Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Myelodysplastic syndrome

Rethinking clinical trial endpoints in myelodysplastic syndromes

Leukemia volume 33, pages 570–575 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous collection of clonal, hematopoietic disorders primarily affecting an older population, making successful drug development a complicated process. A sole focus on response rate in clinical trials is likely not clinically meaningful if not accompanied by substantive response duration, improvement in quality of life, and ideally prolongation of survival. The process of receiving a new therapy should not be more burdensome than the MDS sequela it is intended to ameliorate. We review challenges in drug development in MDS with respect to aligning trial endpoints for lower and higher risk patients with treatment goals meaningful to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foran JM, Shammo JM. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes. Am J Med. 2012;125(7 Suppl):S6–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naqvi K, Jabbour E, Bueso-Ramos C, Pierce S, Borthakur G, Estrov Z, et al. Implications of discrepancy in morphologic diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome between referral and tertiary care centers. Blood. 2011;118:4690–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vardiman J, Thiele J, Arber D, Brunning R, Borowitz M, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 Revisions of the WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114:937–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Makishima H, Yoshizato T, Yoshida K, Sekeres MA, Radivoyevitch T, Suzuki H, et al. Dynamics of clonal evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet. 2017;49:204–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O, Galili N, Nilsson Br, Garcia-Manero G, et al. Clinical Effect of Point Mutations in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Eng J Med. 2011;364:2496–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao X, Yang F, Li S, Liu M, Ying S, Jia X, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype of myelodysplastic syndrome identified through genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation and gene expression. Br J Haematol. 2014;165:649–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taskesen E, Havermans M, van Lom K, Sanders MA, van Norden Y, Bindels E, et al. Two splice-factor mutant leukemia subgroups uncovered at the boundaries of MDS and AML using combined gene expression and DNA-methylation profiling. Blood. 2014;123:3327–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steensma DP, Bejar R, Jaiswal S, Lindsley RC, Sekeres MA, Hasserjian RP, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its distinction from myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2015;126:9–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, Manning A, Grauman PV, Mar BG, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2488–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A, et al. Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:223–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kantarjian H, Issa JP, Rosenfeld CS, Bennett JM, Albitar M, DiPersio J, et al. Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study. Cancer. 2006;106:1794–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, Giagounidis A, Raza A, Feldman E, et al. Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steensma DP, Baer MR, Slack JL, Buckstein R, Godley LA, Garcia-Manero G, et al. Multicenter study of decitabine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3842–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sekeres MA. Epidemiology, natural history, and practice patterns of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes in 2010. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9:57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sekeres MA, Schoonen WM, Kantarjian H, List A, Fryzek J, Paquette R, et al. Characteristics of US patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of six cross-sectional physician surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1542–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zipperer E, Tanha N, Strupp C, Kundgen A, Nachtkamp K, Neukirchen J, et al. The myelodysplastic syndrome-comorbidity index provides additional prognostic information on patients stratified according to the revised international prognostic scoring system. Haematologica. 2014;99:e31–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89:2079–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120:2454–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sekeres MA, Gerds AT. Established and novel agents for myelodysplastic syndromes. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:82–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Platzbecker U, Symeonidis A, Oliva EN, Goede JS, Delforge M, Mayer J, et al. A phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial of darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2017;31:1944–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gabrilove J, Paquette R, Lyons RM, Mushtaq C, Sekeres MA, Tomita D, et al. Phase 2, single-arm trial to evaluate the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for correcting anaemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2008;142:379–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Raza A, Galili N, Smith SE, Godwin J, Boccia RV, Myint H, et al. A phase 2 randomized multicenter study of 2 extended dosing schedules of oral ezatiostat in low to intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2012;118:2138–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, et al. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006;108:419–25. Epub 2006 Apr 11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gale RP, Barosi G, Barbui T, Cervantes F, Dohner K, Dupriez B, et al. What are RBC-transfusion-dependence and -independence? Leuk Res. 2011;35:8–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steensma DP, Gattermann N. When is iron overload deleterious, and when and how should iron chelation therapy be administered in myelodysplastic syndromes? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2013;26:431–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sekeres MA. How to manage lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2012;26:390–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steensma DP. Myelodysplasia paranoia: iron as the new radon. Leuk Res. 2009;33:1158–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Platzbecker U, Germing U, Gotze KS, Kiewe P, Mayer K, Chromik J, et al. Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1338–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Komrokji R, Garcia-Manero G, Ades L, Prebet T, Steensma DP, Jurcic JG, et al. Sotatercept with long-term extension for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase 2, dose-ranging trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e63–e72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tefferi A, Al-Ali HK, Barosi G, Devos T, Gisslinger H, Jiang Q, et al. A randomized study of pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence. Leukemia. 2017;31:1252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramsey SD, McCune JS, Blough DK, McDermott CL, Beck SJ, Lopez JA, et al. Patterns of blood product use among patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Vox Sang. 2012;102:331–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kantarjian H, Giles F, List A, Lyons R, Sekeres MA, Pierce S, et al. The incidence and impact of thrombocytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer. 2007;109:1705–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Platzbecker U, Sekeres MA, Kantarjian H, Giagounidis A, Mufti GJ, Jia C, et al. Relationship of different platelet response criteria and patient outcomes in a romiplostim myelodysplastic syndromes trial. Leukemia. 2014;28:2418–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kantarjian H, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Becker PS, Boruchov A, Bowen D, et al. Safety and efficacy of romiplostim in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia. J Clin Oncol. 2009;28:437–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Giagounidis A, Mufti GJ, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Szer J, Platzbecker U, et al. Results of a randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim versus placebo in patients with low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia. Cancer. 2014;120:1838–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bailey RA, Reardon G, Wasserman MR, McKenzie RS, Hord RS. Association of anemia with worsened activities of daily living and health-related quality of life scores derived from the Minimum Data Set in long-term care residents. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Platzbecker U, Hofbauer LC, Ehninger G, Holig K. The clinical, quality of life, and economic consequences of chronic anemia and transfusion support in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res. 2012;36:525–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Casadevall N, Durieux P, Dubois S, Hemery F, Lepage E, Quarre MC, et al. Health, economic, and quality-of-life effects of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomized, controlled trial. Blood. 2004;104:321–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Steensma DP, Heptinstall KV, Johnson VM, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Camoriano JK, et al. Common troublesome symptoms and their impact on quality of life in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): results of a large internet-based survey. Leuk Res. 2008;32:691–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Santini V, Almeida A, Giagounidis A, Platzbecker U, Buckstein R, Beach CL, et al. The Effect of Lenalidomide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Lower-Risk Non-del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results From the MDS-005 Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018;18:136–44.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Abel GA, Efficace F, Buckstein RJ, Tinsley S, Jurcic JG, Martins Y, et al. Prospective international validation of the Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS). Haematologica. 2016;101:781–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. List AF, Bennett JM, Sekeres MA, Skikne B, Fu T, Shammo JM, et al. Extended survival and reduced risk of AML progression in erythroid-responsive lenalidomide-treated patients with lower-risk del(5q) MDS. Leukemia. 2015;29:2452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Santini V, Almeida A, Giagounidis A, Gropper S, Jonasova A, Vey N, et al. Randomized Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in RBC Transfusion-Dependent Patients With Lower-Risk Non-del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Ineligible for or Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2988–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nazha A, Al-Issa K, Hamilton BK, Radivoyevitch T, Gerds AT, Mukherjee S, et al. Adding molecular data to prognostic models can improve predictive power in treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2017;31:2848–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nazha A, Komrokji RS, Garcia-Manero G, Barnard J, Roboz GJ, Steensma DP, et al. The efficacy of current prognostic models in predicting outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes at the time of hypomethylating agent failure. Haematologica. 2016;101:e224–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zeidan AM, Sekeres MA, Garcia-Manero G, Steensma DP, Zell K, Barnard J, et al. Comparison of risk stratification tools in predicting outcomes of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azanucleosides. Leukemia. 2016;30:649–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Komrokji RS, DeZern AE, Zell K, Al Ali NH, Estling C, Zimmerman C, et al. Validation of International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Report on Behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium (MDSCRC). Blood. 2015;126:909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P, Al-Kali A, Baer MR, Sekeres MA, Roboz GJ, et al. Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:496–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leukemia Programs, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, and Boston, MA, USA

    Mikkael A. Sekeres & David P. Steensma

Authors
  1. Mikkael A. Sekeres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David P. Steensma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikkael A. Sekeres.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M.A.S. serves on Advisory Boards for Celgene, Takeda, and Syros and on a DSMB for Opsona. D.P.S. consults for Novartis and Otsuka; serves on DSMBs for Onconova, Janssen, and Takeda; and his institution receives research funding from Celgene and H3Bioscience.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekeres, M.A., Steensma, D.P. Rethinking clinical trial endpoints in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 33, 570–575 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0367-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0367-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links