Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Falling insulin requirement in late pregnancy: association with obstetric and neonatal outcomes

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether diminishing insulin requirement in the third trimester is associated with placental dysfunction.

Study design

Two-year retrospective cohort study at one tertiary care center of women with pregestational or gestational diabetes, their insulin requirements, and complications associated with placental dysfunction.

Results

Of 157 women, 21 (13%) experienced declining insulin requirement, with average decline of 28% at 34 weeks. They were more likely to have pregestational diabetes (71.4% vs. 42.6%; p < 0.01) and delivered earlier (median 36w4d vs. 37w4d; p < 0.01). There was no difference in placental dysfunction related complications (33% vs. 24%; p = 0.37). There was an increased rate of polyhydramnios (42.9% vs. 8.8%; p < 0.01). NICU admission (62% vs. 33%; p < 0.01) and neonatal respiratory distress (52% vs. 24%; p < 0.01) was higher in cases of declining insulin requirement independent of gestational age.

Conclusions

A decline in insulin requirement should raise concern for increased risk of NICU admission and neonatal respiratory distress.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Neonatal ICU admission rate by gestational age, stratified by maternal insulin requirement status.
Fig. 2: Neonatal respiratory distress rate at birth by gestational age, stratified by maternal insulin requirement status.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langer O, Anyaegbunam A, Brustman L, Guidetti D, Levy J, Mazze R. Pregestational diabetes: insulin requirements throughout pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;159:616–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia-Patterson A, Gich I, Amini SB, Catalano PM, de Leiva A, Corcoy R. Insulin requirements throughout pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: three changes of direction. Diabetologia. 2010;53:446–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan EA, Enns L. Role of gestational hormones in the induction of insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;67:341–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Achong N, McIntyre HD, Callaway L. Factors determining insulin requirements in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus during pregnancy: a review. Obstet Med. 2014;7:52–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Padmanabhan S, Lee VW, Mclean M, Athayde N, Lanzarone V, Khashnow Q, et al. The association of falling insulin requirements with maternal biomarkers and placental dysfunction: a prospective study of women with preexisting diabetes in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1323–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McManus RM, Ryan EA. Insulin requirements in insulin-dependent and insulin-requiring GDM women during final month of pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:1323–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Steel JM, Johnstone FD, Hume R, Mao JH. Insulin requirements during pregnancy in women with Type 1 diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:253–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Padmanabhan S, McLean M, Cheung NW. Falling insulin requirements are associated with adverse obstetric outcomes in women with preexisting diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2685–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ram M, Feinmesser L, Shinar S, Maslovitz. The importance of declining insulin requirements during pregnancy in patients with pregestational gestational diabetes mellitus. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B. 2017;215:148–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American Diabetes Association. Management of diabetes in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:S114–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. SAS Enterprise Miner [software], Version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; Released 2013. https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/sas9.html.

  13. Kirwan JP, Hauguel-De Mouzon S, Lepereq J, Challier JC, Huston-Presley L, Friedman JE, et al. TNFa is a predictor of insulin resistance in human pregnancy. Diabetes. 2002;51:2207–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Callesen NF, Ringholm L, Stage E, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. Insulin requirements in Type 1 diabetic pregnancy: Do twin pregnant women require twice as much insulin as singleton pregnant women. Diabetes Care 2012;44:1246–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Achong N, Callaway L, d’Emden M, McIntyre HD, Lust K, Barrett HL. Insulin requirements in late pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective review. Diabetes Res Clin Pr. 2012;98:414–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ilic S, Javoanovic L, Wollitzer AO. Is the paradoxical first trimester drop in insulin requirement due to an increase in C-peptide concentration in pregnancy type 1 diabetic women? Diabetologia. 2000;43:1329–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen LR, Rehfeld JF, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. Pregnancy-induced rise in serum C-peptide concentrations in women wtih type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1052–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jovanovic L, Knopp RH, Brown Z, Conley MR, Park E, Mills JL.and the NICHHD Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study Group et al. Declining insulin requirement in the late first trimester of diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1130–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan S, Donnelly J. Outcome of pregnancy in women diagnosed with idiopathic polyhydramnios. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57:57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, Simpson LL. Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:648–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiegand SL, Beamon CJ, Chescheir NC, Stamilio D. Idiopathic polyhydramnios: severity and perinatal morbidity. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33:658–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dashe JS, Nathan L, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Correlation between amniotic fluid glucose concentration and amniotic fluid volume in pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:901–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Bradley B, Holdsinger KK. Maternal, fetal, and amniotic fluid levels of glucose, insulin and growth hormone. Obstet Gynecol. 1973;41:323–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weiss PA, HOfmann H, Winter R, Purstner P, Lichtenegger W. Amniotic fluid glucose values in normal and abnromal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:333–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to study design and to manuscript review. BW completed data analysis and manuscript drafting, and SL completed statistical analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Wilkinson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilkinson, B., McDonnell, M., Palermo, N. et al. Falling insulin requirement in late pregnancy: association with obstetric and neonatal outcomes. J Perinatol 41, 1043–1049 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00979-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00979-x

Search

Quick links