Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Dose reconstruction in workers exposed to two major pyrethroid pesticides and determination of biological reference values using a toxicokinetic model

Abstract

A toxicokinetic model has been optimized to describe the time profiles of common biomarkers of exposure to permethrin and cypermethrin: trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acids (trans-DCCA) and 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA). The model then served to reproduce urinary time courses in exposed agricultural workers and predict corresponding absorbed doses. It allowed for the prediction of the main routes of exposure in workers during the study period. Modeling showed that simulating exposure mostly by the oral route, during the 3-day biomonitoring period, provided best-fits to the urinary time courses of most workers. This is compatible with an inadvertent oral exposure during work. According to best-fit scenarios, absorbed doses in workers reconstructed with the model reached a maximum of 2.4 µg/kg bw/day and were below the absorbed dose limits associated with an exposure to the reference dose values established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (0.06 and 0.25 mg/kg bw/day for cypermethrin and permethrin, respectively) and the Acceptable Operator Exposure Level set by the European Commission (0.06 mg/kg bw/day for cypermethrin). Modeling was further used to derive biological reference values for cypermethrin and permethrin exposure. Respective values of 7 and 29 nmol/kg bw/day of trans-DCCA, and 3 and 13 nmol/kg bw/day of 3-PBA were obtained. None of the workers presented values above these biological reference values.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gorse I, Balg C. Bilan des ventes de pesticides au Québec pour l’année. 2010. Québec, ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs; 2013.

  2. MDDEP. Bilan des ventes de pesticides au Québec pour l’année 2009. Québec: Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs; 2012.

  3. Le Quesne P, Maxwell I, Butterworth S. Transient facial sensory symptoms following exposure to synthetic pyrethroids: a clinical and electrophysiological assessment. Neurotoxicology. 1981;2:1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He F, Wang S, Liu L, Chen S, Zhang Z, Sun J. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of acute pyrethroid poisoning. Arch Toxicol. 1989;63:54–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi J-S, Soderlund DM. Structure–activity relationships for the action of 11 pyrethroid insecticides on rat Na v 1.8 sodium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006;211:233–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moretto A. Indoor spraying with the pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin: effects on spraymen and inhabitants of sprayed houses. Bull World Health Organ. 1991;69:591.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Davanzo F, Settimi L, Faraoni L, Maiozzi P, Travaglia A, Marcello I. [Agricultural pesticide-related poisonings in Italy: cases reported to the Poison Control Centre of Milan in 2000-2001]. Epidemiol Prev. 2003;28:330–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walters JK, Boswell LE, Green MK, Heumann MA, Karam LE, Morrissey BF, et al. Pyrethrin and pyrethroid illnesses in the Pacific Northwest: a five-year review. Public Health Rep. 2009;124:149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peshin SS, Srivastava A, Halder N, Gupta YK. Pesticide poisoning trend analysis of 13 years: a retrospective study based on telephone calls at the National Poisons Information Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;22: 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Power LE, Sudakin DL. Pyrethrin and pyrethroid exposures in the United States: a longitudinal analysis of incidents reported to poison centers. J Med Toxicol. 2007;3:94–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wax PM, Hoffman RS. Fatality associated with inhalation of a pyrethrin shampoo. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1994;32:457–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Madsen C, Claesson MH, Röpke C. Immunotoxicity of the pyrethroid insecticides deltametrin and α-cypermetrin. Toxicology. 1996;107:219–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadnagy W, Leng G, Sugiri D, Ranft U, Idel H. Pyrethroids used indoors–Immune status of humans exposed to pyrethroids following a pest control operation–a one year follow-up study. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003;206:93–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Emara AM, Draz EI. Immunotoxicological study of one of the most common over-the-counter pyrethroid insecticide products in Egypt. Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19:997–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao M, Chen F, Wang C, Zhang Q, Gan J, Liu W. Integrative assessment of enantioselectivity in endocrine disruption and immunotoxicity of synthetic pyrethroids. Environ Pollut. 2010;158:1968–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Muranli FDG. Genotoxic and cytotoxic evaluation of pyrethroid insecticides λ-cyhalothrin and α-cypermethrin on human blood lymphocyte culture. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;90:357–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ACGIH. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH, USA: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aylward LL, Kirman CR, Schoeny R, Portier CJ, Hays SM. Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals. Environ Health Perspect (Online). 2013;121:287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berthet A, Bouchard M, Valcke M, Heredia-Ortiz R. Using a toxicokinetic modeling approach to determine biological reference values (BRVs) and to assess human exposure to pesticides. Impact of pesticides. Cheyenne: Academy Publish, 2012;105-142.

  20. Bouchard M, Carrier G, Brunet RC. Assessment of absorbed doses of carbaryl and associated health risks in a group of horticultural greenhouse workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81: 355–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bouchard M, Carrier G, Brunet RC, Dumas P, Noisel N. Biological monitoring of exposure to organophosphorus insecticides in a group of horticultural greenhouse workers. Ann Occup Hyg. 2006;50:505–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bouchard M, Gosselin NH, Brunet RC, Samuel O, Dumoulin M-J, Carrier G. A toxicokinetic model of malathion and its metabolites as a tool to assess human exposure and risk through measurements of urinary biomarkers. Toxicol Sci. 2003;73:182–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carrier G, Brunet RC. A toxicokinetic model to assess the risk of azinphosmethyl exposure in humans through measures of urinary elimination of alkylphosphates. Toxicol Sci. 1999;47:23–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Côté J, Bonvalot Y, Carrier G, Lapointe C, Fuhr U, Tomalik-Scharte D, et al. A novel toxicokinetic modeling of cypermethrin and permethrin and their metabolites in humans for dose reconstruction from biomarker data. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hays SM, Aylward LL. Using biomonitoring equivalents to interpret human biomonitoring data in a public health risk context. J Appl Toxicol. 2009;29:275–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hays SM, Becker RA, Leung H-W, Aylward LL, Pyatt DW. Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007;47:96–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Woollen B, Marsh J, Laird W, Lesser J. The metabolism of cypermethrin in man: differences in urinary metabolite profiles following oral and dermal administration. Xenobiotica. 1992;22:983–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomalik-Scharte D, Lazar A, Meins J, Bastian B, Ihrig M, Wachall B, et al. Dermal absorption of permethrin following topical administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;61:399–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ratelle M, Coté J, Bouchard M. Time profiles and toxicokinetic parameters of key biomarkers of exposure to cypermethrin in orally exposed volunteers compared with previously available kinetic data following permethrin exposure. J Appl Toxicol. 2015;35:1586–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ratelle M, Côté J, Bouchard M. Toxicokinetics of permethrin biomarkers of exposure in orally exposed volunteers. Toxicol Lett. 2015;232:369–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferland S, Côté J, Ratelle M, Thuot R, Bouchard M. Detailed urinary excretion time courses of biomarkers of exposure to permethrin and estimated exposure in workers of a corn production farm in Quebec, Canada. Ann Occup Hyg. 2015;59:1152–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ratelle M, Côté J, Bouchard M. Time courses and variability of pyrethroid biomarkers of exposure in a group of agricultural workers in Quebec, Canada. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016;89:1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin C, Riou B, Vallet B Physiologie humaine appliquée. France: Wolters Kluwer France; 2006.

  34. Weisstein EW Chi-Squared Test. From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. 2017. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Chi-SquaredTest.html. Accessed 21 April 2017.

  35. Weisstein EW Least Squares Fitting. From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. 2017. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LeastSquaresFitting.html. Accessed 21 April 2017.

  36. U.S.EPA. Reregistration eligibility decision (RED) for cypermethrin. In: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 2006.

  37. U.S.EPA. Reregistration eligibility decision (RED) for permethrin. In: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 2009.

  38. U.S.EPA. Reregistration eligibility decision (RED) for cypermethrin (revised 01/14/08). In: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 2008.

  39. Crawford MJ, Croucher A, Hutson DH. Metabolism of cis-and trans-cypermethrin in rats. Balance Tissue Retent Study J Agric Food Chem. 1981a;29:130–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Crawford MJ, Croucher A, Hutson DH. The metabolism of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in rats; excreted metabolites. Pestic Sci. 1981b;12:399–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nishi K, Huang H, Kamita SG, Kim I-H, Morisseau C, Hammock BD. Characterization of pyrethroid hydrolysis by the human liver carboxylesterases hCE-1 and hCE-2. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006;445:115–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ross MK, Borazjani A, Edwards CC, Potter PM. Hydrolytic metabolism of pyrethroids by human and other mammalian carboxylesterases. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;71:657–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Scollon EJ, Starr JM, Godin SJ, DeVito MJ, Hughes MF. In vitro metabolism of pyrethroid pesticides by rat and human hepatic microsomes and cytochrome p450 isoforms. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37:221–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lestremau F, Willemin M-E, Chatellier C, Desmots S, Brochot C. Determination of cis-permethrin, trans-permethrin and associated metabolites in rat blood and organs by gas chromatography–ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:3477–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Willemin M-E, Desmots S, Le Grand R, Lestremau F, Zeman FA, Leclerc E, et al. PBPK modeling of the cis-and trans-permethrin isomers and their major urinary metabolites in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2016;294:65–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaneko H, Miyamoto J. Pyrethroid chemistry and metabolism. In: Krieger RI, Krieger WC, (Eds.). Handbook of pesticide toxicology. vol. 2. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001. pp. 1263–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Leng G, Leng A, Kuhn K-H, Lewalter J. Human dose-excretion studies with the pyrethroid insecticide cyfluthrin: urinary metabolite profile following inhalation. Xenobiotica. 1997;27:1273–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. CHMS. Second report on human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in Canada. Health Canada’s; 2013.

  49. HSE. Inadvertent ingestion exposure in the workplace. In: Institute for Occupational MedicineHaSEH, edittor. Research Park North, Riccarton, Edinburgh, 2007, p. 96.

  50. European_Commission. Review report for the active substance cypermethrin finalized in the Sanding Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 15 February 2005. In: Directorate ECHCP, 2005, p. 35.

  51. Morgan MK, MacMillan DK, Zehr D, Sobus JR. Pyrethroid insecticides and their environmental degradates in repeated duplicate-diet solid food samples of 50 adults. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016;00:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité du travail du Québec (IRSST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Bouchard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Côté, J., Bouchard, M. Dose reconstruction in workers exposed to two major pyrethroid pesticides and determination of biological reference values using a toxicokinetic model. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 28, 599–614 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-017-0004-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-017-0004-y

Keywords

Search

Quick links