Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Comparing head ultrasounds and susceptibility-weighted imaging for the detection of low-grade hemorrhages in preterm infants

Abstract

Objective

Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a complication of prematurity. Grades III and IV IVH lead to significant morbidity, but mounting evidence shows low-grade IVH (grades I–II) may be associated with adverse sequelae. Head ultrasounds (HUS) are used to screen infants for IVH but may miss low-grade IVH. Our study compared the results of HUS around 7 days of age to susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) obtained at term-corrected age in infants born at <30 wGA.

Study design

Infants <30 weeks gestational age (GA) with an HUS and MRI at admission to UF Health were identified by a retrospective chart review. Images were re-read by a pediatric neuroradiologist.

Results

Ninety-four infants with a mean GA of 25.8 weeks were identified. Of those with normal HUS, 50% had low-grade IVH on the term-corrected MRI.

Conclusions

HUS are effective for screening for high-grade IVH. SWI is more sensitive in identifying low-grade IVH.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Gestational age distribution of patients.
Fig. 2: These two graphs show the false positive and false negative findings of head ultrasounds when compared to MRI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts J, Javed M, Hocker J, Wang H, Tarantino M. Risk factors associated with intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely premature neonates. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018;29:25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Szpecht D, Szymankiewicz M, Nowak I, Gadzinowski J. Intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates born before 32 weeks of gestation-retrospective analysis of risk factors. Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32:1399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ment LR, Oh W, Ehrenkranz RA, Philip AG, Duncan CC, Makuch RW. Antenatal steroids, delivery mode, and intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:795–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Humberg A, Härtel C, Paul P, Hanke K, Bossung V, Hartz A, et al. Delivery mode and intraventricular hemorrhage risk in very-low-birth-weight infants: Observational data of the German Neonatal Network. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;212:144–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohamed MA, Aly H. Transport of premature infants is associated with increased risk for intraventricular haemorrhage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:F403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Futagi Y, Toribe Y, Ogawa K, Suzuki Y. Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with intraventricular hemorrhage. Pediatric Neurol. 2006;34:219–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patra K, Wilson-Costello D, Taylor HG, Mercuri-Minich N, Hack M. Grades I-II intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely low birth weight infants: effects on neurodevelopment. J Pediatr. 2006;149:169–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klebermass-Schrehof K, Czaba C, Olischar M, Fuiko R, Waldhoer T, Rona Z, et al. Impact of low-grade intraventricular hemorrhage on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28:2085–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vohr BR, Allan W, Katz KH, Schneider K, Tucker R, Ment LR. Adolescents born prematurely with isolated grade 2 haemorrhage in the early 1990s face increased risks of learning challenges. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:1066–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vasileiadis GT, Gelman N, Han VK, Williams LA, Mann R, Bureau Y, et al. Uncomplicated intraventricular hemorrhage is followed by reduced cortical volume at near-term age. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maalouf EF, Duggan PJ, Counsell SJ, Rutherford MA, Cowan F, Azzopardi D, et al. Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2001;107:719–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong KA, Ashwal S, Obenaus A, Nickerson JP, Kido D, Haacke EM. Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging: a review of clinical applications in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schelhorn J, Gramsch C, Deuschl C, Quick HH, Nensa F, Moenninghoff C, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage detection over time using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radio. 2015;56:1501–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neubauer V, Djurdjevic T, Griesmaier E, Biermayr M, Gizewski ER, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U. Routine magnetic resonance imaging at term-equivalent age detects brain injury in 25% of a contemporary cohort of very preterm infants. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gomori JM, Grossman RI. Mechanisms responsible for the MR appearance and evolution of intracranial hemorrhage. Radiographics. 1988;8:427–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rutherford M. Hemorrhagic lesions of the newborn brain. MRI of the Neonatal Brain, 4 ed. London, United Kingdom: Saunders Ltd; 2001.

  18. Meoded A, Poretti A, Northington FJ, Tekes A, Intrapiromkul J, Huisman TA. Susceptibility weighted imaging of the neonatal brain. Clin Radio. 2012;67:793–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC, Howard K, Inder TE. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:685–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. de Vries LS, Benders MJ, Groenendaal F. Imaging the premature brain: ultrasound or MRI? Neuroradiology. 2013;55:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho T, Dukhovny D, Zupancic JA, Goldmann DA, Horbar JD, Pursley DM. Choosing wisely in newborn medicine: five opportunities to increase value. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e482–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearce R, Baardsnes J. Term MRI for small preterm babies: do parents really want to know and why has nobody asked them? Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:1013–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Levene MI, Fawer CL, Lamont RF. Risk factors in the development of intraventricular haemorrhage in the preterm neonate. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57:410–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vollmer B, Roth S, Baudin J, Stewart AL, Neville BG, Wyatt JS. Predictors of long-term outcome in very preterm infants: gestational age versus neonatal cranial ultrasound. Pediatrics. 2003;112:1108–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parvathi Nataraj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nataraj, P., Svojsik, M., Sura, L. et al. Comparing head ultrasounds and susceptibility-weighted imaging for the detection of low-grade hemorrhages in preterm infants. J Perinatol 41, 736–742 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00890-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00890-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links