Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Blood pressure load per body surface area is higher in women than in men

Abstract

Many unexplained sex differences have been observed in blood pressure (BP) related morbidity. However, there has been little research about the most obvious difference between men and women—body size. Given that blood vessels are organs of tubular shape, we hypothesized that correction of BP for body surface area (BSA), a two-dimensional measurement of body size, would allow comparison of BP load between men and women. We assessed the relationship of 24-h ambulatory BP measurements and BSA in 534 participants (mean age 61 ± 3 years, 51% women) from the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study. The study subjects had no previous medication affecting vasculature or BP. When BP values were adjusted for age, smoking, physical activity, and body fat percentage, males had higher ambulatory daytime mean systolic BP (131 mmHg vs. 127 mmHg, p < 0.001), diastolic BP (83 mmHg vs. 78 mmHg, p < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (100 mmHg vs. 96 mmHg, p < 0.001) than females. However, all BP components per unit of BSA were significantly lower in males: daytime mean systolic BP (65 mmHg vs. 71 mmHg, p < 0.001), diastolic BP (41 mmHg vs. 44 mmHg, p < 0.001), pulse pressure (24 mmHg vs. 28 mmHg, p = 0.013), and mean arterial pressure (49 mmHg vs. 54 mmHg, p < 0.001). The same phenomenon was observed in night-time BP values. BP load per BSA is higher in women than in men, which may explain many reported sex differences in cardiovascular morbidity. Relatively small-sized individuals might benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Distribution of body surface area according to sex.
Fig. 2: The means of body mass index and body surface area in men and women.
Fig. 3: Mean ratio between men and women in different daytime and night-time ambulatory blood pressure components.
Fig. 4: Magnitude of the effect of body surface area as a continuous variable on the ambulatory blood pressure components.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Go A, Mozaffarian D, Roger V.on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robitaille C, Dai S, Waters C, Loukine L, Bancej C, Quach S, et al. Diagnosed hypertension in Canada: incidence, prevalence and associated mortality. CMAJ. 2012;184:E49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prince M, Ebrahim S, Acosta D, Ferri CP, Guerra M, Huang Y, et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control among older people in Latin America, India and China: a 10/66 cross-sectional population-based survey. J Hypertens. 2011;30:177–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gee M, Bienek A, McAlister F, Robitaille C, Joffres M, Tremblay MS, et al. Factors associated with lack of awareness and uncontrolled high blood pressure among Canadian adults with hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:375–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008. JAMA 2010;303:2043–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Piro M, Della Bona R, Abbate A, Biasucci LM, Crea F. Sex-related differences in myocardial remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1057–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Borlaug BA, Redfield MM. Diastolic and systolic heart failure are distinct phenotypes within the heart failure spectrum. Circulation. 2011;123:2006–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okin P, Gerdts E, Kjeldsen S, Stevo J, Edelman JM, Dahlof B, Devereux RB, for the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study Investigators. Gender difference in regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive therapy. Hypertension. 2008;52:100–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossi P, Frances Y, Kingwell BA, Ahimastos AA. Gender differences in artery wall biomechanical properties throughout life. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1023–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shim CY, Park S, Choi D, Yang WI, Cho IJ, Choi EY, et al. Sex differences in central hemodynamics and their relationship to left ventricular diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1226–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamburg NM, Palmisano J, Larson MG, Sullivan LM, Lehman BT, Vasan RS, et al. Relation of brachial and digital measures of vascular function in the community: the Framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2011;57:390–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benetos A, Thomas A, Joly L, Blacher J, Pannier B, Labat C, et al. Pulse pressure amplification, a mechanical biomarker of cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1032–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Adult height and the risk of cause-specific death and vascular morbidity in 1 million people: individual participant meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1419–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Korhonen PE, Kautiainen H, Eriksson JG. The shorter the person, the higher the blood pressure: a birth-cohort study. J Hypertens. 2017;35:1170–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barker DJP, Osmond C, Forsen T, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1802–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1098.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn Y, Garruto RM. Estimations of body surface area in newborns. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:366–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G.On behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2003;21:821–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Woolcott OO, Bergman RN. Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole-body far percentage—a cross-sectional study in American adult individuals. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lakka TA, Venäläinen JM, Rauramaa R, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. Relation of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness to the risk of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1549–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wasenius N, Venojärvi M, Manderoos S, Surakka J, Lindholm H, Heinonen OJ, et al. Unfavorable influence of structured exercise program on total leisure-time physical activity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:404–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guyton AG, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 9th ed., W.B. Saunders Co; 1996. p. 166.

  23. Lemos PA, Ribeiro EE, Perin MA, Kajita LJ, de Magalhaes MA, Falcao JLAA, et al. Angiographic segment size in patients referred for coronary intervention is influenced by constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007;23:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hiteshi AK, Li D, Gao Y, Chen A, Flores F, Mao SS, et al. Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass. Clin Cardiol. 2014;37:605–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Orshal JM, Khalil RA. Gender, sex hormons, and vascular tone. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004;286:R233–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, Gargano JW, Duncan PW, Lynch G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:915–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sara JD, Widmer RJ, Matsuzawa Y, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Neugarten J, Acharaya A, Silbiger S. Effect of gender on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:319–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Paton JF, Dickinson CJ, Mitchell G. Harvey Cushing and the regulation of blood pressure in giraffe, rat and man: Introducing Cushing´s mechanism. Exp Physiol. 2009;94:11–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stramba-Badiale M, Fox KM, Priori SG, Collins P, Daly C, Graham I, et al. Cardiovascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:994–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zafrir B, Salman N, Crespo-Leiro MG, Anker SD, Coats AJ, Ferrari R.on behalf of the Heart Failure Long-Term Registry Investigators et al. Body surface area as a prognostic marker in chronic heart failure patients: results from the Heart Failure Registry of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2016;18:859–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Futter JE, Cleland JG, Clark AL. Body mass indices and outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2011;13:207–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tarnoki AD, Tarnoki DL, Bogl LH, Medda E, Fagnani C, Nistico L, et al. Association of body mass index with arterial stiffness and blood pressure components: a twin study. Atherosclerosis. 2013;229:388–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Verbraecken J, Van de Heyning P, De Backer W, Van Gaal L. Body surface area in normal weight, overweight, and obese adults. A comparison study. Metabolism. 2006;55:515–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Helsinki Birth Cohort Study has been supported by grants from Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Finnish Special Governmental Substudy for Health Sciences, Academy of Finland, Samfundet Folkhälsan, Liv och Hälsa, and Signe and Ane Gyllenbergs Foundation. The funding sources did not participate in the design of the study, the analysis or the interpretation of the data, the writing of this paper, or the process to submit this article for publication. The independence of the researchers from funders is declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Päivi E. Korhonen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Ethics Committee for Epidemiology of Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District approved the study.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from each subject before any procedures were carried out.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korhonen, P.E., Palmu, S., Kautiainen, H. et al. Blood pressure load per body surface area is higher in women than in men. J Hum Hypertens 35, 371–377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-0339-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-0339-z

Search

Quick links