This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Schwartz J. Transparency” as mask? The EPA’s proposed rule on scientific data. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1496–7.
Goldman GT. Trump’s plan would make government stupid. Nature. 2019;570:417.
Mattson MP. Hormesis defined. Ageing Res Rev. 2008;7:1–7.
Burnett RT, et al. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ health Perspect. 2014;122:397–403.
Burnett R, et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:9592–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peltier, R.E., Goldman, G.T. It’s not about transparency: politics is intruding into USEPA science and it could cost the public’s health. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 30, 594–595 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0229-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0229-z