Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Clinical Research

Sex as an independent variable in the measurement of satiation: a retrospective cohort study

Subjects

Abstract

Background

Satiation is a key component of food intake regulation as it brings an eating episode to an end. The effect of sex on satiation measurement has not been characterized.

Objective

To assess the effects of biological variables on satiation.

Design

Retrospective cohort study. We included 959 participants (mean age 39 [SD 12] years; 70.7% female, and BMI 33 kg/m2 [8]) who had measurements of satiation with a nutrient-drink test to assess volume to fullness (VTF) and maximum tolerated volume (MTV), and/or an ad libitum meal test to assess calories consumed to fullness (CTF). We performed univariate and multiple regression analyses to estimate the contribution of sex to VTF, MTV, and CTF, compared to other biological variables, such as age, weight, height, BMI, waist-to-hip circumference (W/H), and lean mass percentage (LM%), that are known to affect these parameters.

Results

Females had higher BMI, W/H, and LM%. VTF, MTV, and CTF were lower in females: 704 [323] vs. 783 [328] mL, p = 0.001; 1226 [384] vs. 1419 [410] mL, p < 0.001; and 871 [291] vs. 1086 [326] kcal, p < 0.001; respectively. Sex was a strong and independent predictor of VTF, MTF and CTF: parameter estimate [PE] = −80.8, p = 0.006; PE = −124.2, p = 0.0007; and PE = −110, p = 0.001; respectively.

Conclusions

Sex has a strong effect on satiation measured by VTF, MTV, and CTF, even after adjusting for other biological factors known to affect these parameters. Females seem to integrate intra-meal inhibition signals to consume fewer calories unrelated to body size or composition.

Clinical trial registration

None.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Satiation Meadurements by Sex.

Data availability

Data collected for the study, including individual de-identified participant data, as well as study protocol, and informed consent will be available to interested parties with publication, after signing of a data access agreement. Data may be requested by contacting Dr. Andres Acosta M.D, Ph.D., at Acosta.andres@mayo.edu.

References

  1. Blundell JE, Halford JC. Regulation of nutrient supply: the brain and appetite control. Proc Nutr Soc. 1994;53:407–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummings DE, Overduin J. Gastrointestinal regulation of food intake. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:13–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Acosta A, Camilleri M, Shin A, Vazquez-Roque MI, Iturrino J, Burton D, et al. Quantitative gastrointestinal and psychological traits associated with obesity and response to weight-loss therapy. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:537–46.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1377–96.

  5. Asarian L, Geary N. Sex differences in the physiology of eating. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;305:R1215–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Brennan IM, Feltrin KL, Nair NS, Hausken T, Little TJ, Gentilcore D, et al. Effects of the phases of the menstrual cycle on gastric emptying, glycemia, plasma GLP-1 and insulin, and energy intake in healthy lean women. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G602–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leeners B, Geary N, Tobler PN, Asarian L. Ovarian hormones and obesity. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:300–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovejoy JC, Champagne CM, de Jonge L, Xie H, Smith SR. Increased visceral fat and decreased energy expenditure during the menopausal transition. Int J Obes. 2008;32:949–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez LM, Edelman A, Chen M, Otterness C, Trussell J, Helmerhorst FM. Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:Cd008815.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Del Parigi A, Chen K, Gautier J-F, Salbe AD, Pratley RE, Ravussin E, et al. Sex differences in the human brain’s response to hunger and satiation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75:1017–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cornier MA, Salzberg AK, Endly DC, Bessesen DH, Tregellas JR. Sex-based differences in the behavioral and neuronal responses to food. Physiol Behav. 2010;99:538–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gregersen NT, Møller BK, Raben A, Kristensen ST, Holm L, Flint A, et al. Determinants of appetite ratings: the role of age, gender, BMI, physical activity, smoking habits, and diet/weight concern. Food Nutr Res. 2011;55.

  13. Raben A, Agerholm-Larsen L, Flint A, Holst JJ, Astrup A. Meals with similar energy densities but rich in protein, fat, carbohydrate, or alcohol have different effects on energy expenditure and substrate metabolism but not on appetite and energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:91–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bédard A, Hudon A-M, Drapeau V, Corneau L, Dodin S, Lemieux S. Gender differences in the appetite response to a satiating diet. J Obes. 2015;2015:140139-.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Monrroy H, Pribic T, Galan C, Nieto A, Amigo N, Accarino A, et al. Meal enjoyment and tolerance in women and men. Nutrients. 2019;11:119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Monrroy H, Borghi G, Pribic T, Galan C, Nieto A, Amigo N, et al. Biological response to meal ingestion: gender differences. Nutrients. 2019;11:702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Benelam B. Satiation, satiety and their effects on eating behaviour. Nutr Bull. 2009;34:126–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Forde CG Chapter 7 - Measuring Satiation and Satiety. In: Ares G, Varela P, editors. Methods in Consumer Research, Volume 2: Woodhead Publishing; 2018. p. 151–82.

  19. Chial HJ, Camilleri C, Delgado-Aros S, Burton D, Thomforde G, Ferber I, et al. A nutrient drink test to assess maximum tolerated volume and postprandial symptoms: effects of gender, body mass index and age in health. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14:249–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tack J, Caenepeel P, Piessevaux H, Cuomo R, Janssens J. Assessment of meal induced gastric accommodation by a satiety drinking test in health and in severe functional dyspepsia. Gut. 2003;52:1271–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Halawi H, Camilleri M, Acosta A, Vazquez-Roque M, Oduyebo I, Burton D, Busciglio I, et al. Relationship of gastric emptying or accommodation with satiation, satiety, and postprandial symptoms in health. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;313:G442–G447.

  22. Delgado-aros S, Cremonini F, Castillo JE, Chial HJ, Burton DD, Ferber I, et al. Independent influences of body mass and gastric volumes on satiation in humans. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:432–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boeckxstaens GE, Hirsch DP, van den Elzen BD, Heisterkamp SH, Tytgat GN. Impaired drinking capacity in patients with functional dyspepsia: relationship with proximal stomach function. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1054–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sysko R, Steinglass JE, Schebendach JE, Mayer LES, Walsh BT. Rigor and reproducibility via laboratory studies of eating behavior: A focused update and conceptual review. Int J Eat Disord. 2018;51:608–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vijayvargiya P, Chedid V, Wang XJ, Atieh J, Maselli D, Burton DD, et al. Associations of gastric volumes, ingestive behavior, calorie and volume intake, and fullness in obesity. Am J Physiol-Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020;319:G238–G44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vazquez Roque MI, Camilleri M, Stephens DA, Jensen MD, Burton DD, Baxter KL, et al. Gastric sensorimotor functions and hormone profile in normal weight, overweight, and obese people. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1717–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez‐Izundegui D, Campos A, Calderon G, Ricardo‐Silgado ML, Cifuentes L, Decker PA, et al. Association of gastric emptying with postprandial appetite and satiety sensations in obesity. Obesity. 2021;29:1497–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Iida A, Konagaya T, Kaneko H, Funaki Y, Kanazawa T, Tokudome K, et al. Usefulness of a slow nutrient drinking test for evaluating gastric perception and accommodation. Digestion. 2011;84:253–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kindt S, Coulie B, Wajs E, Janssens J, Tack J. Reproducibility and symptomatic predictors of a slow nutrient drinking test in health and in functional dyspepsia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:320–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gregersen NT, Flint A, Bitz C, Blundell JE, Raben A, Astrup A. Reproducibility and power of ad libitum energy intake assessed by repeated single meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1277–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Horner K, Byrne N, King N. Reproducibility of subjective appetite ratings and ad libitum test meal energy intake in overweight and obese males. Appetite. 2014;81.

  32. Lara J, Taylor M, Macdonald I. Is ad libitum energy intake in overweight subjects reproducible in laboratory studies using the preload paradigm? European journal of clinical nutrition. 2010;64:1028–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Geliebter A. Gastric distension and gastric capacity in relation to food intake in humans. Physiol Behav. 1988;44:665–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim DY, Camilleri M, Murray JA, Stephens DA, Levine JA, Burton DD. Is there a role for gastric accommodation and satiety in asymptomatic obese people? Obes Res. 2001;9:655–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yunker AG, Alves JM, Luo S, Angelo B, DeFendis A, Pickering TA, et al. Obesity and sex-related associations with differential effects of sucralose vs sucrose on appetite and reward processing: a randomized crossover trial. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4:e2126313-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Palmer BF, Clegg DJ. The sexual dimorphism of obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;402:113–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Campos A, Port JD, Acosta A. Integrative hedonic and homeostatic food intake regulation by the central nervous system: insights from neuroimaging. Brain Sci. 2022;12:431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hallam J, Boswell RG, DeVito EE, Kober H. Gender-related differences in food craving and obesity. Yale J Biol Med. 2016;89:161–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen Y, Jiang M, Krupka EL. Hunger and the gender gap. Experimental Economics. 2019;22:885–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Manippa V, Padulo C, van der Laan LN, Brancucci A. Gender differences in food choice: effects of superior temporal sulcus stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:597-.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Haase L, Green E, Murphy C. Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas. Appetite. 2011;57:421–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Spinelli S, Monteleone E. Food preferences and obesity. Endocrinol Metab. 2021;36:209–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Acosta A, Camilleri M, Abu Dayyeh B, Calderon G, Gonzalez D, McRae A, et al. Selection of Antiobesity Medications Based on Phenotypes Enhances Weight Loss: A Pragmatic Trial in an Obesity Clinic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021;29:662–71.

  44. Bhargava A, Arnold AP, Bangasser DA, Denton KM, Gupta A, Hilliard Krause LM, et al. Considering sex as a biological variable in basic and clinical studies: an endocrine society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2021;42:219–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank participants in the studies, the nurses, the staff of the Mayo Clinic Clinical Research Trials Unit (supported by Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science [CCaTS] grant UL1-TR000135), and Michael Ryks and Deborah Rhoten for their excellent technical support.

Funding

Dr. Acosta is supported by NIH (NIH K23-DK114460), Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine – Gerstner Career Development Award. Dr. Camilleri receives funding related to obesity from the National Institutes of Health (NIH RO1-DK67071). Dr. Kapoor is supported by the NIA grant U54 AG044170. The funding source was not involved in the study design, in collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, in writing the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data, the accuracy of the data analysis, and the decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MDH: designed research, analyzed data or performed statistical analysis and wrote paper; LC: conducted research, analyzed data or performed statistical analysis, wrote paper; AC: conducted research, wrote paper; AK, SF, DDH and MC: wrote paper; AA: designed research, analyzed data or performed statistical analysis, and wrote paper. MDH and AA had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Acosta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr. Acosta is a stockholder in Gila Therapeutics, Phenomix Sciences; he serves as a consultant for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, General Mills. Dr. Camilleri is a stockholder in Phenomix Sciences and Enterin and serves as a consultant to Takeda, Allergan, Rhythm, Kallyope, and Arena with compensation to his employer, Mayo Clinic. Dr. Kapoor serves as a consultant for Mithra and Astellas Pharmaceuticals. She is also a consultant for the company Womaness. The rest of the authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurtado, M.D., Cifuentes, L., Campos, A. et al. Sex as an independent variable in the measurement of satiation: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Obes 46, 2156–2162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-022-01228-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-022-01228-7

Search

Quick links