Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Pulseless electrical activity and asystolic cardiac arrest in infants: identifying factors that influence outcomes

Abstract

Background

There is limited information on pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystolic cardiac arrest (CA) in the infant population. The aim is to describe the incidence and factors associated with outcomes in infants with PEA/asystolic CA.

Methods

Single-center retrospective chart review study of infants less than one year of age who suffer in-hospital PEA/asystolic CA from January 1 2011 to June 30 2019. The primary outcome was the return of spontaneous circulation. The secondary outcome was survival to discharge.

Results

CA occurred in 148 infants and PEA/asystolic was found in 38 (26%). Of those 29 (76%) achieved ROSC, and 12 (32%) survived to discharge. Infants on inotrope support or receiving longer duration of chest compressions and epinephrine had increase mortality. All infants with respiratory etiology of arrest survived to hospital discharge.

Conclusion

PEA/asystolic CAs are uncommon. Poor prognostic indicators include the need for pre-arrest inotrope support and increased duration of chest compressions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flow diagram of the CPR events included in the analysis.
Fig. 2: PEA/asystolic outcomes based on the location of the arrest.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Clark AE, Moler F, Meer K, Harrison RE, et al. Incidence and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in PICUs. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:798–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Donoghue A, Berg RA, Hazinski MF, Praestgaard AH, Roberts K, Nadkarni VM. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bradycardia with poor perfusion versus pulseless cardiac arrest. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1541–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmberg MJ, Wiberg S, Ross CE, Kleinman M, Hoeyer-Nielsen AK, Donnino M, et al. Trends in survival after pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Circulation. 2019;140:1398–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali N, Lam T, Gray MM, Clausen D, Riley M, Grover TR, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in quaternary neonatal intensive care units: a multicenter study. Resuscitation. 2021;159:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foglia EE, Langeveld R, Heimall L, Heimall L, Deveney A, Ades A, et al. Incidence, characteristics, and survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the quaternary neonatal intensive care unit. Resuscitation. 2017;110:32–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad KA, Velasquez SG, Kohlleppel KL, Henderson C, Stine C, LeVan J, et al. The characteristics and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the neonatal intensive care unit based on gestational age and unit level of care. Am J Perinatol. 2019;1. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693990.

  7. Topjian AA, Raymond TT, Atkins D, Chan M, Duff J, Joyner BL, et al. Part 4: pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142:s469–s523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiner GM, Zaichkin J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation (NRP). 8th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics and American Heart Association; 2021.

  9. Sawyer T, Clark A, Ridout R. Infant resuscitation outside the delivery room in neonatal-perinatal and pediatric critical care fellowship programs: NRP or PALS? Results of a national survey. J Neonatal Perinat Med. 2009;2:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali N, Sawyer T, Barry J, Grover T, Ades A. Resuscitation practices for infants in the NICU, PICU and CICU: Results of a national survey. J Perinatol. 2017;37:172–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan RW, Reeder RW, Meert KL, Telford R, Yates AR, Berger JT, et al. Survival and hemodynamics during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bradycardia and poor perfusion versus pulseless cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2020:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000004308.

  12. Sillers L, Handley SC, James JR, Foglia EE. Pulseless electrical activity complicating neonatal resuscitation. Neonatology. 2019;115:95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Luong D, Cheung PY, Barrington KJ, Davis P, Unrau J, Dakshinamurti S, et al. Cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity rhythm in newborn infants: a case series. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;104:F572–F574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyde P, Puddy V. Pulseless electrical activity after rapid administration of fresh frozen plasma. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008;44:464–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Polito A, Biasucci DG, Cogo P. Point-of-care pleural and lung ultrasound in a newborn suffering from cardiac arrest due to tension pneumothorax after cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young. 2015;26:400–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raymond TT, Praestgaard A, Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Parshuram CS. The association of hospital rate of delayed epinephrine administration with survival to discharge for pediatric nonshockable in-hospital cardiac arrest. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20:405–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersen LW, Berg KM, Saindon BZ, Massaro JM, Raymond TT, Berg RA, et al. Time to epinephrine and survival after pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc. 2015;314:802–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. del Castillo J, López-Herce J, Canadas S, Matamoros M, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Rodriguez-Calvo A, et al. Cardiac arrest and resuscitation in the pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter multinational study. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1380–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Handley SC, Passarella M, Raymond TT, Lorch SA, Ades A, Foglia EE Epidemiology and outcomes of infants after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit from a National Registry. Resuscitation. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resusitation.2021.05.029.

  20. Parish DC, Goyal H, Dane FC. Mechanism of dealth: there’s more to it than sudden cardiac arrest. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:3081–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gazmuri RJ, Radhakrishnan J Protecting mitochondrial bioenergetic function during resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care Clin. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2021.02.001.

  22. Vali P, Chandrasekharan P, Rawat M, Gugino S, Koeninsknecht C, Helman J, et al. Evaluation of timing and route of epinephrine in a neonatal model of asphyxial arrest. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004402.

  23. Raymond TT, Stromberg D, Stigall W, Burton G, Zaritsky A. Sodium bicarbonate use during in-hospital pediatric pulseless cardiac arrest—a report from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines—Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;89:106–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Murthy K, Dykes FD, Padula MA, Pallotto EK, Reber KM, Durand DJ, et al. The Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Database: an overview of complexity, outcomes and variation in care. J Perinatol. 2014;34:582–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McCrory MC, Spaeder MC, Gower EW, Nakagawa TA, Simpson SL, Coleman MA, et al. Time of admission to the PICU and mortality. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18:915–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors contributors

KB and NA conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed the manuscript. MHW helped with the study design and critically reviewed the manuscript. RH and ES analyzed the data and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noorjahan Ali.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Best, K., Wyckoff, M.H., Huang, R. et al. Pulseless electrical activity and asystolic cardiac arrest in infants: identifying factors that influence outcomes. J Perinatol 42, 574–579 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01349-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01349-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links