Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Risks of obstructive genitourinary birth defects in relation to trihalomethane and haloacetic acid exposures: expanding disinfection byproduct mixtures analyses using relative potency factors

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 34, pages 34–46 (2024)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Some disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are teratogens based on toxicological evidence. Conventional use of predominant DBPs as proxies for complex mixtures may result in decreased ability to detect associations in epidemiological studies.

Objective

We assessed risks of obstructive genitourinary birth defects (OGDs) in relation to 12 DBP mixtures and 13 individual component DBPs.

Methods

We designed a nested registry-based case-control study (210 OGD cases; 2100 controls) in Massachusetts towns with complete quarterly 1999–2004 data on four trihalomethanes (THMs) and five haloacetic acids (HAAs). We estimated temporally-weighted average DBP exposures for the first trimester of pregnancy. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OGD in relation to individual DBPs, unweighted mixtures, and weighted mixtures based on THM/HAA relative potency factors (RPF) from animal toxicology data for full-litter resorption, eye defects, and neural tube defects.

Results

We detected elevated aORs for OGDs for the highest of bromodichloromethane (aOR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.15–2.65), dibromochloromethane (aOR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.15–2.54), bromodichloroacetic acid (aOR = 1.56; 95%CI: 0.97–2.51), chlorodibromoacetic acid (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.23–3.15), and tribromoacetic acid (aOR = 1.90; 95%CI: 1.20–3.03). Across unweighted mixture sums, the highest aORs were for the sum of three brominated THMs (aOR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.15–2.64), the sum of six brominated HAAs (aOR = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.89–2.31), and the sum of nine brominated DBPs (aOR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.05–3.10). Comparing eight RPF-weighted to unweighted mixtures, the largest aOR differences were for two HAA metrics, which both were higher with RPF weighting; other metrics had reduced or minimally changed ORs in RPF-weighted models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data used in this analysis are based on birth records and birth defects registry data and are not publicly available.

References

  1. Hunter ES 3rd, Rogers E, Blanton M, Richard A, Chernoff N. Bromochloro-haloacetic acids: effects on mouse embryos in vitro and QSAR considerations. Reprod Toxicol. 2006;21:260–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunter ES 3rd, Rogers EH, Schmid JE, Richard A. Comparative effects of haloacetic acids in whole embryo culture. Teratology. 1996;54:57–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Villanueva CM, Gracia-Lavedán E, Ibarluzea J, Santa Marina L, Ballester F, Llop S, et al. Exposure to trihalomethanes through different water uses and birth weight, small for gestational age, and preterm delivery in Spain. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:1824–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Summerhayes RJ, Rahman B, Morgan GG, Beresin G, Moreno C, Wright JM. Meta-analysis of small for gestational age births and disinfection byproduct exposures. Environ Res. 2021;196:110280.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ileka-Priouzeau S, Campagna C, Legay C, Deonandan R, Rodriguez MJ, Levallois P. Women exposure during pregnancy to haloacetaldehydes and haloacetonitriles in drinking water and risk of small-for-gestational-age neonate. Environ Res. 2015;137:338–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo Q, Miao Y, Liu C, Bei E, Zhang JF, Zhang LH, et al. Maternal exposure to nitrosamines in drinking water during pregnancy and birth outcomes in a Chinese cohort. Chemosphere. 2023;315:137776.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright JM, Evans A, Kaufman JA, Rivera-Nunez Z, Narotsky MG. Disinfection By-Product Exposures and the Risk of Specific Cardiac Birth Defects. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125:269–277.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Martinez D, Grellier J, Bennett J, Best N, Iszatt N, et al. Chlorination disinfection by-products in drinking water and congenital anomalies: review and meta-analyses. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1486–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Grazuleviciene R, Kapustinskiene V, Vencloviene J, Buinauskiene J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Risk of congenital anomalies in relation to the uptake of trihalomethane from drinking water during pregnancy. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70:274–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Righi E, Bechtold P, Tortorici D, Lauriola P, Calzolari E, Astolfi G, et al. Trihalomethanes, chlorite, chlorate in drinking water and risk of congenital anomalies: a population-based case-control study in Northern Italy. Environ Res. 2012;116:66–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chisholm K, Cook A, Bower C, Weinstein P. Risk of birth defects in Australian communities with high levels of brominated disinfection by-products. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1267–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Säve-Söderbergh M, Toljander J, Donat-Vargas C, Åkesson A. Drinking Water Disinfection by-Products and Congenital Malformations: A Nationwide Register-Based Prospective Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2021;129:97012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aschengrau A, Zierler S, Cohen A. Quality of community drinking water and the occurrence of late adverse pregnancy outcomes. Arch Environ Health. 1993;48:105–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Magnus P, Jaakkola JJK, Skrondal A, Alexander J, Becker G, Krogh T, et al. Water Chlorination and Birth Defects. Epidemiology. 1999;10:513–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang BF, Magnus P, Jaakkola JJ. Risk of specific birth defects in relation to chlorination and the amount of natural organic matter in the water supply. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:374–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang BF, Jaakkola JJ, Guo HR. Water disinfection by-products and the risk of specific birth defects: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan. Environ Health. 2008;7:23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Toledano MB, Bennett J, Best N, Hambly P, de Hoogh C, et al. Chlorination disinfection by-products and risk of congenital anomalies in England and Wales. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:216–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tain YL, Luh H, Lin CY, Hsu CN. Incidence and risks of congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract in newborns: a population-based case-control study in Taiwan. Med (Baltim). 2016;95:e2659.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murugapoopathy V, Gupta IR. A primer on congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tracts (CAKUT). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15:723–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Pope JCT, Brock JW 3rd, Adams MC, Stephens FD, Ichikawa I. How they begin and how they end: classic and new theories for the development and deterioration of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, CAKUT. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:2018–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson SD, Kimura SY. Water Analysis: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues. Anal Chem. 2020;92:473–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Regli S, Chen J, Messner M, Elovitz MS, Letkiewicz FJ, Pegram RA, et al. Estimating potential increased bladder cancer risk due to increased bromide concentrations in sources of disinfected drinking waters. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:13094–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Birnbaum LS, DeVito MJ. Use of toxic equivalency factors for risk assessment for dioxins and related compounds. Toxicology. 1995;105:391–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Massachusetts Birth Defects Monitoring Program. About the Birth Defects Monitoring Program. 2023. https://www.mass.gov/service-details/about-the-birth-defects-monitoring-program#:~:text=The%20MA%20Center%20for%20Birth,with%20birth%20defects%20in%20Massachusetts.

  25. Caton AR. Exploring the seasonality of birth defects in the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94:424–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. USEPA, Method 502.2. Volatile Organic Compounds in Water by Purge and Trap Capillary Column Gas Chromatography with Photoionization and Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors in Series. 1989, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Cincinnati, OH.

  27. USEPA, Method 524.2. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Gas Column Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry. 1992, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Cincinnati, OH.

  28. USEPA, Method 551.1. Determination of Chlorination Disinfection Byproducts, Chlorinated Solvents, and Halogenated Pesticides/Herbicides in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography Electron-Capture Detection. 1995, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Cincinnati, OH.

  29. USEPA, Method 552.1. Determination of Haloacetic Acids and Dalapon in Drinking Water by Ion-exchange Liquid-Solid Extraction and Gas Chromatography with an Electron Capture Detector. 1992, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Cincinnati, OH.

  30. USEPA, Method 552.2. Determination of Haloacetic Acids and Dalapon in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Derivation and Gas Chromatography with Electron-capture Detection. 1995, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Cincinnati, OH.

  31. Eaton AD, Greenberg AE, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19 ed. 1995, Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.

  32. Ma X. Prediction of the Formation, Speciation, and Health Risks of Unregulated Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water using a Kinetic Binomial Model, in Civil and Environmental Engineering. 2021, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  33. Greenland S, Mansournia MA, Altman DG. Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight. Bmj. 2016;352:i1981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld AT, Brunström B, Cook P, Feeley M, et al. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106:775–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Narotsky MG, Best DS, McDonald A, Godin EA, Hunter ES 3rd, Simmons JE. Pregnancy loss and eye malformations in offspring of F344 rats following gestational exposure to mixtures of regulated trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;31:59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Narotsky MG. Developmental toxicity of disinfection byproducts in F344 rats: Effects on pregnancy maintenance and eye development. Submitted.

  37. Smith MK, Randall JL, Stober JA, Read EJ. Developmental toxicity of dichloroacetonitrile: a by-product of drinking water disinfection. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1989;12:765–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith MK, Randall JL, Read EJ, Stober JA. Developmental toxicity of dichloroacetate in the rat. Teratology. 1992;46:217–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Andrews JE, Nichols HP, Schmid JE, Mole LM, Hunter ES 3rd, Klinefelter GR. Developmental toxicity of mixtures: the water disinfection by-products dichloro-, dibromo- and bromochloro acetic acid in rat embryo culture. Reprod Toxicol. 2004;19:111–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. USEPA, Benchmark Dose Software (BMDS) (Build 3.2; Model Library Version 2020) [Computer Software]. 2020; Available from: https://www.epa.gov/bmds/download-bmds.

  41. Rasouly HM, Lu W. Lower urinary tract development and disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2013;5:307–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wright JM, Schwartz J, Dockery DW. The effect of disinfection by-products and mutagenic activity on birth weight and gestational duration. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:920–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cole SR, Platt RW, Schisterman EF, Chu H, Westreich D, Richardson D, et al. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:417–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Plewa MJ, Simmons JE, Richardson SD, Wagner ED. Mammalian cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the haloacetic acids, a major class of drinking water disinfection by-products. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010;51:871–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kargalioglu Y, McMillan BJ, Minear RA, Plewa MJ. Analysis of the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of drinking water disinfection by-products in Salmonella typhimurium. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 2002;22:113–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kundu B, Richardson SD, Granville CA, Shaughnessy DT, Hanley NM, Swartz PD, et al. Comparative mutagenicity of halomethanes and halonitromethanes in Salmonella TA100: structure-activity analysis and mutation spectra. Mutat Res. 2004;554:335–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Liberatore HK, Daiber EJ, Ravuri SA, Schmid JE, Richardson SD, DeMarini DM. Disinfection byproducts in chlorinated or brominated swimming pools and spas: Role of brominated DBPs and association with mutagenicity. J Environ Sci. 2022;117:253–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Aschengrau A, Coogan PF, Quinn M, Cashins LJ. Occupational exposure to estrogenic chemicals and the occurrence of breast cancer: an exploratory analysis. Am J Ind Med. 1998;34:6–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weisskopf Marc G, Seals Ryan M, Webster Thomas F. Bias amplification in epidemiologic analysis of exposure to mixtures. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126:047003.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Symanski E, Savitz DA, Singer PC. Assessing spatial fluctuations, temporal variability, and measurement error in estimated levels of disinfection by-products in tap water: implications for exposure assessment. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:65–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. LeBel GL BF, Williams DT. A one-year survey of halogenated disinfection by-products in the distribution system of treatment plants using three different disinfection processes. Chemosphere. 1997;34:2301–17.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Klotz JB, Pyrch LA. Neural tube defects and drinking water disinfection by-products. Epidemiology. 1999;10:383–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bell ML, Belanger K. Review of research on residential mobility during pregnancy: consequences for assessment of prenatal environmental exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22:429–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Miller A, Siffel C, Correa A. Residential mobility during pregnancy: patterns and correlates. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14:625–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moore CA, Khoury MJ, Liu Y. Does light-to-moderate alcohol consumption during pregnancy increase the risk for renal anomalies among offspring? Pediatrics. 1997;99:E11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kurita H, Motoki N, Inaba Y, Misawa Y, Ohira S, Kanai M, et al. Maternal alcohol consumption and risk of offspring with congenital malformation: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Pediatr Res. 2021;90:479–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rivera-Nunez Z, Wright JM. Association of brominated trihalomethane and haloacetic acid exposure with fetal growth and preterm delivery in Massachusetts. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55:1125–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Searles Nielsen S, Dills RL, Glass M, Mueller BA. Accuracy of prenatal smoking data from Washington State birth certificates in a population-based sample with cotinine measurements. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24:236–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Heinke D, Rich-Edwards JW, Williams PL, Hernandez-Diaz S, Anderka M, Fisher SC, et al. Quantification of selection bias in studies of risk factors for birth defects among livebirths. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020;34:655–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Massachusetts Birth Defects Monitoring Program, Massachusetts Birth Defects 2015-2018. 2023.

Download references

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This document has been reviewed in accordance with Agency policy and approved for publication.

Funding

JAK was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and CDC. JAK was also supported in part by the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES012870). AE was supported through the Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education Research Participation Program (agreement no. DW8992376701) sponsored by the U.S. EPA. ZRN was supported through The National Academies, Research Associateship Programs sponsored by the U.S. EPA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    John A. Kaufman

  2. Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    J. Michael Wright

  3. St. Elizabeth Physicians, Bellevue Primary Care, Bellevue, KY, USA

    Amanda Evans

  4. Rutgers School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Piscataway, NJ, USA

    Zorimar Rivera-Núñez

  5. Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education, hosted by Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Amy Meyer

  6. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA

    David A. Reckhow

  7. Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

    Michael G. Narotsky

Authors
  1. John A. Kaufman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Michael Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amanda Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zorimar Rivera-Núñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amy Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David A. Reckhow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael G. Narotsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JAK led the statistical analysis and led drafting and revision of the manuscript. JMW conceptualized the study, collected the data along with AM, and revised the manuscript. AE, ZRN, and AM prepared the analytic dataset and drafted analytic code in SAS. DAR contributed to development of the kinetic model used to predict four brominated haloacetic acids. MGN provided benchmark dose data for disinfection byproducts for use in relative potency factors, advised on the creation and use of relative potency factors, drafted text on methods for generation of relative potency factors, and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Kaufman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This research was based on confidential birth records data that did not contain personal identifiable information; therefore, institutional review board approval was not obtained nor was informed consent necessary because potential risk was considered to be minimal and no direct contact with study subjects occurred.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaufman, J.A., Wright, J.M., Evans, A. et al. Risks of obstructive genitourinary birth defects in relation to trihalomethane and haloacetic acid exposures: expanding disinfection byproduct mixtures analyses using relative potency factors. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 34, 34–46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00595-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00595-1

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links