Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Bariatric Surgery

Network meta-analysis of three different forms of intermittent energy restrictions for overweight or obese adults

International Journal of Obesity volume 48, pages 55–64 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of three forms of intermittent energy restriction (IER), including alternate-day fasting (ADF), the 5:2 diet, and time-restricted feeding (TRF), in overweight or obese adults. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) to find relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until August 10, 2022. The modified Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was applied to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. Random network meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 14.0. Sixteen RCTs were included, with 1228 patients. Overall, the methodological quality ranged from low to moderate. ADF was superior to CER and 5:2 diet in reducing waist circumference, whereas 5:2 diet was superior to CER in reducing BMI. Regarding fat mass and drop-out, all forms of IER were comparable. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the type of individuals had no influence on the pooled results; nevertheless, ADF significantly reduced weight compared to CER and achieved significant waist circumference reduction compared to CER, 5:2 diet, and TRF. ADF may be preferentially prescribed for overweight or obese adults. More large-scale and high-quality studies are required, however, to investigate the effect of TRF on overweight and obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Network maps.
Fig. 3: Network meta-analysis.
Fig. 4: SUCRA plots.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article/as supplementary information files.

References

  1. Rapando C, Nyagero J, Wakhu F, editors. Feeding Habits associated with overweight and obesity amongst secondary School students in Private and Public schools in Langata Nairobi Kenya2017.

  2. Norris T, Cole TJ, Bann D, Hamer M, Hardy R, Li L, et al. Duration of obesity exposure between ages 10 and 40 years and its relationship with cardiometabolic disease risk factors: A cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hajek A, Brettschneider C, van der Leeden C, Lühmann D, Oey A, Wiese B, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with obesity among the oldest old. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;89:104069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luhar S, Timæus IM, Jones R, Cunningham S, Patel SA, Kinra S, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of overweight and obesity in India to 2040. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0229438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, Giles CM, Flax C, et al. Projected U.S. State-Level Prevalence of Adult Obesity and Severe Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2440–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J, Wang F, Chen H, Liu L, Zhang S, Luo W, et al. Comparison of the Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction and Continuous Energy Restriction among Adults with Overweight or Obesity: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Nutrients. 2022;14:2315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern B, Mendes TB. Intermittent fasting for obesity and related disorders: unveiling myths, facts, and presumptions. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2021;65:14–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pannen ST, Maldonado SG, Nonnenmacher T, Sowah SA, Gruner LF, Watzinger C, et al. Adherence and Dietary Composition during Intermittent vs. Continuous Calorie Restriction: Follow-Up Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. Nutrients. 2021;13:1195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Maroofi M, Nasrollahzadeh J. Effect of intermittent versus continuous calorie restriction on body weight and cardiometabolic risk markers in subjects with overweight or obesity and mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized trial. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19:216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Varady KA. Intermittent versus daily calorie restriction: which diet regimen is more effective for weight loss? Obes Rev. 2011;12:e593–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varady KA, Cienfuegos S, Ezpeleta M, Gabel K. Cardiometabolic Benefits of Intermittent Fasting. Annu Rev Nutr. 2021;41:333–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saad R. Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Health, Aging, and Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1773.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brandhorst S, Longo VD. Dietary Restrictions and Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease. Circ Res. 2019;124:952–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. St-Onge MP, Ard J, Baskin ML, Chiuve SE, Johnson HM, Kris-Etherton P, et al. Meal Timing and Frequency: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e96–e121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Moon S, Kang J, Kim SH, Chung HS, Kim YJ, Yu JM, et al. Beneficial Effects of Time-Restricted Eating on Metabolic Diseases: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12:1267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cho Y, Hong N, Kim KW, Cho SJ, Lee M, Lee YH, et al. The Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting to Reduce Body Mass Index and Glucose Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meng H, Zhu L, Kord-Varkaneh H, Santos HO, Tinsley GM, Fu P. Effects of intermittent fasting and energy-restricted diets on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition. 2020;77:110801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pureza I, Macena ML, da Silva Junior AE, Praxedes DRS, Vasconcelos LGL, Bueno NB. Effect of early time-restricted feeding on the metabolic profile of adults with excess weight: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:1788–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stekovic S, Hofer SJ, Tripolt N, Aon MA, Royer P, Pein L, et al. Alternate Day Fasting Improves Physiological and Molecular Markers of Aging in Healthy, Non-obese Humans. Cell Metab. 2020;31:878–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schübel R, Nattenmüller J, Sookthai D, Nonnenmacher T, Graf ME, Riedl L, et al. Effects of intermittent and continuous calorie restriction on body weight and metabolism over 50 wk: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108:933–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tinsley GM, Moore ML, Graybeal AJ, Paoli A, Kim Y, Gonzales JU, et al. Time-restricted feeding plus resistance training in active females: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;110:628–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Patterson RE, Sears DD. Metabolic Effects of Intermittent Fasting. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37:371–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. He S, Wang J, Zhang J, Xu J. Intermittent Versus Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss and Metabolic Improvement: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021;29:108–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rynders CA, Thomas EA, Zaman A, Pan Z, Catenacci VA, Melanson EL. Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting and Time-Restricted Feeding Compared to Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss. Nutrients. 2019;11:2442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Adafer R, Messaadi W, Meddahi M, Patey A, Haderbache A, Bayen S, et al. Food Timing, Circadian Rhythm and Chrononutrition: A Systematic Review of Time-Restricted Eating’s Effects on Human Health. Nutrients. 2020;12:3770.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Patikorn C, Roubal K, Veettil SK, Chandran V, Pham T, Lee YY, et al. Intermittent Fasting and Obesity-Related Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2139558.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Varady KA, Cienfuegos S, Ezpeleta M, Gabel K. Clinical application of intermittent fasting for weight loss: progress and future directions. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18:309–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elortegui Pascual P, Rolands MR, Eldridge AL, Kassis A, Mainardi F, Lê K-A, et al. A meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of alternate day fasting, the 5:2 diet, and time-restricted eating for weight loss. Obesity. 2023;31:9–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Silverii GA, Cresci B, Benvenuti F, Santagiuliana F, Rotella F, Mannucci E. Effectiveness of intermittent fasting for weight loss in individuals with obesity: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2023;33:1481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:777–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

  33. Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2019;366:l4898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Research Synthesis Methods. 2020;n/a(n/a).

  36. Tu YK. Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models to Evaluate Inconsistency within a Network Meta-Analysis. Value Health. 2015;18:1120–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu-Kang T. Node-Splitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Evaluation of Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis. Value Health. 2016;19:957–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lu G, Ades AE. Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101:447–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23:3105–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mbuagbaw L, Rochwerg B, Jaeschke R, Heels-Andsell D, Alhazzani W, Thabane L, et al. Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses. Syst Rev. 2017;6:79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. Bmj. 2001;323:101–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. White I Network: Stata module to perform network meta-analysis. Statistical software components 2017.

  43. Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Carter S, Clifton PM, Keogh JB. The effects of intermittent compared to continuous energy restriction on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes; a pragmatic pilot trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;122:106–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Carter S, Clifton PM, Keogh JB. The effect of intermittent compared with continuous energy restriction on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: 24-month follow-up of a randomised noninferiority trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;151:11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Catenacci VA, Pan Z, Ostendorf D, Brannon S, Gozansky WS, Mattson MP, et al. A randomized pilot study comparing zero-calorie alternate-day fasting to daily caloric restriction in adults with obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24:1874–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Conley M, Le Fevre L, Haywood C, Proietto J. Is two days of intermittent energy restriction per week a feasible weight loss approach in obese males? A randomised pilot study. Nutr Diet. 2018;75:65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gabel K, Kroeger CM, Trepanowski JF, Hoddy KK, Cienfuegos S, Kalam F, et al. Differential effects of alternate-day fasting versus daily calorie restriction on insulin resistance. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27:1443–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Harvie M, Wright C, Pegington M, McMullan D, Mitchell E, Martin B, et al. The effect of intermittent energy and carbohydrate restriction v. daily energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers in overweight women. Br J Nutr. 2013;110:1534–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Harvie MN, Pegington M, Mattson MP, Frystyk J, Dillon B, Evans G, et al. The effects of intermittent or continuous energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers: a randomized trial in young overweight women. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35:714–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. He CJ, Fei YP, Zhu CY, Yao M, Qian G, Hu HL, et al. Effects of intermittent compared with continuous energy restriction on blood pressure control in overweight and obese patients with hypertension. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:750714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Headland ML, Clifton PM, Keogh JB. Effect of intermittent compared to continuous energy restriction on weight loss and weight maintenance after 12 months in healthy overweight or obese adults. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019;43:2028–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Isenmann E, Dissemond J, Geisler S. The effects of a macronutrient-based diet and time-restricted feeding (16:8) on body composition in physically active individuals—a 14-week randomised controlled trial. Nutrients. 2021;13:3122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Parvaresh A, Razavi R, Abbasi B, Yaghoobloo K, Hassanzadeh A, Mohammadifard N, et al. Modified alternate-day fasting vs. calorie restriction in the treatment of patients with metabolic syndrome: A randomized clinical trial. Complement Ther Med. 2019;47:102187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pinto AM, Bordoli C, Buckner LP, Kim C, Kaplan PC, Del Arenal IM, et al. Intermittent energy restriction is comparable to continuous energy restriction for cardiometabolic health in adults with central obesity: A randomized controlled trial; the Met-IER study. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:1753–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Razavi R, Parvaresh A, Abbasi B, Yaghoobloo K, Hassanzadeh A, Mohammadifard N, et al. The alternate-day fasting diet is a more effective approach than a calorie restriction diet on weight loss and hs-CRP levels. Int J Vitam Nutr Res Suppl. 2021;91:242–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sundfør TM, Tonstad S, Svendsen M. Effects of intermittent versus continuous energy restriction for weight loss on diet quality and eating behavior. A randomized trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019;73:1006–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Trepanowski JF, Kroeger CM, Barnosky A, Klempel MC, Bhutani S, Hoddy KK, et al. Effect of alternate-day fasting on weight loss, weight maintenance, and cardioprotection among metabolically healthy obese adults: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:930–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to deeply appreciate all authors who performed all eligible studies that have been included in the present network meta-analysis.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China

    Yahui Ma, Lina Sun & Zhijing Mu

Authors
  1. Yahui Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lina Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhijing Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: YM; Methodology: YM and LS; Formal analysis and investigation: ZM and LS; Writing - original draft preparation: YM; Writing - review and editing: YM; Funding acquisition: All authors; Resources: All authors; Supervision: ZM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yahui Ma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article is a meta-analysis. The data comes from published articles and does not require ethical approval.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Sun, L. & Mu, Z. Network meta-analysis of three different forms of intermittent energy restrictions for overweight or obese adults. Int J Obes 48, 55–64 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-023-01416-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-023-01416-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links