Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA

Minimal residual disease in BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: different significance in typical ALL and in CML-like disease

Abstract

Recently, we defined “CML-like” subtype of BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), resembling lymphoid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Here we retrospectively analyzed prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) and other features in 147 children with BCR::ABL1-positive ALL (diagnosed I/2000–IV/2021, treated according to EsPhALL (n = 133) or other (n = 14) protocols), using DNA-based monitoring of BCR::ABL1 genomic breakpoint and clonal immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. Although overall prognosis of CML-like (n = 48) and typical ALL (n = 99) was similar (5-year-EFS 60% and 49%, respectively; 5-year-OS 75% and 73%, respectively), typical ALL presented more relapses while CML-like patients more often died in the first remission. Prognostic role of MRD was significant in the typical ALL (p = 0.0005 in multivariate analysis for EFS). In contrast, in CML-like patients MRD was not significant (p values > 0.2) and inapplicable for therapy adjustment. Moreover, in the typical ALL, risk-prediction could be further improved by considering initial hyperleukocytosis. Early distinguishing typical BCR::ABL1-positive ALL and CML-like patients is essential to enable optimal treatment approach in upcoming protocols. For the typical ALL, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and concurrent chemotherapy with risk-directed intensity should be recommended; in the CML-like disease, no relevant prognostic feature applicable for therapy tailoring was found so far.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of key differences between “Typical ALL” and “CML-like” disease.
Fig. 2: Overall comparison of MRD levels by IG/TR and BCR::ABL1 DNA-based monitoring.
Fig. 3: Outcome of patients according to the subtype.
Fig. 4: Outcome according to MRD levels at TP1 and TP2.
Fig. 5: MRD clearance at TP1 according to subtype and target.
Fig. 6: Outcome of patients according to leukocytosis at diagnosis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Hunger SP, Raetz EA, Loh ML, Mullighan CG. Improving outcomes for high-risk ALL: translating new discoveries into clinical care. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56:984–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Suttorp M, Millot F, Sembill S, Deutsch H, Metzler M. Definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and essential criteria for diagnosis of pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancers. 2021;13:798.

  3. Hijiya N, Suttorp M. How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in children and adolescents. Blood. 2019;133:2374–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cross NC, White HE, Colomer D, Ehrencrona H, Foroni L, Gottardi E, et al. Laboratory recommendations for scoring deep molecular responses following treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29:999–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cazzaniga G, De Lorenzo P, Alten J, Rottgers S, Hancock J, Saha V, et al. Predictive value of minimal residual disease in Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with imatinib in the European intergroup study of post-induction treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, based on immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor and BCR/ABL1 methodologies. Haematologica. 2018;103:107–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Velden VH, Cazzaniga G, Schrauder A, Hancock J, Bader P, Panzer-Grumayer ER, et al. Analysis of minimal residual disease by Ig/TCR gene rearrangements: guidelines for interpretation of real-time quantitative PCR data. Leukemia. 2007;21:604–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ravandi F, Jorgensen JL, Thomas DA, O’Brien S, Garris R, Faderl S, et al. Detection of MRD may predict the outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Blood. 2013;122:1214–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Conter V, Bartram CR, Valsecchi MG, Schrauder A, Panzer-Grumayer R, Moricke A, et al. Molecular response to treatment redefines all prognostic factors in children and adolescents with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results in 3184 patients of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study. Blood. 2010;115:3206–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hovorkova L, Zaliova M, Venn NC, Bleckmann K, Trkova M, Potuckova E, et al. Monitoring of childhood ALL using BCR-ABL1 genomic breakpoints identifies a subgroup with CML-like biology. Blood. 2017;129:2771–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaliova M, Fronkova E, Krejcikova K, Muzikova K, Mejstrikova E, Stary J, et al. Quantification of fusion transcript reveals a subgroup with distinct biological properties and predicts relapse in BCR/ABL-positive ALL: implications for residual disease monitoring. Leukemia. 2009;23:944–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Biondi A, Gandemer V, De Lorenzo P, Cario G, Campbell M, Castor A, et al. Imatinib treatment of paediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL2010): a prospective, intergroup, open-label, single-arm clinical trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e641–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Biondi A, Schrappe M, De Lorenzo P, Castor A, Lucchini G, Gandemer V, et al. Imatinib after induction for treatment of children and adolescents with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL): a randomised, open-label, intergroup study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:936–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Veer A, Zaliova M, Mottadelli F, De Lorenzo P, Te Kronnie G, Harrison CJ, et al. IKZF1 status as a prognostic feature in BCR-ABL1-positive childhood ALL. Blood. 2014;123:1691–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith M, Arthur D, Camitta B, Carroll AJ, Crist W, Gaynon P, et al. Uniform approach to risk classification and treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:18–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Biondi A, Cario G, De Lorenzo P, Castor A, Conter V, Leoni V, et al. Long-term follow up of pediatric Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the EsPhALL2004 study: high white blood cell count at diagnosis is the strongest prognostic factor. Haematologica. 2019;104:e13–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Czech Health Research Council (NU21-03-00128) and Charles University (UNCE 204012), by the project (Ministry of Health, Czech Republic) for conceptual development of research organization 00064203 (University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic), by the project National Institute for Cancer Research (Program EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5102)—Funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU, by Deutsche Krebshilfe (70112958), by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) to AB (IG2017—20564) and G. Cazzaniga (IG2015—17593), and by the Comitato Maria Letizia Verga.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JZ, G.Cario, GCazzaniga, and MZ designed the study; LH, JK, AK, MB, LW, EF, JA, RK, CE, LB, MT, and JStu analyzed samples and provided data; MZ, PDL, MGV, VC, JSta, MS, AB, and JT provided diagnostic and clinical data; all authors participated on data integration, interpretation, and presentation; JZ and MZ wrote the draft; and all authors revised the draft and contributed to the final paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Zuna.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuna, J., Hovorkova, L., Krotka, J. et al. Minimal residual disease in BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: different significance in typical ALL and in CML-like disease. Leukemia 36, 2793–2801 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01668-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01668-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links