Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Outcomes of dialysis in neonates with anuric end-stage renal disease at birth: ethical considerations

Journal of Perinatology volume 42, pages 920–924 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Introduction

We present a case series of neonates with anuric ESRD undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) and discuss the associated ethical implications of RRT in this population.

Methods

We reviewed patients who initiated RRT within 1 week of life due to anuric ESRD from 2009–2019 at a single tertiary center. Primary outcomes were receipt of renal transplant (RT), one-year survival, and overall survival.

Results

Five patients met the inclusion criteria. Two patients received an RT. One-year survival was 80%, while overall survival was 60% with a median follow-up of 18 months. In the 2 still-living patients who have not undergone RT, they are ineligible, one due to recent malignancy and the other from acquired cardiovascular comorbidities.

Conclusion

Patients with anuric ESRD requiring RRT undergo multiple treatment challenges with low RT and survival rates. These findings should be shared with families considering intervention for cases of severe renal disease diagnosed prenatally.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Data availability

Data is not publicly available due to patient privacy laws but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Thomas AN, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA, Placencia FX. Evidence-based, ethically justified counseling for fetal bilateral renal agenesis. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:585–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugarman J, Anderson J, Baschat AA, Herrera Beutler J, Bienstock JL, Bunchman TE, et al. Ethical considerations concerning amnioinfusions for treating fetal bilateral renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:130–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jelin AC, Sagaser KG, Forster KR, Ibekwe T, Norton ME, Jelin EB. Etiology and management of early pregnancy renal anhydramnios: is there a place for serial amnioinfusions? Prenat Diagn. 2020;40:528–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheldon CR, Kim ED, Chandra P, Concepcion W, Gallo A, Su S, et al. Two infants with bilateral renal agenesis who were bridged by chronic peritoneal dialysis to kidney transplantation. Pediatr Transpl. 2019;23:e13532.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bienstock JL, Birsner ML, Coleman F, Hueppchen NA. Successful in utero intervention for bilateral renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 2 Suppl 1):413–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Riddle S, Habli M, Tabbah S, Lim FY, Minges M, Kingma P, et al. Contemporary outcomes of patients with isolated bilateral renal agenesis with and without Fetal Intervention. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47:675–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Stralen KJ, Borzych-Dużalka D, Hataya H, Kennedy SE, Jager KJ, Verrina E, et al. Survival and clinical outcomes of children starting renal replacement therapy in the neonatal period. Kidney Int. 2014;86:168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carey WA, Talley LI, Sehring SA, Jaskula JM, Mathias RS. Outcomes of dialysis initiated during the neonatal period for treatment of end-stage renal disease: a North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies special analysis. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e468–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor DR, Lightbody CJ. Futility and appropriateness: challenging words, important concepts. Postgrad Med J. 2018;94:238–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, Lo B, Truog RD, Rushton CH, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:1318–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown GT. Medical futility in concept, culture, and practice. J Clin Ethics. 2018;29:114–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomlinson T, Brody H. Ethics and communication in do-not-resuscitate orders. N. Engl J Med. 1988;318:43–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:949–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant SB, Modi PK, Singer EA. Futility and the care of surgical patients: ethical dilemmas. World J Surg. 2014;38:1631–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burns JP, Truog RD. Futility: a concept in evolution. Chest. 2007;132:1987–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zurowska AM, Fischbach M, Watson AR, Edefonti A, Stefanidis CJ, Group EPDW. Clinical practice recommendations for the care of infants with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD5). Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28:1739–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bunchman TE. The ethics of infant dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1996;16(Suppl 1):S505–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Medway M, Tong A, Craig JC, Kim S, Mackie F, McTaggart S, et al. Parental perspectives on the financial impact of caring for a child with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65:384–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tong A, Lowe A, Sainsbury P, Craig JC. Parental perspectives on caring for a child with chronic kidney disease: an in-depth interview study. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:549–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lantos JD, Warady BA. The evolving ethics of infant dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28:1943–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klaassen I, Neuhaus TJ, Mueller-Wiefel DE, Kemper MJ. Antenatal oligohydramnios of renal origin: long-term outcome. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2007;22:432–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Warring SK, Novoa V, Shazly S, Trinidad MC, Sas DJ, Schiltz B, et al. Serial amnioinfusion as regenerative therapy for pulmonary hypoplasia in fetuses with intrauterine renal failure or severe renal anomalies: systematic review and future perspectives. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020;4:391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Daniel S. Han

  2. Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA

    Margret E. Bock

  3. Department of Pediatrics and the Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

    Jacqueline J. Glover

  4. Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA

    Vijaya M. Vemulakonda

Authors
  1. Daniel S. Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margret E. Bock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacqueline J. Glover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vijaya M. Vemulakonda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DSH: Substantial contributions to the design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting of the work and critical revision. MEB: Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, the analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the work and critical revision. JJG: Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, drafting the work and critical revision. VMV: Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, the analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the work and critical revision. All authors approve of the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel S. Han.

Ethics declarations

Statement of Ethics

Our study complied with the guidelines for human studies and was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by our institutional review board (IRB) committee on human research, approval 19–1369. This study was granted exemption from requiring written informed consent by the University of Colorado, Anschutz IRB committee.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, D.S., Bock, M.E., Glover, J.J. et al. Outcomes of dialysis in neonates with anuric end-stage renal disease at birth: ethical considerations. J Perinatol 42, 920–924 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01328-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01328-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links