Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Differential effects of the retinopathy of prematurity exam on the physiology of premature infants

Abstract

Objective

To compare the differential effects of the retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) examination on the physiology of premature infants with and without oxygen support.

Study Design

We collected data from 42 premature infants (room air = 19, oxygen support = 23) and compared physiological metrics including heart rate (HR), systemic peripheral saturation (SpO2), mesenteric tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) and clinical events (oxygen desaturation episodes, bradycardia events, and gastric residuals).

Results

We found significant differences between groups in HR during and briefly after the exam, and in mesenteric StO2, during eye drop administration, eye exam, and up to 8 min after the exam. SpO2 was significantly different between the groups at all time points. Gastric residuals were higher after the exam in infants on oxygen support, compared to baseline.

Conclusion

Premature infants on oxygen support may be at a higher risk of adverse physiologic effects in response to the ROP exam.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hellström A, Smith LEH, Dammann O. Retinopathy of prematurity. Lancet. 2013;382:1445–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grabska J, Walden P, Lerer T, Kelly C, Hussain N, Donovan T, et al. Can oral sucrose reduce the pain and distress associated with screening for retinopathy of prematurity? J Perinatol. 2005;25:33–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belda S, Pallás CR, De la Cruz J, Tejada P. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity: is it painful? Biol Neonate. 2004;86:195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Şener Taplak A, Erdem E. A Comparison of breast milk and sucrose in reducing neonatal pain during eye exam for retinopathy of prematurity. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:305–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell A, Hall RW, Erickson SW, Yates C, Hendrickson H. Systemic absorption of cyclopentolate and adverse events after retinopathy of prematurity exams. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41:1601–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reid B, Wang H, Guillet R. Apnea after routine eye examinations in premature infants. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34:199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonthala S, Sparks JW, Musgrove KH, Berseth CL. Mydriatics slow gastric emptying in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2000;137:327–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen AM, Cook N, Harris MC, Ying G-S, Binenbaum G. The pain response to mydriatic eyedrops in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2013;33:462–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Degirmencioglu H, Oncel MY, Calisici E, Say B, Uras N, Dilmen U. Transient ileus associated with the use of mydriatics after screening for retinopathy of prematurity in a very low birth weight infant. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014;51:e44–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozgun U, Demet T, Ozge KA, Zafer D, Murat S, Mehmet Y, et al. Fatal necrotising enterocolitis due to mydriatic eye drops. J Coll Physicians Surg--Pak Jcpsp. 2014;24(Suppl 2):S147–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cortez J, Gupta M, Amaram A, Pizzino J, Sawhney M, Sood BG. Noninvasive evaluation of splanchnic tissue oxygenation using near-infrared spectroscopy in preterm neonates. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:574–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ophthalmology AAOPS on, Ophthalmology AAO, Strabismus AA for POA, Orthoptists AA of C. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2013;131:189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papile L-A, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: A study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Naulaers G, Meyns B, Miserez M, Leunens V, Van Huffel S, Casaer P, et al. Use of tissue oxygenation index and fractional tissue oxygen extraction as non-invasive parameters for cerebral oxygenation. A validation study in piglets. Neonatology. 2007;92:120–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thoyre SM, Carlson J. Occurrence of oxygen desaturation events during preterm infant bottle feeding near discharge. Early Hum Dev. 2003;72:25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harsha SS, Archana BR. SNAPPE-II (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension-II) in Predicting Mortality and Morbidity in NICU. J Clin Diagn Res Jcdr. 2015;9:SC10–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marsh VA, Young WO, Dunaway KK, Kissling GE, Carlos RQ, Jones SM, et al. Efficacy of topical anesthetics to reduce pain in premature infants during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:829–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang AY, Chow J, Liu J. Corneal innervation and sensation: the eye and beyond. Yale J Biol Med. 2018;91:13–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Boron WF, Boulpaep EL, editors. Medical physiology. Third edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017. p. 1297.

  20. Tan JBC, Boskovic DS, Angeles DM. The energy costs of prematurity and the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) Experience. Antioxidants. 2018;7:37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McEwen BS. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;840:33–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Akotia DH, Durham JT, Arnell KM, Petruzzelli DL, Katheria AC. Relationship between near-infrared spectroscopy and transabdominal ultrasonography: noninvasive monitoring of intestinal function in neonates. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2016;22:61–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sun X, Lemyre B, Barrowman N, O’Connor M. Pain management during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants: a systematic review. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992. 2010;99:329–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kandasamy Y, Smith R, Wright IMR, Hartley L. Pain relief for premature infants during ophthalmology assessment. J AAPOS Publ Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2011;15:276–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Samra HA, McGrath JM. Pain management during retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations: a systematic review. Adv Neonatal Care. 2009;9:99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Belmonte C, Acosta MC, Merayo-Lloves J, Gallar J. What causes eye pain? Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2015;3:111–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Trevino R, Stewart B. Change in intraocular pressure during scleral depression. J Optom. 2015;8:244–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Estévez-Herrera J, González-Santana A, Baz-Dávila R, Machado JD, Borges R. The intravesicular cocktail and its role in the regulation of exocytosis. J Neurochem. 2016;137:897–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao J, Gonzalez F, Mu D. Apnea of prematurity: from cause to treatment. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170:1097–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ludington-Hoe SM, Anderson GC, Swinth JY, Thompson C, Hadeed AJ. Randomized controlled trial of kangaroo care: cardiorespiratory and thermal effects on healthy preterm infants. Neonatal Netw Nn. 2004;23:39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hunt F. The importance of kangaroo care on infant oxygen saturation levels and bonding. J Neonatal Nurs. 2008;14:47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bloch-Salisbury E, Zuzarte I, Indic P, Bednarek F, Paydarfar D. Kangaroo care: cardio-respiratory relationships between the infant and caregiver. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90:843–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dorothy Forde RN, Erin Hoch RN, Elena Kim-Saesim RN, and Sharon Lee RN for identifying and consenting subjects. We thank the LLU NICU physicians and nurses for their support. We thank the parents for allowing their babies to be part of this study.

Author Contribution

AH and DMA conceived the original idea and planned the experiments. JBCT and JD performed the experiments. JBCT worked out the technical details and calculations. JCBT and DMA wrote the manuscript. CGW and all co-authors contributed, revised and provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by NIH grant R01 NR011209 (DMA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilyn M. Angeles.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, J.B.C., Dunbar, J., Hopper, A. et al. Differential effects of the retinopathy of prematurity exam on the physiology of premature infants. J Perinatol 39, 708–716 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0331-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0331-z

Search

Quick links