Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Validation of the Kinetik Blood Pressure Monitor—Series 1 for use in adults at home and in clinical settings, according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol on the validation of blood pressure devices

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the blood pressure (BP) measurement accuracy of the Kinetik Blood Pressure Monitor—Series 1 (BPM-1) for use in home or clinical settings according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP). Forty-two participants were recruited to fulfil the required number of systolic and diastolic BP measurements according to the ESH-IP. Nine sequential same-arm BP readings were measured and analysed for each participant using the test device and observer mercury standard readings according to the 2002 ESH-IP. Forty one participants were used to obtain 33 sets of systolic and diastolic BP readings and were included in the analysis. Mean difference between the device measurements and the observer (mercury standard) measurements was 1.1 ± 7.2/1.1 ± 6.8 mmHg (mean ± standard deviation; systolic/diastolic). The number of systolic BP differences between the test and observer measurements that fell within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg was 65, 86 and 92. For diastolic readings, the number of test—observer measurement differences within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg was 77, 91 and 94. The number of participants with at least two out of three differences within 5 mmHg was 28 for systolic and 40 for diastolic BP readings. Three participants had no differences between the test and observer measurements within 5 mmHg in both the systolic and diastolic measurement categories. The Kinetik BPM-1 device fulfilled the requirements of the ESH-IP validation procedure and can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement within the home.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Bland–Altman plot showing the difference between the observer (mercury) systolic BP and the device systolic BP.
Fig. 2: Bland–Altman plot showing the difference between the observer (mercury) diastolic BP and the device diastolic BP.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McManus RJ, Wood S, Bray EP, Glasziou P, Hayen A, Heneghan C, et al. Self-monitoring in hypertension: a web-based survey of primary care physicians. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28:123–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tucker KL, Sheppard JP, Stevens R, Bosworth HB, Bove A, Bray EP, et al. Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Medicines, Healthcare Products Regulatory A. Blood Pressure Measurement Devices London: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency 2013. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/403448/Blood_pressure_measurement_devices.pdf.

  4. O’Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar C, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2002;7:3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis PS, Chapman N, Chowienczyk P, Clark C, Denver E, Lacy P, et al. Oscillometric measurement of blood pressure: a simplified explanation. A technical note on behalf of the British and Irish Hypertension Society. J Hum Hypertens. 2019;33:349–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the British and Irish Hypertension Society, Blood Pressure Measurement Working Party.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Sheppard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwartz, C.L., Edwards, K., Gamble, W. et al. Validation of the Kinetik Blood Pressure Monitor—Series 1 for use in adults at home and in clinical settings, according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol on the validation of blood pressure devices. J Hum Hypertens 35, 1046–1050 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-00445-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-00445-9

Search

Quick links