. B 406, 777–780 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Yan, L. et al. Enhanced microwave absorption of Fe nanoflakes after coating with SiO2 nanoshell. Nanotechnology 21, 095708 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Ingo, G. M., Dirè, S. & Babonneau, F. XPS studies of SiO2-TiO2 powders prepared by sol-gel process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 70-71, 230–234 (1993).

  27. 27.

    Koshizaki, N., Umehara, H. & Oyama, T. XPS characterization and optical properties of Si/SiO2, Si/Al2O3 and Si/MgO co-sputtered films. Thin Solid Films 325, 130–136 (1998).

  28. 28.

    Miller, M. L. & Linton, R. W. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of thermally treated silica (SiO2) surfaces. Anal. Chem. 57, 2314–2319 (1985).

  29. 29.

    Seyama, H. & Soma, M. Bonding-state characterization of the constitutent elements of silicate minerals by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 81, 485–495 (1985).

  30. 30.

    Clark, D. T. & Thomas, H. R. Applications of ESCA to polymer chemistry. XVII. Systematic investigation of the core levels of simple homopolymers. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed. 16, 791–820 (1978).

  31. 31.

    Briggs, D. & Beamson, G. Primary and secondary oxygen-induced C1s binding energy shifts in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of polymers. Anal. Chem. 64, 1729–1736 (1992).

  32. 32.

    Srinivasan, R. & Walton, R. A. X-ray photoelectron spectra of inorganic molecules.: XX. Observations concerning the sulfur 2p binding energies in metal complexes of thiourea. Inorg. Chim. Acta 25, l85–l86 (1977).

  33. 33.

    Biner, H. & Sellman, D. Z. X-ray photoelectron studies of pentacarbonyl chromium and tungsten complexes with nitrogen ligands. Naturforsch. B 33, 173–179 (1978).

  34. 34.

    Andersson, M., Blomquist, J., Folkesson, B., Larsson, R. & Sundberg, P. Esca, mössbauer and infrared spectroscopic investigations of a series of tin complexes. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 40, 385–396 (1986).

  35. 35.

    Micheli, D. Radar Absorbing Materials and Microwave Shielding Structures Design: By Using Multilayer Composite Materials, Nanomaterials and Evolutionary Computation (LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Berlin, 2011).

  36. 36.

    Cao, M. S. et al. Microwave absorption properties and mechanism of cagelike ZnO/SiO2 nanocomposites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 203110 (2007).

  37. 37.

    Wang, X. X., Ma, T., Shu, J. C. & Cao, M. S. Confinedly tailoring Fe3O4 clusters-NG to tune electromagnetic parameters and microwave absorption with broadened bandwidth. Chem. Eng. J. 332, 321–330 (2018).

  38. 38.

    Liu, J. et al. Electromagnetic property and tunable microwave absorption of 3D nets from nickel chains at elevated temperature. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 22615–22622 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Liu, J. et al. Enhanced permittivity and multi-region microwave absorption of nanoneedle-like ZnO in the X-band at elevated temperature. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 4670–4677 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Cao, M. S. et al. Thermally driven transport and relaxation switching self‐powered electromagnetic energy conversion. Small 14, 1800987 (2018).

  41. 41.

    Wen, B. et al. Temperature dependent microwave attenuation behavior for carbon-nanotube/silica composites. Carbon 65, 124–139 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Wen, B. et al. Reduced graphene oxides: light-weight and high-efficiency electromagnetic interference shielding at elevated temperatures. Adv. Mater. 26, 3484–3489 (2014).

  43. 43.

    Cao, M. S., Song, W. L., Hou, Z. L., Wen, B. & Yuan, J. The effects of temperature and frequency on the dielectric properties, electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave-absorption of short carbon fiber/silica composites. Carbon 48, 788–796 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

X.C. appreciates the support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (DMR-1609061) and the College of Arts and Sciences, University of Missouri–Kansas City. L.L. acknowledges the support from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (No. 61525404). M.Z. acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51372080). X.T. is thankful for the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1765105). F.H. appreciates the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0901600).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA

    • Michael Green
    • , Yan Liu
    • , Minjie Zhou
    •  & Xiaobo Chen
  2. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China

    • Zhanqiang Liu
    •  & Fuqiang Huang
  3. College of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hubei Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for New Energy Microgrid, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China

    • Peng Xiang
    •  & Xinyu Tan
  4. College of Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China

    • Yan Liu
  5. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, 414000, China

    • Minjie Zhou
  6. State Key Laboratory of Luminescence and Applications, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130033, China

    • Lei Liu

Authors

  1. Search for Michael Green in:

  2. Search for Zhanqiang Liu in:

  3. Search for Peng Xiang in:

  4. Search for Yan Liu in:

  5. Search for Minjie Zhou in:

  6. Search for Xinyu Tan in:

  7. Search for Fuqiang Huang in:

  8. Search for Lei Liu in:

  9. Search for Xiaobo Chen in:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xinyu Tan or Fuqiang Huang or Xiaobo Chen.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-018-0088-8