Abstract
Recent studies highlighted the role of transcription factors in metabolic regulation during hematopoiesis and leukemia development. GFI1B is a transcriptional repressor that plays a critical role in hematopoiesis, and its expression is negatively related to the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. We earlier reported a change in the metabolic state of hematopoietic stem cells upon Gfi1b deletion. Here we explored the role of Gfi1b in metabolism reprogramming during hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. We demonstrated that Gfi1b deletion remarkably activated mitochondrial respiration and altered energy metabolism dependence toward oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Mitochondrial substrate dependency was shifted from glucose to fatty acids upon Gfi1b deletion via upregulating fatty acid oxidation (FAO). On a molecular level, Gfi1b epigenetically regulated multiple FAO-related genes. Moreover, we observed that metabolic phenotypes evolved as cells progressed from preleukemia to leukemia, and the correlation between Gfi1b expression level and metabolic phenotype was affected by genetic variations in AML cells. FAO or OXPHOS inhibition significantly impeded leukemia progression of Gfi1b-KO MLL/AF9 cells. Finally, we showed that Gfi1b-deficient AML cells were more sensitive to metformin as well as drugs implicated in OXPHOS and FAO inhibition, opening new potential therapeutic strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hematopoiesis is a stepwise process tightly controlled by key transcription factors to produce and replenish the blood system. Although considerable progress in understanding hematopoiesis regulation has been achieved in past decades, open questions remain. Recent studies highlighted the role of metabolic regulation in fate transitions of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and hematopoietic cells [1,2,3,4]. HSCs rely on glycolysis to maintain a quiescent state and protect from oxidative stress, while in response to stimuli, HSCs switch metabolism toward oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), enter the cell cycle, and differentiate into downstream progenitors [1, 2]. Subsequent differentiating hematopoietic cells depend mainly on mitochondrial respiration to meet increased demand for energy and metabolic substrates [4,5,6]. The change in metabolites during the metabolic switch controls a series of epigenetic modifiers to determine the fate of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) by regulating key transcription factor activity [1, 2].
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a group of hematological malignancies characterized by metabolic heterogeneity. Despite a high complete remission rate in AML patients, the 5-year overall survival is still poor, especially in patients over 60 years of age [7]. Accumulating data have highlighted the significance of metabolism reprogramming in the initiation, development, and drug resistance of leukemic cells [4, 8, 9]. Deregulation of cellular metabolism induced by transcription factors such as MYC supports the development of leukemia [10].
Growth factor independence 1B (GFI1B) plays a critical role in hematopoiesis by regulating the dormancy and proliferation of HSCs [11] and the development of erythroid and megakaryocytic cells [12,13,14]. Besides the regulation of normal hematopoiesis, low-level or loss of Gfi1b promotes AML development and negatively influences the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/AML patients [15]. However, the precise mechanism of how GFI1B regulates hematopoiesis and promotes AML development remains less explored. We previously showed that loss of Gfi1b leads to increased metabolic activation in HSCs [11]. Therefore, we investigated metabolic regulation of Gfi1b during hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis in human AML cell lines and mouse models, which could provide mechanistic insights into the hematopoiesis regulation and unveil potential therapeutic strategies for AML patients with low-level GFI1B.
Material and methods
Mouse models
Gfi1bfl/flMxCretg and Gfi1bfl/flMxCrewt mice and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C), Invivogen Europe, Toulouse, France) treatment were performed as described [11, 15]. Concerning ex vivo study, lineage negative (Lin-) cells were depleted from total bone marrow (BM) cells using mouse lineage cell depletion kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), then treated with 1000 Unit/ml interferon-β (IFN β, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for 3 days. Lin-/c-kit+/Sca-1+ (LSK) cells were sorted with Aria III FACS Cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Induction of MLL/AF9 leukemia and serial transplantations in mice were performed as described [15,16,17]. Mice were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility of University Hospital Muenster. All mouse experiments were performed with the approval of the local ethics committee (authorization numbers: 84–02.04.2015.A058 and 81–02.04.2020.A398).
Metabolic measurements
Seahorse Extracellular Flux analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol as described [18, 19]. Briefly, cells in appropriate numbers were seeded in Poly-D-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) coated XFe96 plates (Agilent Technologies, North Billerica, MA, USA) in the XF DMEM medium with optimized concentrations of supplements. The cell plate was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in a non-CO2 incubator to reach ideal pH and temperature conditions. The measurements of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were recorded at the basal levels and after sequential injections of inhibitors into Seahorse ports. The measurements were normalized with cell numbers using Hoechst staining after the seahorse measurements. Data analysis was performed with the Seahorse Wave software (Agilent Technologies, North Billerica, MA, USA). The information and optimized concentrations of inhibitors and cell numbers used are listed in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad software (La Jolla, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated. All experiments were repeated at least three times in more than triplicates unless otherwise indicated. Student’s t-test (two-sided, unpaired) was chosen for the comparisons unless otherwise indicated. p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. p < 0.05 was marked with *, p ≤ 0.01 with **, and p ≤ 0.001 with ***.
Online supplementary materials
Further information on the experimental procedures, tables, and figures are available in the Supplementary materials.
Results
Gfi1b deletion activates mitochondrial respiration in murine HPCs
To explore the role of Gfi1b in metabolic regulation in hematopoiesis, we used a conditional Gfi1b mouse model previously described [11, 15]. Cre-mediated Gfi1b excision was verified by genotype PCR and western blot (Supplementary Fig. S2a, b). About three weeks after poly(I:C) injection to induce Gfi1b deletion, we isolated Lin- cells and sorted LSK cells (Lin-/c-kit+/Sca-1+) for Extracellular Flux assay (Fig. 1a, left). Mito Stress test showed that Gfi1b knockout (Gfi1b-KO) cells had significantly higher basal and maximal OCR than Gfi1b wild type (Gfi1b-WT) cells, indicating that Gfi1b deletion activated mitochondrial respiration and increased respiration capacity in HPCs (Fig. 1b, c). ATP-linked respiration and spare respiration capacity were also markedly upregulated in Gfi1b-KO HPCs (Fig. 1c).
In addition, Glycolysis Stress test was performed to determine the effect of Gfi1b deletion on glycolysis. Basal glycolysis level did not change after Gfi1b deletion, but glycolytic capacity and glycolytic reserve increased in Gfi1b-KO cells (Fig. 1d, e). Cells regularly maintain metabolic plasticity by upregulating the glycolytic activity after OXPHOS inhibition to maintain stable ATP levels [20]. After oligomycin injection to inhibit mitochondrial respiration, we observed a significant increase in ECAR in Gfi1b-KO HPCs, suggesting increased metabolic plasticity in Gfi1b-KO HPCs (Fig. 1d, f).
Cells meet energy requirements through glycolysis and OXPHOS pathways. To further explore the effect of Gfi1b deletion on energy metabolism dependence, we examined OCR/ECAR ratios and observed significantly higher OCR/ECAR ratios under basal and maximal conditions in Gfi1b-KO HPCs, indicating that Gfi1b deletion shifted energy dependence toward OXPHOS (Fig. 1g). To further clarify whether metabolic change upon Gfi1b deletion in HPCs was mediated by the BM microenvironment, we isolated Lin- cells and deleted Gfi1b by adding IFN β in vitro (Fig. 1a, right). Similar effects on OXPHOS and glycolysis were observed; we thus concluded that Gfi1b-mediated changes in metabolism are cell-intrinsic (Supplementary Fig. S3).
To investigate how Gfi1b deletion affects mitochondrial respiration, we measured mitochondria numbers by flow cytometry with MitoTracker, mtDNA content by real time-PCR, and confocal fluorescent microscopy. Strikingly, all approaches showed no significant difference in mitochondria number between Gfi1b-KO and Gfi1b-WT HPCs (Fig. 1h and Supplementary Fig. S4), indicating increased OXPHOS in Gfi1b-KO HPCs potentially resulted from activated mitochondrial function, not from increased mitochondria number. Using transmission electron microscopy, we did not observe significant changes in mitochondrial morphology upon Gfi1b deletion (Fig. 1i). Together, our data demonstrated that Gfi1b deletion activated mitochondrial respiration and reprogramed the energy dependence in favor of OXPHOS in murine HPCs.
Gfi1b deletion upregulates fatty acid oxidation (FAO) dependency
To further investigate metabolism reprogramming induced by Gfi1b, we determined glucose consumption and lactate secretion rates, and found that Gfi1b-KO HPCs consumed less glucose and secreted less lactate than Gfi1b-WT HPCs (Fig. 2a, b). We thus speculated that Gfi1b deletion shifts substrate dependency from glucose to other fuels. To this end, we used specific substrate pathway inhibitors (UK5099, BPTES, or etomoxir) to inhibit the oxidation of three primary mitochondrial substrates (glucose, glutamine, or fatty acids (FAs), respectively), and determined the dependency on specific metabolic substrates. Gfi1b-KO HPCs were more sensitive to FAO inhibitor etomoxir rather than UK5099 or BPTES treatment with respect to cell proliferation (Fig. 2c). Apoptosis analysis revealed no difference in cell viability, suggesting that Gfi1b-KO cells potentially generate less ATP upon FAO inhibition and therefore divide less (Supplementary Fig. S5).
To assess the contributions of three primary substrates to mitochondrial respiration, we performed Substrate Oxidation Stress test. Upon Gfi1b deletion, increased sensitivity to etomoxir and resistance to UK5099 with respect to maximal mitochondrial respiration were observed in HPCs, indicating that loss of Gfi1b induced an elevated mitochondrial substrate dependency on FAs (Fig. 2d). To further validate the effect of GFI1B on FAs dependency, we transduced human AML cell lines OCI/AML3 and KG1 with two isoforms of GFI1B and performed Seahorse FAs Dependency test. GFI1B overexpression significantly reduced FAs dependency in OCI/AML3 and KG1 cells (Fig. 2e, f). Furthermore, in agreement with this data, GFI1B overexpression diminished the sensitivity to FAO inhibitors (etomoxir and ST1326) in OCI/AML3 and KG1 cells with respect to cell proliferation (Fig. 2g, h). These results suggested that GFI1B regulated mitochondrial substrate dependency on FAs.
GFI1B regulates FAO-related genes expression
FAO is the major catabolic pathway for lipids, fueling OXPHOS and the Krebs cycle. To explore how Gfi1b regulates FAs metabolism, we analyzed DNA microarray of blast cells from murine NUP98/HOXD13 AML model [15]. Gene set enrichment analysis showed that loss of Gfi1b was associated with an enrichment of genes involved in FAO (Fig. 3a). Moreover, inherited mutation in GFI1B (GFI1BQ287*) disrupts its DNA binding zinc fingers, acting in a dominant-negative manner and mimicking the phenotype of GFI1B deficiency [21]. We thus performed proteomic analysis from published dataset to identify deregulated proteins in FAs metabolism in human GFI1BQ287* platelets [21]. In concordance with microarray data, many proteins involved in FAO were enriched in GFI1BQ287* platelets compared to healthy controls (Fig. 3b). Given that GFI1B mediates transcriptional repression by DNA binding, we next interrogated published ChIP-seq dataset from hematopoietic precursor cell line HPC-7 (GSE22178) for Gfi1b [22]. We found significant bindings of Gfi1b to several FAO-related genes (Supplementary Fig. S6). Hence, it is tempting to speculate that GFI1B epigenetically regulates the expression of different genes implicated in FAO.
To further substantiate our findings, we examined the expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT1), since this was the top candidate in our analysis and is associated with the translocation of FAs into mitochondria, a rate-limiting step of FAO [23]. Supporting our observation, the expression of CPT1 isoforms, CPT1A/B and CPT1C, was upregulated in Gfi1b-KO HPCs (Fig. 3c). Surprisingly, the expression of CPT1C, not CPT1A/B, was downregulated in various human AML cell lines with GFI1B overexpression (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, we determined the expression level of CD36 responsible for the uptake of FAs into the cytoplasm by flow cytometry. Supporting our hypothesis and in line with our observation, GFI1B overexpression significantly suppressed CD36 levels in various AML cell lines (Fig. 3e). Together, these data indicated an important role of Gfi1b in the regulation of FAO.
GFI1B heterogeneously regulates mitochondrial respiration during AML development
To explore the metabolic regulation of Gfi1b in leukemic cells and metabolic evolution during leukemogenesis, we determined metabolic phenotypes of Gfi1b-KO cells in different leukemia stages in murine AML models.
First, Lin- cells from Gfi1bfl/flMxCretg or Gfi1bfl/flMxCrewt mice were transduced with different oncofusion genes (MLL/AF9, AML/ETO, or BCR/ABL) to generate preleukemic cells, and then treated with IFN β to induce Gfi1b deletion (Fig. 4a). Basal mitochondrial respiration and respiratory capacity in Gfi1b-KO preleukemic cells were significantly higher than those in Gfi1b-WT preleukemic cells expressing MLL/AF9, AML/ETO, or BCR/ABL (Fig. 4b–d, left). Of note, modest inconsistencies were observed in the glycolytic activity of Gfi1b-KO preleukemic cells expressing different oncofusion genes, potentially resulting from the deregulation of different pathways by oncofusion genes (Fig. 4b–d, middle). However, significantly elevated OCR/ECAR ratios were observed in Gfi1b-KO preleukemic cells with all oncofusion genes, suggesting energy production in Gfi1b-KO preleukemic cells mainly depended on OXPHOS (Fig. 4b–d, right). The data thus demonstrated that Gfi1b-deficient preleukemic cells shared metabolic phenotypes with Gfi1b-deficient HPCs.
Next, we determined metabolic phenotypes of leukemic cells isolated from a murine MLL/AF9 AML model as described [15]. After AML development, c-kit+/GFP+ AML cells were isolated from BM as demonstrated (Fig. 4e). AML cells from Gfi1b-KO mice showed elevated mitochondrial respiration, respiration capacity, glycolytic capacity, and metabolic dependence on OXPHOS compared to Gfi1b-WT AML cells (Fig. 4f). Moreover, we noted remarkably divergent metabolic features within Gfi1b-KO and Gfi1b-WT AML groups (Supplementary Fig. S7), although all mice in each group were transplanted with the same donor-derived preleukemic cells. In addition, Substrate Oxidation Stress test showed that Gfi1b-KO AML cells were more sensitive to FAO inhibitor etomoxir than Gfi1b-WT AML cells (Fig. 4g), suggesting an increased level of FAO in Gfi1b-KO AML cells. To further validate our finding, whole-genome gene expression analysis was performed in the murine NUP98/HOXD13 AML model as described [15], and loss of Gfi1b was associated with an enrichment of genes involved in OXPHOS and FAs metabolism (Fig. 4h). These data indicated that Gfi1b deletion upregulated OXPHOS and FAO in MLL/AF9 AML mice.
Various factors, including genetic variation and microenvironment, collaboratively contribute to the metabolic phenotype of cancer cells [24, 25]. The divergent metabolic phenotypes in AML cells but not in preleukemic cells led us to explore whether the heterogeneity resulted from cell-intrinsic or -extrinsic factors during leukemogenesis. To exclude cell-extrinsic factors, we performed leukemia colony-forming units (L-CFU) assay (Supplementary Fig. S8). In line with in vivo data, Gfi1b-KO leukemic cells had a higher level of mitochondrial respiration than Gfi1b-WT, but notable metabolic heterogeneity was observed in the single colonies of Gfi1b-KO and Gfi1b-WT AML groups (Supplementary Fig. S8d). These data indicated that the metabolic heterogeneity resulted from cell-intrinsic factors.
Next, to explore whether the metabolic heterogeneity arises from the subsequent mutations during the leukemia development and further confirm our findings in vitro, we overexpressed GFI1B in various AML cell lines, and found that GFI1B overexpression significantly inhibited mitochondrial respiration and shifted metabolic dependence toward glycolysis in THP1, HEL, and OCI/AML3 cells (Supplementary Fig. S9a–c). In contrast, no significant effects on metabolic phenotype or dependence were observed in K562 and MOLM13 cells (Supplementary Fig. S9d, e). Collectively, these data indicated that metabolic properties evolved during leukemia progression, and genetic alterations influenced metabolism reprogramming induced by GFI1B in AML cells (Fig. 4i).
Inhibition of FAO or OXPHOS impedes leukemia progression of Gfi1b-KO MLL/AF9 cells
We previously reported that loss/reduced expression of Gfi1b promotes AML development in different murine models of human AML [15]. The metabolites generated during metabolism reprogramming contribute to signaling functions, remodeling epigenome, and altering the expression of specific sets of genes, which can initiate and support cancer development [26]. Therefore, we performed serial L-CFU assay to investigate the function of metabolism reprogramming induced by Gfi1b deletion in leukemogenesis in the murine MLL/AF9 AML model. After transducing Lin- cells with MLL/AF9 to generate preleukemic cells, we plated them with OXPHOS inhibitor rotenone or FAO inhibitor etomoxir (Fig. 5a). We observed a substantial decrease in colony numbers of rotenone-treated Gfi1b-WT and Gfi1b-KO MLL/AF9 cells, which supported our previous report about the high dependence on OXPHOS of MLL/AF9 leukemia [27]. Untreated Gfi1b-KO leukemic cells generated more colonies than Gfi1b-WT cells, but Gfi1b-KO cells treated with etomoxir generated a similar number of colonies as Gfi1b-WT cells, indicating that FAO inhibition significantly impeded the rapid progression of Gfi1b-deficient leukemic cells (Fig. 5b, c). These results suggested that increased FAO and OXPHOS induced by Gfi1b deletion promotes leukemogenesis of MLL/AF9 leukemia.
Metformin inhibits the proliferation and c-Myc expression in Gfi1b-deficient cells
Metformin was reported to impair the growth of cancer cells by inhibiting mitochondrial complex I [20, 28, 29]. Based on our observation, we next sought to develop a novel strategy for treating GFI1B-deficient AML patients. Except for AML/ETO preleukemic cells, murine Gfi1b-KO HPCs, MLL/AF9, and BCR/ABL preleukemic cells, and MLL/AF9 AML cells were more sensitive to metformin treatment than Gfi1b-WT cells (Fig. 6a, b and Supplementary Fig. S10a, b). We further validated that metformin suppressed the proliferation of human AML cell line THP1# with GFI1B-KD, without significant apoptosis induction (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. S10c, d).
To explore the underlying mechanism, we measured mitochondrial respirations after metformin treatment for 24 h in HPCs. Basal and maximal OCR values were markedly inhibited in Gfi1b-WT and Gfi1b-KO cells (Supplementary Fig. S11a–d), but lower relative OCR inhibitions after metformin treatment in Gfi1b-KO cells were not observed compared to Gfi1b-WT cells (Supplementary Fig. S11c). To confirm our findings, we measured mitochondrial respiration of HPCs in response to metformin in real time. After sequential metformin (M) injections into the medium, we observed rapid and dose-dependent drops in OCR value and OCR/ECAR ratio and a rise in ECAR value in both Gfi1b-WT and Gfi1b-KO HPCs (Fig. 6d). No significant difference was found between Gfi1b-WT and Gfi1b-KO HPCs concerning OXPHOS inhibition and complex I inhibition (Fig. 6e, f). These data indicated that the high sensitivity of Gfi1b-KO cells to metformin was not caused by mitochondrial complex I inhibition.
Several studies have reported that metformin inhibits cancer cell proliferation by targeting c-Myc [30, 31]. By examining the published ChIP-seq datasets, we found that GFI1B binds to the promoter and enhancer regions of c-Myc [32, 33]. Therefore, we determined the relationship between Gfi1b and c-Myc by immunoblot. Gfi1b deletion increased the c-Myc level in murine HPCs, and GFI1B overexpression inhibited c-Myc expression in various AML cell lines (Fig. 6g and Supplementary Fig. S11e). To test the effect of metformin on c-Myc expression, we treated HPCs with various concentrations of metformin, and observed a dose-dependent downregulation of c-Myc protein level in Gfi1b-KO HPCs (Fig. 6h). These data suggested a potential mechanism for the high sensitivity of Gfi1b-deficient cells to metformin.
AML cells with low-level Gfi1b are more sensitive to venetoclax and FAO inhibitors
Given that our observation of upregulated OXPHOS and FAO was made in Gfi1b-deficient AML cells, we tested the therapeutic effects of venetoclax and FAO inhibitors on the proliferation of AML cells with low-level Gfi1b. Venetoclax was recently reported to inhibit mitochondrial respiration independent of BCL-2 inhibition [34]; therefore, venetoclax and CPT1 inhibitors (etomoxir and ST1326) were employed. Treatment with venetoclax, etomoxir, or ST1326 led to marked suppression of proliferation in THP1# with GFI1B-KD and murine MLL/AF9 AML cells with Gfi1b-KO, without affecting cell viability (Fig. 7a, b and Supplementary Fig. S10d). Furthermore, we explored whether the high sensitivities arose from the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Murine MLL/AF9 AML cells were treated with inhibitors for 24 h, and mitochondrial respiration was determined. Venetoclax, etomoxir, or ST1326 treatment induced significant decreases in basal and maximal OCR values in Gfi1b-KO AML cells rather than in Gfi1b-WT AML cells (Fig. 7c). These data suggested that venetoclax and FAO inhibitors could serve as potential therapeutics in AML patients with low-level GFI1B (Fig. 7d).
Discussion
Gfi1b plays an essential role in hematopoiesis and mediates transcriptional repression by recruiting chromatin modifier complexes to the regulatory regions of the target [35], but the precise mechanism has yet to be elucidated. Here we show that in murine HPCs, Gfi1b deletion significantly upregulated mitochondrial respiration and FAO, and reprogrammed energy metabolism dependence toward OXPHOS and mitochondrial substrate dependency toward FAs. Via mutli-omics analysis, we found that Gfi1b regulated multiple FAO-related genes by direct DNA binding. However, future studies should investigate whether other mechanisms such as de-repression of c-Myc or rewired survival pathways induced by Gfi1b deficiency also contribute to metabolic changes. Gfi1b expression during hematopoiesis is strictly regulated by itself and other transcription factors [13, 36, 37]. Gfi1b is highly expressed in the HSCs, and its expression decreases in the progenitors and other differentiated cells except for megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors and megakaryocyte precursors [38, 39]. Interestingly, metabolism reprogramming induced by Gfi1b is in line with metabolic phenotypes of hematopoietic cells with different Gfi1b levels during hematopoiesis. Future studies should examine metabolites changes regulated by Gfi1b and explore whether and how Gfi1b regulates hematopoiesis by metabolism reprogramming.
Emerging data highlight the role of OXPHOS and FAO in supporting the survival of chemoresistant AML cells and leukemic stem cells (LSCs) [8, 40]. Cytarabine-resistant AML cells exhibit increased FAO and OXPHOS gene signature [8, 41, 42]. Compared to HSCs, LSCs have a distinct metabolic profile and depend mainly on OXPHOS [40]. We previously showed that GFI1B deficiency is associated with inferior prognosis in MDS/AML patients and significantly increases LSCs number, partially resulting from epigenetic alterations of Gfi1b target genes [15], but additional mechanisms might contribute to this. Here, we found that Gfi1b deletion increased OXPHOS and FAO in AML cells, which is interestingly consistent with the metabolic features of shorter survival AML patients, cytarabine-resistant AML cells, and LSCs. Metabolism reprogramming induced by abnormal expression of transcription factors could enable cells to acquire metabolic profiles that supports the development, proliferation, and evasion of immune surveillance of cancers [24, 43]. We provided in vitro evidence that in MLL/AF9 leukemia FAO or OXPHOS inhibition significantly impeded the rapid progression of Gfi1b-KO cells. Our findings suggest a potential mechanism for the inferior prognosis and high LSCs number in GFI1B-deficient AML patients. Future in-depth studies using epigenomics and metabolomics are needed to determine the molecular mechanism underlying the role of metabolism reprogramming by Gfi1b deficiency in leukemic transformation and progression.
Recent studies demonstrated that metabolic phenotypes of cancer cells are heterogeneous and context-specific, without fixed and broadly applicable liabilities [24, 25, 44]. Remarkable metabolic heterogeneity in AML mice transplanted with the same donor-derived preleukemic cells in our study reconfirmed the view in leukemias. Moreover, even though significantly elevated mitochondrial activity was observed in Gfi1b-KO HPCs and preleukemic cells, Gfi1b-KO AML cells showed divergent phenotypes and dependences. By determining metabolic phenotypes of single colonies in L-CFU assay and different AML cell lines with GFI1B overexpression, we confirmed that metabolic heterogeneity arose from genetic variations, not cell-extrinsic factors. Metabolic phenotypes and dependences evolve as cancers progress from preneoplasia to malignancies after acquiring subsequent mutations [24, 25]. Therefore, we hypothesize that in leukemic cells, the effect of some mutations on metabolic regulation is less potent than that of Gfi1b, and others are robust enough to mitigate the metabolic effect of Gfi1b loss; thus, the divergent effect of Gfi1b on metabolic phenotypes in AML cells reflect the effects of different mutations (Fig. 4i).
However, the role of GFI1B in leukemogenesis is still controversial. Some studies suggest GFI1B as a proto-oncogene possibly by supporting cell survival when abnormally expressed [45, 46], supported by the observation of apoptosis induction upon GFI1B inhibition in AML cell lines [35, 45, 47]. On the other hand, our group and others indicate a role of GFI1B as an oncosuppressor by driving differentiation toward the mature cells [15, 35, 48]. Based on our findings, we thus propose a hypothesis linking metabolism reprogramming by GFI1B with leukemogenesis: the role of GFI1B in leukemogenesis is developmental state-specific and mutation-dependent. In the early hematopoiesis stage, GFI1B acts as an oncosuppressor by driving differentiation toward specific hematopoietic lineages, and reduced GFI1B expression in concert with other signaling cascades blocks the differentiation and upregulates OXPHOS and FAO, which in turn promote LSCs augmentation and lead to an inferior prognosis and chemoresistance in AML patients. In the late hematopoiesis stage, an elevated level of GFI1B probably acts as a proto-oncogene by promoting cell proliferation and rewiring metabolism toward glycolysis, thus resulting in sensitivity to chemotherapy (Supplementary Fig. S12). Further research is required to provide information on this hypothesis.
As a safe drug widely used to treat diabetes, metformin is reported to inhibit cancer cell growth by inhibiting mitochondrial complex I [20, 28, 29, 49] or through other pathways [50]. We found an elevated sensitivity of Gfi1b-deficient cells to metformin treatment. By examining the response of mitochondrial respiration to metformin treatment, we confirmed that the high sensitivity to metformin was not caused by mitochondrial complex I inhibition in Gfi1b-KO cells. Combined with previous ChIP-seq data, we demonstrated that GFI1B represses c-Myc expression by directly binding the c-Myc promoter and enhancer. Furthermore, we observed a dose-dependent downregulation of c-Myc protein level after metformin treatment in Gfi1b-KO HPCs. These data suggest a possible mechanism for high sensitivity to metformin in low-level Gfi1b cells. Future studies should examine the therapeutic value of metformin in GFI1B-deficient AML in vivo and explore the underlying mechanism.
The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax was recently approved to treat newly diagnosed older AML patients due to high response rates [51]. Venetoclax can inhibit mitochondrial respiration independent of BCL-2 inhibition [34]. CPT1 inhibitors, including etomoxir and ST1326, could sensitize leukemic cells to the chemotherapeutic drugs [41, 52]. We found that venetoclax and FAO inhibitors exert better anti-leukemia effects by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration in GFI1B-deficient AML cells. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the metabolic phenotypes of the murine AML model and THP1# used have been proved to be regulated by GFI1B in our study. Inconsistency of metabolic regulation by GFI1B across AML cells will limit target therapies for metabolic vulnerabilities. Therefore, technical advances in metabolic phenotyping and biomarker findings to predict therapeutic responses would benefit patients by allowing tailored therapies based on patient-specific cancer metabolism [24].
Collectively, we found that Gfi1b regulates OXPHOS, FAO, and c-Myc expression in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. However, metabolic regulation of GFI1B in AML cells is heterogeneous and genetic mutation-dependent. Furthermore, we showed potential therapeutic options to target GFI1B-deficient AML.
References
Kohli L, Passegué E. Surviving change: the metabolic journey of hematopoietic stem cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24:479–87.
Yamashita M, Dellorusso PV, Olson OC, Passegué E. Dysregulated haematopoietic stem cell behaviour in myeloid leukaemogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:365–82.
Stubbins RJ, Maksakova IA, Sanford DS, Rouhi A, Kuchenbauer F. Mitochondrial metabolism: powering new directions in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021;62:2331–41.
Stergiou IE, Kapsogeorgou EK. Autophagy and metabolism in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:8540.
Kim M, Cooper DD, Hayes SF, Spangrude GJ. Rhodamine-123 staining in hematopoietic stem cells of young mice indicates mitochondrial activation rather than dye efflux. Blood. 1998;91:4106–17.
Simsek T, Kocabas F, Zheng J, Deberardinis RJ, Mahmoud AI, Olson EN, et al. The distinct metabolic profile of hematopoietic stem cells reflects their location in a hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:380–90.
Medeiros BC, Chan SM, Daver NG, Jonas BA, Pollyea DA. Optimizing survival outcomes with post‐remission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:803–11.
Farge T, Saland E, de Toni F, Aroua N, Hosseini M, Perry R, et al. Chemotherapy-resistant human acute myeloid leukemia cells are not enriched for leukemic stem cells but require oxidative metabolism. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:716–35.
Tcheng M, Roma A, Ahmed N, Smith RW, Jayanth P, Minden MD, et al. Very long chain fatty acid metabolism is required in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2021;137:3518–32.
Cantor JR, Sabatini DM. Cancer cell metabolism: one hallmark, many faces. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:881–98.
Khandanpour C, Sharif-Askari E, Vassen L, Gaudreau M-C, Zhu J, Paul WE, et al. Evidence that growth factor independence 1b regulates dormancy and peripheral blood mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2010;116:5149–61.
Saleque S, Cameron S, Orkin SH. The zinc-finger proto-oncogene Gfi-1b is essential for development of the erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages. Genes Dev. 2002;16:301–6.
Laurent B, Randrianarison-Huetz V, Maréchal V, Mayeux P, Dusanter-Fourt I, Duménil D, et al. High-mobility group protein HMGB2 regulates human erythroid differentiation through trans-activation of GFI1B transcription. Blood. 2010;115:687–95.
Foudi A, Kramer DJ, Qin J, Ye D, Behlich A-S, Mordecai S, et al. Distinct, strict requirements for Gfi-1b in adult bone marrow red cell and platelet generation. J Exp Med. 2014;211:909–27.
Thivakaran A, Botezatu L, Hönes JM, Schütte J, Vassen L, Al-Matary YS, et al. Gfi1b: a key player in the genesis and maintenance of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica. 2018;103:614–25.
Hönes JM, Botezatu L, Helness A, Vadnais C, Vassen L, Robert F, et al. GFI1 as a novel prognostic and therapeutic factor for AML/MDS. Leukemia. 2016;30:1237–45.
Hönes JM, Thivakaran A, Botezatu L, Patnana P, Castro SV, da C, et al. Enforced GFI1 expression impedes human and murine leukemic cell growth. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–13.
Liebmann M, Korn L, Janoschka C, Albrecht S, Lauks S, Herrmann AM, et al. Dimethyl fumarate treatment restrains the antioxidative capacity of T cells to control autoimmunity. Brain. 2021;144:3126–41.
Liebmann M, Hucke S, Koch K, Eschborn M, Ghelman J, Chasan AI, et al. Nur77 serves as a molecular brake of the metabolic switch during T cell activation to restrict autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E8017–26.
Sancho P, Burgos-Ramos E, Tavera A, Bou Kheir T, Jagust P, Schoenhals M, et al. MYC/PGC-1α balance determines the metabolic phenotype and plasticity of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cell Metab. 2015;22:590–605.
van Oorschot R, Hansen M, Koornneef JM, Marneth AE, Bergevoet SM, van Bergen MGJM, et al. Molecular mechanisms of bleeding disorderassociated GFI1BQ287* mutation and its affected pathways in megakaryocytes and platelets. Haematologica. 2019;104:1460–72.
Wilson NK, Foster SD, Wang X, Knezevic K, Schütte J, Kaimakis P, et al. Combinatorial transcriptional control in blood stem/progenitor cells: genome-wide analysis of ten major transcriptional regulators. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:532–44.
Tabe Y, Konopleva M. Break the lifeline of AML cells. Blood. 2021;137:3465–7.
Faubert B, Solmonson A, DeBerardinis RJ. Metabolic reprogramming and cancer progression. Science. 2020;368:eaaw5473.
Kim J, DeBerardinis RJ. Mechanisms and implications of metabolic heterogeneity in cancer. Cell Metab. 2019;30:434–46.
Ryan DG, Murphy MP, Frezza C, Prag HA, Chouchani ET, O’Neill LA, et al. Coupling Krebs cycle metabolites to signalling in immunity and cancer. Nat Metab. 2019;1:16–33.
Liu L, Patnana PK, Xie X, Frank D, Nimmagadda SC, Rosemann A, et al. High metabolic dependence on oxidative phosphorylation drives sensitivity to metformin treatment in MLL/AF9 acute myeloid leukemia. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:486.
Fontaine E. Metformin-induced mitochondrial complex I inhibition: facts, uncertainties, and consequences. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:753.
Wang Y, An H, Liu T, Qin C, Sesaki H, Guo S, et al. Metformin improves mitochondrial respiratory activity through activation of AMPK. Cell Rep. 2019;29:1511.e5.
Akinyeke T, Matsumura S, Wang X, Wu Y, Schalfer ED, Saxena A, et al. Metformin targets c-MYC oncogene to prevent prostate cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:2823–32.
Shen P, Reineke LC, Knutsen E, Chen M, Pichler M, Ling H, et al. Metformin blocks MYC protein synthesis in colorectal cancer via mTOR-4EBP-eIF4E and MNK1-eIF4G-eIF4E signaling. Mol Oncol. 2018;12:1856–70.
Bahr C, von Paleske L, Uslu VV, Remeseiro S, Takayama N, Ng SW, et al. A Myc enhancer cluster regulates normal and leukaemic haematopoietic stem cell hierarchies. Nature. 2018;553:515–20.
Rodriguez P, Bonte E, Krijgsveld J, Kolodziej KE, Guyot B, Heck AJR, et al. GATA-1 forms distinct activating and repressive complexes in erythroid cells. EMBO J. 2005;24:2354–66.
Roca-Portoles A, Rodriguez-Blanco G, Sumpton D, Cloix C, Mullin M, Mackay GM, et al. Venetoclax causes metabolic reprogramming independent of BCL-2 inhibition. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:616.
Beauchemin H, Möröy T. Multifaceted actions of GFI1 and GFI1B in hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and lineage commitment. Front Genet. 2020;11:591099.
Huang D-Y. GATA-1 mediates auto-regulation of Gfi-1B transcription in K562 cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:5331–42.
Lancrin C, Mazan M, Stefanska M, Patel R, Lichtinger M, Costa G, et al. GFI1 and GFI1B control the loss of endothelial identity of hemogenic endothelium during hematopoietic commitment. Blood. 2012;120:314–22.
Laurent B, Randrianarison-Huetz V, Kadri Z, Roméo P-H, Porteu F, Duménil D. Gfi-1B promoter remains associated with active chromatin marks throughout erythroid differentiation of human primary progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27:2153–62.
Vassen L, Okayama T, Möröy T. Gfi1b:green fluorescent protein knock-in mice reveal a dynamic expression pattern of Gfi1b during hematopoiesis that is largely complementary to Gfi1. Blood. 2007;109:2356–64.
Lagadinou ED, Sach A, Callahan K, Rossi RM, Neering SJ, Minhajuddin M, et al. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:329–41.
Samudio I, Harmancey R, Fiegl M, Kantarjian H, Konopleva M, Korchin B, et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation sensitizes human leukemia cells to apoptosis induction. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:142–56.
Luna-Yolba R, Marmoiton J, Gigo V, Marechal X, Boet E, Sahal A, et al. Disrupting mitochondrial electron transfer chain complex I decreases immune checkpoints in murine and human acute myeloid leukemic cells. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:3499.
Martínez-Ordoñez A, Seoane S, Avila L, Eiro N, Macía M, Arias E, et al. POU1F1 transcription factor induces metabolic reprogramming and breast cancer progression via LDHA regulation. Oncogene. 2021;40:2725–40.
Koundouros N, Poulogiannis G. Reprogramming of fatty acid metabolism in cancer. Br J Cancer. 2020;122:4–22.
Elmaagacli AH, Koldehoff M, Zakrzewski JL, Steckel NK, Ottinger H, Beelen DW. Growth factor-independent 1B gene (GFI1B) is overexpressed in erythropoietic and megakaryocytic malignancies and increases their proliferation rate. Br J Haematol. 2007;136:212–9.
Vassen L, Khandanpour C, Ebeling P, van der Reijden BA, Jansen JH, Mahlmann S, et al. Growth factor independent 1b (Gfi1b) and a new splice variant of Gfi1b are highly expressed in patients with acute and chronic leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2009;89:422–30.
Koldehoff M, Zakrzewski JL, Beelen DW, Elmaagacli AH. Additive antileukemia effects by GFI1B- and BCR–ABL-specific siRNA in advanced phase chronic myeloid leukemic cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2013;20:421–7.
Bao EL, Nandakumar SK, Liao X, Bick AG, Karjalainen J, Tabaka M, et al. Inherited myeloproliferative neoplasm risk affects haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2020;586:769–75.
Lee J, Yesilkanal AE, Wynne JP, Frankenberger C, Liu J, Yan J, et al. Effective breast cancer combination therapy targeting BACH1 and mitochondrial metabolism. Nature. 2019;568:254–8.
Podhorecka M. Metformin – its anti-cancer effects in hematologic malignancies. Oncol Rev. 2021;15:514.
DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, Jonas BA, Arellano M, Becker PS, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2019;133:7–17.
Ricciardi MR, Mirabilii S, Allegretti M, Licchetta R, Calarco A, Torrisi MR, et al. Targeting the leukemia cell metabolism by the CPT1a inhibition: functional preclinical effects in leukemias. Blood. 2015;126:1925–9.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the animal facility of University Hospital Muenster. We also thank Dagmar Clemens and Hannelore Leuschke from University Hospital Muenster for their technical assistance, Prof. Stephan Hailfinger for editing the manuscript, Di Liu from Hannover Medical School for providing the schematic draft of mouse, and Wolfgang A. Linke (Institute of physiology II, University of Muenster) for TEM support. The work was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (70112392), and partially by the Jose Carreras Leukämie Stiftung (DJCLS 17R/2018), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KH331/2–3), and the intramural funding of the faculty of Medicine at University Hospital of Muenster (Kha2/002/20). Figures 1a, 4a, 4e, 5a, and 7d and Supplementary Figs. S8a and S12 were created with BioRender.com.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LL, PKP, XX, and DF performed research. LL, PKP, and CK performed data analysis and interpretation. TK, FR, ML, LK, WX, JGO, and CK provided essential research support. JV, FN, and JH performed confocal microscopy. AU performed electron microscopy. MS performed ChIP-seq analysis. BO, S-CN, DZ, and ML checked experiments and results and edited the manuscript. LL and CK designed the study and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Patnana, P.K., Xie, X. et al. GFI1B acts as a metabolic regulator in hematopoiesis and acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 36, 2196–2207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01635-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01635-9
This article is cited by
-
Reprogramming hematopoietic stem cell metabolism in lung cancer: glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, and the role of 2-DG
Biology Direct (2024)
-
Enhanced MCM5 Level Predicts Bad Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Molecular Biotechnology (2023)