Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Difference in positive relation between cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and each of four blood pressure indices in real-world Japanese population

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 33, pages 210–217 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the association of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), an arterial stiffness parameter, with four blood pressure (BP) indices, systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), pulse pressure (PP) and mean BP (MBP), in real-world population including untreated hypertension. We analyzed the cross-sectional data from 23,257 Japanese subjects (12,729 men and 10,528 women, aged 47.1 years) without a past history of cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, diabetes or dyslipidemia. Gender differences in four BP indices were slight, but significant for SBP, DBP and MBP. All four BP indices increased linearly with age. After adjusting for confounders comprising gender, age, HDL-C and BMI identified by multiple regression analysis, CAVI was lower in normotensive subjects compared to hypertensive subjects. Trend test detected an almost linear relation of adjusted CAVI with each of four BP indices even within ideal range. Exceptionally, the increment in adjusted CAVI reached its peak over 140 mm Hg range in SBP. Logistic regression models showed that 1-SD increment in each BP index contributed independently to high CAVI (≥90th percentile), whereas that in PP showed a somewhat lower contribution. Subgroup analyses revealed that older age, dyslipidemia and hypertension were independently associated with relatively small contributions to high CAVI per 1-SD increment in SBP. PP might be less useful to assess arterial stiffness compared to other BP indices. Besides, the contribution of SBP increment to arterial stiffening was relatively large in normotensive, normolipidemic non-elderly subjects, whose individual transition of SBP should be noticed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990;335:765–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miura K, Nakagawa H, Ohashi Y, Harada A, Taguri M, Kushiro T, et al. Four blood pressure indexes and the risk of stroke and myocardial infarction in Japanese men and women: a meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies. Circulation. 2009;119:1892–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brunström M, Carlberg B. Association of blood pressure lowering with mortality and cardiovascular disease across blood pressure levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:28–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieb W, Enserro DM, Sullivan LM, Vasan RS. Residual cardiovascular risk in individuals on blood pressure–lowering treatment. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Pencina MJ, Hamburg NM, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;121:505–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Bortel LM, Duprez D, Starmans-Kool MJ, Safar ME, Giannattasio C, Cockcroft J, et al. Clinical applications of arterial stiffness, Task Force III: recommendations for user procedures. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15:445–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shirai K, Utino J, Otsuka K, Takata M. A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter; cardioankle vascular index (CAVI). J Atheroscler Thromb. 2006;13:101–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirai K, Hiruta N, Song M, Kurosu T, Suzuki J, Tomaru T, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as a novel indicator of arterial stiffness: theory, evidence and perspectives. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18:924–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Namekata T, Suzuki K, Ishizuka N, Nakata M, Shirai K. Association of cardio-ankle vascular index with cardiovascular disease risk factors and coronary heart disease among Japanese urban workers and their families. J Clin Exp Cardiol. 2012; S1-3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.S1-003.

  10. Masugata H, Senda S, Himoto T, Okuyama H, Inukai M, Murao K, et al. Early detection of hypertension in a patient treated with sunitinib by measuring cardio-ankle vascular index. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;218:115–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tabara Y, Setoh K, Kawaguchi T, Takahashi Y, Kosugi S, Nakayama T, et al. Factors affecting longitudinal changes in cardio-ankle vascular index in a large general population: the Nagahama study. J Hypertens. 2018;36:1147–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Examination Committee of Criteria for ‘Obesity Disease’ in Japan, Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. New criteria for ‘obesity disease’ in Japan. Circ J. 2002;66:987–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts WC. The Friedewald-Levy-Fredrickson formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the basis for lipid-lowering therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:345–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Teramoto T, Sasaki J, Ishibashi S, Birou S, Daida H, Dohi S, et al. Diagnostic criteria for dyslipidemia. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20:655–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seino Y, Nanjo K, Tajima N, Kadowaki T, Kashiwagi A, Araki E, et al. Report of the Committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2010;1:212–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, et al. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3160–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carretero OA, Oparil S. Essential hypertension. Part I: definition and etiology. Circulation. 2000;101:329–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson JJ, Randall OS. Systolic, diastolic, and combined hypertension: differences between groups. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:1090–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamura K, Tomaru T, Yamamura S, Miyashita Y, Shirai K, Noike H. Cardio-ankle vascular index is a candidate predictor of coronary atherosclerosis. Circ J. 2008;72:598–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawes CM, Rodgers A, Bennett DA, Parag V, Suh I, Ueshima H, et al. Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region. J Hypertens. 2003;21:707–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang JW, Cho KI, Kim JH, Kim SY, Kim CS, You GI, et al. Wall shear stress in hypertensive patients is associated with carotid vascular deformation assessed by speckle tracking strain imaging. Clin Hypertens. 2014;20:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dudenbostel T, Glasser SP. Effects of antihypertensive drugs on arterial stiffness. Cardiol Rev. 2012;20:259–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyashita Y, Saiki A, Endo K, Ban N, Yamaguchi T, Kawana H, et al. Effects of olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, and amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, on Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. J Atheroscler Tromb. 2009;16:621–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasaki H, Saiki A, Endo K, Ban N, Yamaguchi T, Kawana H, et al. Protective effects of efonidipine, a T- and L-type calcium channel blocker, on renal function and arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and nephropathy. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16:568–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mizuguchi Y, Oishi Y, Tanaka H, Miyoshi H, Ishimoto T, Nagase N, et al. Arterial stiffness is associated with left ventricular diastolic function in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors: early detection with the use of cardio-ankle vascular index and ultrasonic strain imaging. J Card Fail. 2007;13:744–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang C, Ohira M, Iizuka T, Mikamo H, Nakagami T, Suzuki M, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index relates to left ventricular ejection fraction in subjects with heart failure. A retrospective study. Int Heart J. 2013;54:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R, Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Parag V, Woodward M, Whitlock G, Lam TH, et al. Blood pressure indices and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region: a pooled analysis. Hypertension. 2003;42:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sesso HD, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in Men. Hypertension. 2000;36:801–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Rourke MF, Staessen JA, Vlachopoulos C, Duprez D, Plante GE. Clinical applications of arterial stiffness; definitions and reference values. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15:426–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hasegawa M. Fundamental research on human aortic pulse wave velocity. Jikei Med J. 1970;85:742–60.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, Tsuda H, Arai T, Koji Y, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertens Res. 2002;25:359–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shirai K, Shimizu K, Takata M, Suzuki K. Independency of the cardio-ankle vascular index from blood pressure at the time of measurement. J Hypertens. 2017;35:1521–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuo CF, See LC, Luo SF, Ko YS, Lin YS, Hwang JS, et al. Gout: an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Perret-Guillaume C, Joly L, Benetos A. Heart rate as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;52:6–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Franklin SS, Gustin W 4th, Wong ND, Larson MG, Weber MA, Kannel WB, et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1997;96:308–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Kenji Suzuki, Japan Health Promotion Foundation, for his enormous contribution to this study, and we gratefully acknowledge the investigators, coinvestigators, study coordinators and patients who participated in this study.

Author contributions

All authors satisfied all International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria. Concept/design: KS; data analysis and interpretation: DN; data interpretation: YW, AS and IT; writing of the manuscript: DN; critical revision of article: YW, AS, KS and IT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nagayama Clinic, Tochigi, Japan

    Daiji Nagayama

  2. Center of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Toho University, Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan

    Daiji Nagayama, Yasuhiro Watanabe, Atsuhito Saiki & Ichiro Tatsuno

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Mihama Hospital, Chiba, Japan

    Kohji Shirai

Authors
  1. Daiji Nagayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yasuhiro Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atsuhito Saiki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kohji Shirai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ichiro Tatsuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daiji Nagayama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagayama, D., Watanabe, Y., Saiki, A. et al. Difference in positive relation between cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and each of four blood pressure indices in real-world Japanese population. J Hum Hypertens 33, 210–217 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-019-0167-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-019-0167-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links