Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Pediatrics

Family-based treatment program contributors to child weight loss

Abstract

Background

Multicomponent family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) program for pediatric obesity includes nutrition and physical activity education, as well as behavior therapy techniques. Studies suggest that parent weight loss is the best predictor of child weight loss in FBT. However, given the important role that parents play in the implementation of FBT for their child, isolating the effects of specific FBT treatment component requires consideration of parent influences over time.

Methods

The following treatment components were assessed: stimulus control (high/low-fat food items in home), nutrition knowledge, energy intake, physical activity, and parental monitoring, as well as weekly anthropometric measures. Adjusted models of interest using inverse probability weights were used to evaluate the effect of specific FBT components on time-varying child weight loss rate, adjusting for time-varying influence of parent weight loss.

Results

One hundred thirty-seven parent–child dyads (CHILD: mean BMI = 26.4 (3.7) and BMIz = 2.0 (0.3); mean age = 10.4 (1.3); 64.1% female; ADULT: mean BMI = 31.9 (6.3); mean age = 42.9 (6.5); 30.1% Hispanic parents; 87.1% female) participated in an FBT program. In traditional model, adult BMI change (b = 0.08; p < 0.01) was the most significant predictor of child weight loss rates and no other treatment components were significant (p’s > 0.1). In models that accounted for potential influences from parental weight loss and differential attendance during treatment period, lower availability of high-fat items (b = 1.10, p < 0.02), higher availability of low-fat items (b = 3.73; p < 0.01), and higher scores on parental monitoring practices (b = 1.10, p < 0.01) were associated with greater rates of weight loss, respectively.

Conclusion

Results suggest that outside of parent weight change, changes in stimulus control strategies at home and improved parental-monitoring practices are important FBT components for child weight loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogden C, Carroll M, Kit B, Flegal K. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311:806–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Skinner A, Ravanbakht S, Skelton J, Perrin E, Armstrong S. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in US Children, 1999-2016. Pediatrics. 2018;141:e20173459.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz W. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998;101:518–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Key T, Schatzkin A, Willett W, Allen N, Spencer E, Travis R. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Pub Health Nutr. 2004;7:187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Micic D. Obesity in children and adolescents—a new epidemic? Consequences in adult life. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2001;14(Suppl 5):1345–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley E, Field A, Colditz G, Dietz W. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:1523–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Skinner A, Perrin E, Skelton J. Cardiometabolic risks and obesity in the young. New Engl J Med. 2016;374:592–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freedman D, Ogden C, Kit B. Interrelationships between BMI, skinfold thicknesses, percent body fat, and cardiovascular disease risk factors among U.S. children and adolescents. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:188.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ul-Haq Z, Mackay D, Fenwick E, Pell J. Meta-analysis of the association between body mass index and health-related quality of life among children and adolescents, assessed using the pediatric quality of life inventory index. J Pediatr. 2013;162:280–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weihrauch-Bluher S, Schwarz P, Klusmann J. Childhood obesity: increased risk for cardiometabolic disease and cancer in adulthood. Metabolism. 2019;92:147–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Franks PW, Hanson RL, Knowler WC, Sievers ML, Bennett PH, Looker HC. Childhood obesity, other cardiovascular risk factors, and premature death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:485–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo S, Chumlea W. Tracking of body mass index in children in relation to overweight in adulthood. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:145S–8S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simmonds M, Llewllyn A, Owen C, Woolacott N. Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17:95–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Janicke D, Harman J, Jamoom E, Simon S, Zhang J, Dumont-Driscoll M. The relationship among child weight status, psychosocial functioning, and pediatric health care expenditures in a medicaid population. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35:883–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boutelle K, Rhee K, Liang J, Braden A, Douglas J, Strong D, et al. Effect of attendance of the child on body weight, energy intake, and physical activity in childhood obesity treatment: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:622–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein L. Development of evidence-based treatments for pediatric obesity. In: Kazdin A, Weisz J, editors. Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Publications; 2003. p. 374–88.

  17. Wilfley D, Tibbs T, Van Buren D, Reach K, Walker M, Epstein L. Lifestyle interventions in the treatment of childhood overweight: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Health Psychol. 2007;26:521–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Epstein L, Paluch R, Roemmich J, Beecher M. Family-based obesity treatment, then and now: twenty-five years of pediatric obesity treatment. Health Psychol. 2007;26:381–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Connor E, Evans C, Burda B, Walsh E, Eder M, Loranzo P. Screening for obesity and intervention for weight management in children and adolescents: evidence report and systematic review for the United States Preventive Services Task Force. J Am Med Assoc. 2017;317:2427–44.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Whitlock E, O’Connor E, Williams S, Beil T, Lutz K. Effectiveness of weight management interventions in children: a targeted systematic review for the United States Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e396–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boutelle K, Cafri G, Crow S. Parent predictors of child weight change in family based behavioral obesity treatment. Obesity. 2012;20:1539–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wrotniak B, Epstein H, Paluch R, Roemmich J. Parent weight change as a predictor of child weight change in family-based behavioral obesity treatment. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:342–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boutelle K, Braden A, Douglas J, Rhee K, Strong D, Rock C, et al. Design of the FRESH study: a randomized controlled trial of a parent-only and parent-child family-based treatment for childhood obesity. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45:364–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Graffeo N, Latouche A, Geskus R, Chevret S. Modeling time-varying exposure using inverse probability of treatment weights. Biom J. 2018;60:323–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Imai K, Ratkovic M. Robust estimation of inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110:1013–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuczmarski R, Ogden C, Grummer-Strawn L, Flegal K, Guo S, Wei R, et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. 2000;314:1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harnack L, Stevens M, Van Heel N, Schakel S, Dwyer J, Himes J. A computer-based approach for assessing dietary supplement use in conjunction with dietary recalls. J Food Compost Anal. 2008;21(Suppl 1):S78–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Actigraph. Actigraph GT1M Monitor/ActiTrainer and ActiLife Lifestyle Monitor software user manual. In: Actigraph. FL: LLC Pensacola; 2007.

  29. Raynor H, Polly B, Wing R, Jeffery R. Is dietary fat intake related to liking or household availability of high- and low-fat foods? Obes Res. 2004;12:816–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Epstein L. The traffic light childhood weight control program: traffic light: kids program. NY: University of Buffalo; 2005.

  31. Birch L, Fisher J, Grimm-Thomas K, Markey C, Sawyer R, Johnson S. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Feeding Questionnaire: a measure of parental attitudes, beliefs and practices about child feeding and obesity proneness. Appetite. 2001;36:201–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaur H, Li C, Nazir N, Choi W, Resnicow K, Birch L, et al. Confirmatory factor analysis of the child-feeding questionnaire among parents of adolescents. Appetite. 2006;47:36–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Muggeo V, Atkins D, Gallop R, Dimidjian S. Segmented mixed models with random changepoints: a maximum likelihood approach with application to treatment for depression study. Statis Modeling. 2014;14:293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grajeda L, Ivanescu A, Saito M, Crainiceanu C, Jaganath D, Gilman R, et al. Modelling subject-specific childhood growth using linear mixed-effect models with cubic regression splines. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2016;13:1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gorter R, Fox J, Twisk J. Why item response theory should be used for longitudinal questionnaire data analysis in medical research. BMC Med Methodol. 2015;15:55.

    Google Scholar 

  36. van der Wal W, Geskus R. Ipw: an R package for inverse probability weighting. J Stat Software. 2011;43:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Grund S, Ludtke O, Robitzsch A. Multiple imputation of missing data for multilevel models: simulations and recommendations. Organiz Res Methods. 2018;21:111–49.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RC. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models. R package version; 2012.

  39. Horgan M., Horgan, A. (2016). Food availability in the homes of overweight children (Thesis, Master of Dietetics). University of Otago, New Zealand; 2016.

  40. Ihmels M, Welk G, Eisenmann J, Nusser S. Development and preliminary validation of a family nutrition and physical activity (FNPA) screening tool. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ihmels M, Welk G, Eisenmann J, Nusser S, Myers E. Prediction of BMI change in young children with the family nutrition and physical activity (FNPA) screening tool. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38:60–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nepper M, Weiwen C. Assessment of home food environment among healthy weight and overweight school-age children. Health Behav Policy Rev. 2016;3:568–80.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ong J, Ullah S, Margary A, Leslie E. Positive influences of home food environment on primary-school children’s diet and weight status: a structural equation model approach. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:2525–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin J, Chater A, Lorencatto F. Effective behaviour change techniques in the prevention and management of childhood obesity. Int J Obes. 2013;37:1287–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim K, Wallander J, Felt J, Elliott M, Schuster M. Associations of parental general monitoring with adolescent weight-related behaviors and weight status. Obesity. 2019;27:280–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Casey B, Tottenham N, Liston C, Durston S. Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development? Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9:104–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Burrows T, Martin R, Collins C. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1501–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Johns D, Hartmann-Boyce J, Jebb S, Aveyard P, Behavioural Weight Management Review Group. Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1557–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. United States Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for obesity in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2010;125:361–7.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Whitlock E, O’Connor E, Williams S, Beil T, Lutz K. Effectiveness of weight management interventions in children: a targeted systematic review for the United States Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e396–418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute of health [grant numbers R01DK075861 and K02HL1120242, PI: Boutelle].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerri N. Boutelle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boutelle, K.N., Kang Sim, D.E., Rhee, K.E. et al. Family-based treatment program contributors to child weight loss. Int J Obes 45, 77–83 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0604-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0604-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links